Select to expand quoteremery said..
I guess you are disappointed Frankfurt only reached 38 degrees instead of the 31 degrees pcdefender claimed had occurred.
Whoaaa, calm down tiger, calm down.
Instead of guessing maybe you should predict or forecast my disappointment !! ?
PM33 claimed two things. One was he had read a media 'fear' article (he never clarified the source or cited the article) staying Frankfurt will reach 40 deg, and the other that he had checked a weather website (he did confirm which one) which did not forecast the same thing.
Only thing PM33 claimed had occured was that the media article had exaggerated the forecast for the purposes of creating a 'fear' article.
Fangy suggested PM33 should be reading better sources and not junk-media that always publishes 'fear' articles. Which seemed like a fair response.
Other people then seemed to highlight that Frankfurt didn't hit the 40 degrees catastrophe that was alledgedly stated in whatever article PM33 read.
Maybe if you'se took a deep breath had a snickers and chillaxed you wouldn't need these things explained to you.
Anyways, to keep the forum on track, how are all the predictions from 2005 going ? I am pretty sure the rain that did fall in NSW last week did fill the reservoirs. So that is one prediction from an expert that might seem to back-up PM33's theory of ill-placed prophecies of doom.
Select to expand quoteremery said..
"In Germany, extreme heat warnings remain in place for large swathes of the country. National forecaster DWD expects temperatures to reach 39C in Berlin, Hanover and Colone, while Frankfurt will reach 40C." (my emphasis).
"In Germany, extreme heat warnings remain in place for large swathes of the country. National forecaster DWD expects temperatures to reach 39C in Berlin, Hanover and Colone, while Frankfurt will reach 40C." (why isn't this your emphasis, it would appear to be the bit that directly relates to PM33's initial statement ? Disappointment I guess).
Oh yeah, just to assist you in your critical thinkin', don't forget I'se think that what PM33 expresses here is such nonsensical twoddle it doesn't warrant a response and it is best to just ignore. You'se people are the ones who engage and encourage him.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Oh yeah, just to assist you in your critical thinkin', don't forget I'se think that what PM33 expresses here is such nonsensical twoddle it doesn't warrant a response and it is best to just ignore. You'se people are the ones who engage and encourage him.
That's fine if you understand that it's 'nonsensical twoddle'. But imagine if a group of voters read such twoddle(sic), and then elected a government that reflected that view because they didn't realise or understand there was a valid counterpoint argument...
That's great coming from "Americans for limited Govn't".
When their president is doing his best to quash democracy, establish tyranny and disable the climate change agenda
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
Exactly my point. The idea that you can conflate Socialism, Communism, Tyranny and Climate change is a perfect example of nonsensical twaddle.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Whoaaa, calm down tiger, calm down.
Instead of guessing maybe you should predict or forecast my disappointment !! ?
PM33 claimed two things. One was he had read a media 'fear' article (he never clarified the source or cited the article) staying Frankfurt will reach 40 deg, and the other that he had checked a weather website (he did confirm which one) which did not forecast the same thing.
Only thing PM33 claimed had occured was that the media article had exaggerated the forecast for the purposes of creating a 'fear' article.
Fangy suggested PM33 should be reading better sources and not junk-media that always publishes 'fear' articles. Which seemed like a fair response.
Other people then seemed to highlight that Frankfurt didn't hit the 40 degrees catastrophe that was alledgedly stated in whatever article PM33 read.
Maybe if you'se took a deep breath had a snickers and chillaxed you wouldn't need these things explained to you.
Anyways, to keep the forum on track, how are all the predictions from 2005 going ? I am pretty sure the rain that did fall in NSW last week did fill the reservoirs. So that is one prediction from an expert that might seem to back-up PM33's theory of ill-placed prophecies of doom.
I think you are still a little confused, pcdefender mentioned an article forecasting 40 degrees for Frankfurt. The article was pretty easy to find and quoted the German weather service.
As it turned out the prediction was slightly off and the temperature only reached 38 degrees.
Pcdementia, howver, claimed that the temperature had only reached 31 degrees. I think he has trouble understanding dates and time zones. Which, to be fair is not surprising, given that he believes the Earth is flat.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
"In Germany, extreme heat warnings remain in place for large swathes of the country. National forecaster DWD expects temperatures to reach 39C in Berlin, Hanover and Colone, while Frankfurt will reach 40C." (why isn't this your emphasis, it would appear to be the bit that directly relates to PM33's initial statement ? Disappointment I guess).
