Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Actually most of the BLOB is the Deep State and corrupt administrations like the Biden crime syndicate. Social media was co-opted by the Deep state to run it's propaganda and Fact Checkers were set up by corporates and special interest groups / private funders to run disinformation protection against their corrupt systems.
The truth is you have NFI. Maybe your social media AI algorithm feeds are a bit out of whack and feeding you false information.
Donald Trump was installed again to create another round of worldwide chaos to distract from the real aims of the Deep State.
If you really wish to understand the inner workings of the 'Deep State' you need to converse with Japie and Fly Surfer. They have read books on the subject by leading experts.
You are a farkin odious lightweight.
I have Net Zero social media accounts. I read widely and draw my own conclusions.
Perhaps your post is a mirror staring back at you? The judgement and abuse is telling of your weakness I guess.
I do agree with you about Trump though. He's another bit part player in the big chess game played by Masters. Doesn't make TDS any less real.
I just knew right from the outset that a Trump win was simply going to be a change of tack. Musk's deep involvement did not come about on a whim. Aside from the fact that most of his clout and $ come from government contracts he is a huge proponent of AI.
There's been a massive push to replace the NHS with AI in the UK. Something I know about because the team at the UK Column have been exposing it for four years. It is the ultimate tool to replace human beings at the same time as doing their thinking for them.
And now Trump is advocating to move Palestinians, lock stock and barrel, to another country. Completing the ethnic cleansing quite nicely thank you very much, whilst he tickles Netenyahu's colon with his tongue.
Not one of the people who speak out, the Rogans and Carlsons of the world, EVER criticise Israel for what it is. Likewise they NEVER call out the central banks at the pinnacle of this massive Ponzi scheme which has gradually enveloped the world with its tentacles.
The reason they don't is not because they are stupid or ignorant. They're gutless. They know full well that the power wielded by the Central Banks is immeasurable and would crush them in an instant.
Whilst we argue amongst one another the behemoth creeps inexorably forward.
I think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
I don't agree with you about plenty Japie but you have hit the nail on the head.
Leadership on both sides of American politics is poisonous, worse it's contagious in like democracies. We are witnessing a big step away from the people's democracy when see the wealthy openly cavort with the politically powerful. It is sign these individuals are very comfortable exposing who they have the ear of, the voice of the people will not get in their way. Much like this time last century we are heading to a time of political upheaval, where fascism seems like a feasible option to the 'undignified poor'.
"Americans, like human beings
everywhere, believe many things that are obviously untrue. Their most destructive untruth is that it is very easy for any American to make money.
They will not acknowledge how in fact hard money is to come by, and, therefore, those who have no money blame and blame and blame themselves. This inward blame has been a treasure for the rich and powerful, who have had to do less for their poor, publicly and privately, than any other ruling class since, say Napoleonic times. Many novelties have come from America. The most startling of these, a thing without precedent, is a mass of undignified poor. They do not love one another because they do not love themselves."
Kurt Vonnegut, Slaughterhouse-Five
Select to expand quotejapie said..
I just knew right from the outset that a Trump win was simply going to be a change of tack. Musk's deep involvement did not come about on a whim. Aside from the fact that most of his clout and $ come from government contracts he is a huge proponent of AI.
There's been a massive push to replace the NHS with AI in the UK. Something I know about because the team at the UK Column have been exposing it for four years. It is the ultimate tool to replace human beings at the same time as doing their thinking for them.
And now Trump is advocating to move Palestinians, lock stock and barrel, to another country. Completing the ethnic cleansing quite nicely thank you very much, whilst he tickles Netenyahu's colon with his tongue.
Not one of the people who speak out, the Rogans and Carlsons of the world, EVER criticise Israel for what it is. Likewise they NEVER call out the central banks at the pinnacle of this massive Ponzi scheme which has gradually enveloped the world with its tentacles.
The reason they don't is not because they are stupid or ignorant. They're gutless. They know full well that the power wielded by the Central Banks is immeasurable and would crush them in an instant.
Whilst we argue amongst one another the behemoth creeps inexorably forward.
I think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
I think Huxley's Brave New World has about as much chance of happening as the Empire Striking Back.
Select to expand quotecammd said..japie said..
I think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
I think Huxley's Brave New World has about as much chance of happening as the Empire Striking Back.
I also think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..cammd said..japie said..
I think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
I think Huxley's Brave New World has about as much chance of happening as the Empire Striking Back.
