Just reminding you that all of those medical professionals who made sure you didn't lose your leg... studied at a university. But then what do you care when you mooched $5,865 from the windsurfing community.
Just wow - why does Seabreeze allow you to still post on here?
You should be banned indefinitely evidenced from the above.
I just looked up the mention of this on the forum back in 2019. Good to hear that PM33 is obviously healed up as it would have been a pretty traumatic hat he had a mobile phone back in those days according to the comments.
Someone on the go-fund-me made a donation and said this:
"Big Pharma
$500 6 yrs
This way it will cost less to pump PM33 full of our drugs than a monkey. But we might learn as much.
"
Reading about it again, I can confidently say that I would rather not have the accident and forfeit the $5,865. I am sure everyone would feel the same.
Good point. PM33 was protected from covid by vaccinated people via herd immunity. Mobile phone-owning people called university-trained medical professionals who stabilised him and took him to hospital. There, university-trained surgeons worked on his leg using "Big Pharma" medications. Then his recovery was supported by GoFundMe donations from fellow windsurfers.
I just looked up the mention of this on the forum back in 2019. Good to hear that PM33 is obviously healed up as it would have been a pretty traumatic hat he had a mobile phone back in those days according to the comments.
Someone on the go-fund-me made a donation and said this:
"Big Pharma
$500 6 yrs
This way it will cost less to pump PM33 full of our drugs than a monkey. But we might learn as much.
"
Reading about it again, I can confidently say that I would rather not have the accident and forfeit the $5,865. I am sure everyone would feel the same.
Good point. PM33 was protected from covid by vaccinated people via herd immunity. Mobile phone-owning people called University-trained medical professionals who stabilised him and took him to hospital. There university trained surgeons worked on his leg using Big Pharma medications. Then his recovery was supported by GoFundMe donations.
Going off on a tangent, it's pretty remarkable when you think about it. A few hundred years ago you would be lucky if you didn't die from blood poisoning, and now, you can have pretty intrusive damage and still have a pretty good chance of recovery. And its getting better all the time.
Medical science has progressed so much in the last 50 or 60 years, it makes you wonder how much better its going to get.
I was talking to someone about surgery I had about 10 years ago. They sliced me open to do the repairs, but now they do the same procedure with key-hole surgery. I have also had both shoulders repaired using key-hole procedures, and its so impressive that you can do something like that and have pretty good recovery times.
Its fine for PM33 to have his beliefs, but when the rubber hits the road, the medics treating all of us know their stuff. Mostly.
Just reminding you that all of those medical professionals who made sure you didn't lose your leg... studied at a university. But then what do you care when you mooched $5,865 from the windsurfing community.
Just wow - why does Seabreeze allow you to still post on here?
You should be banned indefinitely evidenced from the above.
Why? Compared to the stuff you imply about people that don't conform with your antiquated outlook on the world, that's an Albanese wet lettuce slap.
And well done Remery, you have made it to halfway for a established innings on SB. If it's a windy weekend I am sure you could get to next week before PcD sends off his letter to the editor.
Just reminding you that all of those medical professionals who made sure you didn't lose your leg... studied at a university. But then what do you care when you mooched $5,865 from the windsurfing community.
Just wow - why does Seabreeze allow you to still post on here?
You should be banned indefinitely evidenced from the above.
Why? Compared to the stuff you imply about people that don't conform with your antiquated outlook on the world, that's an Albanese wet lettuce slap.
And well done Remery, you have made it to halfway for a established innings on SB. If it's a windy weekend I am sure you could get to next week before PcD sends off his letter to the editor.
It's sort of funny when you see the above where 'PCD' is suggesting that someone get banned indefinitely. Some people come back and then come back, and then come back..
Those who grew up with siblings recognise who in society are the tell-tail Karens. Complaining and moaning is a full time occupation for these dower people.
Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic
Highlights
-Common ancestor of SARS-CoV-2 linked to Huanan market matches the global common ancestor
-Wildlife mitochondrial DNA identified in samples from stalls positive for SARS-CoV-2
-DNA from raccoon dogs, civets, and other wildlife species detected in market samples
-Genotypes of potential hosts were reconstructed for retracing animal geographic origins
Discussion
Extensive epidemiological evidence supports wildlife trade at the Huanan market as the most likely conduit for the COVID-19 pandemic's origin.3,76 Herein, we both describe metagenomic evidence for identification of the plausible intermediate host species at the market, and analyze metagenomic and phylogenetic evidence that further supports the hypothesis of zoonotic emergence at this location.
www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(24)00901-2
Bret Weinstein explaining the logic behind his U-turn on vaccines. Context: He and his wife Heather co-authored the best selling book A Hunter Gatherer's Guide to the 21st Century in which they listed vaccines along with antibiotics and surgery as medicines top three achievement's.
x.com/nameisspartacus/status/1836951707055706510?s=46&t=1GB2TIBB90HpGgoUCFAO5w
Just reminding you that all of those medical professionals who made sure you didn't lose your leg... studied at a university. But then what do you care when you mooched $5,865 from the windsurfing community.
Filthy, disgusting post. Your lowest yet.
I was under the impression personal attacks were not allowed on this forum?
Just reminding you that all of those medical professionals who made sure you didn't lose your leg... studied at a university. But then what do you care when you mooched $5,865 from the windsurfing community.
Filthy, disgusting post. Your lowest yet.
I was under the impression personal attacks were not allowed on this forum?
I think that last part was true up until recently and then some idiot* campaigned for 'freedom of speech' ![]()
*Sorry, I couldn't help using that term, just for comedic effect.
Mind you, I think 'freedom of speech' actually means something like 'holding an opinion' and not necessarily a freedom to express it whenever and wherever you want. But I could be wrong. If I am, don't tell me.
Just reminding you that all of those medical professionals who made sure you didn't lose your leg... studied at a university. But then what do you care when you mooched $5,865 from the windsurfing community.
Filthy, disgusting post. Your lowest yet.
I was under the impression personal attacks were not allowed on this forum?
Just as a tangent to this, to show you the reality, when you had your accident people were happy to contribute for something that we all could have experienced. You made some comment at the time about feeling unsure about the donations, but clearly there is no need to worry about that, we would all expect you to need the money and to not feel any obligation at all.
Mind you, I think 'freedom of speech' actually means something like 'holding an opinion' and not necessarily a freedom to express it whenever and wherever you want. But I could be wrong. If I am, don't tell me.
Sharing different opinions is what this forum is mostly about.
Posting filthy, disgusting remarks should be removed.
Mind you, I think 'freedom of speech' actually means something like 'holding an opinion' and not necessarily a freedom to express it whenever and wherever you want. But I could be wrong. If I am, don't tell me.
Sharing different opinions is what this forum is mostly about.
Posting filthy, disgusting remarks should be removed.
Methinks you might be experiencing that 'Freedom of Speech' is sometimes an unexpected double-edged sword.
I don't think anyone who routinely flouts the description and accepted forum rule:
"Lightweight discussion of most things (excludes politics, religion, racism, hatred & conspiracies)", would have any grounds to complain though.
"Lightweight discussion of most things (excludes politics, religion, racism, hatred & conspiracies)", would have any grounds to complain though.
Without politics aka what is happening to our world i am not sure there would still be a General Discussion.
Certainly a much less popular one.
Posting blatant hate just serves to bring the forum down.
Mind you, I think 'freedom of speech' actually means something like 'holding an opinion' and not necessarily a freedom to express it whenever and wherever you want. But I could be wrong. If I am, don't tell me.
Sharing different opinions is what this forum is mostly about.
Posting filthy, disgusting remarks should be removed.
Methinks you might be experiencing that 'Freedom of Speech' is sometimes an unexpected double-edged sword.
I don't think anyone who routinely flouts the description and accepted forum rule:
"Lightweight discussion of most things (excludes politics, religion, racism, hatred & conspiracies)", would have any grounds to complain though.
