Illegal Immigrants..

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
fingerbone
fingerbone
NSW
921 posts
NSW, 921 posts
8 Aug 2012 7:43pm
What would you do,if you could ?
People complain about the gov not doing enough to stop the boat people.
SP
SP
10982 posts
SP SP
10982 posts
8 Aug 2012 5:52pm
Here we go again..........
Scotty88
Scotty88
4214 posts
4214 posts
8 Aug 2012 5:56pm
fingerbone said...

What would you do,if you could.



could what ?
surferstu
surferstu
1011 posts
1011 posts
8 Aug 2012 5:56pm
Stop them
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
8 Aug 2012 8:08pm


give them the fingerbone...?
SP
SP
10982 posts
SP SP
10982 posts
8 Aug 2012 6:08pm
fingerbone said...

What would you do,if you could ?
People complain about the gov not doing enough to stop the boat people.



But.........

Boat people aren't illegal Immigrants. They are refugges, Australia is a signatory to the UN policy on refugees. It is not illegal to arrive on Australia's shore by boat or any other means seeking asylum.

Illegal immigrants are people that arrive and over stay and are not refugees, so please make it clear who you wish to attack?

Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
8 Aug 2012 8:28pm
Here we go!

OK, hypothetically.... the refugee... fleeing to a new nation...

A favorite buddy of mine (Ash - born in Iran, of distinct middle eastern appearance, a great bloke, and a cool but thick accent) lives in Potts Point Sydney, and his cousin is 19 years old, and living in Mashhad, Iran, near the Afghanistan border.

She is hot, and I've seen photos (I'm talking about the 19 year old cousin). Her parents arranged her marriage when she was 14, and she married the ugliest bastard in town, who drinks home brew whiskey, swears like a trooper, has missing teeth, and gets angry on the turps, and gives her a punch-up about twice per month. The relationship is fully strained, she refuses to have his children, and hates sleeping with him. He forces himself on her, and she pretty much just has to oblige. She gets back yard abortions every now and then... She wants out.

She likes another boy in the town, and he likes her. But she knows she must not do anything about it, because she will bring shame on her family, and she will be at great risk of being killed, if they every found out.

She wants a better life, and wants to leave Iran... She's lucky that her cousin in Sydney has excess coin, and he is arranging for her to get out. She's lucky she doesn't need to catch "the boat".




Original question... what would I do?... Don't know. Just imagine how farked up their individual situations must be, for them to throw their life savings into the dodgiest boat ride that they will ever go on!...
pierrec45
pierrec45
NSW
2005 posts
NSW, 2005 posts
8 Aug 2012 8:46pm
SP said...
But.........

Boat people aren't illegal Immigrants. They are refugges, Australia is a signatory to the UN policy on refugees. It is not illegal to arrive on Australia's shore by boat or any other means seeking asylum.

My understanding is that boat people aren't refugees, they are asylum seekers that may or may not get the status of refugees.

In fact far from all can prove that they fall in the category of "a well founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion". One suspects most are simply looking for better economical prospects.

Am I wrong on the def ?
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23652 posts
WA, 23652 posts
8 Aug 2012 6:56pm
I just gave SP a thumbs up.

Must be softening....

But - quote the UN agreements of refugees asylum seekers all you like, I wonder why:

(1) when Vietnam was pretty much evacuated due to the war, those who arrived were mostly women and kids and oldies. An ex-g/f of mine came here with just her and her mum, and her dad stayed. They finally saw him 25yrs later. That is guts - think about not seeing your wife an kid for 25yrs because you sent them off for their better life.
Why are the arrivals here in the last few years predominantly males in the 18 - 30 age group?

(2) why the hell would you travel through a number of safe countries, at least one of which is religiously aligned with your beliefs (Indo), yet still risk the expensive and very dangerous journey to Australia?
That alone suggests to me that they are not happy to be 'safe' they want all the monetary benefits that comes with a western country like Oz.





wodgina6722
wodgina6722
229 posts
229 posts
8 Aug 2012 6:57pm
Simondo said...

Here we go!

OK, hypothetically.... the refugee... fleeing to a new nation...

A favorite buddy of mine (Ash - born in Iran, of distinct middle eastern appearance, a great bloke, and a cool but thick accent) lives in Potts Point Sydney, and his cousin is 19 years old, and living in Mashhad, Iran, near the Afghanistan border.

