yeah mk1 was famous. but it struggled at the wide end and at f2.8 and only got sharp when stopped down around 3.2/4....... it's best performance seemed to be at the long end but still needed f3.2 and higher.
at that point it was cheaper to buy the f4 version and get sharper images for less cash
i think the mk2 is now sharp wide and at open apertures and almost matches the prime lenses at really open apertures.
i guess that's why so many have ditched the mk1 version for the mk2.
that said i've been looking at the mk1 myself now that they are getting cheaper.