I also think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
well then why do you argue left vs right, they are part of the same team according to Japie.
He says Trump is merely a change of tack. Do you believe in a world wide conspiracy of jewish bankers intent on enslaving the world, that all governments, NGO's, media, big corporates and elitist individuals are complicit with or active in.
Believe and think what you want. We are uncannily resembling Huxley's 'alcohol and religion' phase of societal control on our way to a yet to be determined soma.
In Brave New World, soma is the drug that produces a state of catatonic euphoria, or "soma holiday". It's used to control the masses and maintain social order in the novel's high-tech society. In the book, soma is described as an "opiate of the masses". It's used to replace alcohol and religion in a society that's peaceful but immoral. Huxley believed that ruling oligarchies would eventually discover that narco-hypnosis and infant conditioning were more efficient ways of governing than prisons and clubs.
There are plenty of books in history that people will live by and die for. Brave New World us not one of these, it is a warning to future generations to keep their eyes open to the rise and horrors of tyranny as Huxley witnessed in his own life.
Select to expand quotecammd said..
well then why do you argue left vs right, its part of the same team according to Japie.
My opinions on Huxley's Brave New World - being a lot closer than he anticipated - don't have a lot to do with being a swinging voter.
It's not me who blames 'woke' people for every problem in the world. I think that's just stupid.
Select to expand quoteBrent in Qld said..
Believe and think what you want. We are uncannily resembling Huxley's 'alcohol and religion' phase of societal control on our way to a yet to be determined soma.
In Brave New World, soma is the drug that produces a state of catatonic euphoria, or "soma holiday". It's used to control the masses and maintain social order in the novel's high-tech society. In the book, soma is described as an "opiate of the masses". It's used to replace alcohol and religion in a society that's peaceful but immoral. Huxley believed that ruling oligarchies would eventually discover that narco-hypnosis and infant conditioning were more efficient ways of governing than prisons and clubs.
There are plenty of books in history that people will live by and die for. Brave New World us not one of these, it is a warning to future generations to keep their eyes open to the rise and horrors of tyranny as Huxley witnessed in his own life.
Tyranny is real I agree and we do need to keep our eyes open to it. I also agree our freedoms are being eroded bit by bit, I am just not convinced it is a part of a global conspiracy that has been at play for over 100 years and its strings are getting pulled by a jewish elite.
For example did Hamas attack Israel in order to start a war that would result in Gaza being destroyed thereby justifying the call to ethnic cleanse the area. Are those moves being orchestrated as part of a larger plan. I don't think so. More likely in my opinion is #### happens and people look to take advantage. I don't think it's all apart of a larger plan.
What's happening in the middle east is terrible, always has been and there's no indication the future will be any different. Outside forces attempt to intervene but as we've previously touched on, the issues are ideological, good luck finding a solution to this rooted, ancient conflict.
The point I make is in western democracies, the possession of power doesn't necessarily have to be consciously planned. We are witnessing any say the general population have in the political arena flow towards the rich, much as the cash/wealth is gravitating towards them also. From my perspective the collective unelected uber rich on the podium for the US inauguration was sickening. It was no more than letting everyone know who has a seat at the table, who the people's leader will actually be listening to and who sees themselves above the democratic process. Those voted for to represent the people were very much in the background.
An interesting side bar for Aussies was Pratt and Reinhardt skirting proceedings while Rupert no doubt skulks around in the background looking at how to increasingly manipulate the electorate here going into the next election.
Select to expand quoteBrent in Qld said..
What's happening in the middle east is terrible, always has been and there's no indication the future will be any different. Outside forces attempt to intervene but as we've previously touched on, the issues are ideological, good luck finding a solution to this rooted, ancient conflict.
The point I make is in western democracies, the possession of power doesn't necessarily have to be consciously planned. We are witnessing any say the general population have in the political arena flow towards the rich, much as the cash/wealth is gravitating towards them also. From my perspective the collective unelected uber rich on the podium for the US inauguration was sickening. It was no more than letting everyone know who has a seat at the table, who the people's leader will actually be listening to and who sees themselves above the democratic process. Those voted for to represent the people were very much in the background.
An interesting side bar for Aussies was Pratt and Reinhardt skirting proceedings while Rupert no doubt skulks around in the background looking at how to increasingly manipulate the electorate here going into the next election.
Rupert this Reinhardt that, we can find examples as equally deep in trough on the left.
