Downwind *Faster* than the Wind

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
chucknitro
chucknitro
VIC
2 posts
VIC, 2 posts
6 Nov 2010 6:56pm
Someone has done it apparently. And not just a little bit faster - 2.8 times wind speed!!

http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2010/11/downwind_faster_than_the_wind_black.html
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
6 Nov 2010 6:58pm
Hello David and welcome to the forum....
Blackbird is a fantastic, here is some more info on the machine..
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Land-Yacht-Sailing/General/Ride-Like-the-Wind-only-faster/
chucknitro
chucknitro
VIC
2 posts
VIC, 2 posts
7 Nov 2010 8:44am
Thanks for the welcome. Should have done a search before posting
iand
iand
QLD
243 posts
QLD, 243 posts
7 Nov 2010 8:01am
If it can accelerate up to the speed of the wind in a straight line directly downwind to the speed of the wind(zero apparent wind) then continue to accelerate to 2.8x the wind speed and maintain that speed,-would it not go even faster with a push start in zero wind(that way the apparent wind would be even stronger)
I can see how for a short time it can exceed the wind speed due to the flywheel effect of the prop but otherwise it sounds like perpetual motion to me
Besides when going through a jibe don't we regularly exceed the wind speed directly downwind for a split second[}:)]
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
7 Nov 2010 9:59am
chucknitro said...
Should have done a search before posting

Hey don't worry about that, the forum postings over time have been quite extensive, it actually must be daunting at times for newcomers. And many subjects get re hashed, join in and ask any questions you may have....

spork
spork
24 posts
24 posts
7 Nov 2010 3:08pm
iand said...

If it can accelerate up to the speed of the wind in a straight line directly downwind to the speed of the wind(zero apparent wind) then continue to accelerate to 2.8x the wind speed and maintain that speed,-would it not go even faster with a push start in zero wind(that way the apparent wind would be even stronger)


Actually, it doesn't work at all in zero wind. It's a wind powered vehicle, even though it can go faster than the wind.

I can see how for a short time it can exceed the wind speed due to the flywheel effect of the prop...


We don't use any flywheel effect. We actually have ratchets that allow the prop to freewheel rather than turn the wheels.

...but otherwise it sounds like perpetual motion to me


It's supposed to sound that way, but it's not - honest.

Besides when going through a jibe don't we regularly exceed the wind speed directly downwind for a split second


Yup - but Blackbird will go downwind at nearly 3X wind speed for as long as the wind blows.

iand
iand
QLD
243 posts
QLD, 243 posts
7 Nov 2010 6:07pm
If in 20kmh wind it can claims 2.8x directly down wind 2.8x20=56kmh
56kmh-20kmh=36kmh apparent wind
If towed or pushed up to 56kmh with no wind the apparent wind is 56kmh
could someone explain if it can go 56kmh with 36kmh apparent wind why won't it do 56kmh with 56kmh apparent wind
hills
hills
SA
1622 posts
SA, 1622 posts
7 Nov 2010 6:58pm
G'day Rick, welcome to the forum!!

Thats phenomenal stuff your doing, well done!!
Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
8 Nov 2010 1:33am
There's alot of talk about what was done and where, but lacking detail on how it works. A Science explanation, specifically simple Newtonian physics, is needed.
sn
sn
WA
2775 posts
sn sn
WA, 2775 posts
8 Nov 2010 9:22am
Elroy Jetson said...

There's alot of talk about what was done and where, but lacking detail on how it works. A Science explanation, specifically simple Newtonian physics, is needed.



what he said- but without too many big words that make my brain hurt
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
8 Nov 2010 6:36pm
From what I can work out, the yacht? is started facing down, the wind spins the prop (in reverse so to speak), the prop then drives a shaft through a ratchet drive system to the wheels. With the prop now spinning the yacht drives forward when it gets to to zero apparent wind the spinning of the prop has centrifugal force like a flywheel, this then drives it forward.... then the "forward" wind then drives the prop with the yacht running on apparent wind... VERY clever

Lots more info here.. www.fasterthanthewind.org/

If you look through the blog archive [bottom right of the screen] starting from 2009 and working up it tells about the design, the construction and how the system works.
Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
8 Nov 2010 10:57pm
Gizmo said...


