It's all diet... sure

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..

FormulaNova said..

Haha the FDA wanting to suppress the Pfizer papers until 2096 really triggered you didn't it FN

The only thing that "triggered me" was how quick you went silent when I pointed out that there was no Pfizer attempt to hide papers for 75 years. It was very shocking that something you seemed to believe in went stone cold quiet, all because I pointed out the problems with the argument.

Then you switched to memes, which showed me that you really can't handle not being able to argue a point of view, you are just parroting things people have told you that you think bolsters your argument.

What was I hoping for? Well "oh yeah, that makes sense and I guess I was wrong" would have been just, but also I think I would have had too much of a shock if you had.

Then the memes began.

Select to expand quote

hitch_hiker said..
interesting thought I heard today - The vaccinated are lashing out because deep inside they're scared shi tless

Are we comparing thoughts we hear now? Does it somehow give them merit if we hear them from random strangers?

Is this another one of those things where the CT nuts think that everything is about them and its a great conspiracy, whereas the rest of us are just getting on with life and ignoring the CT nuts?

I can't say I have heard anyone say that they were worried about having been vaccinated. If you were unlucky enough to get a reaction from the vaccination, you would have had it by now.

Select to expand quote

FormulaNova said..
I can't say I have heard anyone say that they were worried about having been vaccinated. If you were unlucky enough to get a reaction from the vaccination, you would have had it by now.

And that's where you are completely wrong. Especially if you have had an mRNA gene therapy that's labeled as a vaccine.

Remember how they said in the beginning side effects are "rare and don't last long"
They said the same about long term side effects.

Possibly a reason for the unknown excess deaths.

Interesting how the WHO are defining science

Maybe avoid the new booster friends...

www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-says-pfizers-bivalent-covid-shot-may-be-linked-stroke-older-adults-2023-01-13/

Select to expand quote

ok said.

And that's where you are completely wrong. Especially if you have had an mRNA gene therapy that's labeled as a vaccine.

Remember how they said in the beginning side effects are "rare and don't last long"
They said the same about long term side effects.

Possibly a reason for the unknown excess deaths.

Excess deaths were up before there was a vaccine. In fact they were a little higher than the recorded COVID deaths, which indicated many COVID deaths were not. Recorded as such.

Top U.S. Cardiologist Peter McCullough calls for the Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, World Health Organization, U.S. Government, Pharmaceutical Suppliers and others to be charged with illegal advertising,
fraud and mass negligent homicide.

gab.com/MorpheusMAGA/posts/109685300329293566

Select to expand quote

Flying Dutchman said..
Any misinformation here?

"A media statement in response to the debate surrounding COVID-19 treatment.
Please attribute comments to Professor Alex Zelinsky AO, Vice-Chancellor:

The University of Newcastle is committed to contributing to the response to COVID-19 and we support peer reviewed science-based decision making as we enter this next phase of the pandemic management, in which vaccination plays an important role. Rigorous peer reviewed research evidence must remain a key mechanism to guide major policy and public health responses. This is the framework that Australian leaders have used to manage our pandemic response to date and the success of this approach is evident. As a world-class research institute, we encourage and promote innovation in research that is underpinned by rigorous scientific principles. Our researchers are expected to adhere to strict scientific standards in providing opinions on matters of public interest. While the University always respects freedom of speech, Robert Clancy is not speaking on behalf of the University of Newcastle when offering his opinion on this issue. The University has not funded his research since 2009 and he retired in 2013. The University does not consider Robert Clancy a subject matter expert on COVID-19."

Select to expand quote

remery said.."A media statement in response to the debate surrounding COVID-19 treatment.
Please attribute comments to Professor Alex Zelinsky AO, Vice-Chancellor:
The University of Newcastle is committed to contributing to the response to COVID-19 and we support peer reviewed science-based decision making as we enter this next phase of the pandemic management, in which vaccination plays an important role. Rigorous peer reviewed research evidence must remain a key mechanism to guide major policy and public health responses. This is the framework that Australian leaders have used to manage our pandemic response to date and the success of this approach is evident. As a world-class research institute, we encourage and promote innovation in research that is underpinned by rigorous scientific principles. Our researchers are expected to adhere to strict scientific standards in providing opinions on matters of public interest. While the University always respects freedom of speech, Robert Clancy is not speaking on behalf of the University of Newcastle when offering his opinion on this issue. The University has not funded his research since 2009 and he retired in 2013. The University does not consider Robert Clancy a subject matter expert on COVID-19."

Good to see you fact checked the video. We can all rest easy now.

Select to expand quote

lotofwind said..
I just fact checked this so must be true.
The BIGGEST death of the whole covid vax has been the death of Seabreeze forums from conspiracy nut jobs that are living in the past and need to stop sooking about things that happened years ago.

I'm triggered. You triggered me. Poo.

At what point are we going to discontinue the term "conspiracy theory" in relation to this diet of vaccinating yourself to health? "It's all vaccines / diet sure ?"
I'm about to take my weekly methotrexate which will give me debilitating back pain for two days (liver + kidney pain)
It will stop the chest pain and extra scarring for around 3.5 days which is caused by the Pfizer vaccine ? I look like a fuggen balloon animal from all the prednisone , anti inflammatories and other heart medications. And on top of that I'm at a higher chance of developing skin cancer so I have to make sure I stay out of the sun in the middle of summer.








For all those healthy tax paying people here's a photo I took two days ago.
Commission house living morbidly obese women chain smoking and drinking goon infront of her outdoor tv infront of multiple infant children. When the next pandemic comes along just remember it's these people who don't value their existence who you MUST SACRIFICE your existence for. The morbidly obese women is formulanovas wife who he fuc? in the belly button once she passes out from her diabetes

Compilation of recent athletes that have collapsed or died suddenly from heart problems.

gab.com/RealRedElephants/posts/109686994367329104


Head turners

gab.com/Dissident_Priest/posts/109686444049222838

When I was a teen, the family used to get fed liver (lamb's fry) every once in a while. When I was in my 20s I sometimes wondered if that was an iron boost for my sisters. I'll never know if that was the aim, but it definitely didn't leave me ripped.
Maybe I should have eaten the stuff day in, day out.

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..

This message is kindly brought to you by The Ministry If Truth

The message is kindly brought to you by peer review.

Sustainable Hate: How Gab Built a Durable "Platform for the People"
February 2022 Canadian Journal of Communication 47(1)
DOI: 10.22230/cjc.2022v47n1a4037

Abstract
Background: Gab is a social network and a haven for racism, sexism, and extremism. With accessible design and tech-forward products, this "platform for the people" has surged in popularity. Analysis: This article examines Gab News, analyzing its topics, sources, and platform integration. Its mix of topics creates an expansive world. Its mix of neutral and hyperpartisan sources creates a believable (yet still conservative) world. And its mix of moderate and explicit content establishes a sustainable (yet still hateful) world. Conclusion: Gab's strategic communication offers a sustainable foundation for the radical right; understanding this is key for counteracting hate.

You've lost your way in being a decent human myscreename. Reading what you wrote by there is a sad joke. Hope one day you wake from your sleep