Is it just that both sides are corrupt or is it really one side with two different colour jersey's. That's the theory Japie is putting forward, Trump is the same side as Biden, just a change of tack.
Select to expand quoteBrent in Qld said..
Believe and think what you want. We are uncannily resembling Huxley's 'alcohol and religion' phase of societal control on our way to a yet to be determined soma.
In Brave New World, soma is the drug that produces a state of catatonic euphoria, or "soma holiday". It's used to control the masses and maintain social order in the novel's high-tech society. In the book, soma is described as an "opiate of the masses". It's used to replace alcohol and religion in a society that's peaceful but immoral. Huxley believed that ruling oligarchies would eventually discover that narco-hypnosis and infant conditioning were more efficient ways of governing than prisons and clubs.
There are plenty of books in history that people will live by and die for. Brave New World us not one of these, it is a warning to future generations to keep their eyes open to the rise and horrors of tyranny as Huxley witnessed in his own life.
The regression of morality was the most poignant message that I took from the book.
In my lifetime, we've gone from an era where my grandfather told me that I wasn't to say the word bottom but I was to describe my backside as my Btm to an era where we have public groups who actually advocate for sex with children and deviant pornography is available on a device that you keep in your pocket.
From recollection, Brave New World was set 400 years ahead of the date it was written. I reckon we have been fast tracked!
Yes in western politics both sides should be held accountable and yes, both have become increasingly the same. It is this sameness that had opened a door to fill the void with something else, a void the wealthiest have eagerly jumped into. You brush this aside to deflect from the blatant move by the outrageously wealthy to override democratic representation.
Select to expand quotecammd said..myscreenname said..cammd said..japie said..
I think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
I think Huxley's Brave New World has about as much chance of happening as the Empire Striking Back.
I also think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
well then why do you argue left vs right, they are part of the same team according to Japie.
He says Trump is merely a change of tack. Do you believe in a world wide conspiracy of jewish bankers intent on enslaving the world, that all governments, NGO's, media, big corporates and elitist individuals are complicit with or active in.
There is plenty of evidence that there is a worldwide conspiracy to achieve a global government. Many people have researched and written about it. Here is an extract from The Creature From Jekyll Island. I'll let you look up the rest of it.
"One of the most authoritative reference works on the history of this group is Tragedy and Hope by Dr. Carroll Quigley. Dr. Quigley was a professor of history at Georgetown University where Presi?dent Clinton had been one of his students. He was the author of the widely used textbook, Evolution of Civilization; he was a member of the editorial board of the monthly periodical, Current History; and he was a frequent lecturer and consultant for such groups as the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, the Brookings Institution, the U.S. Naval Weapons Laboratory, the Naval College, the Smith?sonian Institute, and the State Department. But Dr. Quigley was no mere academic. He also had been closely associated with many of the family dynasties of the super-rich. He was, by his own boast, an insider with a front row view of the world's money power structure.
When Dr. Quigley wrote his scholarly, 1300-page book of dry history, it was not intended for the masses. It was to be read by the intellectual elite, and to that select readership he cautiously exposed one of the best-kept secrets of all time. He also made it clear, however, that he was a friendly apologist for this group and that he supported its goals and purposes. Dr. Quigley said:
" I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments.... In general, my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown."
Huxley's writing always has a moral underbelly without doubt, here's one of my favourite quotes of his on the matter
Morality is always the product of terror; its chains and strait-waistcoats are fashioned by those who dare not trust others, because they dare not trust themselves, to walk in liberty.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Maybe Dutton could shirtfront Xi ?
We know just the thought of that strikes fear into them
I would shirt-front him
Assert dominance
There are about 9000 chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, food additives, preservitives etc etc used in the USA that are banned in Europe due to their health concerns.
I am sure Europe uses plenty that are banned in the USA
I asked a fruit grower here in Australia if he thinks I have to wash his products before eating. He told me they have to use a particular pesticide on their produce in order to grow and sell them here in Australia. Australia is the only country that uses this particular chemical. Banned everywhere else or they have harmless ways to achieve same result. It does gets washed before packaging, but not well, so he recommended to wash everything before eating.
Who has it right? RFK junior wants to ask this question, make the food/chemical industry prove it is safe and then be held liable if they get it wrong.
Sounds fair enough to me.
Select to expand quotejapie said..
I just knew right from the outset that a Trump win was simply going to be a change of tack. Musk's deep involvement did not come about on a whim. Aside from the fact that most of his clout and $ come from government contracts he is a huge proponent of AI.
