it's time to carry guns )-:

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
frant
frant
VIC
1230 posts
VIC, 1230 posts
15 Dec 2010 11:39am
cisco said...

If a Swiss person uses their service weapon in a criminal act the penalty is doubled.

I don't know about the statistics as I have seen other statistics that suggest differently.

What I do believe is:-

"A military program like that will do a lot more good for this country than the "touchy feely" social programs they have going currently."





Gun Deaths - International Comparisons
Gun deaths per 100,000 population (for the year indicated):

Homicide Suicide Other (inc Accident)

USA (2001) 3.98 5.92 0.36
Italy (1997) 0.81 1.1 0.07
Switzerland (1998) 0.50 5.8 0.10
Canada (2002) 0.4 2.0 0.04
Finland (2003) 0.35 4.45 0.10
Australia (2001) 0.24 1.34 0.10
France (2001) 0.21 3.4 0.49
England/Wales (2002) 0.15 0.2 0.03
Scotland (2002) 0.06 0.2 0.02
Japan (2002) 0.02 0.04 0

Data taken from Cukier and Sidel (2006) The Global Gun Epidemic. Praeger Security International. Westport.
If the statistics don't suit then ignore them hey Cisco! You express disdain at social development programs, others express the same about military training. That is a matter of opinion, the statistics suggest contrary to your opinion. Its a bit like Mark. He chooses to ignore the statistics that show that the most violent crime (homicide) is significantly higher in the USA.
One could almost suggest that the ready availability of firearms in the Swiss home leads to a significant increase in the number of gun suicides.5.8 c/f 1.34. or are the Swiss just depressed about compulsory National Service.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23651 posts
WA, 23651 posts
15 Dec 2010 10:21am
frant said...

cisco said...

If a Swiss person uses their service weapon in a criminal act the penalty is doubled.

I don't know about the statistics as I have seen other statistics that suggest differently.

What I do believe is:-

"A military program like that will do a lot more good for this country than the "touchy feely" social programs they have going currently."





Gun Deaths - International Comparisons
Gun deaths per 100,000 population (for the year indicated):

Homicide Suicide Other (inc Accident)

USA (2001) 3.98 5.92 0.36
Italy (1997) 0.81 1.1 0.07
Switzerland (1998) 0.50 5.8 0.10
Canada (2002) 0.4 2.0 0.04
Finland (2003) 0.35 4.45 0.10
Australia (2001) 0.24 1.34 0.10
France (2001) 0.21 3.4 0.49
England/Wales (2002) 0.15 0.2 0.03
Scotland (2002) 0.06 0.2 0.02
Japan (2002) 0.02 0.04 0

Data taken from Cukier and Sidel (2006) The Global Gun Epidemic. Praeger Security International. Westport.

<snip> Its a bit like Mark. He chooses to ignore the statistics that show that the most violent crime (homicide) is significantly higher in the USA.


With respect frant, you choose to ignore that the USA has waaayyyy lower rates of burglary, armed robbery, assault, steal motor vehicles etc than the countries with strict gun control. One could surmise that it because if you do those things in America you may get shot by somebody defending themselves.

Potato, potarrrto



frant
frant
VIC
1230 posts
VIC, 1230 posts
15 Dec 2010 1:35pm
Mark _australia said...

frant said...

cisco said...

If a Swiss person uses their service weapon in a criminal act the penalty is doubled.

I don't know about the statistics as I have seen other statistics that suggest differently.

What I do believe is:-

"A military program like that will do a lot more good for this country than the "touchy feely" social programs they have going currently."





Gun Deaths - International Comparisons
Gun deaths per 100,000 population (for the year indicated):

Homicide Suicide Other (inc Accident)

USA (2001) 3.98 5.92 0.36
Italy (1997) 0.81 1.1 0.07
Switzerland (1998) 0.50 5.8 0.10
Canada (2002) 0.4 2.0 0.04
Finland (2003) 0.35 4.45 0.10
Australia (2001) 0.24 1.34 0.10
France (2001) 0.21 3.4 0.49
England/Wales (2002) 0.15 0.2 0.03
Scotland (2002) 0.06 0.2 0.02
Japan (2002) 0.02 0.04 0

Data taken from Cukier and Sidel (2006) The Global Gun Epidemic. Praeger Security International. Westport.

