City of Stirling Exclusion Zones

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
premo
premo
WA
293 posts
WA, 293 posts
28 Sep 2011 2:06pm
yep, i have been blessed with euro accent so "me no understand english mr ranger i like windsurfing here very nice yes hi 5!"
stringer
stringer
WA
703 posts
WA, 703 posts
28 Sep 2011 3:19pm
Underoath said...

wow like just wow



thats what you said when you were hanging out in izaaks van
Bennosmith
Bennosmith
VIC
43 posts
VIC, 43 posts
30 Sep 2011 1:27pm
Keep up the emails everyone. I got a response from Cr. Proud this morning, who I have dealt a lot with on other matters over the past few years. She said they have been receiving many emails about it recently, and it will be forwarded to the officers for their considered response. She also said she has learnt a lot about windsurfing due to all the action.
I think if education is part of the protest, it will make it a lot easier for the wind surfing opinion to be taken seriously. So, call/email/snail mail your councilors! It's election time here in Stirling, the best time to get action!
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23652 posts
WA, 23652 posts
3 Oct 2011 6:26pm
Interesting development.
Response from John Snook, CoS Beach Services Co-ordinator.

In part:
"The City recognises that windsurfing is an activity that has long been enjoyed at Scarborough Beach, particularly the southern end of the beach, and has no intention of banning this activity. Rather, for the period October to April when beach usage is at its heaviest, it is proposed to create an area where beach users are made clearly aware that if they choose to enter the water within the designated area they do so knowing that windsurfing occurs within it."

Now, to me that reads like there is no ban, no zone. You can windsurf where you like and the swimmers will be warned that windsurfers frequent the area.

Thoughts?
elmo
elmo
WA
8891 posts
WA, 8891 posts
3 Oct 2011 6:38pm
Unless it's for the areas outside the no go zone where they are warning people about the hazards
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23652 posts
WA, 23652 posts
3 Oct 2011 7:05pm
^^^ maybe I am reading this wrong but it seems pretty plain: they say windsurfing is not to be banned (ie: you can go wherever you want and there is no legally enforcable penalty)
and that all they are doing is picking an area which will have signs to warn swimmers

and that is GOLD
Bails
Bails
WA
158 posts
WA, 158 posts
3 Oct 2011 8:36pm
I hope that's right.

Just another thought if there are zones imposed, what if someone ends up extremely underpowered and/or breaks things? I've had a number of instances where I've had to come ashore 100m downwind from my starting point. It's hardly dangerous to slog back in off the plane, but this is probably the sort of thing they would police.
saltiest1
saltiest1
NSW
2568 posts
NSW, 2568 posts
4 Oct 2011 12:23am
Bails said...

I hope that's right.

Just another thought if there are zones imposed, what if someone ends up extremely underpowered and/or breaks things? I've had a number of instances where I've had to come ashore 100m downwind from my starting point. It's hardly dangerous to slog back in off the plane, but this is probably the sort of thing they would police.




isnt there some law about marine craft in duress?
Underoath
Underoath
QLD
2434 posts
QLD, 2434 posts
4 Oct 2011 12:10am
stringer said...

Underoath said...

wow like just wow



thats what you said when you were hanging out in izaaks van


That's what you said when you started riding GAY PRIDE!
leftfield
leftfield
WA
200 posts
WA, 200 posts
3 Oct 2011 10:36pm
Mark _australia said...

