petermac33 said...
ginger pom... some more quotes taken out of context and proving nothing.
you are living in self-denial my friend.
''it does not matter what is true, it only matters what people beliieve is true'' Paul Watson co-founder of Greenpeace''.
please explain how this can be taken out of context.
i suppose you also believe Gordon Brown was also being ''taken out of context and proving nothing'' when he called for a New World Order, something like 6 times in a speech he gave a few months back.
if evidence like this is allowed to be dismissed as ''out of context'' then this would make a mockery of the courts.
larry silverstein '' i spoke to the firefighter commander and we have had such terrible loss of life that we decided the best thing to do was PULL the building and we stood back and watched the building collapse''.
you cannot stand back and watch a building collapse unless it is a PLANNED building collapse.
this is an obvious fact to all.... short of those living in self-denial.
do you believe also Larry Silverstein was being ''taken out of context and proving nothing'' when he gaffed live on television by saying this.
You have walked straight into this one!!
To everyone else, Larry Silverstein wasn't referring to the twin towers. He was referring to the World Trade centre 7 - a building next door that got hit by the falling towers - and later fell. Peter holds a commonly held conspiracy theory about 911 being caused by the US government or some evil subdivision of it...
I'm not a civil engineer but I do accept that civil engineers know more about it than I do...
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htmSuffice to say that you believe that 911 was an action by the US government... and I don'tNext point
We may need to do something to the way that we govern/oversee the world in order to deal with climate change. This is because there's too much of a free rider benefit for countries. Free rider is a concept from game theory that means someone can take advantage of a benefit while contributing nothing to it.
Climate change is similar - all countries will get the benefits of reduced climate change regardless of their contributions towards it. So why should any of them bother to change their own policies. There's no disincentive not to be the dirtiest most CO2 emitting country in the world. If countries cannot be made to keep their promises then what hope do we have...
Of course, you wouldn't trust this new world order because you believe that the current world order sent two planes into the twin towers...
Next point (and my favorite)
''it does not matter what is true, it only matters what people beliieve is true'' Paul Watson co-founder of Greenpeace.
IT IS TRUE THAT Paul Watson is not in Greenpeace any more and was thrown out of Greenpeace before I was born in 1977. By referring to him as the co-founder but omitting to mention that he left 32 years ago, you are misleading people. He was definitely an early member but that's it...
Therefore you have misled the other people on this thread for some reason.
Either you are ignorant and you didn't check the first paragraph of the Wikipedia page on Paul Watson
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Watson... or you did it on purpose and
you yourself agree with the quote.
To be clearer... In your next post please answer with I AM IGNORANT or I BELIEVE THE QUOTE
The quote is valid. It's not evil or manipulative. People act on their beliefs. If something is true and no-one believes it then no one will act on it. If climate change is true but no-one believes it then no one will act on it... as a leader of an organisation (He is the founder and president of Sea Shepherd - an organisation which stops Japanese people killing whales and judging by car stickers is EXTREMELY well supported by surfers and windsurfers), he is suggesting that focus goes into convincing people of the truth... rather than squandering time convincing deliberately stubborn people on windsurfing forums when you should be out in the garage cleaning the van out...