Chemtrails

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7269 posts
WA, 7269 posts
17 May 2010 11:00pm
And ..

Where did theDoctor get his PhD ?

I presume from the internet, and is a PhD in internetism

Thus anything from the internet is valuable, true, faithful, worthy of belief and must be learned, remembered, recorded and passed on to the next generation

(by the way did you know I can make her moan if I give my credit card details to some Nigerian bloke, who will then send me some pills. These pills are secret things made by people who must not be named, thus I must not know to whom I am giving my credit card details - if anyone else wants to make her maon, send me your details and I will pass them on - I have special access to those in power of the pills)
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
18 May 2010 9:43am
ginger pom said...
humans are bloody difficult to organise. They don't do what they're told, they have ideas, they walk off in the wrong direction, get drunk and blab all their secrets, shag their secretaries, shag hookers and get blackmailed, crash their cars drunk, give exposes to tabloid journalists, fail to read their emails telling them what to say and do, miss meetings, misinterpret everything they read, say stupid things, get angry...


Do I know you?

doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
18 May 2010 8:43am
Carantoc said...

theDoctor said...

ginger pom said...



Please list the conspiracy theories that you don't believe in...



christianity






WTF ?

Now I am truly confused.

You don't believe in the conspiracy theory christianity.

So you don't believe that there are a bunch of people going around promoting this religion based on the teachings of Jesus, that they have been doing it for nearly 2,000 years, that it has worked its way into almost every aspect of our lives and has had a huge influence on the world, politically, socially and economically and they are still doing it in a systematic and planned way?

But, you do believe there are a bunch of people going around secretly promoting all sorts of other strange things to control the modern world.


Or are you saying you don't belive the ideals and beliefs that Christians have, but accept they exist ?

In which case presumably you also don't believe that these other people have any reason to do what they do, yet you will believe they are doing it anyway, despite your belief they have no reason to do it, gain nothing from it and it serves no purpose ?

You have to beileve in Christianity - either as a true religion or as a conspiracy. How can you deny Christianity ?

If I posted a Utube of some people in church would it convince you that Christianity exists ?? Try doing that Wiki thing yourself, it may change your whole life.



Sorry, I understand now, you don't think Christianity is a conspiracy. Therefore you must think it is a truth. With that God exists, is onmipotent and unquestionable and thus anything that God tells you is true. Did God tell you about Chemtrails ??






Belted
maxm
maxm
NSW
864 posts
NSW, 864 posts
18 May 2010 11:17am
evlPanda said...

ginger pom said...
humans are bloody difficult to organise. They don't do what they're told, they have ideas, they walk off in the wrong direction, get drunk and blab all their secrets, shag their secretaries, shag hookers and get blackmailed, crash their cars drunk, give exposes to tabloid journalists, fail to read their emails telling them what to say and do, miss meetings, misinterpret everything they read, say stupid things, get angry...


Do I know you?




You're not his secretary by any chance are you? Me, I'm the one that got drunk and drove the car off in the wrong direction. In a one way street!
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
18 May 2010 12:53pm
@Carantoc, what a conspiracy nutt... next you're gona start with your wacky Jesus son of God routine or your Marry immaculate conception story... or how about the walking on water stuff.
Jesus, some people will believe anything they read.

Ha ha lol.

@evlPanda, get with the program already... it's military radar experiments!
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
18 May 2010 1:29pm
You don't believe in walking on water????

People are doing it all the time.

theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
18 May 2010 2:16pm
Carantoc said...


WTF ?

Now I am truly confused.

You don't believe in the conspiracy theory christianity.

So you don't believe that there are a bunch of people going around promoting this religion based on the teachings of Jesus, that they have been doing it for nearly 2,000 years, that it has worked its way into almost every aspect of our lives and has had a huge influence on the world, politically, socially and economically and they are still doing it in a systematic and planned way?

But, you do believe there are a bunch of people going around secretly promoting all sorts of other strange things to control the modern world.


Or are you saying you don't belive the ideals and beliefs that Christians have, but accept they exist ?

In which case presumably you also don't believe that these other people have any reason to do what they do, yet you will believe they are doing it anyway, despite your belief they have no reason to do it, gain nothing from it and it serves no purpose ?

