smicko said..jbshack said..Subsonic said..Taytay said...
No I'm not :) I frequent the site but honestly this is the first post that has provoked me to respond. I don't have to know or be a beach inspector to realise the same thing that volunteers and lifeguards go through probably happens to beach inspectors.
It's a simple matter of respecting the job they do at the beach, paid or unpaid. They're trying to help. Not everyone in a position of authority is trying take advantage of people. If you respect people regardless of who they are, generally you get a good response back :)
I can appreciate that the authoritarian figure had his safety in mind when tried to call him out of the surf, but for him to be issuing a fine for this is ludicrous, on so many levels.
It sounds to me like the council have invented a regulation to allow this. It wouldn't surprise me if this or another case got taken to court and the council was found to have overstepped their jurisdiction. Since when do they have 200m of ocean in their boundary?
This whole business of issuing fines for not obeying vocal orders should remain in the powers of police, no one else.
Id say that he got the fine for being a dick to the inspector.
Its worth noting that councils and governments don't won't beaches closed. They recently even changed the rules on when they will close a beach. Perviously if a shark was 1km away they would close the beach. Now the beach will only be closed if a shark over 3 mtr is with in 500 m. SO the warnings wouldn't have been for a shark a few kms away, yet probably very near by..People stay out in the water and get attacked, soon you will see the law stretched further to help protect the stupid people and you may find the beaches even more regulated
If that line above is written in law "only be closed if a shark over 3m is within 500m" then there is your out. Take it to court.
It was the new parameters that were introduced in January when after the drum lines. They changed the parameters for beach closure and then claimed that due to the drum line cull had helped reduce beach closures by more than 50%. All that means is you will now only get warned when a shark is 500 m away instead of 1 km away.
The point Smicko still is he had no idea of what size shark he was being warned for. Do you imagine that Beach inspectors would clear south Trigg for a small bronze whaler at Mettams

During the time Mitch was fined there were multiple warnings so, the alarm was more likely for a 3.5 mt or 4 mt great white, not a bronze whaler miles away.
Another question is what happens when he ignores the beach inspector, then loses a leg and then his life. His family turn around and sue the government for not doing their job properly and warning beach users about the shark..
This entire thread is absolutely laughable..Stupid laws get made and brought into action because people are soo stupid that they need to be managed so. Like people ignoring shark warnings at a beach, or people being forced to drive sober