Ouch! ![]()
I hate people that discuss politics, religion and conspiracies!
"Lightweight discussion of most things (excludes politics, religion, racism, hatred & conspiracies)", would have any grounds to complain though.
Without politics aka what is happening to our world i am not sure there would still be a General Discussion.
Certainly a much less popular one.
Posting blatant hate just serves to bring the forum down.
If you don't like or want to abide by the rules, post on some other forum. Otherwise don't be surprised if the opinion boomerangs you throw sometimes come back to hit you. Simples.
If you don't like or want to abide by the rules, post on some other forum. Otherwise don't be surprised if the opinion boomerangs you throw sometimes come back to hit you. Simples.
So you are in support of the blatant hate speech then that i have been continually receiving from remery?
Good idea, I am sure Imane Khelif would like to see you stop posting too. Add in the relatives of people who died in the WTC attacks and I am sure you will get the idea. You reap what you sow.
If you stir the pot, you gotta lick the spoon. Up to you as to what you put in the pot.
To extend the metaphor, the username that sounds like a windows antivirus program should blow on the spoon before bringing it to their lips to reduce the chance of being scalded
Filthy, disgusting post. Your lowest yet.
I was under the impression personal attacks were not allowed on this forum?
This is only your opinion, as it was aimed at you.
But was there anything there that was untrue?
To me the intent was to show you how hypocritical you are.
Not an attack at all.
Certainly nothing filthy or disgusting.
But you can't accept the truth, so you in your mind you turn this into an attack.
Just as you think my post here is somehow against you.
Filthy, disgusting post. Your lowest yet.
I was under the impression personal attacks were not allowed on this forum?
Yawn.
So you are in support of the blatant hate speech then that i have been continually receiving from remery?
lol
Well there you go, 28 pages distilled down to a dummy spit and a single word that isn't a word. Most likely a reasonably accurate representation of how homo sapiens will slowly grind ourselves into oblivion.
Have a good weekend breezers!
So you are in support of the blatant hate speech then that i have been continually receiving from remery?
lol
That's two consecutive posts replying to a man who you consider to be an idiot.
Does it not occur to you that, if your assessment is correct, the adage that arguing with an idiot equals two idiots?
Can we keep this topic on track with more straw man arguments from pedants who excel at nitpicking rather than contributing to productive conversation?
"Critical thinking is at the core of most intellectual activity that involves students learning to recognise or develop an argument, use evidence in support of that argument, draw reasoned conclusions, and use information to solve problems. Examples of critical thinking skills are interpreting, analysing, evaluating, explaining, sequencing, reasoning, comparing, questioning, inferring, hypothesising, appraising, testing and generalising."
www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/critical-and-creative-thinking/
"Critical thinking is at the core of most intellectual activity that involves students learning to recognise or develop an argument, use evidence in support of that argument, draw reasoned conclusions, and use information to solve problems. Examples of critical thinking skills are interpreting, analysing, evaluating, explaining, sequencing, reasoning, comparing, questioning, inferring, hypothesising, appraising, testing and generalising."
www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/critical-and-creative-thinking/
So.... are you suggesting that critical thinking is not as entertaining to readers as straw man arguments from pedants?
"Critical thinking is at the core of most intellectual activity that involves students learning to recognise or develop an argument, use evidence in support of that argument, draw reasoned conclusions, and use information to solve problems. Examples of critical thinking skills are interpreting, analysing, evaluating, explaining, sequencing, reasoning, comparing, questioning, inferring, hypothesising, appraising, testing and generalising."
www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/critical-and-creative-thinking/
So.... are you suggesting that critical thinking is not as entertaining to readers as straw man arguments from pedants?
Hey, I just thought of a piece of critical thinking.
If you saw someone's forum activity, and they had 'photos' where they did this sort of thing:
and then you saw "someone else" on the forum post things in a similar, but uncommon way:
What would you think if you applied critical thinking?