Whale Wars

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
18 Nov 2011 3:58pm
Most of the whales taken by the Japanese are Minke whales as far as information on the internet says.

Minke whale populations have been estimated between around 500,000 and just over a 1,000,000 in the southern hemisphere (back in the mid 80's). Each year the Japanese whalers say they take around 1000, give or take a few.

The Minke whales conservation status is as low as it goes (Least concern).

I think what Sea Shepard does is wrong. They are putting other people lives at danger.

I'm not saying whaling is good, just that maybe it is not as bad for the whales population as it is made out to be (and that problems such as shark finning should get more attention).
jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
18 Nov 2011 5:30pm
Dawn Patrol said...

Most of the whales taken by the Japanese are Minke whales as far as information on the internet says.

Minke whale populations have been estimated between around 500,000 and just over a 1,000,000 in the southern hemisphere (back in the mid 80's). Each year the Japanese whalers say they take around 1000, give or take a few.

The Minke whales conservation status is as low as it goes (Least concern).

I think what Sea Shepard does is wrong. They are putting other people lives at danger.

I'm not saying whaling is good, just that maybe it is not as bad for the whales population as it is made out to be (and that problems such as shark fining should get more attention).


The big issue with dropping numbers is the geen pool is limited. Thsi could cause major issues not to far away?

Actually they take, Minke, humpback and fin whales. Minke whale numbers are only guessed and the figures you provided are numbers guessed by the IWC and Japan you'll find. Lets also not forget they are whaling in Australian waters. Against the law, A whale sanctuary, against the law, they are taking a ship with heavy fuel below --?Parallel(sorry don't know the actual figure) also against the law.

As for sea shepherd and sharks did you know that SSCS has been working in the Galapagos's island reserve for years. In fact the SSCS has provided, boats, generators, a ship detection system ( this alone cost over 3 million dollars ), sniffer dogs, radios for all customs crew. In Fact they are part of a joint initiative with the Galapagos's police and are currently helping re write he law books as Eco crime is very hard to prosecute. Even when poachers will take 200,000 sharks and fin them, they still walk free from court. This year the SSCS will also be providing another boat and a helicopter as well as ongoing wages costs for the marine protection.

No major injury from the SSCS so i don't understand how anyone's argument can be they are risking peoples lives recklessly?
Toots
Toots
WA
271 posts
WA, 271 posts
18 Nov 2011 5:54pm
Its just popularism, nothing else, I sit here with my whales tooth that has been passed down from generations, My Dad is Fijian and the whales tooth is the most sacred valuable object there; priceless in fact. They still ate them, as well as humans, Its humans who put the value on these things, even themselves.

Cant stop laughing at the bloke who reckons our 80% of our oxygen comes from the ocean,while some does (cyanobacteria) most of it comes from plants; they take in CO2 and release oxygen, so if our CO2 levels go up, we get greener healthier plants that yield untold wealth.
Kaz1983
Kaz1983
306 posts
306 posts
18 Nov 2011 6:38pm
I'm changing my tune, I still think that that the Sea Shepard use do put themselves in danger and the whalers as well but nobody put a gun to the head of the whalers to be there and it seems just from reading Jbshack's posts and watching The Cove it seems that the Sea Shepard's are in various different projects that all don't involve ramming Japanese boats but seriously I think they are doing more good than harm in the long run.
Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
18 Nov 2011 6:39pm
Yes the catch other whales but it sounds like the Minke Whale is in the lead by a long shot. Sea Shepards website uses an approximation of 800,000 of them-it seems noone really knows, but the general consesus is that their numbers are fairly large, I'm no marine biologist buy I'm not sure what effect/if any removing 1000 whales from a population of several hundred thousand will have on the gene pool.

The other whales seems to be taken in very small numbers <100 , if at all. The JARPA II thingo they use to hunt the whales says the can take 950 Minkes, and 50 Fin whales and 50 humpbacks per season. Unfortunately these whales do have population issues.
Fin Whales are endangered, the IUCN redlist has Humpbacks as of Least Concern (due to their increasing population trend, along with the criteria for being vulnerable getting tougher...). Something should change here definately.

