Volume vrs Weight (post your stats)

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Kami
Kami
1566 posts
1566 posts
19 May 2014 2:15pm
supthecreek said...
I am 66... 100k dry... 108k in wetsuit - 5'11

Today I rode my 8'11 x 31 @ 125 ltr (traditional progressive surf shape)

It was mostly underwater. Sometime paddling for a wave, the entire board would go below water. It surfs amazingly... but I have to take a knee from time to time... just to give my aging body a break from the Bongo Board.

Last month in a 4 mil full suit, I rode a 7'11 x 30 @ 133 liters... Simmons wide body shape.
Easy peezy for stability and catching waves.... but the wide tail was not near as surfy as my 8'11...IMO



This is why i want to fit a bodyboard on the back of that kind of board

Mahanumah
Mahanumah
VIC
336 posts
VIC, 336 posts
19 May 2014 8:43pm
Ok so it looks like you guys are significantly better than me.

5'11" and 92kgs. Currently riding a Hokua 9'10" @ 155l.

Want to downsize but not sure which one to get. Tried my wife's Hokua 8'5" @ 115l and couldn't bloody stay upright. Two paddles strokes and I was back in the drink... On flat water with no real chop to speak of.

Have demoed the Hokua 9'5" @ 140l on flat water as well as the 9' @ 125-130l (can't remember exactly). Was able to stand on both but it was pretty calm each time so not sure how I would go in the chop.

Am interested in trying out the Hokua x32 range to see how I go. Maybe the 8'3" or 8'8". Just not sure how much more yaw I will experience over the 9'10".
Tang
Tang
VIC
580 posts
VIC, 580 posts
19 May 2014 10:57pm
Piros said...
Giving enough practice, you can ride as little volume as 1x your weight + your board's weight in Kilos, however, board's minimum lenght and width is dictated by your height. Sounds about right?

Yes and no but thats a good guide , board shape plays a big part . Pulled in nose and tail is harder to stand on than a fat nose and tail of a board the same specs.


Don't forget that we're not mentioning how long you're surfing or waiting for either. At 87kg and just over 6'4" I ride a 98litre board -I can surf it for 2 hours if it's beautiful and clean but am cactus after 45min if there's much water moving around and I have to wait. I could probably ride a 90 litre board if it was ultra clean and I didn't have to wait for waves.
Dialy
Dialy
3 posts
3 posts
20 May 2014 5:01am
I am 6'5" and weigh 90kg. I have been riding the JP Australia 7'4" by 27" (90 liters) for over a week. The first time I tried it, in pretty choppy conditions, I could not even stand. I went back to paddling on flat water inside a marina for a couple of days. Then, I tried again at a beach break in glassy conditions. Wow! That board is, by far, the best sup surfboard I have ever ridden. It blew my wildest expectations.
I can now stay out in choppy conditions for an hour. It requires more energy than my 8'6" but it gets easier every time. I guess you have to give your brain some time to reorganize those neuron connections and get used to the new balance parameters.
My personal take is that pushing the envelope, volume wise, keeps stand up surfing very exciting. It's also a great fitness challenge.
GizzieNZ
GizzieNZ
4103 posts
4103 posts
20 May 2014 12:53pm
Legion said...
EnzoSV said...
[br]@ the rest: Seems we have a league of +90Kg here...


Yeah, you're not doing much to dispel stereotypes, people.


but surely part of the appeal of sup is having a floatier longer board that makes catching waves a breeze (excuse the seabreeze pun)
don't know why people insist on getting so anorexic :)
stehar
stehar
NSW
598 posts
NSW, 598 posts
20 May 2014 6:50pm
Using your figures plus "southwesterly's" comment on age, I think that an addition of 1 litre of volume for every year past 50 is pretty spot on ie 90 kilos and 64 y old intermed = 134 plus 14 (perfect)
Steve
Legion
Legion
WA
2222 posts
WA, 2222 posts
22 May 2014 3:46pm
GizzieNZ said..

Legion said...
EnzoSV said...

@ the rest: Seems we have a league of +90Kg here...


