My First Surf Shape....? (not Surf Shapes)

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 1:04am
Here's what I have come up with for my first surf SUP. Shaping might turn out different but it will be a learning experience.
I've gone a little retro but without a swallow tail so I can bring the tail width in enough.

Approx 8'6" x 29.5" x 4.2"

The thinking behind it...

- Wider through the nose with a solid concave for nose riding and some extra speed
- Narrower into the tail with lots of V to keep it really loose under the back foot
- Diamond tail cos I like it
- Gradual rocker into the nose (approx 40mm more than my Oxbow). No sharp kick to maintain paddle speed into waves.
- Reasonably flat through the middle (don't know why, just turned out that way)
- Reasonable tail lift similar to my Oxbow but this will have slightly more lift over shorter length for better top to bottom performance

Am I on the right track here? Any tips would be great!






DavidJohn
DavidJohn
VIC
17570 posts
VIC, 17570 posts
27 Aug 2009 1:08am
Looks good Brendan.. How many fins?

DJ
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 1:15am
8 fins like a shark! They are fast as!

Na not sure yet, thinking real small future side fins and a box centre so I can play around with sizes. I will probably start with a 6" centre fin and go from there.
OG SUP
OG SUP
VIC
3516 posts
VIC, 3516 posts
27 Aug 2009 9:06am
Hi Brendon,

If you go as short as 8'6 it might be a good idea to have little more nose lift as if its too flat it will pearl really easily. All the Imperials and DCs definitely need it.

The sweet spot on an 8'6 will be really small and you will want some margin for error.

I would also suggest you look at the rail shape on the Voldomort 9fters as they seem to provide great stability for boards that short.

If your not going to vaccum bag divinicell onto it for strength then maybe do a surf shapes and add a laminate wood deck or you will see significant foam compression.

My 2 cents

Phill.

Cam Gillies
Cam Gillies
SA
216 posts
SA, 216 posts
27 Aug 2009 8:50am
I reckon you're on the right track, 8'6 isn't that short a board, I would think about 10cm of nose rocker and 6-8cm of tail rocker. I measured the nose and tail rocker off my starboard 8'5 as this is a sweet board. I have been making a few boards around the 7'6 - 7'10 mark and been using this amount of rocker, seems to work well. I dont think you need to use a timber laminate, if you're using high density EPS and you laminate it with 2 x 6oz glass this will be plenty strong enough, you could put a 4 oz patch over standing area if you're worried. It's handy if you've got a board that you like to copy rail shape etc. First board might be a bit rough but they get better as you go.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 9:40am
OG SUP said...

Hi Brendon,

If you go as short as 8'6 it might be a good idea to have little more nose lift as if its too flat it will pearl really easily.
Yeah understand, the rocker I have drawn here is very similar to the PSH Ripper but I have extended the flatter spot through the middle so the rocker should still be similar but it will appear flatter on the deck to the nose

The sweet spot on an 8'6 will be really small and you will want some margin for error.
I have tried to keep the thickness through out the board to maximise the so called sweet spot

I would also suggest you look at the rail shape on the Voldomort 9fters as they seem to provide great stability for boards that short.
Stability of my oxbow isn't great due to rounded deck, so I will be keeping thickness to the rails (at least through the centre) to maximise stability

If your not going to vaccum bag divinicell onto it for strength then maybe do a surf shapes and add a laminate wood deck or you will see significant foam compression.
Looking into vaccum bagging but not to start. As Cam said and also Dean's boards show they can be strong enough. I will be putting an extra patch around standing posuition however



Thanks for the feedback Phill.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 9:46am
Cam Gillies said...

I reckon you're on the right track, 8'6 isn't that short a board, I would think about 10cm of nose rocker and 6-8cm of tail rocker. I measured the nose and tail rocker off my starboard 8'5 as this is a sweet board. I have been making a few boards around the 7'6 - 7'10 mark and been using this amount of rocker, seems to work well. I dont think you need to use a timber laminate, if you're using high density EPS and you laminate it with 2 x 6oz glass this will be plenty strong enough, you could put a 4 oz patch over standing area if you're worried. It's handy if you've got a board that you like to copy rail shape etc. First board might be a bit rough but they get better as you go.