There's been a massive push to replace the NHS with AI in the UK. Something I know about because the team at the UK Column have been exposing it for four years. It is the ultimate tool to replace human beings at the same time as doing their thinking for them.
And now Trump is advocating to move Palestinians, lock stock and barrel, to another country. Completing the ethnic cleansing quite nicely thank you very much, whilst he tickles Netenyahu's colon with his tongue.
Not one of the people who speak out, the Rogans and Carlsons of the world, EVER criticise Israel for what it is. Likewise they NEVER call out the central banks at the pinnacle of this massive Ponzi scheme which has gradually enveloped the world with its tentacles.
The reason they don't is not because they are stupid or ignorant. They're gutless. They know full well that the power wielded by the Central Banks is immeasurable and would crush them in an instant.
Whilst we argue amongst one another the behemoth creeps inexorably forward.
I think Huxley's Brave New World is a lot closer than he anticipated!
100% agreed. Huxley is always one step closer to the truth than Orwell, as they both conceded as close friends and brothers at the end of their lives.
The central banking system has to go. Evil to the core. Warmongering criminals that are beyond redemption. Murderers of presidents, bringers of war and debt-enslavers of mankind.
Trump is just the dog being wagged by the Zionist banking mafia tail.
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
There are about 9000 chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, food additives, preservitives etc etc used in the USA that are banned in Europe due to their health concerns.
I am sure Europe uses plenty that are banned in the USA
I asked a fruit grower here in Australia if he thinks I have to wash his products before eating. He told me they have to use a particular pesticide on their produce in order to grow and sell them here in Australia. Australia is the only country that uses this particular chemical. Banned everywhere else or they have harmless ways to achieve same result. It does gets washed before packaging, but not well, so he recommended to wash everything before eating.
Who has it right? RFK junior wants to ask this question, make the food/chemical industry prove it is safe and then be held liable if they get it wrong.
Sounds fair enough to me.
Sounds fair, but only to those truly interested in the good health of all mankind.
Red No.3 food dye is a known carcinogen banned in Europe but still widely put into consumable food stuffs in the USA and Australia. The FDA has now revoked its safety approval.
www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-revoke-authorization-use-red-no-3-food-and-ingested-drugs
Red dye was banned from cosmetics long ago due to its carcinogenicity, but ironically has been allowed to be added to crap masquerading as processed food ever since. Think again before drinking your red cordial or sports drink poison, as you're supporting the sickness industry
Go figure!
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..TonyAbbott said..
There are about 9000 chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, food additives, preservitives etc etc used in the USA that are banned in Europe due to their health concerns.
I am sure Europe uses plenty that are banned in the USA
I asked a fruit grower here in Australia if he thinks I have to wash his products before eating. He told me they have to use a particular pesticide on their produce in order to grow and sell them here in Australia. Australia is the only country that uses this particular chemical. Banned everywhere else or they have harmless ways to achieve same result. It does gets washed before packaging, but not well, so he recommended to wash everything before eating.
Who has it right? RFK junior wants to ask this question, make the food/chemical industry prove it is safe and then be held liable if they get it wrong.
Sounds fair enough to me.
Red food dye is a good example. Yellow-3 is another carcinogen banned in Europe. In the USA, red dye was banned from cosmetics due to it's carcinogenicity, but ironically has been added to crap masquerading as processed food ever since. Think again before drinking your red cordial or sports drink poison.
Go figure!
Are you telling us that all red food dyes are the same chemical? That sounds pretty unlikely. Almost like what a conspiracy theorist would believe.
"Hey guys, did you know 'red' causes cancer? Anyone think of any other chemical that can create red or should we just change to purple?"
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..Are you telling us that all red food dyes are the same chemical? That sounds pretty unlikely. Almost like what a conspiracy theorist would believe.
"Hey guys, did you know 'red' causes cancer? Anyone think of any other chemical that can create red or should we just change to purple?"peacenlove said..TonyAbbott said..
There are about 9000 chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, food additives, preservitives etc etc used in the USA that are banned in Europe due to their health concerns.
I am sure Europe uses plenty that are banned in the USA
I asked a fruit grower here in Australia if he thinks I have to wash his products before eating. He told me they have to use a particular pesticide on their produce in order to grow and sell them here in Australia. Australia is the only country that uses this particular chemical. Banned everywhere else or they have harmless ways to achieve same result. It does gets washed before packaging, but not well, so he recommended to wash everything before eating.
