FranP forum posts in last 60 days

Show Edits
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
14 May 2026 4:15am
....whatever
I believe the real challenge of parawing, translated into board shapes, is not stability before getting on foil, but foot pumpability — so anything that improves that will make a real difference.
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
14 May 2026 4:15am
....whatever
I believe the real challenge of parawing, translated into board shapes, is not stability before getting on foil, but foot pumpability — so anything that improves that will make a real difference.
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
2 May 2026 4:27am
sunsetsailboards said..
interesting that the ARC is 0.3kg heavier than the Super K v2 in the 88/90 size despite not having a handle and being equivalent volume. Arc 88l is spec'd at 5.0kg, Super K2 90l in Pro Carbon at 4.7kg (although my personal board is 5.0kg).


A sharp bit of positioning from KT.
At a time when moving new boards is tougher than ever, they’re leaning into the parawing momentum and reframing the offer—arguably even nudging toward a new sub-category.
The ARC reads very close to a K2: roughly +1” in width, a touch more banana in the rocker, and about +300 g on the scale. Incremental, not radical. The real question is whether those tweaks translate into a meaningfully different on-water feel—or if this is primarily smart product segmentation (and, likely, healthier margins) dressed as innovation.👍👍👍👍
Reply in Topic: Enduro 800 Review
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
27 Apr 2026 6:49pm






Interesting how the average speed ends up being quite similar between small and large foils.






FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
26 Apr 2026 6:07pm
Just wanted to share a couple of clips from the recent Mondial du Vent (the multi-wind-sport week in France) - definitely worth a look if you haven't seen them yet.

The Parawing level is getting seriously impressive. This first-ever PW competition happening alongside the event could be a real tipping point for the market. We saw an international lineup of riders, challenging and far-from-perfect conditions (not your typical Instagram day), and tons of new prototypes and design approaches on display.

www.instagram.com/reel/DXhXEYsDKYD/

www.surffoilworldtour.com/event/sft-downwind-parawing-world-cup-leucate-2026/

www.instagram.com/surffoilworldtour/reels/

A few things stood out: PW is evolving fast, and it's clearly proving itself as a legit low-wind discipline - not just a "perfect Maui conditions" niche, PW is no longer just experimental or limited to advanced riders, different brands are converging, PW is easier than two years ago and gear is more accessible and specialized at the same time....After events like this, you start to see how a sport begins to scale.

...many of you foil in Australia or the US, and in this new anti-globalization era a competition in the south of France might feel pretty far from your local spot and you might not care.... but honestly, this feels like one of those tipping-point moments in a new sport.

Today it's just racing-focused (upwind, pumping, speed), but wait until we start seeing true wave-oriented PW competitions - that's when things could really explode in terms of appeal and media attention.

Curious to hear your thoughts.
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
23 Apr 2026 3:57am
airsail said..

Hubie said..
I really like that explanation Bryan.
So if I am about speed, aggressive and advanced parawinging, flat bottom.
If my location doesn't have strong wind, i am just learning, or just cruising, then a rocker to get me up as quickly as possible.


I found the opposite, the flat rocker gets going faster. I think the banana boards are a carry over from paddle DW where the banana helped with stability. But this isn't required with a para board as the para above your head gives you all the stability required even in the roughest conditions.


Para was adopted by the DW crew so naturally they used their DW boards, but we have moved on now, closer to winging and you don't see banana boards used for winging.


I don't agree.

a) A flat, narrow board reduces drag in flat water and during the pre-foiling phase (displacement mode, as described in hull dynamics). However, when the board gets longer, it becomes harder to generate effective pumping from the feet-making it less suitable for parawing and optimal for wing...... Just look at how racing wing boards look like

b) More rockered ("banana") boards create additional drag in flat water, but they respond much better to leg-driven pumping. That makes them better suited for parawing, where that oscillation is key to getting up on foil.

I hope it helps
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
22 Apr 2026 5:07am
airsail said..



FranP said..
Interesting to see how rocker and width are evolving lately - I think we're starting to see two clear directions:


A. Wing-driven boards
Wingfoiling still favors relatively narrow boards with flatter rockers, since most of the pumping power comes from the wing rather than the board pump-oscillation. That keeps things efficient and fast to release.

Typical "mid-length" shapes still dominate here (roughly 5'8-6'5 length ? 18-21 width), relatively flat bottom, low kick tail.


B. Parawing focused boards.
Lots of discussions about "more volume in the nose", but it looks like there are other relevant trends.With parawing (or more foot-driven pumping), stability becomes more critical - you don't want to be constantly fighting balance. The pumping energy comes more from the rider (foil up/down oscillations), so boards tend to have more rocker in both nose and tail (like a banana).

