sausage said...

deXtrous said...

I think you may enjoy watching this.. Part 1 of 4 if you're interested to look further

Not so sure about the whole 'sun god' thing, but he does raise a good thought on the origin of the pyramids themselves.

What a load of bull5hit - with erroneous "facts" like 5.3 sq km base area, that would make each side at the base around 2.3km long. Somewhat larger than the actual 240metres or 53000 sq. metres.

Well he said 13 acres. That's 52 ha - approx 230 m x 230 m. Its a straightforward conversion error.

I thought the construction had been figured out but I guess I'm wrong. There's no mystery about how they handled stone though. There are quarries with unfinished extractions up the Nile somewhere. The stones were split with magnetically focused nuclear plasma jets and transported by nanobots, billions and billions of them. They came from the future through a stargate no, wet wood wedges. The faces were finished by stone rubbing I think but dont quote me. Maybe it was nanobots. I though there were records of taxes and service records etc that explained the admin and logistics. I must have dreamed it.

NotWal said...

sausage said...

deXtrous said...

I think you may enjoy watching this.. Part 1 of 4 if you're interested to look further



Not so sure about the whole 'sun god' thing, but he does raise a good thought on the origin of the pyramids themselves.

Maybe it was nanobots.

i woulda said fembots. grrrrrrrr.

some of the people on this forum really have lost grip. that video is the biggest crock.

a lot of it was wrong.

other than the maths being dodgey, there is the fact that there is heiroglyphs describing the construction. they're inside the frickin pyramid. there is also the famine stele

plus a french architect has a method of building pyramids quickly.


the other thing that is completely ignored here is that the sumerians built pyramids long before the egyptians. i think a few people need to google sumer and read the facts. and the fact that the sumerians moved into egypt and brought their building tequniques with them. so there is a proven history of that form of construction predating the egyptians.

it is thought the sumerians were the first pharohs. that they also traveled to other parts of the globe and built other pyramids. there is drawings of them in other pyramids. it is thought that they decended from australoid being asia and australia.

in fact the only uniting element of the majority of stepped pyramids around the world is the sumerians.

ezinearticles.com/?In-Search-of-Atlantis----Getting-Closer&id=313482

they entered egypt after a flood destroyed their civilisation. almost every religion known to modern man talks of a civilisation being destroyed by a great flood. some say it's platos atlantic. there is no doubt that lost civilisation exist below water. some are no longer lost like in japan and western india.

fsa.demonoid.com/files/details/2345331/001007074707/

and here is the clincher, better put on those tin foil hats.

what do the pyramids have to do with global warming?

Gestalt said...

and here is the clincher, better put on those tin foil hats.

what do the pyramids have to do with global warming?

way too many people blowing hot air?

actually id say nothing.

barn said...

the simplest answer is always preferred, goddidit?

Nah, I was busy that day. Wasn't me.

i can not believe people..... oh i give up.

lol, right on FN!

ok,

sausage gets the gong. they are both pointing to the sky......

but the other answer is the last mass migration of the human race occurred at the end of the ice age as global warming caused rising sea levels which sank civilisations and forced people to move to new areas. it's thought the summerians left atlantis after it flooded due to high sea levels and a natural disaster.

hey doc,

i read through the rex stuff. that was a great read. he may be ahead of his time. seems to be a lot of evidance now suggesting the australoid connection.

i'm not so sure australia is eden but it is an interesting thought. i'd be going more for indonesia.

this is a good read.
www.armeniapedia.org/index.php?title=Tracing_the_Origin_of_Ancient_Sumerians

yes velikovsky is an interesting read, funny how what a lot of his ideas were berated as lunatic and are now taken as common knowledge.

the lime stone casing/coatings of the pyramid was scavenged for resources.

the pyramid of giza is eight sided

cisco said...

This guy raised some questions and put forward evidence that suggests the world has experienced "near extinction" events as little as 3,500 years ago.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky

www.knowledge.co.uk/velikovsky/

www.varchive.org/

www.skepdic.com/velikov.html

www.tmgnow.com/repository/secret/velikovsky.html

If what he puts forward is fact, the people who built the pyramids were probably wiped out and Egyptians of today would have no connection to them at all.

And that is where I reckon Zahi Hawass has interrupted the investigation. Anything that looks as though it may separate Egyptians from the Pyramids is hindered.

I guess the stake of the nation is at risk. God forbid that the Gypos should turn out to be a nation of nile gardeners who built up a religion around relics from a bygone era which they did not understand!

theDoctor said...


the pyramid of giza is eight sided

How do you work that out?

theDoctor said...

I recon if the cladding was on it still you wouldnt see those seems, they would be filled..

^ here's my guess.

it was known from back in the day of the greeks that long straight lines looked curved or cambered. the greeks built long post and beam arrangemnts with a camber so when you stood back and looked at the building the parapet or top line look to be level.


could be with the pyramid a long straight side would look bowed so they put a v into it to make it look straight.

yep, the pyramid only looks 8 sided under certain light. once the shadow is obvious