You have to beileve in Christianity - either as a true religion or as a conspiracy. How can you deny Christianity ?

If I posted a Utube of some people in church would it convince you that Christianity exists ?? Try doing that Wiki thing yourself, it may change your whole life.



Sorry, I understand now, you don't think Christianity is a conspiracy. Therefore you must think it is a truth. With that God exists, is onmipotent and unquestionable and thus anything that God tells you is true. Did God tell you about Chemtrails ??









ok maybe i should have done a more than one word reply..

if i go outside and its raining and someone asks me if i believe its raining, the answer is no... because i can see its raining.

there are very few things i believe in, religion is not one of them

neither are conspiracy theories,

chemtrails are not conspiracy, they are there above your head to see very clearly for yourself.

9-11 is not conspiracy, the overwhelming amount of independent and verifiable evidence proves the arabs in a cave story to be a ficticious conspiracy.

flouride on the water, no conspiracy there...

aspertame and canola oil...? even the six o'clock boob tube news is beginning to report of the dangers of these substances

but a god in the sky who's there to free mankind and deliver ever lasting life but only if you accept the misery and enslavement of the gift you've been given with this one, and who only speaks through perverts who hoard riches and commit atrocities against those they claim to serve....

pffft, if ever i've heard of a conspiracy theory... religion has to be it


i accept there to be a higher power, i BELIEVE i've been fortune enough to experience its humbling presence as are we all when we are open to it.

and i BELIEVE it to be so seperate from religion as to be its complete opposite.

maybe i should have reponded to gingerpoms question with the word religion rather than christianity...

but christians really sh!t me
maxm
maxm
NSW
864 posts
NSW, 864 posts
18 May 2010 3:51pm
theDoctor said...

...
i accept there to be a higher power, i BELIEVE i've been fortune enough to experience its humbling presence as are we all when we are open to it.

and i BELIEVE it to be so seperate from religion as to be its complete opposite.
...


Isn't that in itself a religion? The Mirriam-Webster dictionary defines religion as a "cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith." You BELIEVE in this higher power through faith since, as you explain, if you had proof of it you would not believe in it. Therefore it is a personal religion. I think you confuse your personal religion with institutionalised religion.

theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
18 May 2010 5:42pm


no, faith is a belief not based on truth

and here enters religion

when i say i BELIEVE, i say it as to hold an opinion of something i know to have experienced, not to have been told to believe or suffer the consequences of such

religion is an indoctrination

spirituality is an emancipation
ginger pom
ginger pom
VIC
1746 posts
VIC, 1746 posts
18 May 2010 7:25pm
theDoctor said...



no, faith is a belief not based on truth

and here enters religion

when i say i BELIEVE, i say it as to hold an opinion of something i know to have experienced, not to have been told to believe or suffer the consequences of such

religion is an indoctrination

spirituality is an emancipation


no. Faith is a belief that is not based on evidence.

Religion may be true but there is not (in your and my) opinion any evidence for it

You use the word belief differently. I think you mean "remember".

ginger pom
ginger pom
VIC
1746 posts
VIC, 1746 posts
18 May 2010 7:36pm
theDoctor said...

ok maybe i should have done a more than one word reply..

if i go outside and its raining and someone asks me if i believe its raining, the answer is no... because i can see its raining.

there are very few things i believe in, religion is not one of them

neither are conspiracy theories,

chemtrails are not conspiracy, they are there above your head to see very clearly for yourself.

9-11 is not conspiracy, the overwhelming amount of independent and verifiable evidence proves the arabs in a cave story to be a ficticious conspiracy.

flouride on the water, no conspiracy there...

aspertame and canola oil...? even the six o'clock boob tube news is beginning to report of the dangers of these substances

but a god in the sky who's there to free mankind and deliver ever lasting life but only if you accept the misery and enslavement of the gift you've been given with this one, and who only speaks through perverts who hoard riches and commit atrocities against those they claim to serve....

pffft, if ever i've heard of a conspiracy theory... religion has to be it


i accept there to be a higher power, i BELIEVE i've been fortune enough to experience its humbling presence as are we all when we are open to it.

and i BELIEVE it to be so seperate from religion as to be its complete opposite.

maybe i should have reponded to gingerpoms question with the word religion rather than christianity...

but christians really sh!t me


If you go outside and you see it is raining. This causes you to believe that is raining because you have evidence that it is raining.