Oh yeah, just to assist you in your critical thinkin', don't forget I'se think that what PM33 expresses here is such nonsensical twoddle it doesn't warrant a response and it is best to just ignore. You'se people are the ones who engage and encourage him.
It's important to remember that governments generally prepare a press release and the media interpret it how they will. It's always a good idea to read the source document.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Cold deaths vastly outnumber heat-related ones
ourworldindata.org/part-one-how-many-people-die-from-extreme-temperatures-and-how-could-this-change-in-the-future
I assume you read the follow-up article in the link your provided that notes... "Death rates are expected to increase in countries with tiny carbon footprints - often less than a few tonnes per person - but could decrease in the countries with large carbon emissions. The burden will be put on the countries that have contributed almost nothing to the problem."
Select to expand quotedecrepit said..
That's great coming from "Americans for limited Govn't".
When their president is doing his best to quash democracy, establish tyranny and disable the climate change agenda
"Death toll from Texas floods rises to 24 as search underway for more than 20 girls unaccounted for. "
Flood warnings issued by weather forecasters the previous evening appear to have been ignored.
From the original article i posted...
Paris sizzled on Tuesday with the temperature nearing 40C.
From the first two links i found on google...Paris reached a max temp of 37 C on July 2nd.
Why the need to exaggerate AGAIN?
Keep regurgitating their narrative based solely on faith not verifiable evidence and you will continue to be part of the majority - congratulations.
Remember THEIR safe and effective stats.....
Stats these days tend not to be worth the paper they are written on.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
Remember THEIR safe and effective stats.....
Stats these days tend not to be worth the paper they are written on.
It might seem that way if you don't understand probability and statistics, and you judge sea level rise by eye. Try building some by eye.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
Remember THEIR safe and effective stats.....
Stats these days tend not to be worth the paper they are written on.
87.2% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
"The greenhouse effect was discovered more than 150 years ago and the first scientific paper linking carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere with climate change was published in 1896.
But it wasn't until the 1950s that scientists could definitively detect the effect of human activities on the Earth's atmosphere.
In 1956, United States scientist Charles Keeling chose Hawaii's Mauna Loa volcano for the site of a new atmospheric measuring station. It was ideal, located in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and at high altitude away from the confounding influence of population centres.
Data collected by Mauna Loa from 1958 onward let us clearly see the evidence of climate change for the first time. The station samples the air and measures global CO? levels. Charles Keeling and his successors used this data to produce the famous Keeling curve - a graph showing carbon dioxide levels increasing year after year.
But this precious record is in peril. US President Donald Trump has decided to defund the observatory recording the data, as well as the widespread US greenhouse gas monitoring network and other climate measuring sites."
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..Pcdefender said..
Remember THEIR safe and effective stats.....
Stats these days tend not to be worth the paper they are written on.
87.2% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
So does that mean, at best, posts on SB are 12.8% safe and effective?
I tend to think the safe and effective crowd on here still buy their theory of global warming.
After 5 years if the penny still hasn't dropped then let's be realistic - it isn't going to lol.
You can't possibly make this s/it up.
Select to expand quotefangman said..
So does that mean, at best, posts on SB are 12.8% safe and effective?
It's comparable to alcohol consumption: there is no 'safe' level.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
I tend to think the safe and effective crowd on here still buy their theory of global warming.
After 5 years if the penny still hasn't dropped then let's be realistic - it isn't going to lol.
You can't possibly make this s/it up.
If a penny doesn't drop in 5 years, you are either undertaking a lengthy experiment or not on this planet. Take your pick.
Type is global warming real into AI and it will confirm it is - surprise, surprise 
Realize - real eyes.
Realize - real eyes.
so, from that I'm guessing you whole arguement is based on you going outside in the middle of the night, realizing it was cold, so therefore global warming doesn't exist.
Where is your proof that global warming doesn't exist, where is the backing evidence to cooborate these statements.
Show us historcal temperature trends where the average tempearture is declining over the last 100 years.
You have slagged of everyone elses eveidence to the contrary of your opion.
So now it's your turn to step up.
PROVE IT, Prove with documented evidence that over the last 100 years the global average temperature is not rising.
Just saying it, doesn't make it so.
Prove it so, WITH EVIDENCE AND DATA.
Links to sites sponsored by the hydrocarbon industry or quotes from persons employed by the Hydrocarbon industry as previously on this thread will bring out the corperate oil stooge comments again.
Data and evidence over tha last 100 years that the temperature is not rising shouldn't be that hard.
Not sure where I heard/read this.
Those who simply refuse the truth are foolish. Those who have access to the truth and call it lies are criminal.
