Poor Juliar

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Cassa
Cassa
WA
1305 posts
WA, 1305 posts
26 Jun 2013 8:33pm
She has got to look at the bright side ,she has a job to fall back on , she proved to Ausie's that she can knit

Great effort after 3 years
Most political commentators , called it as it was ,without the expletives , a crock of sh.t

Big worry is , the mungbeans , will now be calling the praise of Rudd

As I said, what does the rest of the world think ?

Craig66
Craig66
NSW
2466 posts
NSW, 2466 posts
26 Jun 2013 10:45pm
Well we get what we pay for, who would take on the job for a small amount, 500k per year? when many company leaders earn many times more.

Pay peanuts, get monkeys.

What does Michael Clark earn for being captain of Australia?

I just asked google

THE $6 MILLION MAN: Michael Clarke's huge pay rise

www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/the-6-million-man-michael-clarkes-huge-pay-rise/news-story/12f07f4e3baabe94259138c1e5f7519b


PS, we dont rate a thought from the rest of the world....................

PPS, its Julia
subasurf
subasurf
WA
2154 posts
WA, 2154 posts
26 Jun 2013 8:56pm
Wtf, I said just that in the other thread.
Is there an echo in here?
Craig66
Craig66
NSW
2466 posts
NSW, 2466 posts
26 Jun 2013 11:00pm
subasurf said..

Wtf, I said just that in the other thread.
Is there an echo in here?



Yes there is an echo

Unless your a duck

(sorry, we are getting smashed by qld so im trying to not watch it)
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
26 Jun 2013 11:06pm
Came here to red thumb Cassa, it's a knee jerk reaction to the Alan Jones label. Too late he's full already.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23645 posts
WA, 23645 posts
26 Jun 2013 9:10pm
A govt that got in without a proper election result - second time only in history... then changes their mind on leadership and kicks him out and replaces him with our first ever female P.M
So at that point they are on a roll. First for this, rare result for that.

But no, they bicker and kick her out again and put him back in.

Yeah, sounds like they have their sh!t squared away so let them run a country


Craig66
Craig66
NSW
2466 posts
NSW, 2466 posts
26 Jun 2013 11:15pm
yes Mark, as it has been said before "now we dont get the chance to vote Julia out in an election"

and Kiteboy, isant it a pain when you vote and the red thumb doesnt get any bigger
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
26 Jun 2013 9:28pm
Cassa said..

As I said, what does the rest of the world think ?




I am overseas at the moment and have met and spoken with a lot of people from the USA. They don't know much about us at all really, let alone the names of our politicians or how our system works.

They do, on the other hand, talk about their own politicians, their own sporting teams, their own celebrities.

So, what does the rest of the world think? Nothing. They do not care at all, and they don't even notice.
Craig66
Craig66
NSW
2466 posts
NSW, 2466 posts
27 Jun 2013 12:06am
FormulaNova said..


Cassa said..

As I said, what does the rest of the world think ?





I am overseas at the moment and have met and spoken with a lot of people from the USA. They don't know much about us at all really, let alone the names of our politicians or how our system works.

They do, on the other hand, talk about their own politicians, their own sporting teams, their own celebrities.

So, what does the rest of the world think? Nothing. They do not care at all, and they don't even notice.



you will be lucky to get a flight home as no one cares about, knows about, cant find Australia
tmurray
tmurray
WA
485 posts
WA, 485 posts
26 Jun 2013 10:30pm
Mark _australia said..

A govt that got in without a proper election result - second time only in history... then changes their mind on leadership and kicks him out and replaces him with our first ever female P.M
So at that point they are on a roll. First for this, rare result for that.

But no, they bicker and kick her out again and put him back in.

Yeah, sounds like they have their sh!t squared away so let them run a country




Pretty sure Kevin was replaced before the last election.
And she won the election more than Tony Abbott did.
knigit
knigit
WA
319 posts
WA, 319 posts
26 Jun 2013 10:53pm

Kevin is like a god damn cockroach . How many times does he have to be stomped on?

The majority of his party hates him despite their desperate move today, and I suspect that the near future for the party will involve more petty payback and revenge than policy. Meanwhile Abbot is going to get away with murder.


WTF
Boardom
Boardom
8 posts
8 posts
26 Jun 2013 11:43pm
Guess you could say, we just had...

A 'Rudd Wedding'
Battle
Battle
536 posts
536 posts
26 Jun 2013 11:44pm
FormulaNova said..


Cassa said..

As I said, what does the rest of the world think ?





I am overseas at the moment and have met and spoken with a lot of people from the USA. They don't know much about us at all really, let alone the names of our politicians or how our system works.

They do, on the other hand, talk about their own politicians, their own sporting teams, their own celebrities.