Chemtrails are not a conspiracy. You can see them.

All the stuff that you believe around chemtrails being made the way they are in order to control peoples minds though meetings of the new world order are a conspiracy. When you make assertions that chemtrails are the work of a new world order, you are asserting that the NWO meets to discuss these things, decides what they should put in the chemtrails and then decides how to implement this plan. You believe this because you believe that certain pieces of information act as evidence for this assertion.

9-11 was not a conspiracy. Two planes hit the world trade centre. They fell over later. You believe this. I believe this.

You are overwhelmed into believing that 9-11 was caused by a bomb in the tower (or whatever it is you believe) by pieces of information on the internet that you regard as independent evidence. I don't regard the information as supporting evidence and I don't regard it as independent, therefore I don't believe that 9-11 was caused by anything other than it being hit by a plane that was full of fuel.

You believe in a higher power because you have evidence from it in the form of a personal experience. I have not had your personal experience so I can't comment on that, other than that lots of people have had similar experiences and that they can be recreated fairly easily in a lab by pushing making certain areas of the brain active (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11328359)
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
18 May 2010 8:14pm
there is a difference between know and believe and seeing

you assume too much ginger balls

seriously though, a plane full of fuel brings down a sky scraper?

eyewitness claims and obvious video footage, building seven and you still buy the tv story...?


go to a fab shop, put an oxy torch on a beam or even a ten millimetre plate, see how long it takes to turn even just red.

pour ten litres of kero into an open top 44 gallon drum, take note of how quick it burns out

watch youtube or even your so highly respected news agencys footage of plane crash sites, notice all the debris...?

then take a look at the pentagon site immediately after the plane struck

where's the debris...?

heavy metal fallout from aerial chemical spraying but its ok because its just for weather modification or military radar experiments...?

you people have been talking on your mobile phones for too long


poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
18 May 2010 6:47pm
theDoctor said...



seriously though, a plane full of fuel brings down a sky scraper?

eyewitness claims and obvious video footage, building seven and you still buy the tv story...?


go to a fab shop, put an oxy torch on a beam or even a ten millimetre plate, see how long it takes to turn even just red.

pour ten litres of kero into an open top 44 gallon drum, take note of how quick it burns out






Just being a devils advocate but wouldn't a big ass jet plane travelling at high speed straight into a building then exploding make the building structurally unsound causing it to fall down.
I've seen cars annhillate buildings causing them to collapse when they drive into them at speed.

evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
18 May 2010 9:03pm
theDoctor said...

seriously though, a plane full of fuel brings down a sky scraper?

eyewitness claims and obvious video footage, building seven and you still buy the tv story...?


Eyewitnesses claims eh? Credible eh? You waste your life in a fantasy told to you by these people?

(very funny, worth a watch by the way)





watch youtube or even your so highly respected news agencys footage of plane crash sites, notice all the debris...?

then take a look at the pentagon site immediately after the plane struck

where's the debris...?


In the Pentagon. The plane went INTO the building. The debris is INSIDE the comput... building.


heavy metal fallout from aerial chemical spraying but its ok because its just for weather modification or military radar experiments...?


I've seen weather modding in Moscow, for a parade. Pretty impressive. "You want sunshine? We give you sunshine." But they're nuts. "You want canal? We build using ...hmmm ...nuclear bombs. Yes. Fast, easy."

No really. They nuked everything like it was a microwave dinner.
ginger pom
ginger pom
VIC
1746 posts
VIC, 1746 posts
18 May 2010 10:20pm
theDoctor said...


seriously though, a plane full of fuel brings down a sky scraper?




yes seriously.

Though I'm not an engineer.

I studied philosophy and physics at uni so I do know the difference between knowledge, belief and evidence but I freely admit to deferring to the opinion of an engineer on whether planes can bring down sky scrapers. I wouldn't listen to a nuclear physicist, a theologian or even a software engineer.

Is there an American society of civil engineers or something similar?

