Who do we vote for?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
28 Jun 2013 4:51pm
Glitch said..

Who to vote for? When we voted for Kev we got Jules. When we voted for Jules we get Kev. So when we vote for an Abbot ,do we get a Bishop or Joe or Malcolm.........



We should all be so lucky to get Malcolm!!!
dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
28 Jun 2013 6:13pm
subasurf said..
There are some great leaders out there in the business world.

Too true, but they're nearly all miners, businessmen, capitalists or conservatives. Hmmmm, now there's a good question. How does that work?

tmurray
tmurray
WA
485 posts
WA, 485 posts
28 Jun 2013 11:11pm
r
whippingboy said..

We get Tony the pom ....

"We have a strong and credible broadband policy because the man who has devised it, the man who will implement it, virtually invented the internet in this country. Thank you so much Malcolm Turnbull,"


I liked Malcolm anyway, but that was before I knew he invented the internet in Australia. Now I reckon he's tops.
jfunk
jfunk
QLD
255 posts
QLD, 255 posts
29 Jun 2013 9:07am

subasurf said..

You vote for the party, not the leader.


No, you vote for your local member. He/she is your representative in the Australian parliament.

The party system is a construct formed so like minded members could pass legislation when they had a majority of the numbers. The party system we live with and which has corrupted our political system does not exist in the constitution. It is just a convention that has been created by politicians. The office of PM is exactly the same.

If you want a decent political system, all you have to do is hold your local member accountable. They are beholden to you, not their party for their position. Imagine, politicians representing their electorate and doing their job.

Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
29 Jun 2013 10:21am
Jfunk said..


subasurf said..

You vote for the party, not the leader.


No, you vote for your local member. He/she is your representative in the Australian parliament.

The party system is a construct formed so like minded members could pass legislation when they had a majority of the numbers. The party system we live with and which has corrupted our political system does not exist in the constitution. It is just a convention that has been created by politicians. The office of PM is exactly the same.

If you want a decent political system, all you have to do is hold your local member accountable. They are beholden to you, not their party for their position. Imagine, politicians representing their electorate and doing their job.



Totally agree Jfunk. Nowhere in the Australian constitution is a party ever mentioned. However they dominate our politics, to our detriment. Representative democracy is a system of represention based on electors electing someone to represent them, not a party. Party politics is an anathema to representation and is more akin to mob rule than democracy.

The two major political parties and their elected MPs have more in common with each other than with the people they supposibly represent. Sure the grass roots of each party is different. However the actual members of the ALP and Liberals have a decreasing influence of their party. Whenever the members get in the way of the leaders, tactics like branch stacking make long standing membership irrelevant. No wonder membership of political parties is decreasing. Seems like the only people who join them now are those who hope to climb the greasy pole, lick some arses and get on the gravy train of the political system. While decent hard working Australians turn away from what has become and incredibly hypocritical and self serving system. The legislation they pass frees them to reward themselves and their organisation at the expense of the community who are their servants.

The only way parties and their bosses will ever get the message is if safe electorates, which are prizes and rewards for those who climb the political ladder, become marginal, flip the other way, or elect independent MPs. This is the only way MPs will start doing the job as it is under the consitition, representing the people, not the party.
pepe47
pepe47
WA
1382 posts
WA, 1382 posts
29 Jun 2013 8:51am
Really doesn't matter who you vote for, you'll end up with a politician.
beastsurf
beastsurf
WA
902 posts
WA, 902 posts
29 Jun 2013 11:09am
I think the last person you want running the country is a corporate wanker. Heaven forbid politics in this country might end up looking like the surfing industry.

My vote is for Jobe Watson he seems like an honest bloke. Thats what they are all saying even though he is a drug cheat. He would fit the political bill just nice.
gibberjoe
gibberjoe
SA
956 posts
SA, 956 posts
29 Jun 2013 12:59pm



Our 1st Prime Minister got it right!! Read this..

Perhaps this is one email that needs to be forwarded until every Australian with a computer receives it.

The year is 1907, over one hundred years ago....

Sir Edmund Barton's ideas on Immigrants and being an Australian in 1907.

'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an Australian and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an Australian, and nothing but an Australian. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an Australian, but something else also, isn't an Australian at all. We have room for but one flag, the Australian flag. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the Australian people.'

Edmund Barton
1907
beastsurf
beastsurf
WA
902 posts
WA, 902 posts
29 Jun 2013 12:31pm
Edmund was right on the money I reckon. He summed it up just right for 1907. Nice to know we have come a long way in the last 100 years. I reckon that d**khead in Syria would attest to edmun's sermon at the moment.
mineral1
mineral1
WA
4564 posts
WA, 4564 posts
29 Jun 2013 12:44pm
You will vote for who our forefathers told you to vote for. The shooftee ol buggers set it up like that, so all their descendents from their ilk would remain in power.
Its called the "preferential voting system."
Just because you vote for candidate X does not mean that first past the post wins. Two others contesting may share their preferences and thus may, combined, out poll your candidate you can well end up with some dropkick you don?t want.

Take Greens and Labour, most times they share preferences. This gives one a leg up, so a conservative contesting may not get in, even if he is first past the post (has most singular votes)
Same for Libs Nats/Country
Clive Palmer?s mob are a typical group saying they are the answer. And on first look they may well be, but most it?s a bloody big con, as they will share preferences to allow one of the like minded group to out manoeuvre a strong single contestant.
An independent is one out of the box, usually well liked in his/her community. They , once elected, then play the preference game to stay in a seat Nothing wrong with that play, as its legal, but hard to shift once they are in.
sn
sn
WA
2775 posts
sn sn
WA, 2775 posts
29 Jun 2013 12:48pm
Jfunk said..

No, you vote for your local member. He/she is your representative in the Australian parliament.

The party system is a construct formed so like minded members could pass legislation when they had a majority of the numbers. The party system we live with and which has corrupted our political system does not exist in the constitution. It is just a convention that has been created by politicians. The office of PM is exactly the same.

If you want a decent political system, all you have to do is hold your local member accountable. They are beholden to you, not their party for their position. Imagine, politicians representing their electorate and doing their job.



It was explained to me many years ago, that for an Aussie politician to give thier allegience to anything other than thier constituents and the country-[ for example- to a political party] is a treasonous offence.
Our constitution was apparently originally set up this way to prevent party politics taking hold and stuffing the country.

I dont know how accurate this is, anyone care to clarify?
jfunk
jfunk
QLD
255 posts
QLD, 255 posts
29 Jun 2013 5:20pm
The constitution is not very long, it's a quick read. Take the time.
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
29 Jun 2013 9:52pm
Jfunk said..

No, you vote for your local member. He/she is your representative in the Australian parliament.

Absolutely correct!!

If you want a decent political system, all you have to do is hold your local member accountable. They are beholden to you, not their party for their position. Imagine, politicians representing their electorate and doing their job.



A pity we cannot go with the ancient Greek's system. The constituents would send their representative to parliament and if he did not re-present them the way they wanted, when he returned home, they would hang him or tar and feather him.

We then would not need the Democrats to "Keep the Bastards Honest".

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