So, what does the rest of the world think? Nothing. They do not care at all, and they don't even notice.


Yeah I have to admit that most of the time when local politics are being discussed amongst yourselves I haven't got a clue what you're talking about. It's more a case of not noticing though. I'm pretty sure most Aussie's don't know anything about Canadian politics either.
Saffer
Saffer
VIC
4501 posts
VIC, 4501 posts
27 Jun 2013 7:18am
The people I feel sorry for in Australia is the women. The first female prime minister should have been someone to look up to and a role model for young females. With gillard, it couldn't be further from the truth.
choco
choco
SA
4181 posts
SA, 4181 posts
27 Jun 2013 7:23am
Saffer said..

The people I feel sorry for in Australia is the women. The first female prime minister should have been someone to look up to and a role model for young females. With gillard, it couldn't be further from the truth.


She was a role model, the $hit she had to endure while PM was incredible, the media(backed/owned by mining interests) were out to get her because of the mining tax and they were relentless.Not a lot new policies are popular at the time of introduction and Julia stuck to her guns against the odds but time will be the real judge of that and Abbott will go down as the biggest sook in politics when he didn't get the backing of the independents, what are his parties policies anyone know? apart from getting rid of the mining/carbon Tax how much money has gone to Libs from vested interests to get rid of these taxes?

as Mark Twain once said

"If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it"
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
27 Jun 2013 6:31am
choco said..

Saffer said..

The people I feel sorry for in Australia is the women. The first female prime minister should have been someone to look up to and a role model for young females. With gillard, it couldn't be further from the truth.


She was a role model, the $hit she had to endure while PM was incredible, the media(backed/owned by mining interests) were out to get her because of the mining tax and they were relentless.Not a lot new policies are popular at the time of introduction and Julia stuck to her guns against the odds but time will be the real judge of that and Abbott will go down as the biggest sook in politics when he didn't get the backing of the independents, what are his parties policies anyone know? apart from getting rid of the mining/carbon Tax how much money has gone to Libs from vested interests to get rid of these taxes?

as Mark Twain once said

"If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it"



I agree 100%. I think she got a rough deal on things that are not important to being a prime minister.

How can a prime minister be a role model for women in the way Saffer dreams of? It takes a certain strength of character and political nous to even get into that position. Its not a popularity contest for us to vote on who we think makes a "nicer" PM. Its a contest within the party to see who they think can give them credibility to get to the next poll.

A nice "wholesome role model type" would be chewed up and spat out almost immediately.

Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
27 Jun 2013 9:40am
choco said..

Saffer said..

The people I feel sorry for in Australia is the women. The first female prime minister should have been someone to look up to and a role model for young females. With gillard, it couldn't be further from the truth.


She was a role model, the $hit she had to endure while PM was incredible, the media(backed/owned by mining interests) were out to get her because of the mining tax and they were relentless.Not a lot new policies are popular at the time of introduction and Julia stuck to her guns against the odds but time will be the real judge of that and Abbott will go down as the biggest sook in politics when he didn't get the backing of the independents, what are his parties policies anyone know? apart from getting rid of the mining/carbon Tax how much money has gone to Libs from vested interests to get rid of these taxes?

as Mark Twain once said

"If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it"


Agree 100%. If voting made a difference they would make it illegal.
myusernam
myusernam
QLD
6158 posts
QLD, 6158 posts
27 Jun 2013 10:14am
thank fxck we got her out of there before the country needed her to reverse parallel park
Dawso
Dawso
NSW
72 posts
cammd
cammd
QLD
4434 posts
QLD, 4434 posts
27 Jun 2013 10:41am
Karma - if you live by the sword, you die by the sword
Saffer
Saffer
VIC
4501 posts
VIC, 4501 posts
27 Jun 2013 10:52am
choco said..
She was a role model, the $hit she had to endure while PM was incredible, the media(backed/owned by mining interests) were out to get her because of the mining tax and they were relentless.Not a lot new policies are popular at the time of introduction and Julia stuck to her guns against the odds but time will be the real judge of that and Abbott will go down as the biggest sook in politics when he didn't get the backing of the independents, what are his parties policies anyone know? apart from getting rid of the mining/carbon Tax how much money has gone to Libs from vested interests to get rid of these taxes?

as Mark Twain once said

"If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it"


I don't consider someone who lied her way in to be a role model. If that's the lesson we want to teach our kids about what it requires to achieve greatness, then its a really sad reflection on where our society is right now.

Her attitude of promising and going against her promises for the sole reason of maintaining her leadership is also not a good lesson. I.e. it's okay to lie to keep yourself at the top.

And please, don't think I am saying this because I support Abbott. I don't, I think he's a douche bag along with most of the other politicians. At the moment, political parties remind me of a sewerage farm....it's the **** that seems to float to the top.

