Beelzebub said...jbshack said...You could say kids fall from trees and die , so let's cut down every tree. To bad when we have a oxygen issue. But hey the kids will nO longer fall from trees
Falling out of a tree is a subjective danger directly linked to climbing the tree. The tree climber can hence greatly influence the degree of danger. Being eaten by a shark is an objective danger that is not directly linked to surfing (e.g. Brain Guest was killed while crabbing). The surfer can do essentially nothing to mitigate the danger, as it is determined by external factors such as eco-warriors who artificially boost shark numbers.
Its exactly the same.
Don't climb the tree and you cant fall out of it..
Stay out of the water and you wont be eaten by a shark..
The next step is also the same.
Cut down all the trees and human existence will become very difficult..
Extinct a top predator like GW then our ocean ecosystem could be in serous danger. Lose the ocean as a ecosystem and we are in more trouble then cutting down all the worlds trees
The main argument is that people like yourself say GW shark numbers are ragging. But the experts, marine biologists, the worlds scientific brains trust all say that is not true. So why bother people like Suba studying (although id guess SUba is not studing for everyone else's reasons but his own) if people aren't going to listen to the advice they have to offer. This issue will still be ragging in ten maybe twenty years ill bet.
But even if they were 100% wrong and there are 7000 world wide that is low numbers