Lots more info here.. www.fasterthanthewind.org/

If you look through the blog archive [bottom right of the screen] starting from 2009 and working up it tells about the design, the construction and how the system works.


I read the above website. Great story but again very light on with scientific explanations.

There is a wind powered land vehicle that has gone 3 times the speed of the wind (not straight downwind). The name of the vehicle is Greenbird. Not to be confused with the name of this vehicle, Blackbird, of course.

The website explanation and diagrams on how it works works is much more thorough by comparison. It makes perfect sense. It also explains apparent wind again. Note they have used diagrams and simple Newtonian physics.
www.greenbird.co.uk/about-the-greenbird/how-it-works


Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
8 Nov 2010 11:21pm
Wind cannot be apparent when you are going directly downwind, it's just wind.

I have one idea in my mind how this wind powered machine could work. I would like to see 3 force diagrams of the black bird operating at below wind speed, at wind speed and at above wind speed.

Even something basic like this for starters: http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/add_ocr/explaining_motion/forcesandmotionrev1.shtml

It's a big claim to go directly downwind consistently at above wind speed. Just think of the potential applications.

I reckon Walkabout Joe could benefit greatly from one of these designs. The wind from the passing roadtrains could get his machine going, give him a rest and save him a km of walking!
iand
iand
QLD
243 posts
QLD, 243 posts
9 Nov 2010 2:50am
Elroy Jetson said...

Wind cannot be apparent when you are going directly downwind, it's just wind.

How can it not be apparent-there is 2 components that make up apparent wind, speed and direction. When traveling directly downwind up until you reach the speed of the wind it is in the same direction as the true wind but decreasing, at the speed of the true wind it is zero, in excess of the true wind apparent wind is in the opposite direction to the true wind at a speed of true wind minus the speed your traveling. Other directions are best explained with vector diagrams
ThinAirD
ThinAirD
13 posts
13 posts
9 Nov 2010 5:00am
Elroy Jetson said...

There's alot of talk about what was done and where, but lacking detail on how it works. A Science explanation, specifically simple Newtonian physics, is needed.


There are plenty of those out there. Here are two treatments by renoun MIT professor Mark Drela.

http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/attachments/propulsion/28167d1231128492-ddwfttw-directly-downwind-faster-than-wind-ddw2.pdf

www.boatdesign.net/forums/attachments/propulsion/28168d1231128492-ddwfttw-directly-downwind-faster-than-wind-ddwe.pdf
ThinAirD
ThinAirD
13 posts
13 posts
9 Nov 2010 5:07am
iand said...

... could someone explain if it can go 56kmh with 36kmh apparent wind why won't it do 56kmh with 56kmh apparent wind


Because in the second case both the ground speed and the air speed are the same. Of course this means that the wind is not blowing. The Blackbird is wind powered -- if the wind stops, it stops.

Push any sailboat (or any other wind powered craft) up to speed on a day with no wind and it will quickly return to a stop.

JB

Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
9 Nov 2010 7:56am
Welcome ThinAirD to the forum...

Elroy lets explain it this way....
Your going for a ride on a bike, the wind is 20km/h and will be coming from behind for the ride this is the true wind, you ride your bike down the road... when you reach 20km/h there will be NO wind in your face as you are now equal speed with the wind that's effecting the trees around you.

If you now go faster you start to feel wind in your face and lets say the bike gets to 35km/h on the speedo how much wind is on you face? the wind in YOUR face is 15km/h and can only be apparent to you....
The people and trees that you are now passing are ONLY feeling the true wind and NOT the apparent wind that ONLY you can feel on your face.....


So this is apparent wind is the wind that is apparent to ONLY you, and this is how "Blackbird" moves... It uses this apparent wind to continue to keep the prop turning. [Blackbird needs wind from behind it.....]

The yacht "Greenbird" uses a totally different way to move along, it relies on the air moving across the wing to generate lift, similar to how an aircraft wing works.
[Greenbird needs wind coming from the side to move the yacht...]
ThinAirD
ThinAirD
13 posts
13 posts
9 Nov 2010 7:06am
Gizmo said...