<snip> Its a bit like Mark. He chooses to ignore the statistics that show that the most violent crime (homicide) is significantly higher in the USA.


With respect frant, you choose to ignore that the USA has waaayyyy lower rates of burglary, armed robbery, assault, steal motor vehicles etc than the countries with strict gun control. One could surmise that it because if you do those things in America you may get shot by somebody defending themselves.

Potato, potarrrto






Mark, Show me the statistics where the much lower rate of burglary, armed robbery, assault etc is way lower in the USA c/f Australia. All I see is your claim that this is the case and the very real statistic that murder is 15 times greater. Are you then suggesting that there is a quantum leap from murder to other types of crime. ie from 15 times greater murder rate to a lesser armed robbery rate does not add up. You may be quoting perception of being affected by crime. Here in Aus we are sensitive and concerned, in the USA people don't think twice if their neighbour is gunned down.
Unfortunately it is not tomato tumarrto but a very real difference.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23651 posts
WA, 23651 posts
15 Dec 2010 10:49am
Read my long post on about P2 - second last post on the page
Won't post it again as it is huge

And no, it is not perception of crims, FFS somebody else mentioned that also as they just can't believe the big bad US is so far behind us in many areas.
frant
frant
VIC
1230 posts
VIC, 1230 posts
15 Dec 2010 2:19pm
Mark _australia said...

Read my long post on about P2 - second last post on the page
Won't post it again as it is huge

And no, it is not perception of crims, FFS somebody else mentioned that also as they just can't believe the big bad US is so far behind us in many areas.


Mark You have quoted a survey. ie they surveyed people for a response. They quote the number of people who responded to a question, these are not statistics. Even if these figures do accurately refelect the number of recorded incidences someone is making a judgement call that a murder rate of 15 times higher makes up the difference between having more houses burgled as an indication of which is the more violent society. The most violent crime is what counts as having the heaviest weighted average in my book.
maxm
maxm
NSW
864 posts
NSW, 864 posts
15 Dec 2010 2:48pm
Mark _australia said...

Here is an AUSSIE stats verifiable one (if you want stats): (sorry - long)

Posted: March 2, 2001

By Jon Dougherty

Law enforcement and anti-crime activists regularly claim that the
United States tops the charts in most crime-rate categories, but a new
international study says that America's former master -- Great Britain
-- has much higher levels of crime.

The International Crime Victims Survey, conducted by Leiden University
in Holland, found that England and Wales ranked second overall in
violent crime among industrialized nations.

Twenty-six percent of English citizens -- roughly one-quarter of the
population -- have been victimized by violent crime. Australia led the
list with more than 30 percent of its population victimized.

The United States didn't even make the "top 10" list of industrialized
nations whose citizens were victimized by crime.

Jack Straw, the British home secretary, admitted that "levels of
victimization are higher than in most comparable countries for most
categories of crime."

Highlights of the study indicated that:

* The percentage of the population that suffered "contact crime"
in England and Wales was 3.6 percent, compared with 1.9 percent
in the United States and 0.4 percent in Japan.

* Burglary rates in England and Wales were also among the highest
recorded. Australia (3.9 percent) and Denmark (3.1 per cent) had
higher rates of burglary with entry than England and Wales (2.8
percent). In the U.S., the rate was 2.6 percent, according to
1995 figures;

* "After Australia and England and Wales, the highest prevalence
of crime was in Holland (25 percent), Sweden (25 percent) and
Canada (24 percent). The United States, despite its high murder
rate, was among the middle ranking countries with a 21 percent
victimization rate," the London Telegraph said.