^^^ maybe I am reading this wrong but it seems pretty plain: they say windsurfing is not to be banned (ie: you can go wherever you want and there is no legally enforcable penalty)
and that all they are doing is picking an area which will have signs to warn swimmers

and that is GOLD



I read that as in it is not to be (totally banned) but allowed in desiginated areas where swimmers will be warned of dangers.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23652 posts
WA, 23652 posts
4 Oct 2011 8:16am
The don't say "create an area where windsurfers will be allowed and beach users are made clearly aware etc etc"

They just say windsurfing will not be banned and there will be an area where other users are warned (presumably this area is pretty anywhere ppl swim)

NR
NR
WA
517 posts
NR NR
WA, 517 posts
4 Oct 2011 9:08am
I wouldn't get your hopes up, to me, reading the other proposal and this response still reads that they will have the exclusion zones, and then outside the zones, warning signs of kitesurfers and windsurfers. A bit like swim between the flags.
Bertie
Bertie
NSW
1351 posts
NSW, 1351 posts
4 Oct 2011 3:41pm
NR said...

I wouldn't get your hopes up, to me, reading the other proposal and this response still reads that they will have the exclusion zones, and then outside the zones, warning signs of kitesurfers and windsurfers. A bit like swim between the flags.


except you dont get fined if you swim outside the flags or go to an unpatrolled beach do you!
NR
NR
WA
517 posts
NR NR
WA, 517 posts
4 Oct 2011 1:30pm
Bertie said...

NR said...

I wouldn't get your hopes up, to me, reading the other proposal and this response still reads that they will have the exclusion zones, and then outside the zones, warning signs of kitesurfers and windsurfers. A bit like swim between the flags.


except you dont get fined if you swim outside the flags or go to an unpatrolled beach do you!


What I meant, is that they recommend you swim between the flags, and if you don't, you may put yourself in more danger. How I read these proposals, and mark's response is that, the exclusion zone is another flagged area for swimmers, and the kitesurf/windsurf zones areas can still be for swimmers, but just being made aware of the extra dangers. When the letter says not banned, I assume they mean, moved, but not banned from the new moved spot. Maybe thats just me being pessimistic
sheeny
sheeny
WA
38 posts
WA, 38 posts
4 Oct 2011 2:40pm
An interesting incident happened yesterday while sailing Scabs.

I was swimming my gear while in the shorebreak trying to get it into position to waterstart. Experience while sailing this place has taught me to always check behind you to see if there's any waves or other watercraft coming your way.

Lucky I did.

Right in front of my face was the fin of a surf lifesaving kayak. I was lucky enough to duck under and miss it with a nano second to spare. Unfortunately, due to this guy having absolutely no control over his kayak which is completely bouyant, went straight over my gear.

Even with no-one out, this guy had the ability to find the only person in the water to run over, but what really ticked me off in light of this exclusion zone business is the fact the guy didn't even say sorry or ask if I was OK. Even after getting eye contact after the incident, he literally went straight into the beach and walked up to the SLSC.

If this incident was reciprocated, with a windsurfer running over a clubby and his kayak. Windsurfing would definitely be banned from Scabs.

Kayaking in the surf zone (Medium Conflict) my ass..!!!
default
default
WA
1255 posts
WA, 1255 posts
4 Oct 2011 3:38pm
I'll never forget the day on a decent swell when the clubbie d1cks were zooming in and out in the zodiac being heros with no one to save.

They went over a decent set and both clubbies fell out. The zodiac did circle work through the lineup for the next 20mins until it ran into the sand on the shore. No one could stop it, just waaay too dangerous. Everyone had to exit the water.

Nice one SSLSC....safe as!
stringer
stringer
WA
703 posts
WA, 703 posts
4 Oct 2011 3:59pm
sheeny said...

An interesting incident happened yesterday while sailing Scabs.

I was swimming my gear while in the shorebreak trying to get it into position to waterstart. Experience while sailing this place has taught me to always check behind you to see if there's any waves or other watercraft coming your way.

Lucky I did.

Right in front of my face was the fin of a surf lifesaving kayak. I was lucky enough to duck under and miss it with a nano second to spare. Unfortunately, due to this guy having absolutely no control over his kayak which is completely bouyant, went straight over my gear.

Even with no-one out, this guy had the ability to find the only person in the water to run over, but what really ticked me off in light of this exclusion zone business is the fact the guy didn't even say sorry or ask if I was OK. Even after getting eye contact after the incident, he literally went straight into the beach and walked up to the SLSC.

