Select to expand quoteD3 said..
If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)
Scientists rarely cry about data. Data is data. Scientists appreciate the learnings and move on to new understanding.
Select to expand quotejapie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Die plaas Japie praat kak
Die apartheidsregering het met sy kop gemors
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night
Late 40's
All too common these days, it should not be though
FU covid vaccines
You say we should protect vulnerable populations and rely on herd immunity.
How do you suggest we do that while also recommending "If you are under 17 then don't even bother with the vax.'?
It's pretty clear that our elderly population are most at risk, but the next highest group on the risk list are children.
Sure there is a non zero chance of death from COVID for Teens, kids and infants. This risk increases as the age reduces.
Then there are the other impacts that COVID has on kids: hospitalisation and ICU admission with covid, hospitalisation and ICU admission with COVID related Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome, stay home from school sick requiring (non-elderly) family member supervision.
And, yes the relative rates are low, but the sheer numbers of children repeatedly getting sick from this disease will mean we see higher numbers of them getting seriously sick.
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night
Late 40's
All too common these days, it should not be though
FU covid vaccines
Sorry hear that.
Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years, in fact there were more related to chronic IHD than Acute.
So while it is sad to hear another loss in their prime of life, maybe don't use it to push your own agenda. Especially soon
Select to expand quoteD3 said..japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.
Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.
They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).
If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)
Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.
Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!
Select to expand quoteIanR said..japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Die plaas Japie praat kak
Die apartheidsregering het met sy kop gemors
Great response?? Like interacting with pillow stuffing!
Select to expand quoteD3 said..
Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years
You sure about that?
amp.smh.com.au/national/fatal-heart-attacks-have-surged-in-australia-here-s-why-20230117-p5cd22.html
Select to expand quoteFlying Dutchman said..D3 said..
Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years
You sure about that?
amp.smh.com.au/national/fatal-heart-attacks-have-surged-in-australia-here-s-why-20230117-p5cd22.html
Delayed care and affects of the virus are causing these problems? How does that fit in with the anti-vaccine brigade?
Oh dear, that link shows thngs you don't want to talk about:
"
Coronavirus has been implicated in an increased risk of cardiovascular problems, with a study published in the prestigious science journal Nature finding that rates of heart attacks and stroke were substantially higher in military veterans who had recovered from COVID-19, compared to those who hadn't had the disease.
"
What, you mean the actual virus may have increased the rates of heart attacks and strokes? 
"
A recent Australian study also found hospitalisations from myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (swelling of the membrane surrounding the heart), pulmonary embolism, heart attack and stroke were significantly more frequent after COVID?19."
"
What! The same virus actually causes these heart problems including myocarditis and pericarditis?
For those that need a graphic to understand not complex statements:
Covid virus can lead to heart problems.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
For those that need a graphic to understand not complex statements:
Covid virus can lead to heart problems.
I'm still on the fence on all of this.
Have you got a chart, meme or rumble video to illustrate your point?
Select to expand quotejapie said..D3 said..japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.
Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.
They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).
If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)
Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.
Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!
You mean the Childrens Health Defender: Bobby Kennedy Jr?
The one who actively campaigns against Gardasil (a vaccine that prevents certain cancers)?
Yeah, I can see why Fauci wouldn't bother addressing it. I mean it's not like Faucis trying to run for president, he's not trying to win approval for political gain.
But you know who is?
Select to expand quoteD3 said..TonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night
Late 40's
All too common these days, it should not be though
FU covid vaccines
Sorry hear that.
Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years, in fact there were more related to chronic IHD than Acute.
So while it is sad to hear another loss in their prime of life, maybe don't use it to push your own agenda. Especially soon
What a **** thing to say to someone who just lost a friend.
You a doctor or a scientist that works in this area?
Maybe don't be a hypocrite and push your own agenda.
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..FormulaNova said..
For those that need a graphic to understand not complex statements:
Covid virus can lead to heart problems.
I'm still on the fence on all of this.
Have you got a chart, meme or rumble video to illustrate your point?
I could rustle up a 'join the dots' image for you if you want? Maybe with a lot of dots so that imbeciles (not you of course) can see exactly what it is I am trying to make them think, but also at the same time make them feel special for 'figuring it out'.
If that fails there are heaps of internet memes I can steal and paste my own stuff over the top. Is that good enough?
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
I could rustle up a 'join the dots' image for you if you want? Maybe with a lot of dots so that imbeciles (not you of course) can see exactly what it is I am trying to make them think, but also at the same time make them feel special for 'figuring it out'.
Hey FN,
Be careful there, sounds like you are heading towards proclaiming you are of superior intellect.
And we have seen where that leads.......
Holy guacamole, what an abonomination that would be. Don't go all adieu on us...., I know you could draw a picture of the scene better than anyone else, but be a strong supporting column (74) and keep standing....
Select to expand quotehitch_hiker said..D3 said..TonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night
Late 40's
All too common these days, it should not be though
FU covid vaccines
Sorry hear that.
Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years, in fact there were more related to chronic IHD than Acute.