Dimensions are similar in volume vs wing boards but shift slightly: around 5'6-6'2 length ? 19-22 wide, with a more "banana" rocker - similar to the kind of shapes Ken Adgate has been popularizing, and the new KT Arc.


Curious where this converges. do we end up with two distinct board categories, or a hybrid that does both reasonably well?
What do you guys think ?






After replacing my banana rocker board with a flat rocker board I'd never go back. This allowed me to to go from a same volume as weight board to 14lts under my weight but with earlier takeoff.
As for the idea of more volume in the nose it's just not needed if you add 5-6" of length, I've gone from a 6' to a 6'5 board and get absolutely zero pearling when getting going. Plus the slight extra length really makes getting going easy with no extra swing weight.




I agree with the "more volume in the nose" hype. At the end it's a matter of food placement during the initial pump phase.Do you notice board performance difference when winging VS parawing ?

Here's another "banana style" example:
, a DW board range where the smallers are PW-ready

PS: My main board is a 6'4 x19'' custom from HAV foilboards, model Pegaso. A super efficient board.
FranP
FranP
158 posts
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
21 Apr 2026 8:26pm
Interesting to see how rocker and width are evolving lately - I think we're starting to see two clear directions:


A. Wing-driven boards
Wingfoiling still favors relatively narrow boards with flatter rockers, since most of the pumping power comes from the wing rather than the board pump-oscillation. That keeps things efficient and fast to release.

Typical "mid-length" shapes still dominate here (roughly 5'8-6'5 length ? 18-21 width), relatively flat bottom, low kick tail.


B. Parawing focused boards.
Lots of discussions about "more volume in the nose", but it looks like there are other relevant trends.With parawing (or more foot-driven pumping), stability becomes more critical - you don't want to be constantly fighting balance. The pumping energy comes more from the rider (foil up/down oscillations), so boards tend to have more rocker in both nose and tail (like a banana).

Dimensions are similar in volume vs wing boards but shift slightly: around 5'6-6'2 length ? 19-22 wide, with a more "banana" rocker - similar to the kind of shapes Ken Adgate has been popularizing, and the new KT Arc.


Curious where this converges. do we end up with two distinct board categories, or a hybrid that does both reasonably well?
What do you guys think ?
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
21 Apr 2026 6:17pm
Interesting to see how rocker and width are evolving lately - I think we're starting to see two clear directions:


A. Wing-driven boards
Wingfoiling still favors relatively narrow boards with flatter rockers, since most of the pumping power comes from the wing rather than the board pump-oscillation. That keeps things efficient and fast to release.

Typical "mid-length" shapes still dominate here (roughly 5'8-6'5 length ? 18-21 width), relatively flat bottom, low kick tail.


B. Parawing focused boards.
Lots of discussions about "more volume in the nose", but it looks like there are other relevant trends.With parawing (or more foot-driven pumping), stability becomes more critical - you don't want to be constantly fighting balance. The pumping energy comes more from the rider (foil up/down oscillations), so boards tend to have more rocker in both nose and tail (like a banana).

Dimensions are similar in volume vs wing boards but shift slightly: around 5'6-6'2 length ? 19-22 wide, with a more "banana" rocker - similar to the kind of shapes Ken Adgate has been popularizing, and the new KT Arc.


Curious where this converges. do we end up with two distinct board categories, or a hybrid that does both reasonably well?
What do you guys think ?
Reply in Topic: Ozone pocket rocket v2
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
17 Apr 2026 9:18pm
Thanks for sharing ! I've heard there might be a 5.6 m2 size coming for the new PR - is that confirmed ?

Do you have any info on when pre-orders will open and expected delivery timelines?

Will the full size range be available at launch?

thanks !
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
19 Mar 2026 9:20pm
Hi all,


From what I see, most riders and youtube test reviews are always using the 3-4 m? range. I rarely come across anyone talking about larger parawings, which makes me wonder:
- Are bigger sizes not yet bought and as market evolves, riders will expand their quiver to 5-6 m2 ??
- Are large parawings of second generation still facing stability / issues, or just diminishing returns?

So the real question: Is it worth going for a bigger parawing (5.5 or 6 m?) to make light wind sessions fun?
...or is PW simply not the right tool once the wind drops below a certain threshold ?


For context, I'm a solid winger, 94 kg , enjoying wing in 16+ knots ... and I'm looking for PW in 12-18 Knt. That's what got me interested in parawing for low wind days....Would love to hear from anyone with real experience on larger sizes-especially heavier riders.

Thanks!
FranP
FranP
158 posts
158 posts
25 Aug 2025 3:37am
Anyone tested any prototype or first 2026 production units ?
Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