is the PM a coward?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Ados
Ados
WA
421 posts
WA, 421 posts
28 Jan 2012 5:52pm
worrier said...

Ados said...

Cisco,
I reckon that you probably would have been one of those that hunted Aboriginal people down like dogs.....your ignorance astounds me.

There were over 300 language groups when the colonizers came along and far from a culture in decline, people adapted to some very extreme environments, i.e. the arid regions - pretty amazing if you ask me...you'd last a day...
there are reliable C14 dates for a number of sites in many arid to semi arid areas.

as an archaelogist with 20 years experience, I have personally excavated a number of sites that have dated to more than 30 kya + .
There are a large number of dates for the Pleistocene occupation of Australia and from a scientific point of view, its pretty much agreed, and has been for some time, that Aboriginal people have been here for quite some time.

Its convenient to believe that Aboriginal cultures were in decline at the arrival of the colonizers as it makes it easier to dismiss them as irrelevant and to make the colonizers sound like saviors.....the many massacres and mistreatment belie this.

Thats all well and good for a history lesson, but that is all it bloody is.
No offence meant but all the history lessons in the world aint gonna help the future generations of aboriginals f*&K all
The tent embasy has done f*&k all for the future generations. All the young kids have are very few role models and 4 generations of pissheads and criminals to emulate.
Lving in the past /burning the flag and trashing Julia and the mad abbott aint gonna gonna break the cycle of crime, drunkenness and unemployment.

Unless these useless pricks wake up to that, they are dooming their future generations to the same **** life they have got for themselves.
Only people who can change the future is the aboriginal's themselves not the politicians or anyone else. Wallowing in selfpity and bitterness is just a gutless excuse for their own shortcommings

My thoughts anyway. Id just like to see some positive future for their kids, don't see one at the moment.
W

No offence mate - attitudes like yours are a dime a dozen.








cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
29 Jan 2012 1:49am
Ados said...

Cisco,
I reckon that you probably would have been one of those that hunted Aboriginal people down like dogs.....your ignorance astounds me.

How about leaving off with this guilt trip crap and the sins of the father visiting the son bull dust.


There were over 300 language groups when the colonizers (They catalogued this did they?)

came along and far from a culture in decline, people adapted to some very extreme environments, i.e. the arid regions - pretty amazing if you ask me... (More commonly know as survival instinct.) you'd last a day... (Marvelous this insight you have into my capabilities given that you have known me for 0 seconds.)

there are reliable C14 dates for a number of sites in many arid to semi arid areas.

as an archaelogist with 20 years experience, (I would expect you to start a sentence with a capital letter.) I have personally excavated a number of sites that have dated to more than 30 kya + .

There are a large number of dates for the Pleistocene occupation of Australia and from a scientific point of view, its pretty (So in scientific "New Speak" pretty means definitely does it?????)much agreed, (That this is the story we will tell so that the government will continue to fund us scholarly types who have never been out into the real world and earnt an honest dollar.) and has been for some (A couple of seconds??) time, that Aboriginal people have been here for quite some time. (Well that is a very precise scientific conclusion.)

Its convenient to believe that Aboriginal cultures were in decline at the arrival of the colonizers as it makes it easier to dismiss them as irrelevant and to make the colonizers sound like saviors.....the many massacres and mistreatment belie this. (More guilt trip crap. Who is paying you to come up with this rubbish?)


I challenge anybody to prove that the rock art in the Kimberlys is aboriginal in origin, does not predate aboriginal occupation of this land and that Juliar Gillard is not a red headed ranga Welsh bitch who cares not one whit about the welfare of any Australian be he/she white, black, yellow or brindle.

Ados
Ados
WA
421 posts
WA, 421 posts
29 Jan 2012 12:29am
Wow mate, sounds like you know a lot more than me.



For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.


It doesn't matter mate, I have met a lot of people with your attitude over the years and its ugly and ill-informed and downright mean.

I feel sad for you mate that you have to carry this hate with you wherever you go.



cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
29 Jan 2012 2:43am
^^^^You think you know who and what I am based on what?

P.S. Spare me your pity or sorrow. I am quite comfortable with myself.
pierrec45
pierrec45
NSW
2005 posts
NSW, 2005 posts
29 Jan 2012 7:36am
said...
I am quite comfortable with myself.

No doubt. I met a few ignorant hating conspirationists recently on a b-trip in a US southern town.
I was surprised how comfortable they are in their hatrid, and how much some hillbillies would try to impart their hate "I found a web site that says...".