So while it is sad to hear another loss in their prime of life, maybe don't use it to push your own agenda. Especially soon
What a **** thing to say to someone who just lost a friend.
You a doctor or a scientist that works in this area?
Maybe don't be a hypocrite and push your own agenda.
Agreed insensitive
Apologised
Select to expand quotejapie said..D3 said..japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.
Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.
They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).
If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)
Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.
Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!
The same Kennedy who got blasted by his own family?
Who got called out by his own wife for the crazy stuff he comes out with?
Do you reckon he's right? That you are braver than Anne Frank hiding from the Germans?
Select to expand quoteD3 said..hitch_hiker said..D3 said..TonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night
Late 40's
All too common these days, it should not be though
FU covid vaccines
Sorry hear that.
Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years, in fact there were more related to chronic IHD than Acute.
So while it is sad to hear another loss in their prime of life, maybe don't use it to push your own agenda. Especially soon
What a **** thing to say to someone who just lost a friend.
You a doctor or a scientist that works in this area?
Maybe don't be a hypocrite and push your own agenda.
Agreed insensitive
Apologised
Nah, if someone brings it up in the context of blaming the vaccines, without any direct correlation by the sound of it, they are using it to forward their own opinion.
If they just said the first part, sure, but the second part is clearly something else, without any supporting evidence.
People have been having heart attacks in their 40s and 50s and even 60s for a long long time. Blame living too long if you want to blame something, evolution doesn't care.
"DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just is. And we dance to its music." - Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden.
Select to expand quoteD3 said..japie said..D3 said..japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.
Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.
They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).
If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)
Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.
Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!
The same Kennedy who got blasted by his own family?
Who got called out by his own wife for the crazy stuff he comes out with?
Do you reckon he's right? That you are braver than Anne Frank hiding from the Germans?
You win. Should know better than to prove Mark Twain wrong.
Select to expand quotejapie said..D3 said..japie said..D3 said..japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.
Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.
They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).
If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)
Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.
Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!
The same Kennedy who got blasted by his own family?
Who got called out by his own wife for the crazy stuff he comes out with?
Do you reckon he's right? That you are braver than Anne Frank hiding from the Germans?
You win. Should know better than to prove Mark Twain wrong.
I'm ok with having my ideas challenged and being proven wrong.
But when the guy throwing out the accusations has a decades long history of making wild claims that aren't backed up with scientific evidence (at least good Science) that don't stand up to analysis. I'm probably not keen on spending money to read a book that is apparently just one long personal attack.
Out of interest, have you read it?
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night
Late 40's
All too common these days, it should not be though
FU covid vaccines
Sorry for your losss.
www.gofundme.com/f/loving-memory-of-eddie-dos-santos?utm_campaign=p_cp+share-sheet&utm_content=undefined&utm_medium=copy_link_all&utm_source=customer&utm_term=undefined
Bloke my age from my town in my circle of friends died of brain aneurysm last week.
Anyone else want to start the conversation about the rise in cases of vertigo n strokes following these jabs? The guys at risk of vertigo / stroke are the common age of users on seabreezerssss
I wonder how bad it's got to get before there's a proper investigation? WHY ARE ALL THE HEADS OF THE TGA, health ministers all quitting???
I don't think anyone who didn't get jabbed regrets not getting jabbed. Even terminator has apologised for his mistake in encouraging it. 
Select to expand quoteok said..
I don't think anyone who didn't get jabbed regrets not getting jabbed. Even terminator has apologised for his mistake in encouraging it.
You seem to be surrounded by unlucky people. It's hard for people who didn't get jabbed to express regret when they are dead from COVID. Well there are a few who's last words were, "I should have got the vaccine".
The most recent research I read indicated that if 800 vaccinated people caught COVID, one died. If 800 unvaccinated people caught COVID over 6 died. I'm happy to be in the "one died group".
Antivax misinformation is killing people.
Select to expand quoteD3 said..japie said..D3 said..japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.
Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.
They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).
If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)
Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.
Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!
You mean the Childrens Health Defender: Bobby Kennedy Jr?
The one who actively campaigns against Gardasil (a vaccine that prevents certain cancers)?
Yeah, I can see why Fauci wouldn't bother addressing it. I mean it's not like Faucis trying to run for president, he's not trying to win approval for political gain.
But you know who is?Select to expand quoteD3 said..japie said..D3 said..japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.
Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.
Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.
It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.
Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.
Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.
They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).
If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)
Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.
Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!
You mean the Childrens Health Defender: Bobby Kennedy Jr?
The one who actively campaigns against Gardasil (a vaccine that prevents certain cancers)?
Yeah, I can see why Fauci wouldn't bother addressing it. I mean it's not like Faucis trying to run for president, he's not trying to win approval for political gain.
But you know who is?
Gardasil Lawsuits...
Safe and effective?
www.wisnerbaum.com/prescription-drugs/gardasil-lawsuit/
I Just hope that the covid vaccine scam encourages people to look onto all vaccines.
Last week my brothers son (the only child out of 8 in our family that got any childhood vaccines) is showing signs of autism and going to the doctor next week.
