FlySurfer said...
cRAZY Canuk: No, you voted for a party! Same as in UK, Canada, NZ, India, ...................................................................................................................................................................
Absolutely. As Australia is a Westminster style democracy you actually voted for your local MP.
You local MP has chosen to be a member of a polical party
That polical party has chosen to elect a leader
That leader effectly nominates himself prime minster and asks the governor general (as the queen's represenattive) to allow them to become Prime Minister
Only the votors of Rudd's electorate voted for him (well 30% of them).
All you people who moan about politics why not fight for polical parties to be banned ?
You vote for your local MP.
All the MPs vote for a speaker
All the MPs vote for a PM (to lead and represent not to dictate)
All MPs get free vote on all motions, and not controlled by behind the scenes unelected party power brokers
All mPs nominate for seats on select committees and get rotated around them during the fixed term of the parliament
Would you not get a broader, more inclusive and moderate parliament acting in the interest of local communities more than maintenance of party power ?
Or would you get anarchy and unstable parliament with 1 vote for each and every PM candidate and then parties and groupings by default ?
Argh yes, been tried before in the glorious days of the Roman republic, it worked so well (except until it collapsed into anarchy to be reborn in autocracy and empire, which funnily enough survived for a longer period of time than the republic)