Welcome ThinAirD to the forum...


Thanks Gizmo.

... the wind in YOUR face is 15km/h and can only be apparent to you....


This is correct. Apparent wind can be felt when moving *any* direction relative to the true wind ... including directly downwind.


So this is apparent wind is the wind that is apparent to ONLY you, and this is how "Blackbird" moves... It uses this apparent wind to continue to keep the prop turning.


This is actually not the case. The Blackbird is powered by the *true* wind at all times -- that is the relative motion between the air and the ground. It is *not* utilizing any apparent wind between the vehicle and the air to power itself. If your assertion were true, the vehicle would not be able to be 'under power' while exactly at windspeed. The following video demonstrates the capabilities of the vehicle to do just this.



The yacht "Greenbird" uses a totally different way to move along, ...


Actually, the propulsion system on the Greenbird and the Blackbird are identical from an aero standpoint (though different from a kinematic standpoint). The airfoil on the Greenbird is indentical in function to the airfoils on the Blackbird -- the only difference being the diameter of the circle it is carving. The Greenbird's airfoil is carving a circle the diameter of the earth while those on the Blackbird are obviously carving one substantially smaller.

Here is a video which will illustrate the above.



JB

Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
9 Nov 2010 11:30pm
ThinAirD said...

Here are two treatments by renoun MIT professor Mark Drela.

http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/attachments/propulsion/28167d1231128492-ddwfttw-directly-downwind-faster-than-wind-ddw2.pdf

www.boatdesign.net/forums/attachments/propulsion/28168d1231128492-ddwfttw-directly-downwind-faster-than-wind-ddwe.pdf


Thanks for posting but those links didn't help at me at all. Should it be presumed that other people on this forum understood the equation in it's entirety

You used the above links in these forums too.

www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=129359&page=2

www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=270041

www.physorg.com/news194851568.html



As I mentioned initially, there's alot of talk about what was done and where, but lacking detail on how it works. Your design is controversial all over the web and you and spork prefer to pick apart posters comments (see previous post example) instead of putting forward a reasoned summarised explanation of the device.

It's frustrating.

If the intention is to confuse people to keep blackbird controversial then you have been doing a great job! Full marks...


For the benefit of the readers here on seabreeze, I have found a thorough and reasonable explanation from a poster on the following forum:
skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%E2%80%A6-faster-than-the-wind/


Fred Nurk says: October 27, 2010 at 10:13 am

Here's my guess:

Three phases:
1. Slower than wind speed (relative wind coming from behind)
2. At wind speed (no relative wind)
3. Faster than wind speed (relative wind from in front)

1. At first, the prop is acting like a sail on a boat running downwind - the wind pushes on it, and moves the vehicle forward. Because the vehicle moves forward, the wheels turn the prop, actually increasing forward speed a fraction. As the cart gets faster, the prop moves faster, and is actually beginning to propel the cart. The faster the cart goes, the greater effect the prop has as a propelling force.

So to start with, the wind pushes the cart forward, but then the turning wheels drive the prop, which then pulls the cart forward. The wind is needed here to offset the inefficiency. At this stage the wheels are driving the prop, which then pulls the cart forward, helped by a pushing wind, until it reaches wind speed.

2. When the cart is going the same speed as the wind, then the wind is no longer pushing. However, the wheels are spinning at say 15mph. This drives the prop. The prop is then like an aircraft standing still, and it will pull the cart forward through the apparently still air - just like an aircraft can move forward from rest. The propulsion is supplied by the momentum of the wheels only at this point. If the cart is light enough, and the ratio worked out nicely, then the cart continues to accelerate. This is only possible because of the wind - creating a no airspeed yet fast groundspeed situation that allows the wheels to drive the prop.

In this stage, the wheels are driving the prop, and it is the prop that is providing the forward acceleration. This phase only lasts a short while until.

3. Once there is a headwind, then the prop stops acting as the propulsion, and instead acts as a windmill. The wind moves the prop, which then turns the wheels. More forward speed = more apparent wind to windmill the prop to drive the wheels = more forward speed. And the whole thing happily accelerates until it reaches its efficiency limits.