On the issue of Julie and new policies, let's be realistic about this. The policies she introduced were not about her desire to achieve greatness. The carbon tax was to keep the greens happy. The mining tax was about generating additional revenue to cover their excessive spending. The NDIS and Gonski were introduced for the sole purpose of buying votes from the public as can be seen by the timing. I.e. they will not bare the fallout of the additional spending before the elections, therefore it's an easy item to introduce at the end of the year to gain approval ratings for your party without the cost implications on the budget. if they really cared about them, why didn't they introduce them at a point where it would have impacted on their chances of a surplus.
Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7268 posts
WA, 7268 posts
27 Jun 2013 9:09am
Is Gonski the 'education revolution' that was spruked so hard a few years ago by the ALP, or are the Gonski reforms post the revolution, in which case what was the 'education revolution' ??


Sorry, I just googled it and found out :

the Education revolution was in fact :
?National School Pride, to refurbish buildings and construct or upgrade fixed shade structures, outdoor learning areas and sporting grounds and facilities.

Gonski therefore seems to be post-revolution. I just got confused that I thought once a revolution had occured not much else would be required for a while, and certainly not wholesale change. It seems, however, the revolution was so revolutionary that 12 months later a new revolution is required.

Mmmm maybe a common theme there somewhere ?
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
27 Jun 2013 11:11am
"If voting made a difference ......."

Never a truer word said. The system is not there to make changes, it is there to keep things as they are. The sooner the majority wake up to that the sooner it can be changed.
Cambodge
Cambodge
VIC
851 posts
VIC, 851 posts
27 Jun 2013 1:15pm
Easy to call for change to the system. Much, much harder to agree what it should be replaced with! Any ideas that are better than the current system?
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
27 Jun 2013 1:31pm
On the issue of Julie and new policies, let's be realistic about this. The policies she introduced were not about her desire to achieve greatness. The carbon tax was to keep the greens happy. The mining tax was about generating additional revenue to cover their excessive spending. The NDIS and Gonski were introduced for the sole purpose of buying votes from the public as can be seen by the timing. I.e. they will not bare the fallout of the additional spending before the elections, therefore it's an easy item to introduce at the end of the year to gain approval ratings for your party without the cost implications on the budget. if they really cared about them, why didn't they introduce them at a point where it would have impacted on their chances of a surplus.

Wrong....just everywhere.

The Labour Party tried for years to get a price on carbon up. Rudd tried to get get it though the senate and the Coalition and the greens voted it down.To say it was to keep[ the greens happy is crap....the greens would vote with Labour anyway.

The mining tax was about getting a fair return on the enormous profits that the Miners were making. The miners reap their profit from a resource that's owned by Australians. It was a fair and reasonable tax that was destroyed by the multimillion dollar campaign mounted by the miners and their foot soldiers the Liberal party aided by the support of the right wing media.

"The NDIS and Gonski were introduced for the sole purpose of buying votes from the public as can be seen by the timing. I.e. they will not bare the fallout of the" Blah, blah blah.......I think this is probably the most cynical thing I've ever heard! Listen, just because your side of politics operates in a completely unprincipled, opportunist fashion doesn't mean we all do. This really does you no good.

"The policies she introduced were not about her desire to achieve greatness". Well that's right(for a change), She wasn't trying to "achieve greatness" she was doing something to make the lives of people with disabilities better. Y'know it's what governments do.....well Labour governments do anyway. I mean, your statement shows so much about you it's kind of depressing. To think that you think a Labour party could use disabled people and their carers...........to gain "approval ratings". OMG
WA71
WA71
WA
1382 posts
WA, 1382 posts
27 Jun 2013 11:39am
log man said..
On the issue of Julie and new policies, let's be realistic about this. The policies she introduced were not about her desire to achieve greatness. The carbon tax was to keep the greens happy. The mining tax was about generating additional revenue to cover their excessive spending. The NDIS and Gonski were introduced for the sole purpose of buying votes from the public as can be seen by the timing. I.e. they will not bare the fallout of the additional spending before the elections, therefore it's an easy item to introduce at the end of the year to gain approval ratings for your party without the cost implications on the budget. if they really cared about them, why didn't they introduce them at a point where it would have impacted on their chances of a surplus.

Wrong....just everywhere.

The Labour Party tried for years to get a price on carbon up. Rudd tried to get get it though the senate and the Coalition and the greens voted it down.To say it was to keep[ the greens happy is crap....the greens would vote with Labour anyway.

The mining tax was about getting a fair return on the enormous profits that the Miners were making. The miners reap their profit from a resource that's owned by Australians. It was a fair and reasonable tax that was destroyed by the multimillion dollar campaign mounted by the miners and their foot soldiers the Liberal party aided by the support of the right wing media.

