Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
Hey, forget about PM33. What about the dinosaurs? I am not sure what section they are mentioned in the bible, but its probably near the flat earth bit.
Plenty of dinosaurs on this forum. Myself, I identify as T-Rex. Actually, just the forearms bit.
Just checking with the mods, is it ok to refer to someone as "gullible" or "ignorant"?
Select to expand quoteremery said..
Nothing to see here, move along.
1914 and 1928 look quite similar to recent years, which is unsurprising given the small temperature range covered by the entire colour spectrum. I remember the article the alarmist bull**** was pulled from
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..
1914 and 1928 look quite similar to recent years, which is unsurprising given the small temperature range covered by the entire colour spectrum. I remember the article the alarmist bull**** was pulled from
Really? Please elaborate, what article?
Select to expand quoteremery said..psychojoe said..
1914 and 1928 look quite similar to recent years, which is unsurprising given the small temperature range covered by the entire colour spectrum. I remember the article the alarmist bull**** was pulled from
Really? Please elaborate, what article?
The one that had numbers assigned to the colours obviously. Weather is measured in numbers, not colours.
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..remery said..psychojoe said..
1914 and 1928 look quite similar to recent years, which is unsurprising given the small temperature range covered by the entire colour spectrum. I remember the article the alarmist bull**** was pulled from
Really? Please elaborate, what article?
The one that had numbers assigned to the colours obviously. Weather is measured in numbers, not colours.
As a small aside, the 10% of males who have a degree of red/green colour blindness, can find those colour graded charts a complete pain in the backside. I often rely on the different contrast levels, not hues, to determine which is which. Old fashioned black and white graphs using different symbols are much easier and clearer for me, even if they are not as pretty.
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..
The one that had numbers assigned to the colours obviously. Weather is measured in numbers, not colours.
It's not from an article. I cropped out the legend because I thought it was obvious, even to non-scientists, the blue was cool and red was hot. But since you are interested, here is the legend.
Select to expand quotefangman said..
As a small aside, the 10% of males who have a degree of red/green colour blindness, can find those colour graded charts a complete pain in the backside. I often rely on the different contrast levels, not hues, to determine which is which. Old fashioned black and white graphs using different symbols are much easier and clearer for me, even if they are not as pretty.
A mate of mine asked me to check out a green car on Carsales for him. There was no green car.
Species Distribution Models have coloured heat maps and many journals publish in colour these days. It must be hard for colourblind people. I'm surprised they don't have cross-hatch intensity as an accessibility option.
Select to expand quoteremery said..psychojoe said..
The one that had numbers assigned to the colours obviously. Weather is measured in numbers, not colours.
It's not from an article. I cropped out the legend because I thought it was obvious, even to non-scientists, the blue was cool and red was hot. But since you are interested, here is the legend.
Yeah that's the chart, only goes a few degrees in each direction. If it went all the way down to zero, which a rational person might expect blue to represent, then every year for the entire chart would be the same pale colour in the middle. So as you said "nothing to see here"
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..Yeah that's the chart, only goes a few degrees in each direction. If it went all the way down to zero, which a rational person might expect blue to represent, then every year for the entire chart would be the same pale colour in the middle. So as you said "nothing to see here"
You should share your expertise in analytical visualization with the Bureau of Meteorology.
Before you do, best look up the meaning of "anomaly".
I finally watched 'Inception' on the plane. It occured to me that WindowVirusAp might be the first case I have seen of a man living a dream inside a dream, and way down at the bottom level is Remery planting the seed , the inception, of an alternate world.
Just as an aside, has anybody seen where Switzerland is having to redraw it's borders because of climate change?
Closer to home, this map shows the westward movement of grain growing regions. Some farms under the arrows will have to diversify or quit.
Pcdefender working his magic?
"False claims suggesting that Hurricane Milton was "engineered" and that the weather in Florida is being "manipulated" have been spreading on social media.
There is no technology that allows humans to create and control hurricanes.
But on platforms like X and TikTok, posts alleging - without evidence - that the US government is secretly controlling the weather have been viewed millions of times.
Many were published by accounts known for spreading conspiracy theories, as well as misinformation about Covid-19 or vaccines."