What do they think?


And what about the NWO attempt to hijack Copenhagen? It wasn't very O from NWO was it?
Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7269 posts
WA, 7269 posts
18 May 2010 8:49pm
theDoctor said...

there is a difference between know and believe and seeing

go to a fab shop, put an oxy torch on a beam or even a ten millimetre plate, see how long it takes to turn even just red.

pour ten litres of kero into an open top 44 gallon drum, take note of how quick it burns out



OK : today I went outside of my house and put a blow torch on my brick wall. 10 hours later, bit of a black cricle on the brick, and it was a bit warm but that was it.

Then I looked back to the footage of the Black Saturday bushfires in Victoria. Come on - you telling me a fire of wood and vegetation caused that much destruction to brick houses ? My blow torch was 10 times hotter than a bush fire. Bricks don't burn - my blow torch had no affect.

There was something else going on with those bushfires right ??? right ??? come on am I right ???

Somebody wanted to buy cheap land right ??? probably a mining giant upset at the SuperTax right ?? or the Japanese ?? yeah bet it was the Japs, they wanted to open a whale meat processing centre right ??? Come on what was it Doc, you know that I know that you know

Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7269 posts
WA, 7269 posts
18 May 2010 9:07pm
ginger pom said...

theDoctor said...


seriously though, a plane full of fuel brings down a sky scraper?





Is there an American society of civil engineers or something similar?

What do they think?





Yes there is. And an Australian one and a British one. The British being the oldest, it is called the Institue of Civil Engineers. I happen to be a member - not chartered as I disagree with the principals of their route to chartered membership, so I shall stay at 'Graduate' level.

There are also similar organisations for structral engineers, who would be better informed to report on tall buildings.

One of the outcomes of the world trade tower failures was to re-write the design codes for fire protection for tall buildings. I do not believe the new codes are actually in place yet (I may be wrong) - these things take time with extensive modelling and testing to ensure the design codes are correct.

But the basic proposal is to encase steel columns in sacrifical concrete casings to protect against fire, for long enough to evacuate people. The principal of protecting steel columns long enough to protect the structural integrity of the building is not considered reasonably acheivable, when taken into consideration of the cost (not just financial cost) and the liklihood of the event ever occuring.

Tall buildings are designed to limit state principals. That is, at full design loading they just stand up. There is no margin for additional undesigned loads. Design codes do not require impact from planes to be considered. Wind loads yes, snow loads yes, seismic loads yes, plane impact no, corrosion from Chemtrails no, 7 plagues sent down by God no, impact from the 4 horsemen of the apocolypse no, people inside the building yes, window cleaners hanging over the side yes.

If you would like to know more, go to University for 4 years, study Civil or Structural Engineering, get a job, do a structured experience study, become chartered, read peer technical papers, model structures, build things, watch things fall down, retire at 65 and still know very little.

Or - alternatively read Seabreeze forums and google utube. It works for me.
Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7269 posts
WA, 7269 posts
18 May 2010 9:22pm
ginger pom said...

theDoctor said...


seriously though, a plane full of fuel brings down a sky scraper?





And what about the NWO attempt to hijack Copenhagen? It wasn't very O from NWO was it?


For friggs sake. Shut up with the New World Order.

What basis is this alledged order based on. I understand the order of the AFL. Play a game, win get some points. Add up the points, put the teams in a list with most points at the top.

How is the NWO structured ?

Do you get points for winning wars or something ? Having Debts ? cheeseyness of rulers smile ? how much you suck up to Obama ? size of GDP ? size of your flag ? hits on Google ? membership of most UN standing committees ?? how is this order determined ? Has it something to do with the Duckworth - Lewis method ??

And can somebody please show me the list ?

Who is currently top of the ladder ? US, Christians, FBI, Chinease, BHP, the Queen ? Flipper ? King of the Point ?? and how is the rest of the order looking ? Has Mark Webber and Jessica Watson changed anything in the top ten ?? Surely with England winning T20 they must move up ?

