I agree with Chris - seen it all before
(1) post a question which implies 'i am thinking about doing this what do you all think?'
(2) argue with responses
(3) then we all notice the post count and think maybe it is spamming crap yet again
Stuff like "a farmer can have a big house with an air-conditioner and all electric system and run many power tools and beat the grid price over ten years as though he were living in a suburban street.
That's where it does beat the grid full stop for price!"
well why did you have to ask us all for opinions then? Sounds like you are decided (or have something you realllly need to make us all aware of - selling?)
Opinion of the article written as being helpful informative? did it lack anything? I wrote an article refering to general off grid but part of its implementation requires economic values that to this recent date were considered out of reach or uncompetitive against the grid .
Most certainly decided when a factor of great signifigance has changed such as affordability and viability of personal implementation and acquirement.
And this section is "general discussion" which is what it is generating, so no misuse.
You are more than implying at no time can you actually show a picture or mention any item unless it is by common name or unrecognisable as brand of board, surf board or camera or boat e.t.c.
Also if you do that with your finger, Res Ipsa Des. I see the two of you do think alike.
You are making me agree to the fact that safety information for 25K of equipment does not need to be present in the article , i can remaove some of that. Keep going, aircraft wings have omething related to it also.