Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..Flying Dutchman said..D3 said..
OK, so they made statements that they thought were correct at the time.
Obviously their thinking isn't to be trusted.
Temp. Sign in..!
Obviously, most defenders of the official stream of endless horse**** can't tell reality from fiction, can't deduce using logic, and probably didn't watch that clip past 2:00min where the bombshell is dropped.
Obviously, every claim made by this scumbags has been proven to be false in time, yet, true to form, the apologists and defenders of the idiocracy continue merrily on with their perpetuation of the horse****.
There. Now run along for ya seventh booster to fix the problems created with the sixth.
Peace be with all.
The bit where he says three doses with booster offer reasonable protection?
In late 2022?
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..
The looks fictitious. Do you even know how to operate a CRISPR-11
That's an excerpt from a Nature article. Do you even know how to operate a CRISPR-11?
What sparked the COVID pandemic? Mounting evidence points to raccoon dogs
"The origin of the pandemic is still deeply politicized, and the lack of clear answers hasn't helped. The virus probably originated in bats living in southern China. From there, many scientists think it infected an intermediate animal that passed it to people. The virus could also have passed directly from bats, although that is considered less likely given their habitat is far from Wuhan. And some still suggest that the virus could have escaped, or been deliberately released, from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was known to be doing research on coronaviruses."
www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00426-3
doi: doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00426-3
Select to expand quoteremery said..psychojoe said..
The looks fictitious. Do you even know how to operate a CRISPR-11
That's an excerpt from a Nature article. Do you even know how to operate a CRISPR-11?
Ok, Nature is a fairly respectable journal. I'm just pointing out the significant difference between human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptors and the mammalian varieties. Of course six thousand nucleotides of an agreeable glycoprotein spliced through the CRSPR will make short work overcoming that.
Are you not concerned that the angiotensin converting enzyme cleaves the C-terminal dipeptide of various oligopeptides, including bradykinin and angiotensin I. It can be regarded as either the enzyme kininase II, due to its action on bradykinin degradation, thereby increasing vasodilation, or as angiotensin I-converting enzyme, due to its inhibition of the conversion of angiotensin I into the vasoconstricting octapeptide angiotensin II?
Select to expand quoteremery said..
Are you not concerned that...
Hey remery,
Just to note - nope, that does not concern me one little bit. Carantoc's concern level on that subject is 0/10, and that is at best.
In fact, I spent the whole of yesterday not even giving it one iota of thought.
Select to expand quoteremery said..
What sparked the COVID pandemic? Mounting evidence points to raccoon dogs
"The origin of the pandemic is still deeply politicized, and the lack of clear answers hasn't helped. The virus probably originated in bats living in southern China. From there, many scientists think it infected an intermediate animal that passed it to people. The virus could also have passed directly from bats, although that is considered less likely given their habitat is far from Wuhan. And some still suggest that the virus could have escaped, or been deliberately released, from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was known to be doing research on coronaviruses."
www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00426-3
doi: doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00426-3
So where's the material evidence to support these claims? Without the material evidence it's just more COVID drivel.
Sounds like an echo chamber where hunches, suspicions and bets are the closest they can come to incontrovertible material evidence.
On the other hand, "COVID-19" patient Zero was a researcher at the WIV, conducting the research into bat coronaviruses using partly US funding and gain-of-function methodology to discover potential new military grade bio-weapons. Hmmm.
But look over there at that shiny cover story based on filthy wet markets where cross contamination is rife.
Remers! You would have to be the epitome of why so many folk no longer have faith in the crud they are fed through the media. It don't match up buddy. Like looking into a cracked mirror. You just know that the reflection is distorted because the glass is broken. It bears no resemblance to realty.
But keep trying do! Your post about your ability to understand all because you're a scientist still tickles days after you wrote it. John Cleese would be challenged writing something more comical!
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Hey remery,
Just to note - nope, that does not concern me one little bit. Carantoc's concern level on that subject is 0/10, and that is at best.
In fact, I spent the whole of yesterday not even giving it one iota of thought.
Hey Croutontoc, you need to know that Remery was not replying to you. Remery is a busy man and he has little time to concern himself with minedless diatribe.
Select to expand quotejapie said..
