What did you get from the royal wedding

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
30 Apr 2011 4:20pm
I learnt that Kate Middleton's sister is kn hot......


/images/misc/forum-image-missing.gif
Jradedmondo
Jradedmondo
NSW
637 posts
NSW, 637 posts
30 Apr 2011 6:24pm
definitely second that one
poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
30 Apr 2011 4:53pm
Fine.......

Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
30 Apr 2011 8:29pm
I think Kate is hotter.... Although a tiny tiny bit underweight on wedding day !
GypsyDrifter
GypsyDrifter
WA
2371 posts
WA, 2371 posts
30 Apr 2011 7:13pm
Did Not watch it. Very much not interested.
bjw
bjw
QLD
3690 posts
bjw bjw
QLD, 3690 posts
30 Apr 2011 9:20pm
What did I get from the wedding day?

A chubby, I mean the clap. Errr I mean great memories..................... of the sister.


AKSonline
AKSonline
WA
925 posts
WA, 925 posts
30 Apr 2011 7:58pm
There was a wedding?????

DM
lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
30 Apr 2011 10:10pm
What did I get from the royal wedding????
The royal sh!ts that every tv channel was showing it.
Its a shame a nice aussie girl has married into a bunch of pommie, stuck up,toffee nosed twatts.

$76 million spent just on sercurity.......enough to save millions of people from starvation in a third world country,,,,just on the security,let alone all the rest of the bullpoo.
Royalty.....WTF..... kings and Queens........do they do anything?
Do we need them?
GreenPat
GreenPat
QLD
4103 posts
QLD, 4103 posts
30 Apr 2011 10:51pm
lotofwind said...


$76 million spent just on sercurity.......enough to save millions of people from starvation in a third world country


To be fair, it takes a lot more than $76 million to 'save' people from starvation in a third world country. It takes education, leadership, and most of all cultural change. The problem with most third world countries is the incompatible mix of first world / western technology and culture with traditional culture and ideals. If these can be reconciled and sustainable agriculture and economic policy be established, then perhaps people can be 'saved' from starvation.

In the meantime, I reckon $76 million plus the rest is probably quite worth it for the royal 'brand' to the UK, considering the estimated 2 billion strong audience. That sounds like pretty good value for money marketing to me.
hamburglar
hamburglar
ACT
2174 posts
ACT, 2174 posts
30 Apr 2011 10:57pm
GypsyDrifter said...

Did Not watch it. Very much not interested.


+1 .. had some paint that i watched dry
lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
30 Apr 2011 11:03pm
GreenPat said...

lotofwind said...


$76 million spent just on sercurity.......enough to save millions of people from starvation in a third world country


To be fair, it takes a lot more than $76 million to 'save' people from starvation in a third world country. It takes education, leadership, and most of all cultural change. The problem with most third world countries is the incompatible mix of first world / western technology and culture with traditional culture and ideals. If these can be reconciled and sustainable agriculture and economic policy be established, then perhaps people can be 'saved' from starvation.

In the meantime, I reckon $76 million plus the rest is probably quite worth it for the royal 'brand' to the UK, considering the estimated 2 billion strong audience. That sounds like pretty good value for money marketing to me.


Value for money.
Who wins,,,who gets the great value for money...the royal family?
$76 million was just the sercurity,,,,not even the smallest tip of the ice burg.
You could probly multiplie that figure by 100 and still be under estermating.
The cost of some one to look after the royal corgies for the night was probly more than enough to feed a third world family for a year.

Did you see the report that they Forcfully loaded all the homeless street people onto buses and removed them well clear of the area because many of the upper class society find then an eye sore.
GalahOnTheBay
GalahOnTheBay
NSW
4188 posts
NSW, 4188 posts
1 May 2011 12:36am
cRAZY Canuk said...

Caption contest:

lalalalalala - hear no evil


Om nom nom nom?
subasurf
subasurf
WA
2154 posts
WA, 2154 posts
30 Apr 2011 10:45pm
Simondo said...

I think Kate is hotter.... Although a tiny tiny bit underweight on wedding day !