She is hot, and I've seen photos (I'm talking about the 19 year old cousin). Her parents arranged her marriage when she was 14, and she married the ugliest bastard in town, who drinks home brew whiskey, swears like a trooper, has missing teeth, and gets angry on the turps, and gives her a punch-up about twice per month. The relationship is fully strained, she refuses to have his children, and hates sleeping with him. He forces himself on her, and she pretty much just has to oblige. She gets back yard abortions every now and then... She wants out.

She likes another boy in the town, and he likes her. But she knows she must not do anything about it, because she will bring shame on her family, and she will be at great risk of being killed, if they every found out.

She wants a better life, and wants to leave Iran... She's lucky that her cousin in Sydney has excess coin, and he is arranging for her to get out. She's lucky she doesn't need to catch "the boat".




Original question... what would I do?... Don't know. Just imagine how farked up their individual situations must be, for them to throw their life savings into the dodgiest boat ride that they will ever go on!...


What if she was ugly? story sounds far fetched Iran is quite westernised
SP
SP
10982 posts
SP SP
10982 posts
8 Aug 2012 6:59pm
pierrec45 said...

SP said...
But.........

Boat people aren't illegal Immigrants. They are asylum seeker, Australia is a signatory to the UN policy on refugees. It is not illegal to arrive on Australia's shore by boat or any other means seeking asylum.

My understanding is that boat people aren't refugees, they are asylum seekers that may or may not get the status of refugees.

In fact far from all can prove that they fall in the category of "a well founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion". One suspects most are simply looking for better economical prospects.

Am I wrong on the def ?


You are correct, in a UN sense they are asylum seeker, I typed the wrong word either way not illegal. Which is the point.


doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
8 Aug 2012 7:04pm
SP said...

Here we go again..........


Its helicat time!!

chrispychru
chrispychru
QLD
7932 posts
QLD, 7932 posts
8 Aug 2012 9:12pm
****ing wog ****s ****ing..... dont trust us
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
8 Aug 2012 7:20pm
chrispychru said...

****ing wog ****s ****ing..... dont trust us


Do you do your own censoring? < that is possibly a spelling mistake but you know what I mean
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23652 posts
WA, 23652 posts
8 Aug 2012 8:54pm
doggie said...

chrispychru said...

****ing wog ****s ****ing..... dont trust us


Do you do your own censoring? < that is possibly a spelling mistake but you know what I mean


**** ****ers
Pitbull
Pitbull
WA
1267 posts
WA, 1267 posts
8 Aug 2012 9:06pm
I don't mind who comes into the country as long tax dollars aren't used to support them. Get a job, pay your taxes and buy things like everyone else.
paulford
paulford
WA
312 posts
WA, 312 posts
8 Aug 2012 9:13pm
Why not look at the immigration of these people under a different light?.
We see reports and costings of million$$$ spent housing and transporting these individuals. Why not see this as money well spent?, eventually these people will contribute to the Aussie economy. If we look at the immigration on a worldwide scale then can we not see a global 'integration' of communities?. Like it or not it is happening and maybe it is part of human evolution.
Sure there are going to be a lot of problems for a long time, but eventually(im talking a number of generations) this will cease. With the growing global population, we need to learn to accomodate our 'foreign friends'. These people need the protection of a more humane and stable governing body(which the Aussie government really is) to be able to establish a foundation for future generations.
Jradedmondo
Jradedmondo
NSW
637 posts
NSW, 637 posts
8 Aug 2012 11:27pm
i cant really hear anyone complaining over tong abbott, all he does is blame the ginja ninja for this and that and never even says what he'd do, (his flueroscent safety vests and massive ears are very distracting)

I'd send them back straight away if they had no paperwork, like the Americans do with the mexicans,
we could build a giant catapult on christmas island, would be the cheapest most cost effective way, once they hit indonesian air space their no longer our problem, the catcopter may also work, would just have to figure something out

Jarryd
tmurray
tmurray
WA
485 posts
WA, 485 posts
8 Aug 2012 9:59pm
I would set up a competition. Match every asylum seeker with a genuine "ozzie" select from a pool of talent at centrelink. Both contestants are supplied with 3 months of 'basic' housing and a crash course in "employment" and English language communication skills.
At the end of the year the there is a test - the 3 categories are
1. amount of tax paid minus any government subsidies
2. any criminal activity (counts as a negative)
3. an English language test

The loser gets deported.