"The NDIS and Gonski were introduced for the sole purpose of buying votes from the public as can be seen by the timing. I.e. they will not bare the fallout of the" Blah, blah blah.......I think this is probably the most cynical thing I've ever heard! Listen, just because your side of politics operates in a completely unprincipled, opportunist fashion doesn't mean we all do. This really does you no good.

"The policies she introduced were not about her desire to achieve greatness". Well that's right(for a change), She wasn't trying to "achieve greatness" she was doing something to make the lives of people with disabilities better. Y'know it's what governments do.....well Labour governments do anyway. I mean, your statement shows so much about you it's kind of depressing. To think that you think a Labour party could use disabled people and their carers...........to gain "approval ratings". OMG


YAWN
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
27 Jun 2013 1:42pm
Carantoc said..

Is Gonski the 'education revolution' that was spruked so hard a few years ago by the ALP, or are the Gonski reforms post the revolution, in which case what was the 'education revolution' ??


Sorry, I just googled it and found out :

the Education revolution was in fact :
?National School Pride, to refurbish buildings and construct or upgrade fixed shade structures, outdoor learning areas and sporting grounds and facilities.

Gonski therefore seems to be post-revolution. I just got confused that I thought once a revolution had occured not much else would be required for a while, and certainly not wholesale change. It seems, however, the revolution was so revolutionary that 12 months later a new revolution is required.

Mmmm maybe a common theme there somewhere ?


The BER was a measure to try to prevent the ravages of the global financial crisis. And guess what, it was incredibly successful, thousands of schools got to replace old buildings, libraries, halls etc ....AND.....we stimulated the building industries and that contributed to the huge success of the economy in the last 5 years.

Can I just remind people here that our unemployment rate is 5.4%.

Gonski is response to the poor lack funding in schools and poor results that come from that. Maybe we should have had Gonski when Mr. Carantoc was at school
dusta
dusta
WA
2940 posts
WA, 2940 posts
27 Jun 2013 12:24pm
log man said..

The BER was a measure to try to prevent the ravages of the global financial crisis. And guess what, it was incredibly successful, thousands of schools got to replace old buildings, libraries, halls etc ....AND.....we stimulated the building industries and that contributed to the huge success of the economy in the last 5 years.

Can I just remind people here that our unemployment rate is 5.4%.

Gonski is response to the poor lack funding in schools and poor results that come from that. Maybe we should have had Gonski when Mr. Carantoc was at school


guess what it was an incredible waste of money .

Schools were getting buildings they didn't need , the whole BER was a waste of our money . Just like Kevin07's 55" lcd screen stimulus .

i work in alot of schools and have seen how there is so much wasted money from BER
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
27 Jun 2013 2:51pm
dusta said..

log man said..

The BER was a measure to try to prevent the ravages of the global financial crisis. And guess what, it was incredibly successful, thousands of schools got to replace old buildings, libraries, halls etc ....AND.....we stimulated the building industries and that contributed to the huge success of the economy in the last 5 years.

Can I just remind people here that our unemployment rate is 5.4%.

Gonski is response to the poor lack funding in schools and poor results that come from that. Maybe we should have had Gonski when Mr. Carantoc was at school


guess what it was an incredible waste of money .

Schools were getting buildings they didn't need , the whole BER was a waste of our money . Just like Kevin07's 55" lcd screen stimulus .

i work in alot of schools and have seen how there is so much wasted money from BER


Umm! the Orgill report! have a look at it and see if the money was well spent. And while your at have a look at the unemployment rate and the general state of our economy in comparison to lets say.......any other country in the world!! and then say the BER wasn't worth it.

I mean you do realize that the crap you've swallowed is..... well, crap, don't you.
dusta
dusta
WA
2940 posts
WA, 2940 posts
27 Jun 2013 1:00pm
log man said..


Umm! the Orgill report! have a look at it and see if the money was well spent. And while your at have a look at the unemployment rate and the general state of our economy in comparison to lets say.......any other country in the world!! and then say the BER wasn't worth it.

I mean you do realize that the crap you've swallowed is..... well, crap, don't you.


ok so seeing wasted BER money at schools around western australia with my own eyes and talking to staff at the schools counts for nothing compared to one report ?

And you're telling me to stop swallowing crap ?


just wait . We haven't even gotten close to having a recession yet . We will though .

Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7268 posts
WA, 7268 posts
27 Jun 2013 1:07pm
So it wasn't about revolutionising education ?

The education revolution was about spending our way out of recession (that we weren't actually in)

I had just assumed that an 'education revolution' was about revolutionising education delivery.

Maybe if the BER was around when I went to school I wouldn't have studied Keynes, Marx and Von Heyk, but I could have had my lunch outside, but in the shade.


Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