* England and Wales also led in automobile thefts. More than 2.5
percent of the population had been victimized by car theft,
followed by 2.1 percent in Australia and 1.9 percent in France.
Again, the U.S. was not listed among the "top 10" nations.

* The study found that Australia led in burglary rates, with
nearly 4 percent of the population having been victimized by a
burglary. Denmark was second with 3.1 percent; the U.S. was
listed eighth at about 1.8 percent.


Interestingly, the study found that one of the lowest victimization
rates -- just 15 percent overall -- occurred in Northern Ireland, home
of the Irish Republican Army and scene of years of terrorist violence.

Analysts in the U.S. were quick to point out that all of the other
industrialized nations included in the survey had stringent gun-control
laws, but were overall much more violent than the U.S.

Indeed, information on Handgun Control's Center to Prevent Handgun
Violence website actually praises Australia and attempts to portray
Australia as a much safer country following strict gun-control measures
passed by lawmakers in 1996.

"The next time a credulous friend or acquaintance tells you that
Australia actually suffered more crime when they got tougher on guns
. offer him a Foster's, and tell him the facts," the CPHV site says.

"In 1998, the rate at which firearms were used in murder, attempted
murder, assault, sexual assault and armed robbery went down. In that
year, the last for which statistics are available, the number of
murders involving a firearm declined to its lowest point in four
years," says CPHV.

However, the International Crime Victims Survey notes that overall
crime victimization Down Under rose from 27.8 percent of the population
in 1988, to 28.6 percent in 1991 to over 30 percent in 1999.

Advocates of less gun control in the U.S. say the drop in gun murder
rates was more than offset by the overall victimization increase. Also,
they note that Australia leads the ICVS report in three of four
categories -- burglary (3.9 percent of the population), violent crime
(4.1 percent) and overall victimization (about 31 percent).

Australia is second to England in auto theft (2.1 percent).

In March 2000, WorldNetDaily reported that since Australia's widespread
gun ban, violent crime had increased in the country.

WND reported that, although lawmakers responsible for passing the ban
promised a safer country, the nation's crime statistics tell a
different story:

* Countrywide, homicides are up 3.2 percent.

* Assaults are up 8.6 percent.

* Amazingly, armed robberies have climbed nearly 45 percent.

* In the Australian state of Victoria, gun homicides have climbed
300 percent.

* In the 25 years before the gun bans, crime in Australia had been
dropping steadily.

* There has been a reported "dramatic increase" in home burglaries
and assaults on the elderly.

Interesting - the 2 countries with the most stringent gun laws topped the violent crime list.Then again, doubt anyone read it as it is factual and long.





Is that the quote you were referring to Mark? The one by a gun lobbyist that says (in part)
The International Crime Victims Survey, conducted by Leiden University in Holland, found that England and Wales ranked second overall in violent crime among industrialized nations.


Which I guess is referring to this survey - http://rechten.uvt.nl/icvs/pdffiles/ICVS2004_05.pdf

Where levels of victimisation in Australia are about on par with the US, although reporting levels in the US are far, far lower than in Aus (p.36).

But this is talking about victimisation, Mark. I've been a victim of a crime. Someone broke into my house while I was on holidays and stole my telly. I'm a crime victim. But I've never had anyone stick a gun in my face nor do I feel that I need to worry about that kind of thing happening in my neighbourhood, unlike people in the USA.

All throughout that report are notes like this one (my emphasis):

On average a weapon was present in 17% of cases of assault or threat in
countries (based on cases over the last five years). Of all incidents 6.4%
involved a knife and 2.4% a gun. Mexico, the USA and Northern Ireland
stand out with the highest percentages gun-related attacks (16%, 6% and
6% respectively).


Nor do I know anyone who has had a gun stuck in their face. Nor do I hear about it happening around here. I'm quite happy with that state of affairs! As far as I'm concerned, if you want to live with guns, go live in the good ol' US of A or Northern Ireland or Sao Paolo and leave me and mine in peace.
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
15 Dec 2010 11:55am
I'd rather get robbed than shot.

