iti said...
RSC move on for pete sake,
you could of waited for a a couple on minutes and asked for help
you self launched didnt you , look in the mirror , dont blame no one other than the boy in the mirror
Laurie should close this thread down , i believe we are all over people who dont take cotrol for 100% of their actions,
1. Yes, I could have. Perhaps I had waited for many minutes already. Does the story tell you otherwise?
2. I was self launching with no one else in any danger from my actions (the CLEAR thing).
3. Interesting comment and reaction. Why the appeal to a higher authority (whoever Laurie is) -- is this not an open forum for discussion? Why are you trying to take control and shut it down?
It can stop anytime from my perspective -- but everyone should be entitled to share their views. Who knows, tomorrow someone may read this and add their 2-cents worth. Why does that affect you? It will die off naturally when there are no more comments and no interest. Why do you seek to intervene in a public discussion process? Want to burn some books next?
This is getting closer to the core attitudes and tone I'm seeking to study. What is it about this control obsession in this recreational activity and culture? Why all the anger?
Here again is a little something from a friend in another area altogether (i.e. comments on Dawkins). (the link if you want
fora.tv/2009/10/07/Richard_Dawkins_The_Greatest_Show_on_Earth (and perhaps
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros):
"I like the golden rule, which in fact is very uoroburoslike, that when someone is externalising strongly a hate, he is trying to come to terms with this undecidability in him/herself." (Luc)
Now, thanks to another thread, here is a good day out for me:
BTW: "cotrol for 100% of their actions" -- I think you mean responsibility for (although 'control' as a core value is what a lot of these reactive responses here are about). In essence I can partly agree with you but only if you widen the scope of the interaction to include all parties - i.e. including the action of intervention. The only other close observer was her student. What did he see happen and of the resulting resolution? There are many angles to this type of thing. Don't be too quick to pass final judgments on limited 'facts' from one perspective.
I launched, I failed, I suffered, I learned. Now I've shared. Nothing more. And I've learned more even about the culture here. I have new insight into the issue I am researching which is outrage and anger as part of total risk assessment and communication.
If anyone is interested then check out Peter Sandman's
Risk Communication and his 'Total Risk = Hazard + Outrage' approach (
www.psandman.com/). It might help deal with some of the wider community concern and rising anger and outrage (it seems) associated with the
Show Pony phenomena on public beaches (the thread title and original theme). Reinterpret his scale for
outrage for kiteboarding and it might provide a means of communicating 'total risk' better across a whole spectrum of situations of concern -- and diversity of opinions.