Is windsurfing popularity still declining?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
jermaldan
jermaldan
VIC
1572 posts
VIC, 1572 posts
17 Aug 2011 6:00pm
Zed said...

I think within 2 - 3 years kiting numbers will drop.


Because all the owners will be stuck up trees and powerlines? ;P
Bondalucci
Bondalucci
VIC
1580 posts
VIC, 1580 posts
17 Aug 2011 7:10pm
felixdcat said...

I don't care if it is cool or popular! I windsurf because I enjoy it and it gives me kicks and adrenaline rushes, I do not want it to become extremely popular. What will I gain for it; more peeps doing it = less parking space, less water space, more gear getting stolen, more agro .....
Love it to stay the way it is.
Young peeps stay out of my sport!


I agree with this in part.
-people on our forum, visiting our forum, getting into the sport, meeting windsurfers at beaches etc often comment on what a great bunch of people the windsurfing community are. Full of help and advice, good sense of humour, grounded in life etc.

I like it like that. Good people at the beach to sail with!
I'd hate to have our car parks and rigging areas full of dickeads with bad attitudes who don't really care about the sport, but just "do it 'cos it's cool"

eg When my mates and I have a sail there are no near collisions on the water through arrogance or ignorance, and when we have a beer after a sail, you can be sure any cans end up in the bin, not on the foreshore.

When we teach others to windsurf we should choose wisely....
- grow the sport in the right direction.

......to me the quality of the people participating in our sport is more important than the quantity.

Make windsurfing cool again??
....careful what you wish for....

lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
17 Aug 2011 7:33pm
^^^^^^^yep,,,,someone agrees with me
albers
albers
NSW
1739 posts
NSW, 1739 posts
17 Aug 2011 9:39pm
I believe the two sports can't really be compared.

Yes, they both use water.
Yes, they both use wind.

But that's about it.

The equipment is completely different.
The learning process is completely different.
The physical movements are completely different.

Just enjoy whichever of the two sports you are into, unless, of course, you do both!

Cheers
DrJ
DrJ
ACT
481 posts
DrJ DrJ
ACT, 481 posts
17 Aug 2011 9:55pm
sick_em_rex said...

DrJ said...

lotofwind said...

Sorry guys but You cant polish a turd


I could ...... If only you would stay still for long enough !


Actually, on Mythbusters last week they showed you could indeed polish a turd....


Yay congratulations you win this weeks prize for completely missing the gag!
lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
17 Aug 2011 10:30pm
finally
DrJ
DrJ
ACT
481 posts
DrJ DrJ
ACT, 481 posts
17 Aug 2011 10:49pm
lotofwind said...

finally


Don't know what you are pleased about ... You're the punchline!
pierrec45
pierrec45
NSW
2005 posts
NSW, 2005 posts
18 Aug 2011 12:01am
albers said...

I believe the two sports can't really be compared.

They cannot be compared as sports because one is a sport and the other one ain't.

They come back ashore fresh as a rose, whereas many of us come back exhausted after a good session. There are exceptions: yes sailboarding a 2m sail in a 3 knot wind is not very sporty. Competitive kiting like long distance races might be demanding, I don't know, but the 98% we see every weekend at the beach is more like reading a book.

Kiting is something you do because you don't want to do a watersport - nothing wrong with that. Before I pick my students, I take them to the beach, and I show them the difference. I really, really push them towards kiting, or other easy stuff, if they don't want to work too hard. Technically you could say I promote kiting...

As you say, to each his/her own. Nothing wrong with activities either, as long as said activities don't interfere with real water sports once on the beach.
Chris 249
Chris 249
NSW
3573 posts
NSW, 3573 posts
18 Aug 2011 8:24am

You're right there - the popularity of most 'mainstream' sports is due to TV coverage, advertising sponsorship


Actually, the two major national survey of sports participation, sponsorship and ratings (ABS and Sweeney)pointed out that there is NOT a correlation between TV ratings and participation.

League is a classic example - lots of TV time, lots of sponsorship, but quite small player numbers.

Netball is another classic example in the other direction - lots of players, very little TV.