Yeah, you're not doing much to dispel stereotypes, people.


but surely part of the appeal of sup is having a floatier longer board that makes catching waves a breeze (excuse the seabreeze pun)
don't know why people insist on getting so anorexic :)


Like with other balance sports or self-propelled sports, the biggest performance gains come from the pilot.

Classic example - middle aged men spending $$$ and saving grams on the lightest carbon fibre push bikes when they're 10kg+ overweight themselves.

And if you can lose some weight yourselves, then you can go to a lighter smaller board that is much more manoeuvrable without needing the extra length, width and floatation. If you just want to trim along, then sure, eat seconds and desserts. But if you want the best performance, look after yourself first, equipment second.

Look at the pictures of the guys in the NSW titles thread. I presume they were at the competitive end of the field. Not much spare weight amongst them therefore they can ride fairly small boards (relatively speaking).
stm
stm
VIC
165 posts
stm stm
VIC, 165 posts
22 May 2014 7:46pm
Legion said...
GizzieNZ said..

Legion said...
EnzoSV said...

@ the rest: Seems we have a league of +90Kg here...


Yeah, you're not doing much to dispel stereotypes, people.


but surely part of the appeal of sup is having a floatier longer board that makes catching waves a breeze (excuse the seabreeze pun)
don't know why people insist on getting so anorexic :)


Like with other balance sports or self-propelled sports, the biggest performance gains come from the pilot.

Classic example - middle aged men spending $$$ and saving grams on the lightest carbon fibre push bikes when they're 10kg+ overweight themselves.

And if you can lose some weight yourselves, then you can go to a lighter smaller board that is much more manoeuvrable without needing the extra length, width and floatation. If you just want to trim along, then sure, eat seconds and desserts. But if you want the best performance, look after yourself first, equipment second.

Look at the pictures of the guys in the NSW titles thread. I presume they were at the competitive end of the field. Not much spare weight amongst them therefore they can ride fairly small boards (relatively speaking).


Maybe they like beer to much ,llike me
Kami
Kami
1566 posts
1566 posts
23 May 2014 4:52am
stm said...
Legion said...
GizzieNZ said..

Legion said...
EnzoSV said...

@ the rest: Seems we have a league of +90Kg here...


Yeah, you're not doing much to dispel stereotypes, people.


but surely part of the appeal of sup is having a floatier longer board that makes catching waves a breeze (excuse the seabreeze pun)
don't know why people insist on getting so anorexic :)


Like with other balance sports or self-propelled sports, the biggest performance gains come from the pilot.

Classic example - middle aged men spending $$$ and saving grams on the lightest carbon fibre push bikes when they're 10kg+ overweight themselves.

And if you can lose some weight yourselves, then you can go to a lighter smaller board that is much more manoeuvrable without needing the extra length, width and floatation. If you just want to trim along, then sure, eat seconds and desserts. But if you want the best performance, look after yourself first, equipment second.

Look at the pictures of the guys in the NSW titles thread. I presume they were at the competitive end of the field. Not much spare weight amongst them therefore they can ride fairly small boards (relatively speaking).


Maybe they like beer to much ,llike me


Sure, i did'nt stop drinking wines when my wife asked me, i do it because i want to keep standing up on my shortSUP.
Adapt
Adapt
QLD
723 posts
QLD, 723 posts
25 May 2014 11:11am
It's getting to a point where most of you should ride a normal style surfboard again rather then a SUP. As the old saying goes "it's not the size that counts, it's how you use it"
surfershaneA
surfershaneA
869 posts
869 posts
25 May 2014 12:55pm
Adapt said...
It's getting to a point where most of you should ride a normal style surfboard again rather then a SUP. As the old saying goes "it's not the size that counts, it's how you use it"


Kind of feel the same way. Thing that strikes me too is that most people pushing these tiny SUPs surf exactly the bloody same! I would much rather ride a slightly or much bigger board and concentrate on using the paddle to rip it around. I find I get a lot more kudos from the prone surfers than the guys who are trying to imitate or compete with them.