If this incident was reciprocated, with a windsurfer running over a clubby and his kayak. Windsurfing would definitely be banned from Scabs.

Kayaking in the surf zone (Medium Conflict) my ass..!!!


didnt someone die recently at a SLS event? cant remember the last (or first) fatal windsurfer related accident... anyone?
Greenroom
Greenroom
WA
7608 posts
WA, 7608 posts
4 Oct 2011 8:24pm
^^^It wasn't at Scabs but a windsurfer died at Gnaraloo the year before last.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23652 posts
WA, 23652 posts
4 Oct 2011 8:26pm
Default and Sheeny hope you are emailing those incidents to City of Stirling and asking for the clubbies to be controlled not us
skekles
skekles
WA
44 posts
WA, 44 posts
4 Oct 2011 10:41pm
This has probably already been asked but has a petition been formalised? As someone stated in the thread, council members rely on votes and get nervous when public sentiment turns against them. A well signed petition accompanied by a letter that summarises the key points made in this thread could be very powerful.
Also, a mass meeting at Scabs carpark with a couple of journos present would also be good.
NR
NR
WA
517 posts
NR NR
WA, 517 posts
5 Oct 2011 10:51am
stringer said...

sheeny said...

An interesting incident happened yesterday while sailing Scabs.

I was swimming my gear while in the shorebreak trying to get it into position to waterstart. Experience while sailing this place has taught me to always check behind you to see if there's any waves or other watercraft coming your way.

Lucky I did.

Right in front of my face was the fin of a surf lifesaving kayak. I was lucky enough to duck under and miss it with a nano second to spare. Unfortunately, due to this guy having absolutely no control over his kayak which is completely bouyant, went straight over my gear.

Even with no-one out, this guy had the ability to find the only person in the water to run over, but what really ticked me off in light of this exclusion zone business is the fact the guy didn't even say sorry or ask if I was OK. Even after getting eye contact after the incident, he literally went straight into the beach and walked up to the SLSC.

If this incident was reciprocated, with a windsurfer running over a clubby and his kayak. Windsurfing would definitely be banned from Scabs.

Kayaking in the surf zone (Medium Conflict) my ass..!!!


didnt someone die recently at a SLS event? cant remember the last (or first) fatal windsurfer related accident... anyone?


I think it was a kid that died over east during a surf life saving competition. Very unlucky.

This shouldn't be turned though into a SLS vs windsurfer argument as the windsurfers will defainly not win. Generally, I like the SLS. I like what they stand for as a whole, and like that they are around. But like any sport or organisiation, there are always a few idiots which ruin it for the rest. Not sure what the answer is as they are providing a good volunteer service and should be encouraged to do so. Its just ashame us windsurfers have to be moved a side for for this to happen.
lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
5 Oct 2011 9:38pm
So lets recap,

You guys are now pointing out to council the dangers of the SLSC,"yeah,make sure you send those complaining emails Sheeny and Default against the surfclub.WTF" and are fighting to be exempt from martime rules of keeping min of 60m from swimmers?
Bagging out the surf club to try and get your way with council,,,,good luck with that.

Then again,senior citizens vote in record numbers. and endless letters and email.
R1DER
R1DER
WA
1476 posts
WA, 1476 posts
5 Oct 2011 10:31pm
DO NOT RESPOND !!!! continue on as normal and he will go away.
Reflex Films
Reflex Films
WA
1460 posts
WA, 1460 posts
6 Oct 2011 9:44am
lets keep on track.

last time i went out sailing at Brighton - last Sunday - i had kite lines dumped on my head - AGAIN.

This guy gybed his twin tip in front of a wave , got eaten and had the tension pulled out of his lines so the kite lines were now in freefall onto my head. Down i go into the water and then eaten by the end section of the same wave. Thankfully this time i didnt get wrapped in the lines like the fun incident last year.