Here is the reality of the sports that attract the most live spectators, in rough order. TV results are similar but they are covered in the Sweeney Report and I no longer have access to it;

Australian Rules football
Horse racing
Rugby league
Motor sports
Soccer (outdoor)
Cricket (outdoor)
Rugby union
Harness racing
Tennis (indoor and outdoor)/ Netball (for women only)
Dog racing (for men only)

Here are the most popular adult ACTIVITIES, in order;

Men

Walking for exercise
Aerobics/fitness/gym
Cycling/BMXing
Jogging/running
Golf
Swimming/diving
Tennis
Soccer (outdoor)
Cricket (outdoor)
Basketball

Women

Walking for exercise
Aerobics/fitness/gym
Swimming/diving
Jogging/running
Cycling/BMXing
Netball
Tennis
Yoga
Dancing/ballet
Bush walking

The top 4 most-watched sports are not in the top 10 of sports that people actually do - league and competitive motor sport for example are smaller than sailing IIRC, in terms of actual adult participants in organised events.

This effect is very well known among those who actually formally study these things. It's like the fact that we now watch more sport, but DO less sport. It's like the fact that hosting an Olympics does NOT increase sport participation.

The "if you show it they will come" belief is wrong. Not only that, it may actually harm sports, because they rely on a myth and therefore don't do the things that actually work.





Chris 249
Chris 249
NSW
3573 posts
NSW, 3573 posts
18 Aug 2011 9:13am
And another thing....

Windsurfing went through the "cool" phase years ago, in the '80s. Robby Naish was one of the biggest sporting stars in the huge German market. 250,000 spectators watched live during the ten day Dutch World Cup. Security guards were needed when there were autograph sessions. Here in Oz, we had something like 5 choppers circling over the Cannon Run with cameras.

And it all turned to crap. The two years in which the above events occurred saw the boom start to turn to bust. Windsurfing went from being the fastest-growing watersport to one that was notable for the speed of its collapse.

Going for the cool extreme spectator-oriented look didn't work last time, it doesn't work for most other sports, so why bother?

One of the boom sports of today is sea kayaking - ironically, much of the growth in that sport was built on the simple, cheap low-performance polyethylene manufacturing that windsurfing turned its back on. Windsurfing dumped such "low tech" stuff and collapsed - kayaking picked up the techniques and in some cases the very operators and very same machinery and boomed.

And finally, even on spectator appeal - go to the IOC site and download the TV ratings for various sports at the Olympics. Supposedly "extreme" disciplines are almost always outrated by less-extreme versions of the same sport. Road cycling far outrates "extreme" BMX and MTB. Flat water kayak racing outrates "extreme" white water kayak slalom. People rowing boats on a still lake far outrates the 49ers and Tornado cats, and the slowest water sport (swimming) is the highest-rated. Supposedly-sexy beach volleyball is outrated by "boring" normal volleyball.

People watch the sport that they do, but they don't often seem to get into a sport by watching it unless it looks easily accessible.

I'm doing a PhD on the impacts of technology on sports participation, and neither I or my supervisors can find any proof of the idea that making a sport extreme o increasing viewership will get people to participate. There is a LOT of evidence to point the other way.

terminal
terminal
1421 posts
1421 posts
18 Aug 2011 7:36am
Popularity doesn't matter, as long as there are enough participants to buy enough boards to create enough cash to support some professionals to push the sport forward.

Koster shows the best windsurf attitude here at 15 years old after winning Pozo 2009. Its all about performance and lack of attitude.

You cant be cool if you try to be cool.

jermaldan
jermaldan
VIC
1572 posts
VIC, 1572 posts
18 Aug 2011 5:19pm
terminal said...



You cant be cool if you try to be cool.



Yes you can...






Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
18 Aug 2011 5:43pm
5 pages in less than a week - must be still popular.
lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
18 Aug 2011 5:45pm
but most of the posts are my dribble
choco
choco
SA
4181 posts
SA, 4181 posts
18 Aug 2011 5:29pm
lotofwind said...

but most of the posts are my dribble


that's what broke the drought
K Dog
K Dog
VIC
1847 posts
VIC, 1847 posts
18 Aug 2011 5:59pm
We really do need a lotofwind at the moment
albers
albers
NSW
1739 posts
NSW, 1739 posts
18 Aug 2011 7:13pm
lotofwind said...

but most of the posts are my dribble


Wasn't he one of the original ABC newsreaders - James Dribble
Zed
Zed
WA
1274 posts
Zed Zed
WA, 1274 posts
19 Aug 2011 12:32pm
jermaldan said...

Zed said...

I think within 2 - 3 years kiting numbers will drop.


Because all the owners will be stuck up trees and powerlines? ;P


Ha ha yeah maybe. Nah I think due to the relatively cheap cost and short learning curve, the number of kiters will continue to rise which means more and more noobs and guys who just don't give a f*ck. Sooner or later (in WA anyway) a kiter is going to seriously injure a member of the public and then it's bannings/restrictions/fines.. you'll end up with 80 kiters trying to kite in one small little spot - numbers will drop. It's amusing that a few years ago Kiters were all "ha ha kiting is more popular than windsurfing" now they're like "kiting is more popular than windsurfing - f*ck my life..."
jermaldan
jermaldan
VIC
1572 posts
VIC, 1572 posts
19 Aug 2011 3:27pm
Meh... I got nothing, I just want to see this thing go to six pages
KenHo
KenHo
NSW
1353 posts
NSW, 1353 posts
19 Aug 2011 5:44pm
jermaldan said...

Meh... I got nothing, I just want to see this thing go to six pages


I'll see your six and raise you seven.

I could care less if more people sail or not.
Crowds piss me off, and it's bad enough getting a park at Currumbin most of the time anyway, cos it's such a choice place.
OTOH, a minimum number of sailors are needed to keep the shops afloat.
I don't need more people to sail to order to validate my choice of recreation.


Chris 249
Chris 249
NSW
3573 posts
NSW, 3573 posts
19 Aug 2011 5:45pm
terminal said...

Popularity doesn't matter, as long as there are enough participants to buy enough boards to create enough cash to support some professionals to push the sport forward.

Koster shows the best windsurf attitude here at 15 years old after winning Pozo 2009. Its all about performance and lack of attitude.

You cant be cool if you try to be cool.




Agree with some of that, but windsurfing isn't "all about performance" is it?

Isn't it pretty much all about having fun in the way you want to have fun?

The attitude that high performance is all that windsurfing is about is what has screwed the sport, and it seems to be really unusual. Other sports seem to be pretty open-minded, windsurfing seems to just want to narrow itself down.

Windsurfing can be about anything from doing a multi-day camping trip sleeping under your sail, to light wind racing, to speed or looping or freestyle or just cruising back and forth in whatever wind you have.

There's some great moves in that vid, but almost no one is watching.

terminal
terminal
1421 posts
1421 posts
19 Aug 2011 4:08pm
In competition, its all about performance.

I like that its a performance driven sport. That doesn't mean that you restrict the applications. If you want to cruise around on a Serenity, you can and it does what it was designed for very well, and Starboard also led the way into developing good kit for learners and kids.

It doesn't have to be high performance - just very fit for purpose. Windsurfers dont wear boardshorts over their wetsuits because its unnecessary. If things work, they get kept, and there's very little style discussed compared to function.

The only problem with that that I see, is that the high performance gear costs more, development each year is now marginal and in the current economic situation, sales will drop more than they would with cheaper, heavier gear.
SWS
SWS
SA
196 posts
SWS SWS
SA, 196 posts
20 Aug 2011 10:51am
It seems to all come down to money it is easier to make money on expensive gear even selling less than selling reasonably priced gear.
DrJ
DrJ
ACT
481 posts
DrJ DrJ
ACT, 481 posts
20 Aug 2011 11:52am
SWS said...

It seems to all come down to money it is easier to make money on expensive gear even selling less than selling reasonably priced gear.


Then why is hyundia twice as profitable as Lexus?
SWS
SWS
SA
196 posts
SWS SWS
SA, 196 posts
20 Aug 2011 11:33am
DrJ said...

SWS said...

It seems to all come down to money it is easier to make money on expensive gear even selling less than selling reasonably priced gear.