A lot of others are totally forgetting,.at the end of the day SUP should be fun. If you are struggling to even stand up on the thing paddling, why not just go back to a prone?
JeanG
JeanG
161 posts
161 posts
25 May 2014 1:54pm
Has anyone here recommended riding a board so small that they don't enjoy surfing?
colas
colas
5379 posts
5379 posts
25 May 2014 3:11pm
Adapt said...
It's getting to a point where most of you should ride a normal style surfboard again rather then a SUP. As the old saying goes "it's not the size that counts, it's how you use it"


Ah ah, I guess you never tried a ShortSUP to emit such preconceptions...

I have just tried again prone surfboarding after 5 years only SUPing. I found it refreshing being in the water, kind of swimming, more one with the sea. But once on a wave, what a disappointment! With my 6'8" SUP I had a blast, taking waves after waves, and more importantly exploiting them to the max, as I was able to position perfectly at the peak and enjoy a turbo boost at takeoff to set a fat tempo to the ride. On proning my 7'6', I saw the waves as they were: crappy mushburgers with not enough power for even a roller.

SUP are wave magnifiers, whatever their size. Why do you want to punish me and force me to ride a prone surfboard and kill all my fun?
surfershaneA
surfershaneA
869 posts
869 posts
25 May 2014 6:18pm
colas said...


SUP are wave magnifiers, whatever their size. Why do you want to punish me and force me to ride a prone surfboard and kill all my fun?


No, not really. Point is thought, a lot of other people read threads like this and feel pressured to go lower volume.

I don't think this is just a SUP thing. Today I was out a solid six feet peak with a solid rip running under it. Most of the prone surfers were riding boards too small and we're struggling to catch anything. A lot of the situation is the peer pressure or a resistance to the reality they are no longer 15? Then again, many might not have realised the surf was up? Still, maybe they should have been on SUP?

The situation was hard for me as my narrower 10' Sup was loving the drops. It was not that I was hassling; just I had the right equipment (Well excepting my legrope, which broke twice. How much fun is it swimming in those conditions with a paddle?).

At the end of the day it is probably just go do whatever makes you happy? "Happy" being the key?



Kami
Kami
1566 posts
1566 posts
25 May 2014 9:41pm
just come back from surfing with my 6'4", few waves caught but a lot of fun . What do i like the most is the kind feeling while riding the nose when the board start to glide in a slow motion before the rushing take off. Also the round house cut back on a short distance as the prone short boarders do. I will post one this kind one day...


This sensation is providing more by the reaction of board area than the volume .
This is why i like minimum volume to my own weight to magnifie the sensation of riding small waves.


Like this posted yet:



.
colas
colas
5379 posts
5379 posts
26 May 2014 2:32pm
surfershaneA said...
Today I was out a solid six feet peak


Now, this is quite different. No need for a wave magnifier for these conditions :-)

Adapt
Adapt
QLD
723 posts
QLD, 723 posts
26 May 2014 9:16pm
colas said...
Adapt said...
It's getting to a point where most of you should ride a normal style surfboard again rather then a SUP. As the old saying goes "it's not the size that counts, it's how you use it"


Ah ah, I guess you never tried a ShortSUP to emit such preconceptions...

I have just tried again prone surfboarding after 5 years only SUPing. I found it refreshing being in the water, kind of swimming, more one with the sea. But once on a wave, what a disappointment! With my 6'8" SUP I had a blast, taking waves after waves, and more importantly exploiting them to the max, as I was able to position perfectly at the peak and enjoy a turbo boost at takeoff to set a fat tempo to the ride. On proning my 7'6', I saw the waves as they were: crappy mushburgers with not enough power for even a roller.

SUP are wave magnifiers, whatever their size. Why do you want to punish me and force me to ride a prone surfboard and kill all my fun?