Anybody else actually had a gun pointed at them in anger? I have and will never believe it's a good idea to increase the numbers of them out there.

EDIT:
I had a rifle barrel in right up my face and also against my head. It was surreal at the time and even freakier later (6 months) when i recalled that I nearly got my head blown off coz a customer in the shop went into 'auto pilot' and tried to walk out of the shop - freaking the speed/steriod junky out. He could have just twitched and it was game over for me.

So I am a crime victim and a gun victim but don't see any sense whatsoever in increasing the incidence of guns.




Hell, I think the average good citizen out there can barely be trusted to do up their own shoes, let alone drive. Why would I ever be tempted to encourage more gun ownership??

Just like cars, who is ever gonna say "Aww yeh, I'm a bit of an idiot so I really shouldn't operate a car/gun."


Instead of following the US down the self destructive path of high gun ownership (and worship), perhaps we should be allowing registered possesion of non-lethal protection such as capsicum spray. Cap spray is not entirely without flaws but obviously less fatal generally.

doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
15 Dec 2010 12:23pm
Take the guns off the people, and the tazers off the cops
frant
frant
VIC
1230 posts
VIC, 1230 posts
15 Dec 2010 5:03pm
maxm said...

Tell this baby about how safe he and his mum are thanks to everyone carrying guns:

www.smh.com.au/world/mother-killed-in-mall-gun-battle-20101215-18xjq.html



Now let me see. Thats 1 murdered and 5 wounded as a result of a gun battle in a shopping mall in the USA. Now Mark just how can it be that with 15 times the murder rate the serious assault rates are not going to reflect a similar extreme rate in the USA. Or is it that these guys were just really lousy shots and typically in the USA we would have 6 clean kills and no wounded to keep the murder rates so disproportionate to the serious assault rate.
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
16 Dec 2010 7:47am
frant said...
are the Swiss just depressed about compulsory National Service.


That could be on the mark.

Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23651 posts
WA, 23651 posts
16 Dec 2010 10:16am
Switzerland has the highest per household gun ownership in the world (due to aforementioned national service) 6 million guns in 8 million houses was mentioned.

Why does it not have the highest murder rate?

Could it be social problems are the driving factor, not the accessability of tools that can do the job?
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
16 Dec 2010 10:36am
I still can't get my head around why you would want a potential tool of death in every household?

It's not like every household in the burbs has been burgled or every individual has been mugged, raped, asaulted.

Sure (depending on which skewed stats you subscribe to) the incidence of serious crime may be on the rise, but a proliferation of guns will seriously esculate the situation IMO.

Introduce a gun into a home invasion situation and the whole scenario ratchets up in danger - for ALL parties.

More guns out there in society would surely mean easier accessibility to guns for crooks too?

EDIT: Pretty bloody sketchy for coppers who turn up to the typical domestic/drug drama if there is a gun on premises. Suddenly it's looking like a hostage seige or in the heat of the moment, somebody copping a bullet instead of cap spray or a tingle time jolt.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23651 posts
WA, 23651 posts
16 Dec 2010 10:44am
GF I never said that everyone should have them - but I do believe the buyback was on false pretences, achieved nothing and took a lawfully owned item away from responsible people but not off the crooks.

If guns are so bad then the Govt's first action should be increasing the pathetic penalties for having an unlicensed firearm.

I know of a drug dealer, previously convicted of drugs and weapons charges, who was found with speed, lots of cash and a loaded revolver in his car. He got $500 fine for the gun.
That is disgusting.

All I'm saying is let the nice people have guns if they wish (make them well secured of course), and put the druggies and bikies in jail for a bl00dy long time when they are found with a gun.

The fact that nice people can have them is evidenced by the fact that we don't have cops or soldiers shooting each other when they have guns with them all the time.
We all have knives in our houses but we don't all stab people. But likewise, a $100 fine for a gang member carrying a knife outside a nightclub is disgusting.
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
16 Dec 2010 11:35am
Fair nuff.