They pretty much use this same self-serving view of yours: "I do not disrespect any man or woman unless they deserve it".
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
29 Jan 2012 2:28pm
cisco said...I challenge anybody to prove that the rock art in the Kimberlys is aboriginal in origin, does not predate aboriginal occupation of this land and that Juliar Gillard is not a red headed ranga Welsh bitch who cares not one whit about the welfare of any Australian be he/she white, black, yellow or brindle.


Reads to me like you are trying to validate one point with another, which is on a completely different subject.
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
29 Jan 2012 2:30pm
I think Julia might actually be quite tough. Can you imagine going to work every day and pretending to be someone that you are not

It would be awful[}:)]
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
29 Jan 2012 7:06pm


what.....? human.....?
mineral1
mineral1
WA
4564 posts
WA, 4564 posts
29 Jan 2012 4:21pm
We all finished whinging about who was here first, who stole what from which mob and wont give it back,? cos the topic heading is:
"Is the PM a coward?"
Get back on topic for goodness sake. You want to have a sledge fest, start your own topic, and respect Mr Floats original topic.
weiry
weiry
QLD
5396 posts
QLD, 5396 posts
29 Jan 2012 6:26pm
mineral1 said...

We all finished whinging about who was here first, who stole what from which mob and wont give it back,? cos the topic heading is:
"Is the PM a coward?"
Get back on topic for goodness sake. You want to have a sledge fest, start your own topic, and respect Mr Floats original topic.


+1
Mr float
Mr float
NSW
3452 posts
NSW, 3452 posts
29 Jan 2012 8:25pm
mineral1 said...

We all finished whinging about who was here first, who stole what from which mob and wont give it back,? cos the topic heading is:
"Is the PM a coward?"
Get back on topic for goodness sake. You want to have a sledge fest, start your own topic, and respect Mr Floats original topic.


yes please .Whoa ,this one is spiraling out of control
Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7269 posts
WA, 7269 posts
29 Jan 2012 5:47pm
I have changed my mind. She is a coward. A big fat coward.

She has not ever mentioned to the Chinese that their attempts to melt the polar ice caps and then fly the planet earth out of orbit around the sun to find another star is un-Australian. Only Razzamatazzinator is willing to tackle this tricky internationally sensitive diplomatic issue.

And she has never been up to Ningaloo to hold a community forum with the goats to let them know just how unpopular their 'pro-goat within a marine park' stance is, and how the turtles vote too.

And, she has not visited northern NSW, sat on a throne on the river bank and ordered the floods and rain back to where it came from and ushered in a summer of seabreezes.

What a frigging whooss. If I was allowed to vote I would seriously consider voting for somebody else.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
30 Jan 2012 9:39am
cisco said...

^^^^You think you know who and what I am based on what?

P.S. Spare me your pity or sorrow. I am quite comfortable with myself.


So, what? you're happy being a bigot, happy being a racist, happy, happy,happy
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
30 Jan 2012 11:00am
Yes, I think Gillard is a coward. She is too cowardly to hold referendums on important issues and she is too cowardly to hold an election so we can get rid of her.
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
30 Jan 2012 11:45am
Ados said...

For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.



A few years ago I was working on several programs for SBS and ABC about Aboriginal housing in Australia and it opened my eyes to the complexity of the problem.
Just a question for you Ados as you have as you said "I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life"
The question is... How many years / generations should the indigenous community be virtually fully supported,1,2....10, 20, 50 or forever more? And at what level of Aboriginal blood should be regarded as indigenous and what would be the cut off point?

Ados
Ados
WA
421 posts
WA, 421 posts
30 Jan 2012 9:38am
Gizmo said...

Ados said...

For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.



A few years ago I was working on several programs for SBS and ABC about Aboriginal housing in Australia and it opened my eyes to the complexity of the problem.
Just a question for you Ados as you have as you said "I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life"
The question is... How many years / generations should the indigenous community be virtually fully supported,1,2....10, 20, 50 or forever more? And at what level of Aboriginal blood should be regarded as indigenous and what would be the cut off point?




Gizmo,
My guess is you already have the answers. Your last question doesn't make any sense.


Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
30 Jan 2012 12:39pm
Ados said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.



A few years ago I was working on several programs for SBS and ABC about Aboriginal housing in Australia and it opened my eyes to the complexity of the problem.
Just a question for you Ados as you have as you said "I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life"
The question is... How many years / generations should the indigenous community be virtually fully supported,1,2....10, 20, 50 or forever more? And at what level of Aboriginal blood should be regarded as indigenous and what would be the cut off point?