Who has it right? RFK junior wants to ask this question, make the food/chemical industry prove it is safe and then be held liable if they get it wrong.
Sounds fair enough to me.
Red food dye is a good example. Yellow-3 is another carcinogen banned in Europe. In the USA, red dye was banned from cosmetics due to it's carcinogenicity, but ironically has been added to crap masquerading as processed food ever since. Think again before drinking your red cordial or sports drink poison.
Go figure!
Not all food dyes. Red No.3.
I'm not telling you Formula, it's a fact. Don't be so lazy and throw the old conspiracy theory crap at me son. We're all fed up with this rubbish labelling. Time to man up and get real.
www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-revoke-authorization-use-red-no-3-food-and-ingested-drugs
And
www.cspinet.org/cspi-news/red-3-fda-finally-bans-cancer-causing-food-dye
and
www.pbs.org/newshour/health/the-fda-banned-red-3-food-coloring-a-scientist-explains-the-dyes-history-and-health-risks
And
www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives/fdc-red-no-3
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..TonyAbbott said..
There are about 9000 chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, food additives, preservitives etc etc used in the USA that are banned in Europe due to their health concerns.
I am sure Europe uses plenty that are banned in the USA
I asked a fruit grower here in Australia if he thinks I have to wash his products before eating. He told me they have to use a particular pesticide on their produce in order to grow and sell them here in Australia. Australia is the only country that uses this particular chemical. Banned everywhere else or they have harmless ways to achieve same result. It does gets washed before packaging, but not well, so he recommended to wash everything before eating.
Who has it right? RFK junior wants to ask this question, make the food/chemical industry prove it is safe and then be held liable if they get it wrong.
Sounds fair enough to me.
Sounds fair, but only to those truly interested in the good health of all mankind.
Red No.3 food dye is a known carcinogen banned in Europe but still widely put into consumable food stuffs in the USA and Australia. The FDA has now revoked its safety approval.
www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-revoke-authorization-use-red-no-3-food-and-ingested-drugs
Red dye was banned from cosmetics long ago due to its carcinogenicity, but ironically has been allowed to be added to crap masquerading as processed food ever since. Think again before drinking your red cordial or sports drink poison, as you're supporting the sickness industry
Go figure!
I thought you'd have a different opinion on it.
Considering the FDA must have caved in to political pressure on this.
This quote is directly from their decision when "petitioned" to review Red No. 3 as an approved food additive. You tell me where it says it's a carcinogen for humans?
"The petition requested the agency review whether the Delaney Clause applied and cited, among other data and information, two studies that showed cancer in laboratory male rats exposed to high levels of FD&C Red No. 3 due to a rat specific hormonal mechanism. The way that FD&C Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats does not occur in humans. Relevant exposure levels to FD&C Red No. 3 for humans are typically much lower than those that cause the effects shown in male rats. Studies in other animals and in humans did not show these effects; claims that the use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food and in ingested drugs puts people at risk are not supported by the available scientific information. "
To any and all government employee that has ever approved any carcinogenic additives to be put in our foods
Select to expand quoteBrent in Qld said..
From my perspective the collective unelected uber rich on the podium for the US inauguration was sickening. It was no more than letting everyone know who has a seat at the table, who the people's leader will actually be listening to and who sees themselves above the democratic process. Those voted for to represent the people were very much in the background.
An interesting side bar for Aussies was Pratt and Reinhardt skirting proceedings while Rupert no doubt skulks around in the background looking at how to increasingly manipulate the electorate here going into the next election.
The tech oligarchs don't care about anyone except themselves. I think there is next to no chance America will be great again for the believers.
I've got the popcorn on the stove in anticipation for the biggest 'rug pull' in American history.
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
There are about 9000 chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, food additives, preservitives etc etc used in the USA that are banned in Europe due to their health concerns.
I am sure Europe uses plenty that are banned in the USA
I asked a fruit grower here in Australia if he thinks I have to wash his products before eating. He told me they have to use a particular pesticide on their produce in order to grow and sell them here in Australia. Australia is the only country that uses this particular chemical. Banned everywhere else or they have harmless ways to achieve same result. It does gets washed before packaging, but not well, so he recommended to wash everything before eating.
Who has it right? RFK junior wants to ask this question, make the food/chemical industry prove it is safe and then be held liable if they get it wrong.
Sounds fair enough to me.
