hairytesties said...
forget the drama.... look at the details, as for the pentagon plane, over 80 cctv's would have caught the plane flying into the building, not one has been released to the public media, the registration no's of the planes that flew into the towers, are still being recorded as active.... www.loosechange911.com... look at facts, melted pools of glowing steel were found in the sub-basement 5 weeks after the towers collapsed, kerosene (av-gas) won't burn hot enough to turn steel red, those towers turned to dust, eyewitnesses, hundreds of them, claimed explosions happened in the basement levels BEFORE the planes impacted, the earliest television reports, from the eyewitness reporters themselves, claimed the planes were NOT commercial, had no livery, the pentagon admits to running anti terror exercises that very morning, using the exact same senario of planes into the towers and pentagon....hhmmmm.. non of these are as half baked as the offical explanations.. www.redicecreations.com www.letsroll911.org
Dear oh dear! I don't know why I bother. It's like trying to hold a logical conversation with the Mormons.
But anyway, it's too hot to work outside today so,......
forget the drama.... look at the details,
Good idea! please do!
The aircraft was picked up by the cct cameras. The problem was, the plane didn't idle in on a slow approach. It crackled in on descent and probably at full throttle which would result in a speed of over 600km per hour.
600km/h is 166 meters per second. Thus the aircraft only appeared in two frames, firstly about 100 meters out from the building and second, just as the nose hit the building.
From the video footage of the post impact explosion, (and there are a number of these available to all and sundry on you tube etc.) it is very obvious that the explosion is a fuel based explosion. Lots of red fire and black smoke, typical of an aircraft crash and not at all typical of a high explosive misile.
Add to this that there were workmen outside the building close to the impact point at that time and they reported that they saw an airliner hit the building, left wing low (at ground level) and the right wing higher.
Only the nose of the aircraft penetrated the building as it had recently had major reinforcements to its external profile alledgedly including kevlar and steel reinforced outer walls and blast proof windows.
The aircraft almost totally disintergrated on impact to very small pieces, as is typical of a high speed impact. The right engine was still recogniseable and can be seen in some photos. To say that no aircraft parts were found in the wreckage is just not true.
What is true is that they didn't bother to salvage the parts and analyse them for defects as they do in most aircraft accidents.
The reason for this was that there was nothing to be gained from it. It was obvious what the cause of the crash was. A perfectly airworthy aeroplane loaded with innocent people was hijacked by some lunatics who subscribed to a perverted and cancerous mutation of their religion, and flown into a building to make some obscur statement.
Because there was nothing to be gained from reassembly of the wreckage it was probably just shovelled up and removed along with al the rubble.
There seems to be some inconsistency amonst the conspiracy group as some report that there was a C130 aircraft above and behind the airliner guiding it in.
Another lot say that it was guided in by a helicopter hovering over the Pentagon.
And you say that the official explanations are "half baked'???
And then of course, still others say that it was directed in by the all seeing eye of the Illuminatti by a long mark in the grass.
All your other trivia quoted can be easilly and adequately explained by normal events and circumstances.
the registration no's of the planes that flew into the towers, are still being recorded as active....
The registration number or callsign is just a number. When an aircraft is removed from the register for any reason, the callsign becomes available for re use. If it crashes 10 times the callsign can still be in current use.
Nothing I have seen in any of the footage is inconsistent with the reported facts.
Kerosene can burn hot enough to turn steel red hot. (Jet fuel i.e. kerosene is not av-gas by the way. Av-gas is a much higher octane fuel similar to car petrol. Jet fuel is pretty much just ordinary kerosene with a few additives.)
The towers didn't turn to dust. They were reduced to rubble with a lot of steel girders still in them. The steel was later removed to a dump site on Long Island.
Some of it was still very hot when dug up as a huge pile of rubble is an excellent thermal blanket.
Because it was so hot and starved of oxygen under the rubble, as soon as it is dug up and hits the oxygen, any flamable material immediately burst into flame and makes a short but spectacular photo. That's what I see.
And why on earth do you claim that some witnesses say that they saw the aircraft hit the towers and they were not civil airliners, when the whole thing was covered on TV and they clearly were civil aircraft, consistent with what was hijacked, consistent with all the missing passengers, consistent with the primary radar traces going back to the airport of departure, etc. etc.
You seem to pick up some minor curiosity about the event and construct a giant conspiracy around it.
Oh well, I spose that's just the nature of a good conspiracy theory...
Carry on then.
Their always watching ...gathering information ...In their pressed uniforms and their beady eyes....riding past your house....