However knives don't go off accidentally and are so ordinary that most kids don't find them interesting and want to play with them.. to their own fatal end.

As far as the buyback goes, nice folks could keep most of their weapons but had to register and keep them in an approved manner. That made perfect sense to me.

It may have been inconveniant for some, but hey - isn't everything in society such as vehicle licencing/road speed limits etc geared around the majority welfare not the minority?

As for automatic rifles, assault rifles and 'machine guns' well.. anyone wanting play Arnie on the weekend and having access to high powered or high repeating weaponary is totally tapped in the head as far as I'm concerned. Sure roo cullers etc are a very small niche that may be able to justify such weapons but an M16 in suburbia.. c'mon.

Gotta take the good with the bad in all legislation and ensuring safer storage and registration of weapons as well as ceasing the legal distribution of assault rifles has no doubt made the whole game safer - and most likelt stemmed the flow (but not ceased) of these weapons into the hands of crooks too.

Win - win.



Anyway.. this thread was called "It's time to carry guns".. and short of 120,000,000 Indos arriving armed in troopies on our shores it is never time to 'carry' guns IMO.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23651 posts
WA, 23651 posts
16 Dec 2010 1:30pm
getfunky said...

Fair nuff.

However knives don't go off accidentally and are so ordinary that most kids don't find them interesting and want to play with them.. to their own fatal end.

As far as the buyback goes, nice folks could keep most of their weapons but had to register and keep them in an approved manner. That made perfect sense to me.

It may have been inconveniant for some, but hey - isn't everything in society such as vehicle licencing/road speed limits etc geared around the majority welfare not the minority?

As for automatic rifles, assault rifles and 'machine guns' well.. anyone wanting play Arnie on the weekend and having access to high powered or high repeating weaponary is totally tapped in the head as far as I'm concerned. Sure roo cullers etc are a very small niche that may be able to justify such weapons but an M16 in suburbia.. c'mon.

Gotta take the good with the bad in all legislation and ensuring safer storage and registration of weapons as well as ceasing the legal distribution of assault rifles has no doubt made the whole game safer - and most likelt stemmed the flow (but not ceased) of these weapons into the hands of crooks too.



Agree with all bar last para

Are you aware that about 10,000 SKS assault rifles were imported in the 1980's and bought in Qld and Tas when they did not have registration? In the buyback, about 1% of them were handed in. 99% of the hand-ins were normal people giving up their registered / licensed .22semiauto's, pump and semiauto shotguns.
All the bad ones like those used by Bryant are still out there and largely in the wrong hands. The best estimate for these semiautomatic military style rifles is that there are about 350,000 of them in Australia.
That is why I say first step should have been a decent jail term, no excuses, if caught in possession of an unlicensed firearm. It was a Govt vote grab / seen to be doing "something" in the aftermath of a tragedy.

Whoever robbed you probably got 5-10 yrs...... it should be 15yrs for armed robbery, and 30yrs if done with a firearm.
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
16 Dec 2010 2:27pm
Cars & guns = deadly weapons. You need a licence for both.

When will we get driver education and IF guns were more available we would need more education for them and at the moment unless some one has more info we dont have any.

When I was young and living with Mum & Dad, Dad and most of his mates at the time had guns. Dad had a .22 Bretta semi auto and it was always kept at the house. We were taught about gun safety ect.

Its alot different today as peoples acces to guns isnt like it was in the 70s.
basil
basil
NSW
1 posts
NSW, 1 posts
18 Dec 2010 5:02pm
Forget Police, Lawyers, Judges.
I have never started a fight in my life. I live by two rules:-

1. forget pubic servants above they are useless, form & paper work fillers.
2. ***censored - leave to your imagination*****.

Other night in Sydney we had about 100 mostly sensible protesters
supporting Wiki Leaks guy. Radio reported over 70 police watching them.

I saw 2 gang bangers drive by in a $300K car past them, no
problem, no how could you afford this...nothing.

Shows you priorities of nasty government in this country.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