Remers! You would have to be the epitome of why so many folk no longer have faith in the crud they are fed through the media. It don't match up buddy. Like looking into a cracked mirror. You just know that the reflection is distorted because the glass is broken. It bears no resemblance to realty.
But keep trying do! Your post about your ability to understand all because you're a scientist still tickles days after you wrote it. John Cleese would be challenged writing something more comical!
Beaut storm woke me up . . . so here i am in full gamma wave state.
Now look here japie ole brother, a "scientist" requires critical thinking, scepticism and most of all, an open mind to be of any benefit to mankind's journey of the soul. Stray but a little from this path and man-scientist suffers the consequences of Divine Intervention AKA fate AKA karma AKA judgement by Natural Law.
So pretend as we do, we can't trick the immune system into submission by injecting genetically modified organisms wrapped in toxic nano-technology and contaminated with foreign DNA particles, because the body has evolved sophisticated defence systems against poisoning by sub-dermal intrusion - such as snake bite, spider bite, scorpion bite etc. The reason we can drink snake poison and only get a gut ache while the same tiny amount administered sub-dermally kills us is precisely because injection bypasses almost all our defence systems. This goes against the Laws of Nature, like eating processed pesticide-laden GMO foods low in nutrition makes us sick. This is why the new platform of injectables not deserving of the name "vaccines" is causing such high levels of excess all cause deaths, myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots and disorders, neurological diseases, turbo cancers and most hideously coined "sudden death".
So to quote Nature magazine in the belief that they are presenting anything remotely cognisant of nature or Natural Law is farcical, especially when these "scientists" are touting zero material evidence in support of their theoretical "hunches, guesses and bets".
As I've said, if the proximal natural origin theory had ANY merit whatsoever, we'd be hearing about it by now.
In contrast, here's what the US Congress Sub-Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic found, to add to the CIA's recent admissions:
quote:
"The Origins of the Coronavirus Pandemic, Including but Not Limited to the Federal Government's Funding of Gain-of-Function Research
COVID-19 ORIGIN: COVID-19 most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. The FIVE strongest arguments in favor of the "lab leak" theory include: The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature. Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events. Wuhan is home to China's foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research at inadequate biosafety levels. Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with a COVID-like virus in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market. By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced.
PROXIMAL ORIGIN PUBLICATION: "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2" publication - which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory - was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated in nature.
GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH: A lab-related incident involving gain-of-function research is most likely the origin of COVID-19. Current government mechanisms for overseeing this dangerous gain-of-function research are incomplete, severely convoluted, and lack global applicability.
ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE INC. (ECOHEALTH): EcoHealth - under the leadership of Dr. Peter Daszak - used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. After the Select Subcommittee released evidence of EcoHealth violating the terms of its National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) commenced official debarment proceedings and suspended all funding to EcoHealth. New evidence also shows that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has opened an investigation into EcoHealth's pandemic-era activities.
NIH FAILURES: NIH's procedures for funding and overseeing potentially dangerous research are deficient, unreliable, and pose a serious threat to both public health and national security. Further, NIH fostered an environment that promoted evading federal record keeping laws - as seen through the actions of Dr. David Morens and "FOIA Lady" Marge Moore."
End quote.
. . .
Mother Earth is NOT there to kill us and make us sick at every turn as the Remery's and the globalist COVID Cult propaganda merchants would have us believe.
Natural Law: Mother Earth is there to nurture and protect us. She provides all we need for optimal vitality.
Viruses, are in fact an internal expression occurring during regular cellular decay and death. "Viruses" are not some third party proteins just floating about the environment waiting for a victim - very unlike bacteria, fungi and parasites. They are more accurately described as cell nucleus waste proteins wrapped within exosomes, and we all have billions of them in our bodies all the time. The cell nucleus material must be wrapped up in an exosome particle (to avoid being identified as foreign and therefore targeted by immune response) which is identical to a so-called "virus" under a microscope, or, consumed by bacteria and macrophages as the cell wall bursts open. If these waste products from the billions of cells that die every day are not dealt with efficiently, such as when we are under stress or malnourished or eating crap or poisoning ourselves, then the expression of these nuclear materials can be disease inducing when they enter the bloodstream for recycling, or, the lymph for disposal. The body can't keep up with basic waste management, plus the waste being produced is nasty - system overload.
