There is a moral conundrum. Its interesting to hear the various views.
- As long as its humane killing its ok. (Speaks to minimising suffering)
- To waste what you kill is disrespectful. (Speaks to minimising killing)
- Doing your own killing is somehow better. ( I think this is about personal awareness of what is involved in killing so you are less inclined towards capricious consumption?)
- Some couldn't give a rat's arse about other animals or their suffering or their circumscribed joyless lives and see no hint of a moral issue. (Don't buy sailboards from people like this because they see you the same way

)
What about capricious killing? I'm sure that's ok with some of you. When I was a kid I used to wander around the bush with a .22 and kill birds and rabbits. It was utterly capricious. Shooting bunnies was doing the farmers a favour but that's not why I did it. It gave me some joy to hit a mark with some pointed consequence. I wouldn't say I felt fierce visceral joy but it was a tiny bit that way. Hunters always feel a bit awkward justifying what they do.
I think there is a common view that killing and eating creatures is entirely natural and that is sufficient justification for doing it. I'm personally not sure about it at all.
I don't identify with that ethos. After all, its entirely natural to die at 40 too but that's not something I ever aspired to.
I don't think about killing at all when I eat meat. I feel a little guilty about my mindless attitude to it. I wonder if an awareness campaign might be in order, like the smoking awareness campaign or the driving safety campaign. Can you imagine going into Maccas and being confronted by a picture of Ronald up to his arse in fresh gibblets as he eviscerates some unfortunate creature with a caption saying "MMmmm Big Mac - only fresh kill used". People might at least think about what they do.