When he came up from the wave he explained to me how terrible it was that his foot got twisted in the strap. I felt very sorry for him.


The session a few days before that it was a guy on a flysurfer with a super slow kite that kept flying into the water (not enough turning speed / larger bar required) - and twice right in front of me so i had to take evasive action.

And then he was in the break clogging up the place - and then after relaunching he had a twisted whirling out of control foil kite that would not behave or correspond to his control inputs on the bar - not a good look.

Then another guy plonks his kite in the break just as i was launching- about 10 ft in front of me. Wait for the attempted relaunch - inevitable wave wash and swim in with drowned soggy kite/ lines in a mess.

I would love not to have to Windsurf with kites anymore as all these incidents just add up to 1 big pain in the ass footprint. As usual Most of the good guys i have no issues with - the problem is that the kooks and learners then follow.
default
default
WA
1255 posts
WA, 1255 posts
6 Oct 2011 11:38am
Reflex Films said...

lets keep on track.


ha, whining about kiters is not going to get you anywhere.

I have now liaised with CoS, and they definitely see windsurfers in the high risk category. This will not be changed.

Kiters and windsurfers are seen as the same (by the CoS) in the risk categories they have created. Local authorities are simply not dynamic enough to separate...as crazy as it may seem to windsurfers, there is more chance of amendments, if windsurfers AND kiters work together on this one. Although this is hard to swallow, it is the reality.

Some points I have tried to push with CoS, is amendment to the southern boundary (move it north 100m, which takes it too the southern end of SSLSC) of the zone at SSLSC and the commencement date beginning mid-November rather than beginning of October (October is simply too early).

I thought these may have some chance of being successful but it seems they are going to be quite rigid in their views...nothing new here. They have written their reports and documentation, to amend is essentially a pain in the a-hole to the CoS.

Even this happening during an election doesnt seem to worry the councillors All they have done is forward my emails onto the Beach Services Manager (amazing effort!) to whom I have liaised with.


EDIT: have just been made aware and find it interesting the CoS Beach Services Co-ordinator is a member of SSLSC
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
6 Oct 2011 12:03pm
default said...

I'll never forget the day on a decent swell when the clubbie d1cks were zooming in and out in the zodiac being heros with no one to save.

They went over a decent set and both clubbies fell out. The zodiac did circle work through the lineup for the next 20mins until it ran into the sand on the shore. No one could stop it, just waaay too dangerous. Everyone had to exit the water.

Nice one SSLSC....safe as!


I was in the water when that happened, some guy paddled his board over and managed to stop it and take it back to the tools. It wasnt even big that day!!

That was a couple of years ago from memory..
default
default
WA
1255 posts
WA, 1255 posts
6 Oct 2011 12:09pm
Interesting, might have happened twice!! because the day I saw the incident Im sure the zodiac wasnt stopped, it ran aground!

But yes, it would have been a couple of years ago.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
6 Oct 2011 12:38pm
I had lines dropped on me when I was sailing my Hobbie 18 at Pinnaroo was a very scary situation would hate to be in a tangle and sudden tension on my arms or around the neck. The winkir abused me ! Was going to cross his way????
Is there an exclusion zone of let say...... 50 m around idiots kiting????
I have bought a small rope cutter and I carry it attached to my harness! Drop your lines on me and I will cut myself free![}:)]
lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
6 Oct 2011 6:10pm
^^^^^See,,winddancers are "high risk"

Serously though,
complaining to council that the surf lifesaving clubs are "high risk" will be opening up a big can of worms which will end negativly to you.

The surf club has a lot more power than a couple of windsurfers.
default
default
WA
1255 posts
WA, 1255 posts
6 Oct 2011 3:45pm
^^^especially since the dude managing the whole exclusion zone thing is a member of SSLSC.

To be fair, I dont think anyone is planning to write to the CoS complaining about the clubbies and their f-ups or trying to have them deemed as high risk.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