Thanks Cam, I haven't measured the rocker heights but I would think they are going to be pretty close to what you said. Maybe slightly
more nose rocker. I will be looking at the PSH rail shapes and also Cam's Surf Shapes that seem to be pretty stable. A divinicell patch is
an option for strength but probably not for this board.
goatman
goatman
NSW
2151 posts
NSW, 2151 posts
27 Aug 2009 10:49am
I reckon, depending on the sort of surf/surfing you will be doing, that you could go with more noes lift (and a touch more tail lift) than the 9 3 ripper.

I love the 9 3 but always feel as though it could have a bit more curve - especially in the nose. It does have fantastic glide and run for a smaller board which is the trade off if you went with more rocker.

Anyway my mate who is a very experienced shaper, is finishing one right now that is what I described above (more curve) and 8 8" so should be interesting.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
27 Aug 2009 11:28am
Yeah,bnaccas My 8'3 has 120 mil of nose rocker and it could have done with more. I can't see any down side to using extreme nose kick for say the front 200 mil of the board. On fins, I'm not experienced enough, but I've been using a 8" single fin but changed to a big 10" fin ,wow, I think I understand the "drive" feeling that others talk about. Do we need more than 1 fin?LSD posted an excellent "how to" a while ago, and I'm not sure of how you're going to build ,and at the risk of teaching my grandmother how to suck eggs , I think I've got a modification to LSD's method that I recon is better. Use 2 sheets instead of 1. If you want a thickness of 4.5 inches use a 2 plus 3 . Then set the rocker by glueing the sheets together. The advantage as I see it is you can weight the top sheet down in the middle of the board to create a more complex rocker .I did one board as a single sheet and found the rocker tended to be a bit too uniform like a big banana The down sides? Don't get any epoxy out to the edge of the board when you glue the sheets , stay 6 inches inside the outline. Make sure your table is level and you sheets are level on the table(avoid twisting). I don't know if you've built boards before , its pretty easy and great fun and from your posts I think your an experienced surfer so you'll be better able to understand the qualities you want in your board....... let the fibreglass itching begin.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 2:31pm
I'm going to get the blank cut to the outline and rocker pix I posted above so no need to bend in rocker. I need to minimise sanding/mess as I will be doing the board at work after hours. It won't be hard to add a little nose kick but I want to keep the lines nice and reasonable consistent. I'll make the changes and see what it looks like.

I also built a hotwire cutter to help shape the rails, looks something like this:

log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
27 Aug 2009 2:39pm
That looks great Brendon. Who's cutting the blank for you?
goatman
goatman
NSW
2151 posts
NSW, 2151 posts
27 Aug 2009 2:40pm
Bnaccas said...

I'm going to get the blank cut to the outline and rocker pix I posted above so no need to bend in rocker. I need to minimise sanding/mess as I will be doing the board at work after hours. It won't be hard to add a little nose kick but I want to keep the lines nice and reasonable consistent. I'll make the changes and see what it looks like.

I also built a hotwire cutter to help shape the rails, looks something like this:



Bnaccas, doing the rocker that way is definately the go IMO. After all it is the main thing that determines how the thing will surf and it will allow you to experiment accurately with different rockers - changing things slightly here and there. I don't get this bending the rocker in idea at all.

My mate is using his software program for the profile so he can make very accurate changes to future boards and see how they go.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
27 Aug 2009 2:41pm
If you don't mind ,whats your weight
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 3:00pm
log man said...

That looks great Brendon. Who's cutting the blank for you?


Foamex


log man said...

If you don't mind ,whats your weight


Thats a bit personal, but just between you and me around 84kg at the moment, with the intention of being around 75kg in 12 weeks.

Goatman, bending it in will be cheaper and if done right you should get a perfect rocker line. However I don't trust myself in these early days. It will cost me $100 more for the blank but in the scheme of things this is nothing. I want to save on time and also minimise errors and not having to worry about the rocker will make things a lot easier for me.
goatman
goatman
NSW
2151 posts
NSW, 2151 posts
27 Aug 2009 3:10pm





Goatman, bending it in will be cheaper and if done right you should get a perfect rocker line. However I don't trust myself in these early days. It will cost me $100 more for the blank but in the scheme of things this is nothing. I want to save on time and also minimise errors and not having to worry about the rocker will make things a lot easier for me.