There have been no injuries yet. These guys are throwing acid at people, they are ramming boats in freezing cold waters. They were lucky none of their own people were injured when they got their boat chopping in half. Amd it does sound like they do good in other parts of the world, which is great.



Shirts like these shows they are proud to be undertaking reckless activities. And no matter what someone says, ramming a ship with the intent to sink it, especially in the souther ocean, is not very bright. I'm all for protecting species and saving the environment etc and it should be done. Just not in ways like this.

I don't see the issue with a sustainable approach to whaling, which is what appears to be happening with the Minke whales. If they stop hunting the Fins and Humpbacks and allowed their populations to recover, that'd be great.

It is also thought Krill populations are going to be a serious issue to whale populations in the future.

Kaz1983 said...

I'm changing my tune, I still think that that the Sea Shepard use do put themselves in danger and the whalers as well I'm sticking to that but nobody put a gun to the head of the whalers to be there and it seems just from reading Jbshack's posts and watching The Cove it seems that the Sea Shepard's are in various different projects that all don't involve ramming Japanese boats but seriously I think they are doing more good than harm.



And you're right, noone is putting a gun to the heads of the fisherman. But they don't make the calls on what extent of whaling can happen. It is just their job and they are trying to make a living. I think they are the wrong people to be attacking.
Kaz1983
Kaz1983
306 posts
306 posts
18 Nov 2011 7:00pm
Dawn Patrol said...
And you're right, noone is putting a gun to the heads of the fisherman. But they don't make the calls on what extent of whaling can happen. It is just their job and they are trying to make a living. I think they are the wrong people to be attacking.


So would they have more success if they went after the right people?

Or is it a case of they might have some success if they went after the right people?



EDIT: for the most part I agree with what your saying, just the issues seem to be bigger than I first thought hence the changing of my tune.
stamp
stamp
QLD
2797 posts
QLD, 2797 posts
19 Nov 2011 7:59am
personally i don't have an issue with eating whale as long as it's sustainable. but if people feel so strongly they should target the source of the problem. if there was no demand for whale meat there would be no whale fishing. the money these sea shepherd idiots waste campaigning in the southern ocean would be more effective if it was spent in japan on education/advertising.

charging around the ocean throwing paint is just self-indulgent and childish

subasurf
subasurf
WA
2154 posts
WA, 2154 posts
19 Nov 2011 8:45am
Toots said...


Cant stop laughing at the bloke who reckons our 80% of our oxygen comes from the ocean,while some does (cyanobacteria) most of it comes from plants;


That's because it's true mate. The popular consensus among scientists is between 50-80% of the worlds O2 comes from the sea. You do realise phytoplankton uses photosynthesis to create O2 and is in such abundance it is visible from space? You say that the majority of 02 comes from plants...well there it is. You may ahve this picture in your head of rain forests giving off copious amounts of oxygen while removing CO2...but rain forests only make up less than 2% of the planet...the ocean on the other hand...

I still struggle to understand that people cannot grasp how important the balance in the ocean is. A simple thing like the removal of sharks can have an immense effect (granted enough time) on the world. Remove the shark you get lots fish...get lets of fish you get increased predation on phytoplankton...get that then you'll graduallly get a reduction in O2 output of the oceans. It's a huge simplification but it's a well supported theory. The oceans ARE the world's major source of life giving oxygen. Don't **** with it.

As for the Sea Shepperd and it's crew. Definitely a bunch of unskilled and useless hippies without a clue as to what they are doing. Incompetend doesn't evne begin to describe them.

Still...having said that...they had a huge positive effect on protecting sharks around the world and thus I cannot truly hate them

*sorry, still early...bad spelling*
jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
19 Nov 2011 10:31am
As for the Sea Shepperd and it's crew. Definitely a bunch of unskilled and useless hippies without a clue as to what they are doing. Incompetent doesn't evne begin to describe them.

