poor relative said...
Maybe the other side of the coin is some are too sensitive.
as Gruzie put it "its the internet it aint real"
I notice that gropster's been banned....again.
Is that cause his viewpoint is skewed or is it cause he is a tool. The latter me thinks.
If you act like a tool expect to be treated like a tool. Simple.
How many letters/articles criticising the Murdoch family make it into print doya reckon Rellie?
I have to say I can't recall Groper being abusive at any time (unlike most of us one time or another). He has been like a dog with a bone tho and has dared to question this site and the moderators. Holy fek?!

If that is the reason for banning then SB should take a real good look at itself and even the playing field for all contributers and lessen the pally pally bias that seems to exist.
Disapointing Loz. I can think of several regulars that have nothing but a nasty sh!t stiring and negative vibe that should be waaaayyyy further ahead in the cue for banning.
BTW, I'm not thinking of you here Rellie (although i think your personal attacks on Groper show an inability to let go of former friction and are a tad out of line) as you do post some genuinely informative items and don't make your sole intention of internerd biatch slappin. Yes and you post some funny as fek sh!te now and then too.
Galah.. you have ended up playing the same game as that which you criticise Rellie for.
Here's a simple suggestion:Acceptable = "I think your argument/idea is ridiculous or even idiotic and here is my reasons why.."
Unacceptable = " I think you are an idiot/tool/turkey etc etc."
The diff is the former example draws attention to the view of/on the topic NOT the individual. BIG diff IMO.
3 strikes on the above shows a clear trend and you is outta here?
Has SB got the nurries (and time) for this?
Have your say.. but just maybe get banned ey?