Gizmo,
My guess is you already have the answers. Your last question doesn't make any sense.





When I did those programs I went in with a preconceived idea of how to solve the housing problem... but came away with not knowing of how the housing problem could be solved successfully to benefit ALL sides.

The last part of my question to you is at the moment the Australian tax payer / Government would be fair to say financially supports the indigenous community of Australia, how long should the Government continue to do so.... Should they still be supported in the same as they are at the moment in say 5 or 10 generations?

And I have no idea of what the answer is or should be, I actually think it's a problem the Australian population will need to face in the years to come.

Little Jon
Little Jon
NSW
2115 posts
NSW, 2115 posts
30 Jan 2012 1:59pm
SomeOtherGuy said...

cisco said...

The "protesters" were full of hate and wound up for a stousch and you are just as bad soggy.


A stousch which Abbott gave them a trigger for. The idiot.

So yes, my opinion - and one I'm not ashamed of - is that Abbott is a dick on legs.


Or a turd with big ears
Ados
Ados
WA
421 posts
WA, 421 posts
30 Jan 2012 11:09am
Gizmo said...

Ados said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.



A few years ago I was working on several programs for SBS and ABC about Aboriginal housing in Australia and it opened my eyes to the complexity of the problem.
Just a question for you Ados as you have as you said "I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life"
The question is... How many years / generations should the indigenous community be virtually fully supported,1,2....10, 20, 50 or forever more? And at what level of Aboriginal blood should be regarded as indigenous and what would be the cut off point?




Gizmo,
My guess is you already have the answers. Your last question doesn't make any sense.





When I did those programs I went in with a preconceived idea of how to solve the housing problem... but came away with not knowing of how the housing problem could be solved successfully to benefit ALL sides.

The last part of my question to you is at the moment the Australian tax payer / Government would be fair to say financially supports the indigenous community of Australia, how long should the Government continue to do so.... Should they still be supported in the same as they are at the moment in say 5 or 10 generations?

And I have no idea of what the answer is or should be, I actually think it's a problem the Australian population will need to face in the years to come.




Like you, I have no answers - and you are right, its a very complex problem.

FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
30 Jan 2012 11:11am
cisco said...

Yes, I think Gillard is a coward. She is too cowardly to hold referendums on important issues and she is too cowardly to hold an election so we can get rid of her.


Coward - "a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition, pain, etc.; a timid or easily intimidated person."

Wouldn't a coward actually hold referendums, and hold an election to avoid a difficult situation? So, by your own comments, does that mean that you in that position would be a coward?

What politician ever voluntarily holds an election they think they will lose? Anybody that makes it that far as a politician is smart enough not to do something that stupid.

Referendums? What are the issues big enough to warrant the expense of a referendum? The only people that seem to call for referendums are the people that disagree with the decision of the government. I suspect that the same people would call for another referendum if the previous one disagreed with their own beliefs.

Imagine if we had to have a referendum on any issue where the public disagreed...

SomeOtherGuy
SomeOtherGuy
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
30 Jan 2012 5:07pm
FormulaNova said...

cisco said...

Yes, I think Gillard is a coward. She is too cowardly to hold referendums on important issues and she is too cowardly to hold an election so we can get rid of her.


Coward - "a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition, pain, etc.; a timid or easily intimidated person."

Wouldn't a coward actually hold referendums, and hold an election to avoid a difficult situation? So, by your own comments, does that mean that you in that position would be a coward?

What politician ever voluntarily holds an election they think they will lose? Anybody that makes it that far as a politician is smart enough not to do something that stupid.

Referendums? What are the issues big enough to warrant the expense of a referendum? The only people that seem to call for referendums are the people that disagree with the decision of the government. I suspect that the same people would call for another referendum if the previous one disagreed with their own beliefs.

Imagine if we had to have a referendum on any issue where the public disagreed...




To be honest, I wouldn't mind an election or a referendum on the question of whether the Libs supporters are a bunch of whiny losers. They haven't shut up since Rudd won office and they get worse by the day!
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
30 Jan 2012 6:04pm
I do not think she is a coward. I think she is a sociopath or a psychopath, whatever, Like a lot of the bastards in high positions, she has no conscience.

The sad thing is is that the majority of everyday Australians mistake this for being tough and put them on pedestals and positions of power,

It is not being tough, it is simple a lack of conscience
Mr float
Mr float
NSW
3452 posts
NSW, 3452 posts
30 Jan 2012 9:23pm
japie said...