There is no order in the world. It is in disorder. It always has been. And right now, there is less order than ever before. There is no world superpower, it is pretty well an even playing field at the moment. Did Copenhagen not show that ? nobody could agree and nobody could impose their will on others.
petermac33
petermac33
WA
6415 posts
WA, 6415 posts
18 May 2010 9:59pm
another mad conspiracy theorist


japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
19 May 2010 2:08am
History repeats itself time and time again! I cannot believe how many naysayers there are who write so eloquently but seem so short on argument. I can only assume that they are blinded by the American dream, or the money lenders ultimate sell to their world domination.

I have been around metal fabrication in large buildings for a long time. It is virtually impossible to bring down a building like the word trade centers with fire fueled by aviation gas. You could, but would have an almighty phenomenal problem doing it. Only forced air would heat it up enough but you would need an almighty big supply of both, not just a plane load. Plus some pretty accurate direction of heat. I only know of two ways. Gas cutters and directional explosives.

Steel reinforced modern buildings just does not suddenly collapse through localised fire and impact. That is why there are so many of them worldwide. Every major city has a metropolis reaching for the sky. How many burn down? Who has ever seen one fail other than through earthquake. Even then they show higher ability to withstand damage.

If you flew five Boeing's in starting at the bottom you may well bring the trade center down but there is no way in this wide world would they come down as neatly as they did.

And wasn't that pile of rubble moved quickly? No massive sections of steel still intact. Just a great demolition site! Trucks in, super control, we all sit and stare at the TV. No one found alive, stench of death!

I love it.

Any other catastrophe involving man is picked clean by forensics, why not this one? Well it was war from then on was it not?

The world is stunned and everything gets swept away. They immediately take retribution on the Islamic world. The press sells it and the investors and those poor delude souls who believe that there is a correlation between starvation and and the economy vote like little Punch and Judy puppets with their wallets.

The yanks economy relies on securing oil supplies and being permanently at war. It generates huge money through automobiles, war funds and technology. And it keeps the bastards at work.

Look what has happened since. The whole world is nicely polarised against Muslims. Sure they have radicals and sure Al Quaeda exists. Bin Ladin was nicely ensconced with the Yanks in the nineties. Do people seriously believe that he could have achieved stacking planes into the Pentagon and trade centers without help? They have the most sophisticated air attack system in existence. And electronic surveillance. Give us a break!

Gone the communist threat that they now confess did not stand a snow balls hope in hell of winning a way in the 1980,s. Done the Gulf.! ****ers were running dry!!!!!!!!!!

Hood winked, maybe or TV winked? Anything, or absolutely nothing, is out of order to keep the wealth flowing in the right direction.

How long before the Yanks, with their age old allies, justify themselves attacking Iran? The weapons of mass destruction argument is going to come up again isn't it?

Look how dumb the ****ers are. And us, we get sucked up in it like a lot of sheep.

And for those who don't think they would kill their own citizens or be party to it think of the guys they killed in Vietnam, all based on bull****. The average Yank today believes they won that one.

They are crass, uneducated boors as a nation and it is time they were set adrift.

Problem is there is a lot of money tied up isn't there?

95% of the worlds wealth is in 5% of the populations hands in this country alone. The total worlds wealth as a percentage of the global population is a disgrace. The irrefutable history of nefarious involvement by big money over the past two hundred years is overwhelming up until today.

Anybody who believes that that modus operandi has recently come to a halt are deluding themselves.

Could it be that there is a huge rift in the upper echelons of power. Is the Islamic world and it's oil reserve a threat to the seat of wealth in the world through their stance on lending for profit?

( Can someone tell me why we Christian nations take no heed of Jesus of Nazareth's one and only recorded violent act, that of whipping the money lenders out of the temple and why the Catholic church banned slavery 100 years after Britain).

The frightening thing for me is that the Australia I came to in 1983 is vastly different and better off place than it is now and will get steadily worse unless we start taking a very good look at ourselves. If we do not take heed and exercise our democratic rights according to our hearts and not our wallets, or the system that manipulates them, we run the risk of turning into a pretty crap sort of society.

And the reason why there was no wreckage outside the Pentagon is because this was unique occurrence, one where a vacuum occurred as opposed to outward shock on impact. The wings et al were sucked into the building, contacted the power supply which vaporised all the aluminium. Conveniently!