Colas, I don't doubt one bit about catching waves easier or turning small average days into something more enjoyable. But I agree with Shane, "the peer pressure" to ride something smaller, narrower etc, rather then embracing being in the ocean on a craft that suits the conditions. I have ridden short SUP's for my size and ability, but what's concerning at times is do you guys look at what you write from an informative perspective, flick back through some of the pages and actually see what is written, nothing about wider/ longer boards for particular surf conditions it's about how small your board is. Just saying, it's pretty intimidating for people that get on here to learn about topics relating to board size and width because they have no idea and then think they have to aim to ride something that's 1 to 1.5 their weight or they're just not on the team.
Mahanumah
Mahanumah
VIC
336 posts
VIC, 336 posts
26 May 2014 9:34pm
I reckon everyone should ride the biggest board your ego will allow....
laceys lane
laceys lane
QLD
19804 posts
QLD, 19804 posts
26 May 2014 11:14pm
JeanG said...
Has anyone here recommended riding a board so small that they don't enjoy surfing?



no, but i know a lot of ex really hardcore sup ers who went so small - well, they don't sup at all now. one was one of oz's best


nothing imo, when i'm prone surfing, looks more stupid than i guy on a really small sup tripping around and paddling his ring out trying to get waves. and it certainly doesn't look like they are having fun and thats includes more than a few that know what they are doing


sup surfing in general has lost the plot


flame on
teatrea
teatrea
QLD
4177 posts
QLD, 4177 posts
27 May 2014 12:57am

Unless your tyrone lannister , these short sups are a croc.
EnzoSV
EnzoSV
8 posts
8 posts
27 May 2014 6:08am
Interesting input from all of you.

My first SUP was 9'8, I got loads of comments at the line up calling it "the bus" but with proper surf etiquete I gained acceptance. Then (with doubts) I moved to a 8'5 on which I really improved skills and therefore I had more fun.

Then I trimmed to a 7'7x27... same story, way better feeling, got lots of respect at the line up, fun factor went double and skills too. I finally performed good roundhouses.

Now I feel I should do it again, get smaller to have more powerful turns, better carving, and more fun. My context is fairly flat 3-8' point breaks all year, so I dont worry much about wind chop. In fact, wind chop with the small board doesnt affect me at all, mixed swells like storm swells when you get a lot of movement does.

My 7'7 98L feels fat now (starboard pro 2012) from 2013 it has only 92L but from your input I could learn to handle 85L. Now, shape for 85L is the question: how small vrs how fat? How to compare a JP pro 7'4x27 90L vrs Fanatic 8'0x28 90L? I would go 7'4 unless waves were 8+

One last thought: on every new board I thought to keep the previous for the "tough days" but I ended up growing the skills to compensate and it is my one board quiver for all conditions (I dont do pipeline or jaws anyway)

Cheers
Kami
Kami
1566 posts
1566 posts
27 May 2014 6:26am
Hi Enzo, watch this GONG 6'10" making it fun in crappies condition from the Channel on French coast looking England coast
EnzoSV
EnzoSV
8 posts
8 posts
27 May 2014 7:55am
Kami said...
Hi Enzo, watch this GONG 6'10" making it fun in crappies condition from the Channel on French coast looking England coast



I would love to have that one, lenght/width/outline look like a winner, just the ~5" rails dont convince me. Maybe 4"-4.5" max would do for me and Gong wont ship to El Salvador :(
Kami
Kami
1566 posts
1566 posts
27 May 2014 3:13pm
EnzoSV said...
Kami said...
Hi Enzo, watch this GONG 6'10" making it fun in crappies condition from the Channel on French coast looking England coast



I would love to have that one, lenght/width/outline look like a winner, just the ~5" rails dont convince me. Maybe 4"-4.5" max would do for me and Gong wont ship to El Salvador :(


Despite of these fat rails it's would be working at your place when it's got choppy conditions, as Gizzie said need a quiver . this GONG will complet it.
Last year as i shaped one of my board inspired from this GONG 6'10", i can say this is hard to make thinner rail and keep some volume .
Your prime question was:" key points to consider about the shape that affect that ratio".
Your Madeiro PRO 7'5 is a well balance board. , if you move one of the 3 dimensions making together the right volume, you have to change the two others.
Other parameters is rocker and outline which is giving volume. As i said before square instead of traditional elliptic design provide more area the more volume -->so you can go thinner board






GizzieNZ
GizzieNZ
4103 posts
4103 posts
27 May 2014 3:27pm
Very nice to ride a low volume board in "perfect conditions" I am sure
but the 75 % of the surfing time that is "less than perfect conditions".......
well Ho Hum we all know we need at least two boards.....mayb even a quiver
colas
colas
5379 posts
5379 posts
27 May 2014 4:26pm
Hi EnzoSV,
For the volume, you need to match your weight. The baseline volume is your weight + weigth of board & paddle in kg
This gives your the minimal floatation, and then you can add some liters for confort. 10 to 20 liters seem a general rule. Less and it can get quickly tiring, more and it actually feels less stable as too "corky".

