I would happily look at any studies on the genetic disorders you can link, including the claim regarding magnesium deficiency. I strongly suspect it is a case of increased diagnosis not occurance, but I am happy to be shown differently.
I had included accounting for increased diagnosis based on incentives to do so in my original comment but then my phone shutdown before I pressed enter and I just wasn't keen to rewrite the whole comment.
Here's the very first article that came up on Google.
There's a chart showing increased prevalence down the page. Of course this is just one condition caused by the ultra-processed wildly imbalanced nutritional mess that's offered up to the chromosomes.
www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
Here's the very first article that came up on Google.
There's a chart showing increased prevalence down the page. Of course this is just one condition caused by the ultra-processed wildly imbalanced nutritional mess that's offered up to the chromosomes.
www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
Actually to correct your statement, the charts show reported prevelance. A direct quote from the link you provided:
"The reported prevalence of ASD has been higher in recent years, and this trend is consistent across data sources. It is unclear how much this is due to changes to the clinical definition of ASD (which may include more people than previous definitions) and better efforts to diagnose ASD (which would identify people with ASD who were not previously identified)."
There is no doubt identification and diagnosis is up. But it is not clear if it is just increased testing or increased occurance. Many people diagnosed with ASD these days were simply part of the human spectrum when I was growing up. My family takes great delight in picking which members would have been diagnosed with ASD back in the day. So sorry I cannot see any compelling evidence there are increasing rates of occurance of genertic disorders from your links.