Underweight? You mad? A girl cannot be underweight...unless they suffer from anorexia...or as I like to call it....anorsexier

Oh...and Kate's sister....that ass....that ass indeed.
GypsyDrifter
GypsyDrifter
WA
2371 posts
WA, 2371 posts
30 Apr 2011 11:29pm
Do you think someone might have said something
to these poor princess's before they went out the door
to the wedding to be seen by millions of people WTHell





lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
1 May 2011 7:39am
GypsyDrifter said...

Do you think someone might have said something
to these poor princess's before they went out the door
to the wedding to be seen by millions of people WTHell



She might as well as worn this and looked like a complete ass.

FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
1 May 2011 6:34am
lotofwind said...

What did I get from the royal wedding????
The royal sh!ts that every tv channel was showing it.
Its a shame a nice aussie girl has married into a bunch of pommie, stuck up,toffee nosed twatts.

$76 million spent just on sercurity.......enough to save millions of people from starvation in a third world country,,,,just on the security,let alone all the rest of the bullpoo.
Royalty.....WTF..... kings and Queens........do they do anything?
Do we need them?



Aussie girl married into the royals? Is she an Aussie?

FWIW I think the royal family are changing to a more modern view as it looks like their recent past history hasn't been too flash.

I think the royal family are actually a good idea. It gives the public something to look too, in the same way that people look to Hollywood stars.

Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
1 May 2011 11:38am
The issue with the British royals nowdays is the British government is on the brink of bankruptcy and the economy is not that flash hot but they still lead this opulent life style at the taxpayers expense.

GalahOnTheBay
GalahOnTheBay
NSW
4188 posts
NSW, 4188 posts
1 May 2011 11:43am
lotofwind said...

She might as well as worn this and looked like a complete ass.



Bahahaha - I thought exactly the same thing, but was thinking about a different part of the donkey...
Flux
Flux
WA
533 posts
WA, 533 posts
1 May 2011 12:11pm


She's not an Aussie , she's born in England by the way.


FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
1 May 2011 12:58pm
Mobydisc said...

The issue with the British royals nowdays is the British government is on the brink of bankruptcy


They are?


and the economy is not that flash hot but they still lead this opulent life style at the taxpayers expense.



Well, what the economy needs is something that stimulates spending... how 'bout a war? Nah, got that one.

What about a great big social occasion that generates income and tourism, and generates a bit of optimism in the country... now that's an idea.

I haven't paid that much attention, but I think the British royal family have changed the way they work with the rest of the nation. I think they pay taxes and earn income from their investments more than being given money by the taxpayer although I am sure they still get something.

I think I read somewhere that part of the wedding was paid by the family themselves, and the security cost by the taxpayer. If this is correct, that sounds fair to me. The public want to see this sort of stuff, and if they need to see it, the public should pay for the security. Otherwise, they may as well have held it in a private location and locked out all other people. It would be a lot easier for them to secure it that way.

cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
1 May 2011 3:18pm
poor relative said...

I learnt that Kate Middleton's sister is kn hot......





Apparently you are not the only one to notice.

http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2011/04/30/royal-wedding-info-pippa-middleton-sexy-butt-william-kate/#.1258-stage-hero1-12

This is a fun look from the same site www.hollywoodlife.com/2011/04/18/royal-wedding-kate-middleton-prince-william-viral-video-dance-funny/

Plus a bit of speculation on Harry and Pippa. www.hollywoodlife.com/2011/04/29/pippa-middleton-prince-harry-chelsy-davy-dating-royal-wedding-video/#362778-0-042911_harry_pippa_19_XXXX_110429164004

pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
1 May 2011 2:31pm
lotofwind said...

What did I get from the royal wedding????
The royal sh!ts that every tv channel was showing it.
Its a shame a nice aussie girl has married into a bunch of pommie, stuck up,toffee nosed twatts.

$76 million spent just on sercurity.......enough to save millions of people from starvation in a third world country,,,,just on the security,let alone all the rest of the bullpoo.
Royalty.....WTF..... kings and Queens........do they do anything?
Do we need them?



Why do you choose to make such a fuss about spending $76million plus on something like this when they make second rate movies every week on budgets greater than this?
Some of these $100million movies get a few hours airing at some obscure movie theatre somewhere and that's about all.
Nobody lines the streets to see them.
Nobody cheers and waves flags when they see them pass by.

