Title 42 allowed for imigrants to be sent back, but there was nohting stopping them from crossing the border again and again. The Biden administration introduced new rules this week that would deny asylum to almost all migrants who cross illegally. The strict measures would largely ban migrants from applying for asylum in the US if they had travelled through other countries on their way to the US-Mexico border, or failed to first apply online. Illegal crossers will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be "presumed ineligible for asylum", according to CBP.
Under Trump's Title 42, there were no such consequences.
Once trusted faces on the news, meteorologists now brave threats, insults and slander online from conspiracy theorists and climate change deniers who accuse them of faking or even fixing the weather.
Key points:
Social media users claim weather bureaus around the world have been making up information
Australian's BoM has been falsely accused of doctoring temperature records
Globally there has been a rise in climate change denial - particularly among far-right supporters
amp.abc.net.au/article/102342754
Reason why the ownership of the press used to be limited was to prevent the reach of people who had agendas which were not necessarily beneficial to society.
What we are experiencing now is the result of the reversal of that policy.
If an issue cannot be debated you ain't going to hear the truth.
Select to expand quotejapie said..
Reason why the ownership of the press used to be limited was to prevent the reach of people who had agendas which were not necessarily beneficial to society.
What we are experiencing now is the result of the reversal of that policy.
If an issue cannot be debated you ain't going to hear the truth.
Sheepies are so lucky to read the truth from you through those copy & paste text walls and the dodgy links you post.
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..japie said..
Reason why the ownership of the press used to be limited was to prevent the reach of people who had agendas which were not necessarily beneficial to society.
What we are experiencing now is the result of the reversal of that policy.
If an issue cannot be debated you ain't going to hear the truth.
Sheepies are so lucky to read the truth from you through those copy & paste text walls and the dodgy links you post.
Thanks you are so kind.
The sheep conspiracy crew will blindly follow any meme or youtube vid that says anything bad about anyone in gov. or big company no matter how many times it has been proven wrong by independent reviews, and that crew love independent reviews..ha ha.
There has been plenty of debate allowed, but when the debate proves them wrong, again, they cry they have been silenced, lol, happens every time. maybe its time THEY were silent.
like the German secret covid society.
sshhhhhhhhhhh.
Select to expand quotelotofwind said..
The sheep conspiracy crew will blindly follow any meme or youtube vid that says anything bad about anyone in gov. or big company no matter how many times it has been proven wrong by independent reviews, and that crew love independent reviews..ha ha.
There has been plenty of debate allowed, but when the debate proves them wrong, again, they cry they have been silenced, lol, happens every time. maybe its time THEY were silent. like the German secret covid society. sshhhhhhhhhhh.
Just explain what's going on with Assange and then I might start to believe I'm wrong.
it'd be fair to say from some of the grass eaters on this page - short term damage should be included
Select to expand quoteremery said..
Once trusted faces on the news, meteorologists now brave threats, insults and slander online from conspiracy theorists and climate change deniers who accuse them of faking or even fixing the weather.
Was a time once though that the face on the news providing the weather forecast was an actual meteorologist.
They studied the data, formulated a forecast and then presented it.
Now it is just some wanna-be C list airhead reading from an autocue who wouldn't know the difference between a cirrus and a cumulonimbus if it was floating over their head.
Interesting talk with a Fox News viewer this weekend. Told me that since they fired Carlson he didn't think fox was a reliable news source anymore. SMH Carlson is and always was an entertainer, not a journalist.
Select to expand quotephiln said..
Interesting talk with a Fox News viewer this weekend. Told me that since they fired Carlson he didn't think fox was a reliable news source anymore. SMH Carlson is and always was an entertainer, not a journalist.
And yet his channel on Twitter has surpassed all of the main stream spews combined together in viewing numbers by a fk tonne
Select to expand quotehitch_hiker said..philn said..
Interesting talk with a Fox News viewer this weekend. Told me that since they fired Carlson he didn't think fox was a reliable news source anymore. SMH Carlson is and always was an entertainer, not a journalist.
And yet his channel on Twitter has surpassed all of the main stream spews combined together in viewing numbers by a fk tonne
All that means is that there is an audience for his brand of entertainment.
A question for all you conspiratards - is there one going about prostate cancer diagnosis? There must be something anti family in having a doctor's finger in your anus.
Select to expand quotehitch_hiker said..
And yet his channel on Twitter has surpassed all of the main stream spews combined together in viewing numbers by a fk tonne
CNN, BBC and NY Times are all ranked in the top 30 for Twitter followers. Tucker Carlson is ranked 749.
Select to expand quotehitch_hiker said..philn said..
Interesting talk with a Fox News viewer this weekend. Told me that since they fired Carlson he didn't think fox was a reliable news source anymore. SMH Carlson is and always was an entertainer, not a journalist.
And yet his channel on Twitter has surpassed all of the main stream spews combined together in viewing numbers by a fk tonne
Being popular doesn't make you smart or right. I would rather the critique of one intelligent adversary than receive the praise of a fk tonne of fools.
Select to expand quotehitch_hiker said..
And yet his channel on Twitter has surpassed all of the main stream spews combined together in viewing numbers by a fk tonne
Please elaborate with numbers. Preferably a fk tonne.
Select to expand quoteMr Milk said..hitch_hiker said..philn said..
Interesting talk with a Fox News viewer this weekend. Told me that since they fired Carlson he didn't think fox was a reliable news source anymore. SMH Carlson is and always was an entertainer, not a journalist.
And yet his channel on Twitter has surpassed all of the main stream spews combined together in viewing numbers by a fk tonne
All that means is that there is an audience for his brand of entertainment.
A question for all you conspiratards - is there one going about prostate cancer diagnosis? There must be something anti family in having a doctor's finger in your anus.
Select to expand quoteremery said..hitch_hiker said..
And yet his channel on Twitter has surpassed all of the main stream spews combined together in viewing numbers by a fk tonne
Please elaborate with numbers. Preferably a fk tonne.
I actually meant his first two posts since leaving fox. Over 25M views each within 24hrs. That's a fk tonne IMO ya bunch of Fktards
Now go report me to the admin and get me censored or comment deleted, cause we know that's the only way your fragile little egos can cope.
"Twitter video views: In the case of video on Twitter, the company says, "The main Twitter video view metric is triggered when a user watches a video for at least 2 seconds and sees at least 50% of the video player in-view." In other words, those millions of viewers on Carlson's video haven't necessarily watched the whole thing-not by a long shot."
Select to expand quoteremery said..
"Twitter video views: In the case of video on Twitter, the company says, "The main Twitter video view metric is triggered when a user watches a video for at least 2 seconds and sees at least 50% of the video player in-view." In other words, those millions of viewers on Carlson's video haven't necessarily watched the whole thing-not by a long shot."
Nor are the numbers any sign of support, morbid curiousity, or otherwise.
Quoting the big colouring book 'CT for Dummies', don't believe anything big corporations say, they lie to make you look stupid and maintain power over you. I believe Twitter is a big corporate entity.
Select to expand quoteremery said..hitch_hiker said..
And yet his channel on Twitter has surpassed all of the main stream spews combined together in viewing numbers by a fk tonne
CNN, BBC and NY Times are all ranked in the top 30 for Twitter followers. Tucker Carlson is ranked 749.
Stop it!! You are trying to let facts get in the way of a poorly constructed story. HOW DARE YOU.