Cue cancer, blood clots, lymphoma, colds, infections, inflammation, fluid retention, metabolic dysfunction and a myriad of seemingly "incurable" diseases that the biomedical complexe just loves $$$.
Who would have thought a "new" poster called Peacenlove joined just to tell us all about conspiracies? What are the chances!
Did he manage to post to concepts that contradict each other?
The virus must have been leaked from a lab, by quoting "here's what the US Congress Sub-Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic found, to add to the CIA's recent admissions"
But then he goes on to write that "viruses" are not externally introduced pathogens, but instead are the result of inefficient cell waste removal.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
Who would have thought a "new" poster called Peacenlove joined just to tell us all about conspiracies? What are the chances!
How dare you elude to the conspiracy that pnl is conspiracy pete
I just wish the real conspiracy talk was focused on MAID in canada and how they want to bring it to the rest of the west for homeless population control
Its amazing knowing due to my circumstances i qualify for medically assisted something dieing
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Beaut storm woke me up . . . so here i am in full gamma wave state.
Now look here japie ole brother, a "scientist" requires critical thinking, scepticism and most of all, an open mind to be of any benefit to mankind's journey of the soul. Stray but a little from this path and man-scientist suffers the consequences of Divine Intervention AKA fate AKA karma AKA judgement by Natural Law.
So pretend as we do, we can't trick the immune system into submission by injecting genetically modified organisms wrapped in toxic nano-technology and contaminated with foreign DNA particles, because the body has evolved sophisticated defence systems against poisoning by sub-dermal intrusion - such as snake bite, spider bite, scorpion bite etc. The reason we can drink snake poison and only get a gut ache while the same tiny amount administered sub-dermally kills us is precisely because injection bypasses almost all our defence systems. This goes against the Laws of Nature, like eating processed pesticide-laden GMO foods low in nutrition makes us sick. This is why the new platform of injectables not deserving of the name "vaccines" is causing such high levels of excess all cause deaths, myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots and disorders, neurological diseases, turbo cancers and most hideously coined "sudden death".
So to quote Nature magazine in the belief that they are presenting anything remotely cognisant of nature or Natural Law is farcical, especially when these "scientists" are touting zero material evidence in support of their theoretical "hunches, guesses and bets".
As I've said, if the proximal natural origin theory had ANY merit whatsoever, we'd be hearing about it by now.
In contrast, here's what the US Congress Sub-Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic found, to add to the CIA's recent admissions:
quote:
"The Origins of the Coronavirus Pandemic, Including but Not Limited to the Federal Government's Funding of Gain-of-Function Research
COVID-19 ORIGIN: COVID-19 most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. The FIVE strongest arguments in favor of the "lab leak" theory include: The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature. Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events. Wuhan is home to China's foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research at inadequate biosafety levels. Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with a COVID-like virus in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market. By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced.
PROXIMAL ORIGIN PUBLICATION: "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2" publication - which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory - was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated in nature.
GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH: A lab-related incident involving gain-of-function research is most likely the origin of COVID-19. Current government mechanisms for overseeing this dangerous gain-of-function research are incomplete, severely convoluted, and lack global applicability.
ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE INC. (ECOHEALTH): EcoHealth - under the leadership of Dr. Peter Daszak - used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. After the Select Subcommittee released evidence of EcoHealth violating the terms of its National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) commenced official debarment proceedings and suspended all funding to EcoHealth. New evidence also shows that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has opened an investigation into EcoHealth's pandemic-era activities.
NIH FAILURES: NIH's procedures for funding and overseeing potentially dangerous research are deficient, unreliable, and pose a serious threat to both public health and national security. Further, NIH fostered an environment that promoted evading federal record keeping laws - as seen through the actions of Dr. David Morens and "FOIA Lady" Marge Moore."
End quote.
. . .
Mother Earth is NOT there to kill us and make us sick at every turn as the Remery's and the globalist COVID Cult propaganda merchants would have us believe.
Natural Law: Mother Earth is there to nurture and protect us. She provides all we need for optimal vitality.