At least in this case it had an immediate audience of billions and was covered by almost every channel on tv.
What better positive publicity could anyone ask for than that?
No matter how good or bad the product is that sort of advertising is impossible to buy.
And I would say in this case, they did an excellent job of selling it.
The people lining the streets and cheering were not there like in third world countries where the crowd is forced to attend and cheer or be shot.
Those people were there of their own free will and cheered because they wanted to.
Many had turned up hours or even days earlier to make sure they got a position where they could only just see the procession for a few minutes.

Every time something like this happens there are always the tight orifices who bleat something to the tune of "the money should have been spent on the poor" or education or health or some other bottomless pit.
No matter how much you spend on these things they will always want more because there will always be poor, ignorant and unhealthy people no matter how much money you throw at them.
If it cost $200milion it was still money well spent and it will pay a dividend to british society for a very long time.

dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
1 May 2011 3:47pm
[b]pweedas said...
Why do you choose to make such a fuss about spending $76million plus on something like this when they make second rate movies every week on budgets greater than this?
Some of these $100million movies get a few hours airing at some obscure movie theatre somewhere and that's about all.
Nobody lines the streets to see them.
Nobody cheers and waves flags when they see them pass by.

At least in this case it had an immediate audience of billions and was covered by almost every channel on tv.
What better positive publicity could anyone ask for than that?
No matter how good or bad the product is that sort of advertising is impossible to buy.
And I would say in this case, they did an excellent job of selling it.
The people lining the streets and cheering were not there like in third world countries where the crowd is forced to attend and cheer or be shot.
Those people were there of their own free will and cheered because they wanted to.
Many had turned up hours or even days earlier to make sure they got a position where they could only just see the procession for a few minutes.

Every time something like this happens there are always the tight orifices who bleat something to the tune of "the money should have been spent on the poor" or education or health or some other bottomless pit.
No matter how much you spend on these things they will always want more because there will always be poor, ignorant and unhealthy people no matter how much money you throw at them.
If it cost $200milion it was still money well spent and it will pay a dividend to british society for a very long time.


I agree with him!

poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
1 May 2011 3:59pm
I agree too.

I think they have asked for all their wedding prezzies to be charitable donations raising millions of quid and also benefitting RFDS.

What has Kate Middleton's sisters arse got in common with a JK rowling book?
You know harry is going to be in it.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23649 posts
WA, 23649 posts
1 May 2011 4:12pm
Back on topic - Pip

www.pippasass.com

the gibbo
the gibbo
WA
776 posts
WA, 776 posts
2 May 2011 9:29pm
GypsyDrifter said...

Do you think someone might have said something
to these poor princess's before they went out the door
to the wedding to be seen by millions of people WTHell








In the night garden is a great show dont knock it
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5124 posts
VIC, 5124 posts
3 May 2011 10:35am
I wonder if the royals watch stuff like Robin Hood on the tv?

William could be Richard and Harry could be evil Prince John the bastard half brother.

At the wedding William had the ****y red uniform on and Harry wore the cool dark blue one.

That would be kind of cool getting to play the bad guy and have several hundred years of historical precedent and role models.
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
3 May 2011 10:28pm
Swamp Donkey? Gosh!

I got this from the Royal Wedding.

I tought it was highly appropriate:

petermac33
petermac33
WA
6415 posts
WA, 6415 posts
4 May 2011 8:09am
far and away your best post ever japie.

how appropriate,how true.

loved the bit at 0.56 seconds.

if only the sheep were half as concerned about the trails thousands of feet above their heads,but then they don't exist...baa,baaa





Hamsta
Hamsta
505 posts
505 posts
4 May 2011 8:42am


EDIT

FWIW I think the royal family are changing to a more modern view as it looks like their recent past history hasn't been too flash.

I think the royal family are actually a good idea. It gives the public something to look too, in the same way that people look to Hollywood stars.




I hope you are being facetious because if you are not you are a deadset phucking idiot.
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
4 May 2011 9:13am
petermac33 said...

far and away your best post ever japie.

how appropriate,how true.

loved the bit at 0.56 seconds.

if only the sheep were half as concerned about the trails thousands of feet above their heads,but then they don't exist...baa,baaa








Its funny pete as the more you crap on like that, the more you look like an idiot.
I know you cant help yourself but jeez take it somewhere else mate its getting a bit boring..
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