Still...having said that...they had a huge positive effect on protecting sharks around the world and thus I cannot truly hate them

*sorry, still early...bad spelling*



I did point out that the above skill set still enabled them to perform a search and rescue in condition's that the NZ navy couldn't Still not a single major injury I do think the facts talk for themselves. Also please remember this is the 7th campaign to the southern ocean.

Part of the problem for SSCS is the way they market themselves. They portray themselves as pirates. That works because when the poaches see them coming they panic. BUT sadly that also turns people against them in some circles.

Also the Animal planet show sells them as a little hopeless as well. But we are talking about a skillful bunch of passionate crew that are simply doing what the governments of the world should be doing.
jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
19 Nov 2011 10:36am
stamp said...

personally i don't have an issue with eating whale as long as it's sustainable. but if people feel so strongly they should target the source of the problem. if there was no demand for whale meat there would be no whale fishing. the money these sea shepherd idiots waste campaigning in the southern ocean would be more effective if it was spent in japan on education/advertising.

charging around the ocean throwing paint is just self-indulgent and childish




The big green do nothing machine do that. They run around raising money by telling people they are in the southern ocean ( witch there not and haven't been for years) than use that money to educate the Japanese. I really think there approach is to just wait and hope they stop.

The SSCS budget for the Campaign is very low. In fact less than $2.5 million witch in light of what they are up against and trying to stop is a pittance.

We need people who are passionate about life because so many are just so blazay about it. SO one balances out the other IMHO. We just lost the Black Rhino, what next

jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
19 Nov 2011 10:38am
Sorry to be a Post whore but want the truth to be known, not just hearsay
avoidablpain
avoidablpain
WA
5 posts
WA, 5 posts
19 Nov 2011 11:22am
jbshack said...

stamp said...

personally i don't have an issue with eating whale as long as it's sustainable. but if people feel so strongly they should target the source of the problem. if there was no demand for whale meat there would be no whale fishing. the money these sea shepherd idiots waste campaigning in the southern ocean would be more effective if it was spent in japan on education/advertising.

charging around the ocean throwing paint is just self-indulgent and childish




The big green do nothing machine do that. They run around raising money by telling people they are in the southern ocean ( witch there not and haven't been for years) than use that money to educate the Japanese. I really think there approach is to just wait and hope they stop.

The SSCS budget for the Campaign is very low. In fact less than $2.5 million witch in light of what they are up against and trying to stop is a pittance.

We need people who are passionate about life because so many are just so blazay about it. SO one balances out the other IMHO. We just lost the Black Rhino, what next



the Tasmanian devil is losing to contagious cancer a disease from the neanderthal days.
worrier
worrier
WA
726 posts
WA, 726 posts
19 Nov 2011 11:50am
There a few people who are under the misconception that the japanese can be "educated" about conservation and whaling. I work on Japanese mines all over the place and believe me education aint gonna happen with this mob. They have a totally different mindset to us.
My opinion is sea shepard is the only answer, Garret and Brown are useless against the inscrutable japanese. Total wast of effort in negotiating with them.
W
Toots
Toots
WA
271 posts
WA, 271 posts
19 Nov 2011 12:00pm
subasurf said...

Toots said...


Cant stop laughing at the bloke who reckons our 80% of our oxygen comes from the ocean,while some does (cyanobacteria) most of it comes from plants;


That's because it's true mate. The popular consensus among scientists is between 50-80% of the worlds O2 comes from the sea. You do realise phytoplankton uses photosynthesis to create O2 and is in such abundance it is visible from space? You say that the majority of 02 comes from plants...well there it is. You may ahve this picture in your head of rain forests giving off copious amounts of oxygen while removing CO2...but rain forests only make up less than 2% of the planet...the ocean on the other hand...