Then why is hyundia twice as profitable as Lexus?


Cars are not windsurfers.

Windsurfing tends to work on a standard % mark up. Thus if you sell a board for $1500 you will make less than selling a board for $2800 as both boards have the same % mark up.
Glitch
Glitch
QLD
292 posts
QLD, 292 posts
20 Aug 2011 12:15pm
Cheaper gear would be great if it was available but besides myself and a few others, who would buy brand new not quite top of the range cheap sh!t. Probably not too many people. Also what other material is available to build cheap mass produced boards. Polyethelene board require very expensive moulds that for a few exception make a very second rate board. ASA is a bit better but still has limitations. Sails could be made from dacron which would be good for a year before they bag out.
Any way did that rant get to page 6
SWS
SWS
SA
196 posts
SWS SWS
SA, 196 posts
20 Aug 2011 11:53am
Not yet on page 6!
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
20 Aug 2011 3:08pm
You could be well set up with a decent kit for less than $3000. Most people with a job could afford this if they saved up for a few months.

Of course the cost of living is going up all the time and appears it will continue to skyrocket. Australia was once known as a cheap place to live but now its becoming a much more expensive place to live.

Perhaps the time will come when we can all sell up in Australia and retire to Maui. Then we will complain about too many windsurfers with nowhere to park and rig up.





GazMan
GazMan
WA
848 posts
WA, 848 posts
20 Aug 2011 3:52pm
Been windsurfing for nearly 30 years and gone are the days of one board-one-sail thankfully! However, what must the newbies to windsurfing think when they rock up at their local spot with one board and two sails when Joe average has so much shiny modern gear to choose from? Maybe that's the beginning of their equipment race, to aspire to get more and better gear to improve their sailing (usually based on what others say!). Does this really help the windsurfing industry when someone new to windsurfing slowly but gradually becomes an equipment freak, spending all his or her hard earned dollars on better gear rather than persevering with the basic one board and two sails for a while to improve and master what he or she has? OK, maybe that concept is very simplistic and naive, but I consider 'the old days' of windsurfing were very appealing as what the beginners were riding was pretty much the same as what the advanced riders were riding. Much the same as Kitesurfing I guess, can see the appeal, simplicity and benefits in having one or two boards with not many kites to cover a huge wind range (and that will all fit in the back of a station wagon or car boot!). Maybe windsurfing has become too technical for many with too much gear on the market that needs careful tuning to get the best from it, driven by huge marketing strategies and the desire for more and better gear? (no doubt that Kitesurfing would suffer from this too).

Gotta add that I'm a 'minimalist', I get away with the least amount of gear that I possibly can and feels like I'm in part reliving the old days by 'keeping it simple' which I think may be a reason for a decline in windsurfing popularity, not that I have really noticed!

On another note, had some of my best sails ever last season (Sept 10 to April 11) due mainly to the fact that I had health problems that stopped me from windsurfing for nearly all of the previous windy season. Sometimes you can really appreciate what you've got (or had) when it's taken away from you!
DrJ
DrJ
ACT
481 posts
DrJ DrJ
ACT, 481 posts
20 Aug 2011 7:39pm
Cost and amount of gear has little to do with the popularity.

It's been said before, and a browse through the buy and sell pages shows that perfectly good gear can be picked up cheap, also beginners gear is cheap compared to pro/ limited edition stuff. All sports are the same, look at anyone that's serious about cycling.... How mang bikes do they have and how much do they cost $1500, $2000 - more like $5000 each. My mate likes to fish. All his gear excluding boat cost several thousand. My father in law plays golf ... Two sets of clubs each cost between $2000. -$4000.

The one and only thing that turns people away from windsurfing is that it's feckin difficult. People that see the sport and think they would like to try it all want to be planing in the straps soon as they start ..... How many people do you k ow or have seen try it a few times then quit. I even know of a few that have spent a couple of grand on kit, seen them use it half a dozen times in one season then never seen them again.

And since no-one can make it as jet skiing, swimming, cycling or skiing .... It always going to be a niche .... Reserved only for those with patience and resilience. It's that simple.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