I do not think she is a coward. I think she is a sociopath or a psychopath, whatever, Like a lot of the bastards in high positions, she has no conscience.

The sad thing is is that the majority of everyday Australians mistake this for being tough and put them on pedestals and positions of power,

It is not being tough, it is simple a lack of conscience


japie what are you doing tapping away at the keyboards when there was EPIC CHOCOLATE WIND today .i had a great sesh all to myself on perfect glassy water and x shore to some nice waves .
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
31 Jan 2012 1:20am
Gizmo said...

Ados said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.


A few years ago I was working on several programs for SBS and ABC about Aboriginal housing in Australia and it opened my eyes to the complexity of the problem.
Just a question for you Ados as you have as you said "I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life"
The question is... How many years / generations should the indigenous community be virtually fully supported,1,2....10, 20, 50 or forever more? And at what level of Aboriginal blood should be regarded as indigenous and what would be the cut off point?

Gizmo,
My guess is you already have the answers. Your last question doesn't make any sense.

When I did those programs I went in with a preconceived idea of how to solve the housing problem... but came away with not knowing of how the housing problem could be solved successfully to benefit ALL sides.

The last part of my question to you is at the moment the Australian tax payer / Government would be fair to say financially supports the indigenous community of Australia, how long should the Government continue to do so.... Should they still be supported in the same as they are at the moment in say 5 or 10 generations?

And I have no idea of what the answer is or should be, I actually think it's a problem the Australian population will need to face in the years to come.


Very interesting point you have raised there Gizmo.

With the current "political correct thinking" that is so pervasive in Austrialian culture one would think that "equal rights for all" would be what it is all about.

I would like to have "equal rights" to the benefits that aboriginal people, be they full blood or any degree of dilution or of a mental conviction or declaration of aboriginalality, have. Such as free education for my children, low interest loans with repayment not enforceable, just to mention a couple.

I would like to have "equal rights" to the benefits that the so called "boat people REFUGEES" have such as free accomodation, free food, free mobile phones with unlimited FREE internationalcalls, free cigarettes and free MONEY just to name a few.

So how did that popular song go:- "We are the world, we are the people, we gotta find a better place for you and me."

Yeah!! ......I'm in.

Ados
Ados
WA
421 posts
WA, 421 posts
31 Jan 2012 1:11am
cisco said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.


A few years ago I was working on several programs for SBS and ABC about Aboriginal housing in Australia and it opened my eyes to the complexity of the problem.
Just a question for you Ados as you have as you said "I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life"
The question is... How many years / generations should the indigenous community be virtually fully supported,1,2....10, 20, 50 or forever more? And at what level of Aboriginal blood should be regarded as indigenous and what would be the cut off point?

Gizmo,
My guess is you already have the answers. Your last question doesn't make any sense.

When I did those programs I went in with a preconceived idea of how to solve the housing problem... but came away with not knowing of how the housing problem could be solved successfully to benefit ALL sides.

The last part of my question to you is at the moment the Australian tax payer / Government would be fair to say financially supports the indigenous community of Australia, how long should the Government continue to do so.... Should they still be supported in the same as they are at the moment in say 5 or 10 generations?

And I have no idea of what the answer is or should be, I actually think it's a problem the Australian population will need to face in the years to come.


Very interesting point you have raised there Gizmo.

With the current "political correct thinking" that is so pervasive in Austrialian culture one would think that "equal rights for all" would be what it is all about.

I would like to have "equal rights" to the benefits that aboriginal people, be they full blood or any degree of dilution or of a mental conviction or declaration of aboriginalality, have. Such as free education for my children, low interest loans with repayment not enforceable, just to mention a couple.

I would like to have "equal rights" to the benefits that the so called "boat people REFUGEES" have such as free accomodation, free food, free mobile phones with unlimited FREE internationalcalls, free cigarettes and free MONEY just to name a few.

So how did that popular song go:- "We are the world, we are the people, we gotta find a better place for you and me."

Yeah!! ......I'm in.




I think you should look up the word - 'entitled'
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
31 Jan 2012 4:07pm
cisco said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.


A few years ago I was working on several programs for SBS and ABC about Aboriginal housing in Australia and it opened my eyes to the complexity of the problem.
Just a question for you Ados as you have as you said "I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life"
The question is... How many years / generations should the indigenous community be virtually fully supported,1,2....10, 20, 50 or forever more? And at what level of Aboriginal blood should be regarded as indigenous and what would be the cut off point?