How do you get 'a perfect rocker line' without a template? Sorry to bang on about this but the bending thing intrigues me.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 3:42pm
goatman said...


How do you get 'a perfect rocker line' without a template? Sorry to bang on about this but the bending thing intrigues me.


Ah, yes hear what you're saying. I guess it would be just done by eye so might not be so accurate. Even if you were trying to copy a rocker template it would be hard to get it exact. Not impossible but hard!

Cam Gillies
Cam Gillies
SA
216 posts
SA, 216 posts
27 Aug 2009 3:49pm
Bnaccas said...

goatman said...


How do you get 'a perfect rocker line' without a template? Sorry to bang on about this but the bending thing intrigues me.


Ive been laying a straight edge on blank, pull the ends down and move your stands back or forward depending on where you need more/less rocker, get the ruler out and start measuring at different points, stand back and have a look, then hope for the best, who says the rocker line has to be perfect, doesn't mean you have rocker right if its cut from a template, the board can still feel crap, i agree it makes it easier to adjust but how many boards are you making the one size?
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
27 Aug 2009 4:29pm
Goaty, I get your distrust of the bend method. But for me I recon It's ok. I think getting it cut from a block by hot wire and computer is the ultimate though.Brendon did you supply foamex with the Aku file or how did you do it. $100 bucks is great.
goatman
goatman
NSW
2151 posts
NSW, 2151 posts
27 Aug 2009 4:45pm
Cam Gillies said...
Ive been laying a straight edge on blank, pull the ends down and move your stands back or forward depending on where you need more/less rocker, get the ruler out and start measuring at different points, stand back and have a look, then hope for the best, who says the rocker line has to be perfect, doesn't mean you have rocker right if its cut from a template, the board can still feel crap, i agree it makes it easier to adjust but how many boards are you making the one size?


I disagree Cam, but each to their own. I made high performance goatboats for 20 years and a 5 or 10 mm difference change in rocker made a very different feeling board. Once we got it right we would keep em within 1mm+/- in the mid to tail area. Admittedly on a SUP you can move your weight around a lot more to compensate.

To me it would be worth shelving out a few more bucks (for a thicker piece of foam) to save time and to get exactly the shape I had in mind. Anyway, as I said each to their own.

By the way, that shape looks very very nice Bnaccas. Round nose looks good to boot!
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 5:20pm
log man said...

Goaty, I get your distrust of the bend method. But for me I recon It's ok. I think getting it cut from a block by hot wire and computer is the ultimate though.Brendon did you supply foamex with the Aku file or how did you do it. $100 bucks is great.


Yep, just send them the file and pay the cash. Not using aku shaper though.
hilly
hilly
WA
8120 posts
WA, 8120 posts
27 Aug 2009 3:28pm
Bnaccas said...



Am I on the right track here? Any tips would be great!





Nice looking shape only suggestion I would make is that being a 'surf' shape you might want to thin out the foil under the back foot. Will make it easier to sink a rail when bottom turning.
JonathanC
JonathanC
VIC
1024 posts
VIC, 1024 posts
27 Aug 2009 6:04pm
Hi Brendan,

Took the liberty of taking your rocker shape and outline, smoothing things out a little and turning them into 3D. Files ready to send to the foam guys to CNC cut out of a block.

What you have here is 8'6" long x 29 1/8", 141 litres (as you see it - this would come down with rail shaping, concaves etc).

You can see the rocker taken from a straight line I put under the board, but for this imaginary line it works out at 54mm nose rocker and 26mm tail rocker - 300mm in from each end.

Rocker measurements











JonathanC
JonathanC
VIC
1024 posts
VIC, 1024 posts
27 Aug 2009 6:06pm
Forgot to mention that the shape if 107mm thick at the mid point - about 4 1/4". I'm guessing but I would think that shaping the blank would take off about 10 litres of volume.
Cam Gillies
Cam Gillies
SA
216 posts
SA, 216 posts
27 Aug 2009 5:54pm
goatman said...