For the lengths, it depends on your spot. More length allows for a bigger range to position yourself for takeoff, so if the take off zone is quite predictable, you can get away with sub-7' boards. Note that sub-7' are really interesting in very small waves, on chest high waves and more, no problem to move a 7'6" around.

On the thickness, note the the quoted thickness is at the stringer, it is the thickness of the rails only for flat decks. Domed decks can bring you surprisingly low-volume rails while keeping a comfortable volume
SandS
SandS
VIC
5904 posts
VIC, 5904 posts
27 May 2014 8:50pm

big supper + big sup = good easy fun, all the time .
EnzoSV
EnzoSV
8 posts
8 posts
28 May 2014 5:03am
colas said... if the take off zone is quite predictable, you can get away with sub-7' boards. Note that sub-7' are really interesting in very small waves, on chest high waves and more, no problem to move a 7'6" around.

On the thickness, note the the quoted thickness is at the stringer, it is the thickness of the rails only for flat decks. Domed decks can bring you surprisingly low-volume rails while keeping a comfortable volume


I totally agree and sums up my conclusion:

a) 1x total weight to volume ratio can be done and wave performace is very enjoyable if you got the skill and stamina
b) giving the same volume: the larger the surf, the longer the board.

@Kami and Colas: the 6'10 gong totally makes sense in chest high surf or less, its volume means it can be ridden by up to a 90-95kg supper. Rails wise, it is true you can get a very domed deck to get thinner rails to a certain point or think outside the box with the shape.

Just how much a sub 7 vrs a 7+ at same volume overlap on chest to head high surf is a matter of preference I think.

Probably 2yrs ago, somebody had the same conclusion but volume ratio was 1.2 and shortSUP was sub 8, therefore everything written above could be discarded in the near future.






boardbumps
boardbumps
NSW
698 posts
NSW, 698 posts
28 May 2014 10:04am
Lacey you just have to remember that everthing in surfing is a cycle/circle.
We are, well here on this forum, are at the opposite side of the circle.

After being part of the wave ski revolution in the early 80's, the wind surf revolution at the same time, later the longboard evolution, then kite boarding and now SUP designs. Surf SUP designs will move back to a more "conventional" shape eventually.

You just have to remember that, All shapes work, only some work better than others.

One of the things that I really like about surf design is the complete freedom of design choice.
Especially when you use EPS and epoxy as your not constrained by a 6'0 PU blank.
rodriguez
rodriguez
VIC
883 posts
VIC, 883 posts
30 May 2014 5:02pm
boardbumps said..

Lacey you just have to remember that everthing in surfing is a cycle/circle.
We are, well here on this forum, are at the opposite side of the circle.

After being part of the wave ski revolution in the early 80's, the wind surf revolution at the same time, later the longboard evolution, then kite boarding and now SUP designs. Surf SUP designs will move back to a more "conventional" shape eventually.

You just have to remember that, All shapes work, only some work better than others.

One of the things that I really like about surf design is the complete freedom of design choice.
Especially when you use EPS and epoxy as your not constrained by a 6'0 PU blank.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
In the late 70's early 80's you didn't paddle boards so much as swim with them under your chest, unless you were 65-70 kg surf fit ie; surf everyday, it got old real quick.
Everyone just went too small,ruined some surfers,it's not fun catching 6 waves in an hour and bogging down on a wave you would scoot around on a board with more volume and length. I think we could be seeing a similar thing with the evolution of sup's, it's going to be interesting to see where we end up.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