Experts say hurricanes are likely to increase in frequency as the impact of climate change grows.The area where Hurricane Milton bore down hadn't seen a hurricane "in over a century", according to University of Newcastle associate professor Iftekhar Ahmed.
(bold text is the ABC's)
www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-10/hurricane-milton-live-updates/104454338
Mmmmmm ????
coast.noaa.gov/hurricanes/#map=4.98/28.44/-78.74&search=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
www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/All_U.S._Hurricanes.html
Interesting list and additional notes mentioning pre 1900 hurricanes underestimated.
Select to expand quoteremery said..
Pcdefender working his magic?
"False claims suggesting that Hurricane Milton was "engineered" and that the weather in Florida is being "manipulated" have been spreading on social media.
There is no technology that allows humans to create and control hurricanes.
But on platforms like X and TikTok, posts alleging - without evidence - that the US government is secretly controlling the weather have been viewed millions of times.
Many were published by accounts known for spreading conspiracy theories, as well as misinformation about Covid-19 or vaccines."
Imagine if we did have the ability to affect weather? We could setup wind turbines in the middle of nowhere and just get them running all the time. Energy problems solved!
Sadly, these social media platforms allow idiots to bring up their ideas and hear thousands of other people that agree with them, and then they think they are the majority.
Still, we have been using the internet to track PM33 ever since he ditched his mobile, so it can't all be bad 
As long as he keeps reading the sites he does, we know exactly where he is...
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Experts say hurricanes are likely to increase in frequency as the impact of climate change grows.The area where Hurricane Milton bore down hadn't seen a hurricane "in over a century", according to University of Newcastle associate professor Iftekhar Ahmed.
(bold text is the ABC's)
www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-10/hurricane-milton-live-updates/104454338
Mmmmmm ????
coast.noaa.gov/hurricanes/#map=4.98/28.44/-78.74&search=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
It's OK though, Trump has never heard or a Category 5 making landfall before.
(There's a clip of him saying that phrase 5 times over recent decades)
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
Sadly, these social media platforms allow idiots to bring up their ideas and hear thousands of other people that agree with them, and then they think they are the majority.
On another thread you used the derogatory term CT.
On this thread you don't even try to hide your disdain for those with a different opinion from yourself by calling them idiots.
Is this the way you talk to your mates who have a different take on issues than yourself?
It seems you will gladly accept the 'need' for a crackdown on different opinions or CT as they are described by the MSM in the future.
If so, you will be well and truly selling your soul.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Experts say hurricanes are likely to increase in frequency as the impact of climate change grows.The area where Hurricane Milton bore down hadn't seen a hurricane "in over a century", according to University of Newcastle associate professor Iftekhar Ahmed.
(bold text is the ABC's)
www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-10/hurricane-milton-live-updates/104454338
Mmmmmm ????
coast.noaa.gov/hurricanes/#map=4.98/28.44/-78.74&search=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
Ahmed specified Tampa Bay in his original comment.
""Climate change will make hurricanes more ferocious and frequent and can impact areas without a history of the hazard," Associate Professor Iftekhar Ahmed from the University of Newcastle said. "Hurricane Milton bore down on Tampa Bay - an area that hadn't seen a hurricane in over a century.
"The increasing magnitude of recent hurricanes has meant their impact has stretched 500 kilometres inland, as with the very recent Hurricane Helene affecting North Carolina."
---
"Tampa Bay has not been hit directly by a major hurricane since 1921, and authorities fear luck is about to run out."
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
Is this the way you talk to your mates who have a different take on issues than yourself?
Thanks for noticing. I throw the term out every now and then to see if anyone will respond. I am learning that on some forums you can just ignore others and then throw out your own opinion to get attention. It works well.
What do I do when a friend or a relative starts talking about these sorts of conspiracies? Well, I initially hear them start, and then I try and change the topic. By now I can generally predict where they are going to go and what they are going to say, so I politely shut it down without making it really obvious I am shutting that topic down. By bringing up something more interesting that we have in common it avoids the conflict and I know I am never going to change their opinion.
On the other hand I have a friend who is pretty clever. He has read a lot and is pretty observant and I enjoy having conversations with him. When he brings up something that conflicts with what I think, I know that he will provide background and information about why he thinks what he thinks and we discuss it. It becomes an actual conversation and he even listens, and sometimes refutes, my point of view. At the end of the conversation I feel that we have both seen a different point of view. Sometimes my opinion changes, sometimes it doesn't.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
On another thread you used the derogatory term CT. On this thread you don't even try to hide your disdain for those with a different opinion from yourself by calling them idiots.