I literally told him he would get autism if he gets the ridiculous amount of vaccines on the childhood schedule but his wife wanted free childcare and government payments.
Just another coincidence that the only vaccinated child is the only one with health problems?
Why do you think they eradicate the placebo in vaccine study's?
This isn't Fauci's first rodeo.
Please just stop listening to the TV, stop using Google and Facebook and look deeper with platforms that don't censor whats happening.
Select to expand quoteremery said..
"DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just is. And we dance to its music." - Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden.
I like that.
I find it funny when someone will start telling me that 'evolution will end up with...'. I don't think they really understand what is happening and why.
Select to expand quotesnoidberg said..
Gardasil Lawsuits...
Safe and effective?
www.wisnerbaum.com/prescription-drugs/gardasil-lawsuit/
I Just hope that the covid vaccine scam encourages people to look onto all vaccines.
Last week my brothers son (the only child out of 8 in our family that got any childhood vaccines) is showing signs of autism and going to the doctor next week.
I literally told him he would get autism if he gets the ridiculous amount of vaccines on the childhood schedule but his wife wanted free childcare and government payments.
Just another coincidence that the only vaccinated child is the only one with health problems?
Why do you think they eradicate the placebo in vaccine study's?
This isn't Fauci's first rodeo.
Please just stop listening to the TV, stop using Google and Facebook and look deeper with platforms that don't censor whats happening.
Be interesting to see where that civil lawsuit gets based on such poor evidence? They're relying on only a couple of outdated VAERS reviews (unsubstantiated claims of injury, mostly self reported) and desperately trying to get large numbers of claimants to participate by asking for anyone who may have possibly been injured after vaccination, 'even if the injury occurred years after vaccination'
Safety? It's pretty darn safe considering the number of doses world wide. And (despite Bobby Kennedys best efforts) extremely low numbers of verified adverse reactions.
Effective: considering that cervical cancers tend not to present until women are in their mid - late 20s, probably not seeing much impact of the vaccine rollout on cancer just yet.
However, the significant 'reductions in the prevalence of infections with vaccine-included oncogenic HPV types, anogenital warts and histologically confirmed HSIL have already been documented in young women, including a reduction in vaccine-included type infections in unvaccinated young women'. Looks like herd immunity from vaccination is helping prevent young people get the disease across the board.
Even rumours we could essentially eradicate it.
And everyone should know I get my information from Seabreeze, not Facebook; ABS, not TV; DuckDuckGo, not Google
Select to expand quotesnoidberg said..
Last week my brothers son (the only child out of 8 in our family that got any childhood vaccines) is showing signs of autism and going to the doctor next week.
I literally told him he would get autism if he gets the ridiculous amount of vaccines on the childhood schedule but his wife wanted free childcare and government payments.
Just another coincidence that the only vaccinated child is the only one with health problems?
Why do you think they eradicate the placebo in vaccine study's?
This isn't Fauci's first rodeo.
Please just stop listening to the TV, stop using Google and Facebook and look deeper with platforms that don't censor whats happening.
I'm sorry to hear that your nephew is experiencing developmental delays.
Fingers crossed it's something that he grows out of in short order.
As far as I was aware, there was no clear mechanism for how autism spectrum disorders occur in children? Most science points towards primarily a genetic component but environmental factor contributions haven't been ruled out. Just difficult to pin point anything beyond inaccurate correlation.
Last I heard there was a study of autism prevalence in Denmark that potentially linked (read: haven't been able to entirely rule out) lithium in drinking water supply to increased rats of ASD. Not a definitive study, but shows that we're investigating every possibility to find out more about this significant impact on children.
Select to expand quoteD3 said..snoidberg said..
Last week my brothers son (the only child out of 8 in our family that got any childhood vaccines) is showing signs of autism and going to the doctor next week.
I literally told him he would get autism if he gets the ridiculous amount of vaccines on the childhood schedule but his wife wanted free childcare and government payments.
Just another coincidence that the only vaccinated child is the only one with health problems?
Why do you think they eradicate the placebo in vaccine study's?
This isn't Fauci's first rodeo.
Please just stop listening to the TV, stop using Google and Facebook and look deeper with platforms that don't censor whats happening.
I'm sorry to hear that your nephew is experiencing developmental delays.
Fingers crossed it's something that he grows out of in short order.
As far as I was aware, there was no clear mechanism for how autism spectrum disorders occur in children? Most science points towards primarily a genetic component but environmental factor contributions haven't been ruled out. Just difficult to pin point anything beyond inaccurate correlation.
Last I heard there was a study of autism prevalence in Denmark that potentially linked (read: haven't been able to entirely rule out) lithium in drinking water supply to increased rats of ASD. Not a definitive study, but shows that we're investigating every possibility to find out more about this significant impact on children.
You are too kind.
If he grows out of it "it would have been the vaccines that caused it".
If he doesn't, "it will be the vaccines".
If he never had it, "it was the effect of the vaccines".
See the pattern? I wonder if there is a genetic link?
