FormulaNova said...Carantoc said...
This is brilliant. I can't work out who is serious and who is egging on the crazy people.
<second hand board stuff snipped>
Brilliant? Nah, its sort of strange. I can't work out why some people seem to be going out of their way to dismiss an idea that has no impact on them. It's almost like you were afraid of someone thinking outside of the box and possibly innovating.
........
Starboard seem to have a bit of a reputation for thinking outside the box. What a bunch of losers! You hardly hear about them today

Not sure anyone is dismissing the new and innovative ideas. But I didn't realise that was what this thread was all about.
The original post is claiming that board manufacturers and retailers are ripping us consumers off, making massive fat profits by selling boards at over-inflated prices, that you can buy a board from a chinese bloke for $350, and that people would prefer to buy a board for $400 that lasts 6 months and not a board for $2000 that lasts five years. It is also then stating that the $350 board has an unknown construction and that the person complaining about $2000 boards has no idea how boards are made or from what materials.
Then in previous posts we have also had moaning that cheap masts don't last more than one season and that cheap ali booms break on average every 2 years. Can't have it both ways.
Now, if the original post was an idea and not an ignorant dig at the windsurfing industry - something like :
Do we really need composite sandwich technology for intermediate boards ? who would be interested in buying a glass over stringered PE foam board (or another cheaper alternative) for 1/3 of the price of a full carbon / wood sandwich that would probably only last a couple of seasons of flat water sailing but would take the learner off a learners board onto a short board and get them addicted to the sport. After all most people on here learnt on these boards in the past, they maybe 3kg heavier, not as stiff and much weaker, but are they really that bad for the intermediate if they cost $1000 not $2500 ?
Then that would have been an idea.
It is interesting also that after moaning about prices and saying people would be happy with cheap crappy boards the original poster then goes out and buys a new upper-end-of-price range board.
So, not only does the general consumer prefer high end higher price goods (look how many carbon boards vs same board in glass construction are sold) the original poster also prefers the higher end product, whilst simultaneously moaning about it.
Perhaps if Macroscien had gone out and purchsed an OES custom (or NCS just up the road, or any of many Gold Coast surfboard shapers) custom in PE construction for around $1350 then he would assist OES to advance the low-tech low-price end of the market he was first promoting.
I present this thread as evidence of a brilliant version of a good 'ideas' thread :
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Windsurfing/General/Wooden-windsurfer/?SearchTerms=SUPNot this 4 pages of random dribble crap.