Is this the way you talk to your mates who have a different take on issues than yourself?
It seems you will gladly accept the 'need' for a crackdown on different opinions or CT as they are described by the MSM in the future.
If so, you will be well and truly selling your soul.
Another reply, because the previous one talked about normal adult conversations.
This one is about the actual idiots that think that things like hurricanes can be controlled by humans.
It is crazy. A sci-fi dream that people think up because they have no understanding of the physical world around them, Then they post something and see other people with the same brain-farts and then think they are onto something. Social media is making it easy for someone to post something and find someone that agrees with them. Whether it is only 1 in 10,000 that agree with them, they will see that reply and think that they are correct.
You understand the wind. Well, you should as most of us do after sailing for so long. There is nothing mysterious about it. To think that amount of energy can be controlled by humans is ambitious. To think that way is going to set you on one path. You have to then turn around and think "well if people can affect/create that, then they can affect everything". If you genuinely believe that humans can affect everything, then you may as well give up as nothing could change it. Nothing. If someone had that genuine level of power, nothing you or I wanted to do about it would matter.
Or you could say "well, that is nonsense, but maybe humans can affect other normal things, but these hurricane nutters are just idiots".
I don't know if I have a soul. That is something we will never know. But what I do know is that in real-life there are people that will run you over to get what they want and there are nice people that will help someone out. I think it is good to be the second type of person.
Select to expand quoteremery said..
Ahmed specified Tampa Bay in his original comment.
""Climate change will make hurricanes more ferocious and frequent and can impact areas without a history of the hazard," Associate Professor Iftekhar Ahmed from the University of Newcastle said. "Hurricane Milton bore down on Tampa Bay - an area that hadn't seen a hurricane in over a century.
"The increasing magnitude of recent hurricanes has meant their impact has stretched 500 kilometres inland, as with the very recent Hurricane Helene affecting North Carolina."
---
"Tampa Bay has not been hit directly by a major hurricane since 1921, and authorities fear luck is about to run out."
....And the map I posted from NOAA was the impact and track map using Tampa Bay as the location.
Saying "nar-nar he said directly hit" seems a bit of a..... strawman pedant if I may be so bold..
If the argument is saying the eye must pass exactly over the zip code area then there would be many, many places in hurricane and cyclone areas that would fit that definition, but the fact not be particularly special. Tampa Bay has been directly impacted by many hurricanes in the last 100 years.
When I read the ABC I assumed it was a mis-quote. Earlier in the week the reporting I saw was that this could be the strongest cyclone to hit the Florida west coast in over 100 years. Not the only, but the biggest. I applied critical thinking and assumed an ABC journo had quoted it wrong, not that is was a defendable quote. Although I also understood the general concensus elsewhere is that a changing climate will bring fewer hurricanes and cyclones, but that when they do occur they will be larger and more intense. And the quote certainly didn't say that.
Anyways, it seems that neither happened. The centre didn't directly pass over Tampa Bay and after it hit the coast it wasn't the strongest in 100 years. Not to downplay the impact, loss of live and destruction it did cause (and may continue to cause).
Select to expand quoteD3 said..
It's OK though, Trump has never heard or a Category 5 making landfall before.
(There's a clip of him saying that phrase 5 times over recent decades)
I've not seen the clip. Also not sure what point your making.
I am also no expert in Carribean hurricanes, but Google tells me the only hurricanes to be at Cat 5 when they hit the US coast were Michael in 2018, Andrew in 1992 (both of which hit north and south of Tampa Bay although not directly exactly at Tampa Bay), then back in 1969, 1935...
So they are pretty rare, but not unprecendented.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Michael
I also assume that recording central windspeeds in 1935 was not quite as accurate as it it today, and that the category scale of hurricanes and cyclones is a bit simplistic and doesn't necessarily convey the destructive power or affect they may have.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..remery said..
Ahmed specified Tampa Bay in his original comment.
""Climate change will make hurricanes more ferocious and frequent and can impact areas without a history of the hazard," Associate Professor Iftekhar Ahmed from the University of Newcastle said. "Hurricane Milton bore down on Tampa Bay - an area that hadn't seen a hurricane in over a century.