Viruses, are in fact an internal expression occurring during regular cellular decay and death. "Viruses" are not some third party proteins just floating about the environment waiting for a victim - very unlike bacteria, fungi and parasites. They are more accurately described as cell nucleus waste proteins wrapped within exosomes, and we all have billions of them in our bodies all the time. The cell nucleus material must be wrapped up in an exosome particle (to avoid being identified as foreign and therefore targeted by immune response) which is identical to a so-called "virus" under a microscope, or, consumed by bacteria and macrophages as the cell wall bursts open. If these waste products from the billions of cells that die every day are not dealt with efficiently, such as when we are under stress or malnourished or eating crap or poisoning ourselves, then the expression of these nuclear materials can be disease inducing when they enter the bloodstream for recycling, or, the lymph for disposal. The body can't keep up with basic waste management, plus the waste being produced is nasty - system overload.
Cue cancer, blood clots, lymphoma, colds, infections, inflammation, fluid retention, metabolic dysfunction and a myriad of seemingly "incurable" diseases that the biomedical complexe just loves $$$.
The first paragraph and a half were quite coherent.
Select to expand quoteremery said..
Remery is a busy man and he has little time to concern himself with minedless diatribe.Select to expand quoteremery said..
The first paragraph and a half were quite coherent.
?
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Sounds like an echo chamber where hunches, suspicions and bets are the closest they can come to incontrovertible material evidence.
On the other hand, "COVID-19" patient Zero was a researcher at the WIV, conducting the research into bat coronaviruses using partly US funding and gain-of-function methodology to discover potential new military grade bio-weapons. Hmmm.
But look over there at that shiny cover story based on filthy wet markets where cross contamination is rife.
There you go again, making stuff up. Who was "patient Zero"? What is the exact relationship between gain-of -function research and bio weapons.
Pete, you need to find a new angle; you're going around in circles. (Here's a tip, your new persona has forgotten to keep referring to other posters as "brother", Laurie is sure to wise up sooner or later)
Select to expand quoteD3 said..
Did he manage to post to concepts that contradict each other?
The virus must have been leaked from a lab, by quoting "here's what the US Congress Sub-Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic found, to add to the CIA's recent admissions"
But then he goes on to write that "viruses" are not externally introduced pathogens, but instead are the result of inefficient cell waste removal.
Nope. Spike proteins can easily be synthesised and enhanced with genetics. That's exactly how a mRNA vaxx reprograms cells to produce the spike protein. The spike exists on the outside of the exosomes, just as with viruses. They are identical chemically and under the microscope. They can act as signifiers but also as poisons in the body. Depending on who you talk to, they have an interest in promoting viruses as independent third party entities waiting to murder us, or recognise these particles simply as totally natural consequences of gene expression in animals.
Nothing controversial here, except perhaps that you just need a catch up with the science. That's OK, bro.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
Who would have thought a "new" poster called Peacenlove joined just to tell us all about conspiracies? What are the chances!
What's the conspiracy you're alleging today? I'm simply talking biology and government information.
Select to expand quoteremery said..There you go again, making stuff up. Who was "patient Zero"? What is the exact relationship between gain-of -function research and bio weapons. peacenlove said..
Sounds like an echo chamber where hunches, suspicions and bets are the closest they can come to incontrovertible material evidence.
On the other hand, "COVID-19" patient Zero was a researcher at the WIV, conducting the research into bat coronaviruses using partly US funding and gain-of-function methodology to discover potential new military grade bio-weapons. Hmmm.
But look over there at that shiny cover story based on filthy wet markets where cross contamination is rife.
There you go again, making stuff up. Who was "patient Zero"? What is the exact relationship between gain-of -function research and bio weapons.
Pete, you need to find a new angle; you're going around in circles. (Here's a tip, your new persona has forgotten to keep referring to other posters as "brother", Laurie is sure to wise up sooner or later)
Not making anything up remery. That's your specialty as japie rightly points out.
Patient zero is Ben Hu at the WIV. To quote mainstream corporate news that you appear to have faith in:
www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/bombshell-report-identifies-covids-infamous-patient-zero/news-story/2d11625a69124dfea8cfd4ba43806fdf
www.forbes.com/sites/ericmack/2023/06/15/covid-19-patients-zero-in-wuhan-identified-boosting-lab-leak-theory/
Gain of function is about identifying potential new viruses and potential bio-weapons before they emerge. That's it. Nothing controversial. Been at it for decades.