They wash our beans in bleach btw gives them that crunch
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..Brent in Qld said..
From my perspective the collective unelected uber rich on the podium for the US inauguration was sickening. It was no more than letting everyone know who has a seat at the table, who the people's leader will actually be listening to and who sees themselves above the democratic process. Those voted for to represent the people were very much in the background.
An interesting side bar for Aussies was Pratt and Reinhardt skirting proceedings while Rupert no doubt skulks around in the background looking at how to increasingly manipulate the electorate here going into the next election.
The tech oligarchs don't care about anyone except themselves. I think there is next to no chance America will be great again for the believers.
I've got the popcorn on the stove in anticipation for the biggest 'rug pull' in American history.
Yeah but theyll bleed it off blameing brics rather then yank it out
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..FormulaNova said..Are you telling us that all red food dyes are the same chemical? That sounds pretty unlikely. Almost like what a conspiracy theorist would believe.
"Hey guys, did you know 'red' causes cancer? Anyone think of any other chemical that can create red or should we just change to purple?"peacenlove said..TonyAbbott said..
There are about 9000 chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, food additives, preservitives etc etc used in the USA that are banned in Europe due to their health concerns.
I am sure Europe uses plenty that are banned in the USA
I asked a fruit grower here in Australia if he thinks I have to wash his products before eating. He told me they have to use a particular pesticide on their produce in order to grow and sell them here in Australia. Australia is the only country that uses this particular chemical. Banned everywhere else or they have harmless ways to achieve same result. It does gets washed before packaging, but not well, so he recommended to wash everything before eating.
Who has it right? RFK junior wants to ask this question, make the food/chemical industry prove it is safe and then be held liable if they get it wrong.
Sounds fair enough to me.
Red food dye is a good example. Yellow-3 is another carcinogen banned in Europe. In the USA, red dye was banned from cosmetics due to it's carcinogenicity, but ironically has been added to crap masquerading as processed food ever since. Think again before drinking your red cordial or sports drink poison.
Go figure!
Not all food dyes. Red No.3.
I'm not telling you Formula, it's a fact. Don't be so lazy and throw the old conspiracy theory crap at me son. We're all fed up with this rubbish labelling. Time to man up and get real.
www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-revoke-authorization-use-red-no-3-food-and-ingested-drugs
And
www.cspinet.org/cspi-news/red-3-fda-finally-bans-cancer-causing-food-dye
and
www.pbs.org/newshour/health/the-fda-banned-red-3-food-coloring-a-scientist-explains-the-dyes-history-and-health-risks
And
www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives/fdc-red-no-3
Hmmm... there was someone else on here that used to go back and edit his posts after the fact... I am trying to remember who it was (or is)....
It's pretty lame though that you go back and edit your original post that I quoted and then start arguing with me about something that wasn't there when you originally posted it...
Who was that person again.... 
It does ring a bell, but I might need AI to pattern match this one.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
It does ring a bell, but I might need AI to pattern match this one.
100% a reincarnation. I'm having doubts it's a Skoda driver. Same shouty, odious passive aggressive nature, but different politics. Maybe the politics are a disguise.
Select to expand quotejapie said..Brent in Qld said..
Believe and think what you want. We are uncannily resembling Huxley's 'alcohol and religion' phase of societal control on our way to a yet to be determined soma.
In Brave New World, soma is the drug that produces a state of catatonic euphoria, or "soma holiday". It's used to control the masses and maintain social order in the novel's high-tech society. In the book, soma is described as an "opiate of the masses". It's used to replace alcohol and religion in a society that's peaceful but immoral. Huxley believed that ruling oligarchies would eventually discover that narco-hypnosis and infant conditioning were more efficient ways of governing than prisons and clubs.
There are plenty of books in history that people will live by and die for. Brave New World us not one of these, it is a warning to future generations to keep their eyes open to the rise and horrors of tyranny as Huxley witnessed in his own life.
The regression of morality was the most poignant message that I took from the book.
In my lifetime, we've gone from an era where my grandfather told me that I wasn't to say the word bottom but I was to describe my backside as my Btm to an era where we have public groups who actually advocate for sex with children and deviant pornography is available on a device that you keep in your pocket.
From recollection, Brave New World was set 400 years ahead of the date it was written. I reckon we have been fast tracked!
Demoralisation is one of the first stages in any campaign to control an entire people through force. Ask the Russians or Eastern Europeans who lived through the Soviet Communist era.