The cool thing about this is how the prop and wheels interact. At first the prop is being pushed, then it's the wheels driving the prop, then the wind driving the prop that then drives the wheels.
ThinAirD
ThinAirD
13 posts
13 posts
10 Nov 2010 1:33am
Elroy Jetson said...It's frustrating.


It's a brainteaser -- that's what good brainteasers are ... frustrating. Don't confuse your lack of understanding with us not having given a correct explanation (which we've given countless times).

In my VERY FIRST post on this thread I posted links to *two* perfectly accurate and VERY DETAILED explanations and you complain that our posts "lack detail in how it works". WTF???

Just admit that you asked for detail, I gave you detail and you don't understand detail. I don't hold it against you that you don't understand the level of detail that Drela went into -- but you certainly have no standing be blame ME for your lack of understanding by claiming I haven't given detail.

Thanks for posting but those links didn't help at me at all.


Perhaps this one will be more to your liking: dwfttw.blogspot.com/

Should it be presumed that other people on this forum understood the equation in it's entirety


I don't presume to know what anyone on such a forum understands - that takes time and communication between the parties. You asked for an explanation utilizing Newtonian physics and there is no treatment more comprensive than those from Dr. Drela.

You see Elroy, everyone wants something different -- what works for you is the exact thing that makes someone else whine like this -- "If the intention is to confuse people to keep blackbird controversial then you have been doing a great job! Full marks..."

For the benefit of the readers here on seabreeze, I have found a thorough and reasonable explanation from a poster on the following forum:
www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%E2%80%A6-faster-than-the-wind/


For an *even better* benefit of the readers here on seabreeze, I will point out that the "thorough and reasonable explanation" that you found on the forum is absolutely and fundamentally incorrect.

The propeller never drives the wheels -- ever!

JB

spork
spork
24 posts
24 posts
10 Nov 2010 3:39am
Elroy Jetson said...

There's alot of talk about what was done and where, but lacking detail on how it works. A Science explanation, specifically simple Newtonian physics, is needed.



I've given at least a dozen different explanations that are absolutely valid and vary in mathematical detail so that anyone should be able to follow. One thing I'm absolutely certain of... if I could breath life back into Newton himself and have him explain this, you'd tell him he was full of ****.

I've become comfortable with that.

Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
10 Nov 2010 11:25am

Still picking apart posts Spork.

Play the ball not the man.

This thread is starting to read like the flat earth society forums.



Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
10 Nov 2010 11:32am
spork said...


I've given at least a dozen different explanations that are absolutely valid and vary in mathematical detail so that anyone should be able to follow.



Let me predict the future: You won't post any of them here...
spork
spork
24 posts
24 posts
10 Nov 2010 11:32am
>> Still picking apart posts Spork.

Nope. Just giving you the benefit of my experience.
spork
spork
24 posts
24 posts
10 Nov 2010 11:33am
>> You won't post any of them...

I've posted all of them countless times. But you can go on insisting that I can't, won't, don't understand...
Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
10 Nov 2010 11:44am
So that's it then?

Move along nothing to see here
spork
spork
24 posts
24 posts
10 Nov 2010 11:56am
>> Move along nothing to see here

Nah - I think I'll stay and watch.
Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
10 Nov 2010 12:05pm
So you're not feeling the intense pressure to post one of your, 'dozen different explanations that are absolutely valid and vary in mathematical detail so that anyone should be able to follow'?

Flat earth society forums are a bit slow today?
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
10 Nov 2010 2:46pm
So Elroy...do you understand how a sail works with low and high pressure?
spork
spork
24 posts
24 posts
10 Nov 2010 12:17pm
Elroy Jetson said...

So you're not feeling the intense pressure...



Not so much. But if you *actually* want to understand the thing, I'll put in as much time as it takes. If you just want to be a dick we can go that way too.
Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
10 Nov 2010 12:18pm



spork said...

I've given at least a dozen different explanations that are absolutely valid and vary in mathematical detail so that anyone should be able to follow.






Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