japie said..lotofwind said..If they wanted people to believe their call for mass protest
they shouldnt have tried to prove their claims using Peter A. McCullough who has had all his covid 19 theories completely proven false and have been well proven to have actually increased the spread of covid in Brazil based on his opinion.
Really?
Tell me something. Why would an eminent physician disseminate false medical information?
Do you think perhaps he'd had an attack of Lotifwinditis and his brain had stopped functioning?
The pharmaceutical industry has unlimited funds available. They use a portion of this to malign physicians and medicines that stand to affect their profit margins.
Here is an example for you. The study published in the Lancet, (the medical publication which used to be considered the pinnacle of medical journalism), published the article which sunk hydroxychloroquin based on a trial which was fraudulent. The article was subsequently retracted but not until after the damage had been done.
Google the pharmaceutical fines issued. If you think they've suddenly developed a conscience you're even more stupid than I originally thought.
And if you think I'm likely to tell you what my movements are you're equally delusional.
Bro
ahrp.org/the-lancet-published-a-fraudulent-study-editor-calls-it-department-of-error/ OK - so why would far more eminent physicians, epidemiologists and others who say that Covid is bad and lockdowns are good disseminate false information?
Where is your evidence that big pharma use funds to malign those who stand to affect their profit margins? What proof do you have? Do you have bank account data? Where did you get it? How did you confirm that it's correct?
Sure, the Lancet study had issues. Plenty of people have known about that - my wife, sitting next to me as I write this, is in the same "data thug" group, dedicated to examining and exposing dodgy science, as James Heathers, one of the people who blew up the Lancet piece and who we have known since she was doing her PhD.
Have you used the GRIM test of stats (granularity-related inconsistency of means) that James and Nick Brown created? Do you know the basic idea of the GRIM test? Have you applied it to studies that DO conform to your beliefs?
Have you held the studies that you believe in to the same level of analysis that people like James, Nick and others held the studies you don't believe in to? If you believe the attacks on the Lancet article, why not believe the attacks on the pieces you believe in?
The fact that ONE or SOME pieces of science are dodgy does NOT mean, to any reasonable person, that they are all dodgy. Statistically, some WA windsurfers have probably committed vile crimes, but that does not mean that we say that you all have done so. Statistically, some Japies are racist scum, but that does not mean that all South Africans are. You can't throw 90% away because of the problems with a minority.
BTW. To those unbelievers that don't believe in magic power of SUPER PILL .
Now , that is a proper vaccine ! 