Gizmo,
My guess is you already have the answers. Your last question doesn't make any sense.

When I did those programs I went in with a preconceived idea of how to solve the housing problem... but came away with not knowing of how the housing problem could be solved successfully to benefit ALL sides.

The last part of my question to you is at the moment the Australian tax payer / Government would be fair to say financially supports the indigenous community of Australia, how long should the Government continue to do so.... Should they still be supported in the same as they are at the moment in say 5 or 10 generations?

And I have no idea of what the answer is or should be, I actually think it's a problem the Australian population will need to face in the years to come.


Very interesting point you have raised there Gizmo.

With the current "political correct thinking" that is so pervasive in Austrialian culture one would think that "equal rights for all" would be what it is all about.

I would like to have "equal rights" to the benefits that aboriginal people, be they full blood or any degree of dilution or of a mental conviction or declaration of aboriginalality, have. Such as free education for my children, low interest loans with repayment not enforceable, just to mention a couple.

I would like to have "equal rights" to the benefits that the so called "boat people REFUGEES" have such as free accomodation, free food, free mobile phones with unlimited FREE internationalcalls, free cigarettes and free MONEY just to name a few.

So how did that popular song go:- "We are the world, we are the people, we gotta find a better place for you and me."

Yeah!! ......I'm in.




Cassa
Cassa
WA
1305 posts
WA, 1305 posts
31 Jan 2012 7:34pm
cisco said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

Gizmo said...

Ados said...

For what its worth, I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life. I've seen the worst and best of things and everything in between. But in the end, the people I have come to call family are no different to you or I.


A few years ago I was working on several programs for SBS and ABC about Aboriginal housing in Australia and it opened my eyes to the complexity of the problem.
Just a question for you Ados as you have as you said "I have worked and lived with Aboriginal people for most of my working life"
The question is... How many years / generations should the indigenous community be virtually fully supported,1,2....10, 20, 50 or forever more? And at what level of Aboriginal blood should be regarded as indigenous and what would be the cut off point?

Gizmo,
My guess is you already have the answers. Your last question doesn't make any sense.

When I did those programs I went in with a preconceived idea of how to solve the housing problem... but came away with not knowing of how the housing problem could be solved successfully to benefit ALL sides.

The last part of my question to you is at the moment the Australian tax payer / Government would be fair to say financially supports the indigenous community of Australia, how long should the Government continue to do so.... Should they still be supported in the same as they are at the moment in say 5 or 10 generations?

And I have no idea of what the answer is or should be, I actually think it's a problem the Australian population will need to face in the years to come.


Very interesting point you have raised there Gizmo.

With the current "political correct thinking" that is so pervasive in Austrialian culture one would think that "equal rights for all" would be what it is all about.

I would like to have "equal rights" to the benefits that aboriginal people, be they full blood or any degree of dilution or of a mental conviction or declaration of aboriginalality, have. Such as free education for my children, low interest loans with repayment not enforceable, just to mention a couple.

I would like to have "equal rights" to the benefits that the so called "boat people REFUGEES" have such as free accomodation, free food, free mobile phones with unlimited FREE internationalcalls, free cigarettes and free MONEY just to name a few.

So how did that popular song go:- "We are the world, we are the people, we gotta find a better place for you and me."

Yeah!! ......I'm in.



Sign me up too
shame the reality of what shoud be !!! Isn't
SomeOtherGuy
SomeOtherGuy
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
31 Jan 2012 10:54pm
Cassa said...
Sign me up too
shame the reality of what shoud be !!! Isn't


You and cisco can sign up to the asylum malarky anytime. Just leave the country, come back in on a boat and say "I'm a [insert nationality here] national and I request asylum". No probs.

So go ahead. If it's such a great lark, what's stopping you?
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
1 Feb 2012 3:57am
Why go to the trouble of the dangerous boat trip etc.

As you say:- Just front up to your nearset immigration office and say

"I'm an [insert nationality hereAustralian] national and I request asylum". No probs.

myusernam
myusernam
QLD
6158 posts
QLD, 6158 posts
1 Feb 2012 8:59am
If you are referring to the tent embassy thing is that all you could get out of that? Her security detail would make all decisions about that and I daresay she would simply follow any recommendations. She would be foolish if she did not.

What about the atrocious behaviour of the tent embassy people. Militant white blackfellas that live in canberra?

At what point does the past become the past? Will the 1/50th aboriginal in 2150 still be damanding something? Am I entitled to something from the Romans?

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