"The increasing magnitude of recent hurricanes has meant their impact has stretched 500 kilometres inland, as with the very recent Hurricane Helene affecting North Carolina."
---
"Tampa Bay has not been hit directly by a major hurricane since 1921, and authorities fear luck is about to run out."
....And the map I posted from NOAA was the impact and track map using Tampa Bay as the location.
Saying "nar-nar he said directly hit" seems a bit of a..... strawman pedant if I may be so bold..
If the argument is saying the eye must pass exactly over the zip code area then there would be many, many places in hurricane and cyclone areas that would fit that definition, but the fact not be particularly special. Tampa Bay has been directly impacted by many hurricanes in the last 100 years.
When I read the ABC I assumed it was a mis-quote. Earlier in the week the reporting I saw was that this could be the strongest cyclone to hit the Florida west coast in over 100 years. Not the only, but the biggest. I applied critical thinking and assumed an ABC journo had quoted it wrong, not that is was a defendable quote. Although I also understood the general concensus elsewhere is that a changing climate will bring fewer hurricanes and cyclones, but that when they do occur they will be larger and more intense. And the quote certainly didn't say that.
Anyways, it seems that neither happened. The centre didn't directly pass over Tampa Bay and after it hit the coast it wasn't the strongest in 100 years. Not to downplay the impact, loss of live and destruction it did cause (and may continue to cause).
journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0189.1?mobileUi=0
The WMO has little confidence of increasing intensity ,frequency.Hyping human attribution of extreme weather is just for political points and media clicks.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
....And the map I posted from NOAA was the impact and track map using Tampa Bay as the location.
Saying "nar-nar he said directly hit" seems a bit of a..... strawman pedant if I may be so bold..
If the argument is saying the eye must pass exactly over the zip code area then there would be many, many places in hurricane and cyclone areas that would fit that definition, but the fact not be particularly special. Tampa Bay has been directly impacted by many hurricanes in the last 100 years.
When I read the ABC I assumed it was a mis-quote. Earlier in the week the reporting I saw was that this could be the strongest cyclone to hit the Florida west coast in over 100 years. Not the only, but the biggest. I applied critical thinking and assumed an ABC journo had quoted it wrong, not that is was a defendable quote. Although I also understood the general concensus elsewhere is that a changing climate will bring fewer hurricanes and cyclones, but that when they do occur they will be larger and more intense. And the quote certainly didn't say that.
Anyways, it seems that neither happened. The centre didn't directly pass over Tampa Bay and after it hit the coast it wasn't the strongest in 100 years. Not to downplay the impact, loss of live and destruction it did cause (and may continue to cause).
www.modernglobe.com/why-dont-hurricanes-directly-hit-tampa-bay/amp/
^ Well, yeah, there you go.
A bit of lay-person questioning and a bit of digging and it turns out that despite experts linking climate change to hurricanes hitting Tampa Bay, it is actually just luck, folklore or the statistics of land area versus hurricane eye size. Exactly zero to do with climate change.
I guess we can thank seabreeze.com.au forum threads on critical thinking to have taught me to question what I read experts have said in the MSM. Now, where else do I apply my newly learnt learned# skill ??
# for remery's benefit [Hint: for comedic effect]
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
^ Well, yeah, there you go.
A bit of lay-person questioning and a bit of digging and it turns out that despite experts linking climate change to hurricanes hitting Tampa Bay, it is actually just luck, folklore or the statistics of land area versus hurricane eye size. Exactly zero to do with climate change.
I guess we can thank seabreeze.com.au forum threads on critical thinking to have taught me to question what I read experts have said in the MSM. Now, where else do I apply my newly learnt learned# skill ??
# for remery's benefit [Hint: for comedic effect]
Hey, I think you are starting to get it.
You posted, "Experts say hurricanes are likely to increase in frequency as the impact of climate change grows. The area where Hurricane Milton bore down hadn't seen a hurricane "in over a century", according to University of Newcastle associate professor Iftekhar Ahmed." I thought that was unusually vague comment from an associate professor. So I used my critical thinking skills and looked for the full quote. Turns out he specified Tampa Bay and a little move delving showed that he was correct.