I still struggle to understand that people cannot grasp how important the balance in the ocean is. A simple thing like the removal of sharks can have an immense effect (granted enough time) on the world. Remove the shark you get lots fish...get lets of fish you get increased predation on phytoplankton...get that then you'll graduallly get a reduction in O2 output of the oceans. It's a huge simplification but it's a well supported theory. The oceans ARE the world's major source of life giving oxygen. Don't **** with it.

As for the Sea Shepperd and it's crew. Definitely a bunch of unskilled and useless hippies without a clue as to what they are doing. Incompetend doesn't evne begin to describe them.

Still...having said that...they had a huge positive effect on protecting sharks around the world and thus I cannot truly hate them

*sorry, still early...bad spelling*



Not all plants are part of a rain forest, and the whole ocean is noy phytoplankton nor cyanobacteria. a link with some evidence would help but I dont beleive that 50-80% is made by the ocean until you give some credible evidence. As far as I know its just speculative.

Are these the same scientitsts who are being sponsored under the banner of global warming? the same scientists who discovered that the earth is in fact cooloing, so they changed the scare campaign to climate change? not having a go at you but this is all popularistic hippy sh!t, and we know any theory can be supported and SEEM credible when you sponser some scientists to fetch some evidence when they are getting paid well.
Kaz1983
Kaz1983
306 posts
306 posts
19 Nov 2011 12:43pm
OK after reading Scuba's claims, I wasn't sure about weather the ocean produces more than half of the worlds oxygen and at first kinda thought it was bs to be honest so I goggled it and found this from the Nat Geo website.. it seems to say half of the oxygen is created by our oceans.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/06/0607_040607_phytoplankton.html
jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
19 Nov 2011 12:48pm
Kaz1983 said...

OK after reading Scuba's claims, I wasn't sure about weather the ocean produces more than half of the worlds oceans and at first kinda thought it was bs to be honest so I goggled it and found this from the Nat Geo website.. it seems to say half of the oxygen is created by our oceans.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/06/0607_040607_phytoplankton.html


Here's another that says more than half.

www.ecology.com/2011/09/12/important-organism/
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
19 Nov 2011 12:56pm
jbshack said...

Kaz1983 said...

OK after reading Scuba's claims, I wasn't sure about weather the ocean produces more than half of the worlds oceans and at first kinda thought it was bs to be honest so I goggled it and found this from the Nat Geo website.. it seems to say half of the oxygen is created by our oceans.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/06/0607_040607_phytoplankton.html


Here's another that says more than half.

www.ecology.com/2011/09/12/important-organism/

So Suba was right!!
jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
19 Nov 2011 12:58pm
doggie said...

jbshack said...

Kaz1983 said...

OK after reading Scuba's claims, I wasn't sure about weather the ocean produces more than half of the worlds oceans and at first kinda thought it was bs to be honest so I goggled it and found this from the Nat Geo website.. it seems to say half of the oxygen is created by our oceans.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/06/0607_040607_phytoplankton.html


Here's another that says more than half.

www.ecology.com/2011/09/12/important-organism/

So Suba was right!!



Technically i said it first Suba just supported me..
Not bad for a Greene hippie

SO if the Oceans die, we die
Toots
Toots
WA
271 posts
WA, 271 posts
19 Nov 2011 2:19pm
Dont take life too seriously, no one gets out alive
Im sure they thought the world was going to end when the Dodo became extinct too.
sn
sn
WA
2775 posts
sn sn
WA, 2775 posts
19 Nov 2011 4:07pm
It is just their job and they are trying to make a living.


sounds like the Nurenburg defence to me

from what I understand, under international law, if governments are unable- or unwilling- to stop illegal activities like whaling, it is not an illegal act to stop those doing so.



jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
19 Nov 2011 4:28pm
Toots said...

Dont take life too seriously, no one gets out alive
Im sure they thought the world was going to end when the Dodo became extinct too.


I agree but i would love for my kids to be out boating with there kids and be able to show them a whale or two, to see dolphins in the wild with there kids, instead of history books like we have to for so many other now instinct creatures

I say we don't own the earth, we just have it on lone from our children and i would like to pass it on the best way i can.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