Cam Gillies said...
Ive been laying a straight edge on blank, pull the ends down and move your stands back or forward depending on where you need more/less rocker, get the ruler out and start measuring at different points, stand back and have a look, then hope for the best, who says the rocker line has to be perfect, doesn't mean you have rocker right if its cut from a template, the board can still feel crap, i agree it makes it easier to adjust but how many boards are you making the one size?


I disagree Cam, but each to their own. I made high performance goatboats for 20 years and a 5 or 10 mm difference change in rocker made a very different feeling board. Once we got it right we would keep em within 1mm+/- in the mid to tail area. Admittedly on a SUP you can move your weight around a lot more to compensate.

To me it would be worth shelving out a few more bucks (for a thicker piece of foam) to save time and to get exactly the shape I had in mind. Anyway, as I said each to their own.

By the way, that shape looks very very nice Bnaccas. Round nose looks good to boot!


I hear what your saying in regard to when you get it right keep em the same but... if your having a go for the first time how do you know what rocker line etc to make templates, I think you've got as much chance as getting it right either way, it's not until you start making multiple boards can you start making adjustments to your templates to get it spot on, it's possibly quicker flexing rocker in because you don't have to shape the top. But like you said, each to their own.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 6:27pm
hilly said...
Nice looking shape only suggestion I would make is that being a 'surf' shape you might want to thin out the foil under the back foot. Will make it easier to sink a rail when bottom turning.


Yeah I was thinking about that. I like the rocker so I will probably thin it out from the top down. By the looks of Jonathan's drawings I could loose some litres. I might try get another 1/4 inch into the width and loose an inch or 2 in length with a thinner profile.

I'll post the updates tonight or tomorrow.

Jonathan, thanks for putting it into your program. I'm guessing it will loose around 14 litres after doing rails top & bottom, concaves etc from what we worked out the other day.
JonathanC
JonathanC
VIC
1024 posts
VIC, 1024 posts
27 Aug 2009 6:57pm
Instant change, 1/4 " wider, and thinned out tail from the top down. No change in rocker. Now 119 litres with shaping to come off - should work fine in 12 weeks!






oliver
oliver
3952 posts
3952 posts
27 Aug 2009 6:18pm
I wanna make my own board too - looks like great fun, making tools, playing with 3d programs, getting the blanks, dreaming up shapes.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
27 Aug 2009 9:04pm
12 weeks? You're tripping JC. I'll be slashing that thing week after next!
Or are you talking about the SHQ event?

I think it is just a fraction too thin now. Somewhere in the middle would be perfect (coming from someone who doesn't really know).
dtm
dtm
NSW
1610 posts
dtm dtm
NSW, 1610 posts
27 Aug 2009 9:06pm
shape the bottom curve first and finsh the bottom first as its the most important part and the rocker is so important to how a board goes if the rocker is out the board will go crap no matter how good you do all the rest! I would personaly never bend the rocker into the board that is just crazy talk maybe if you had a templete you are lying on the board as you do it to check that the rocker is true. i am talking from experience as ive shaped over way to many boards to count around 40 a week for a long time, also take your time when shaping as remember you can always take foam off but you cant add it and when finshing be aware that the glass will thicken up the board so if the board looks and feels perfect be aware once glassed the rail will thicken up only slightly but sometimes enough to have a negative effect
STNDUP
STNDUP
VIC
248 posts
VIC, 248 posts
27 Aug 2009 9:09pm
Bnaccas said...

12 weeks? You're tripping JC. I'll be slashing that thing week after next!
Or are you talking about the SHQ event?



..I think JC was talking about the 12 week weight loss plan! The board looks like it is going to be a ripper. Cant wait to see it as it progresses......Ronnie
laceys lane
laceys lane
QLD
19804 posts
QLD, 19804 posts
27 Aug 2009 9:11pm
119 litres is going to be tight at 84 kg's i reckon, but the wider nose will help you stability wise
cheers

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