Rob11 said..RichardG said..
It is however true that foiling classes are smaller fleets than non-foiling classes due to cost and complexity.
This claim is based on what? Hot air? Error data of GPS? Pure speculation? Fact that foiling you need to learn a new thing vs zero learning with the lt advanced technological progress....
Oops forgot this was a forum where 99% is me and mine is bigger than yours




If there's zero learning on an LT (or slalom board, wave board, RB or anything else that doesn't foil) then everyone would finish every event in a dead heat because everyone would know exactly the same techniques as everyone else. That doesn't happen because there is a LOT to learn, just as there's a lot to learn about running, swimming or other sports where technology does not change much.
Some people like to learn new things. Some people like to perfect skills they may already be developing. It's great if people like different things, but it's utterly incorrect to infer that there is nothing to learn unless there is technological change. Chess has not changed for many years but I bet you can't beat the world champion.
Foiling classes are great, but they are less popular than many non-foiling classes. If that's not due to cost and complexity then what is the cause?