Yeah Right!
ginger pom
ginger pom
VIC
1746 posts
VIC, 1746 posts
19 May 2010 9:34am
petermac33 said...

another mad conspiracy theorist



member of insititute of engineers vs fox news vs someone "who has spent some time around buildings"

Decisions are so difficult sometimes

Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7269 posts
WA, 7269 posts
19 May 2010 8:07am
ginger pom said...

petermac33 said...

another mad conspiracy theorist



member of insititute of engineers vs fox news vs someone "who has spent some time around buildings"

Decisions are so difficult sometimes





Just remember there are 3 sides to every story - your side, my side and the truth

And the golden rule : He who has the gold makes the rule

Jukebox
Jukebox
NSW
155 posts
NSW, 155 posts
19 May 2010 10:36am
Google this , zeit geist
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
19 May 2010 1:16pm
@japie, wow I thought they stopped making rational people after 70's.

@cisco, look conspiracy nutt nobody walks on water... Jesus people will believe anything they see on "utube". If CH9/7/10 didn't say it happened, it didn't happen. (satire)

@Carantoc, I have gold (pretty happy about it now too) so I will be making the rules.

Here are my 3 dictats or sides of the story:

-We need to refocus society on 3 primary Engineering endeavors.
1.- Infinite/Renewable/Abundant Energy
2.- Space exploration; the world is getting to small for our needs.
3.- Efficient food/water production with low waste.

-Finance has no benefit for mankind... Resources can be distributed based on specific criteria or developed for oneself.

-Governance should be by participatory democracy. NO MORE "representatives".


Without these basic constructs doesn't matter how you spin it there will be trouble.
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
19 May 2010 11:48am
martman said...

Google this , zeit geist



Seen it
Jukebox
Jukebox
NSW
155 posts
NSW, 155 posts
19 May 2010 3:34pm
doggie said...

martman said...

Google this , zeit geist



Seen it


So what did make of it doggie , some reasonable theories to generate turmoil and confusion in a conspiritists mind
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
19 May 2010 2:27pm
martman said...

doggie said...

martman said...

Google this , zeit geist



Seen it


So what did make of it doggie , some reasonable theories to generate turmoil and confusion in a conspiritists mind


Yes there is, I must admit when I first saw it I tripped out a bit. As far as 911 I beleive that it wasnt a terrorist attack and that the American Government have alot to answer to.
As for the rest of it (dont get me started on religion) yea there is but I dont susscribe to the rest of it tho.
Some times I dont know what to make of it all
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
19 May 2010 4:35pm
@flysurfer - this one was made in the fifties!

@gingerpom - you ought to think about setting up a novel way of demolishing buildings in competition with the experts. Starting a fire is a hell of a lot cheaper than explosives. You obviously know better!

There is not maybe a little ostrich lineage in prior existences is there? I have visions of this white english backside sticking out of the sand and a little pommie voice crying "No! No! It cant be true, they told me it wern't!"

Keep it up mate, the fewer people question the system the more successful it is. Keep a closed mind, go with the throng, head down bum up like a hamster on a wheel, moving moving but going nowhere to the sound of incessant bleating!
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
19 May 2010 2:44pm
The one thing that most people forget re 911 is that these buildings were designed to handle an aircraft hit from a plane the same size as what hit them and the first plane was much smaller than the second so why did they both fall?

Then we have building 7 please tell me why that got demolished? As it was not hit by any falling debris from the other two buildings like buildings, 3,4,5 & 6, and was across the street.

Oh and how can 5 guys who havnt ever used complex navigation fly those planes, man the whole thing just stinks!!
maxm
maxm
NSW
864 posts
NSW, 864 posts
19 May 2010 5:46pm
It's obvious the ALIENS knocked down those buildings. Blind Freddy could see it.

And they're warming up the planet to make it habitable when they colonise it.

So-called chemtrails are the tracks their craft leave behind by their drive systems in our atmosphere.

Anyone who thinks different has definitely come under their mind control.

YOUR ATTENTION IS BEING DIVERTED, PEOPLE. The only solution is to make sure you wear your foil hat at all times:



Do as Hillary says:

Act NOW! Free yourself from alien mind control NOW!
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