I aim to please, but i doubt any amount of material evidence is going to satisfy you of the truth as we know it. You're COVID Cult faithful and you seem glued to the proximal natural origin myth created by Tony Fraud Fauci. ZERO material evidence.
Why not start calling people idiots again? Worked a treat last time bro.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Nope. Spike proteins can easily be synthesised and enhanced with genetics. That's exactly how a mRNA vaxx reprograms cells to produce the spike protein. The spike exists on the outside of the exosomes, just as with viruses. They are identical chemically and under the microscope. They can act as signifiers but also as poisons in the body. Depending on who you talk to, they have an interest in promoting viruses as independent third party entities waiting to murder us, or recognise these particles simply as totally natural consequences of gene expression in animals.
Nothing controversial here, except perhaps that you just need a catch up with the science. That's OK, bro.
Ok Pete, tell us about your training, research and experience in microbilogy and epidmeiology.
Good for you brother.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
What's the conspiracy you're alleging today? I'm simply talking biology and government information.
No Pete, you are making stuff up.
Again.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Why not start calling people idiots again? Worked a treat last time bro.
Seriously pathetic.
Pete, Bro, how many times have you created a new Seabreeze account so you can continue to espouse mindless drivel?
Would you actually like to know that answer remery? Because by useing ai and the way back machine you can actually find out....
Im not sure we actually need to utilise those tho for this particular character tho 
Dont worry pnl (i pronounce your name peenal btw like the colonys but i think penis ) i still love ya were allllll friends here any site conversation and agregation is good for our lord and saviour lauriebauriewauritonIII
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..D3 said..
Did he manage to post to concepts that contradict each other?
The virus must have been leaked from a lab, by quoting "here's what the US Congress Sub-Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic found, to add to the CIA's recent admissions"
But then he goes on to write that "viruses" are not externally introduced pathogens, but instead are the result of inefficient cell waste removal.
Nope. Spike proteins can easily be synthesised and enhanced with genetics. That's exactly how a mRNA vaxx reprograms cells to produce the spike protein. The spike exists on the outside of the exosomes, just as with viruses. They are identical chemically and under the microscope. They can act as signifiers but also as poisons in the body. Depending on who you talk to, they have an interest in promoting viruses as independent third party entities waiting to murder us, or recognise these particles simply as totally natural consequences of gene expression in animals.
Nothing controversial here, except perhaps that you just need a catch up with the science. That's OK, bro.
That's not what you meant in your previous comment, though is it?
When you said "Viruses, are in fact an internal expression occurring during regular cellular decay and death. "Viruses" are not some third party proteins just floating about the environment waiting for a victim - very unlike bacteria, fungi and parasites"
So are you saying you agree the SARS-COV-2 virus originated in China and spread around the world?
Or
Do you believe that millions of people managed somehow express the same disease due to poor cellular waste management?
I thought you were clearly stating that you didn't think COVID-19 was caused by a "so-called virus".
Select to expand quoteremery said..
how many times have you created a new Seabreeze account so you can continue to espouse mindless drivel?
As a small engine (under 50cc) carburetor expert I'm qualified to answer.
Adriano
Bominator
Holy Guacamole
Peacenlove
I vote myscreenname as the agreed expert on the 30 year history of seabreeze.com.au.
I have heard some self-identified historians confuse pnl and pm33. Whadda-mistake-a to make-a. Even a child can see this is not an empirical fact.
Hey, here's an idea - little tags under our usernames so everyone knows who is an expert on what ?
If only someebody would volunteer to upgrade the site.......
If you met Pete, you would understand why p&l isn't Pete.
More than likely someone who misses Petes ramblings and the "discussions" they caused, so they've created a troll account to fill the void.
Select to expand quoteSubsonic said..
If you met Pete, you would understand why p&l isn't Pete.
More than likely someone who misses Petes ramblings and the "discussions" they caused, so they've created a troll account to fill the void.
And if he comes back with a different name, it would only take a few posts to recognise him.
His style and beliefs don't change, he's always been just Pete.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Hey, here's an idea - little tags under our usernames so everyone knows who is an expert on what ?
Wouldn't work. Almost everyone here identifies as a vaccine expert.