youngbull
youngbull
QLD
826 posts
QLD, 826 posts
9 Aug 2012 12:01am
So every seabreazer red thumbs poor old fingerbone but ya still have to comment.
If a post gets more than 200 reads or 10 reply's it should be instantly be maxed to the greener side of things. Sheep!!!
Cassa
Cassa
WA
1305 posts
WA, 1305 posts
8 Aug 2012 10:08pm
Dunno , but if MY COUNTRY (thats just how I feel) was as f--ked up as what they are saying theirs is , I would fight like the last man alive to try to rectify the situation. If that meant getting into politics, standing up for my rights or going on a rampage to KILL people like the Taliban (if that sort of situation arose) to free MY family from the ****e that is happening I would , and know most around me would do the same!!!!![}:)]


NOT RUN LIKE A SCARED RABBIT , to find an EASY escape

4 of my closest friends are recent immigrants , followed the correct protocol struggled with it but got through in the end(well in 4 mths they will find out, but looks good) .they didn't LOSE their ID , why do all the boat people?

Going to be no winners with boat people

Neither side of politics has a good solution

Besides this has been happening for hundreds of years ( violence of the worst kind) in their country ,






sorry but leave them to it .

Ohh no is my neck red!!!!
stamp
stamp
QLD
2797 posts
QLD, 2797 posts
9 Aug 2012 12:24am
Cassa said...

Dunno , but if MY COUNTRY (thats just how I feel) was as f--ked up as what they are saying theirs is , I would fight like the last man alive to try to rectify the situation. If that meant getting into politics, standing up for my rights or going on a rampage to KILL people like the Taliban (if that sort of situation arose) to free MY family from the ****e that is happening I would , and know most around me would do the same!!!!![}:)]


NOT RUN LIKE A SCARED RABBIT , to find an EASY escape









i'm torn between pity, revulsion and scorn reading this.

Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23652 posts
WA, 23652 posts
8 Aug 2012 11:41pm
stamp said...

Cassa said...

Dunno , but if MY COUNTRY (thats just how I feel) was as f--ked up as what they are saying theirs is , I would fight like the last man alive to try to rectify the situation. If that meant getting into politics, standing up for my rights or going on a rampage to KILL people like the Taliban (if that sort of situation arose) to free MY family from the ****e that is happening I would , and know most around me would do the same!!!!![}:)]


NOT RUN LIKE A SCARED RABBIT , to find an EASY escape








i'm torn between pity, revulsion and scorn reading this.




Stamp, does that translate to "if we were invaded tomorrow I'd run away rather than fight" ???? Let me get this right - you are revulsed by one who would stand up and fight? Mandela must be right up on your sh!tlist huh? I guess all those who spoke out about black slavery in the USA some 50yrs ago are to be scorned?


IMHO, pity, scorn and revulsion are not the typical traits of anyone who made this country what you enjoy today.

Did you read my example about how the Viet men stayed to fight? Yet this current crop seem to do the opposite...... do a runner and leave the frail behind.

Just wondering....

getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
9 Aug 2012 12:18am
My mum was a 10 quid POM immigrant in the 60s.

Lucky for her she was snow white and Oz (openly) had a welcome all UK honkies policy.

Mum's large, whinging, (sometimes) racist family and were put on a luxury liner and brought here, at great expense, to help boost whities in a white bread country.

Had my mum come from a background where they worshipped some other religious nuttery (just my 2c on that stuff), had they all been swarthy skinned, been sporting beards and/or had hard to pronounce names.. well I guess they would have had a very different experience of how welcoming Oz can be.. depending on how you look/sound/worship.

I am still stunned at how backward and selfish we are in this country today when it comes to a trickle of largely genuine asylum seekers that arrive. Especially so when you look at how we opened the door to the Vietnamese after meddling in their internal conflict in the name of 'democracy'.

Just how is it we have become so ignorant, selfish and xenophobic +30 yrs later?

Maybe people read beyond the headlines then? Maybe we didn't think we were a nation that sh@t chocolate then? Maybe we were a kinder, more accepting nation then?

Not sure, but people that continue to use (deliberately) misleading and enflaming language, with obvious racist undertones, should be pushed back out to sea on the boats that arrive IMO.

We don't need those that won't accept others in this country so take your "We're full - fk orf" stickers and your racist mates and fk orf yaself.[}:)]

This country would be better without the likes of people who feed dumb-arsed redknecks like Alan Jones, Cassa and fingerbone if you ask me.

We are lucky enough to live in a democracy and no-one is goin broke by pandering to the ignorant and selfish that's for sure Alan Jones and co.

Just my 2.5c tho.
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
9 Aug 2012 12:36am
I read Anh Do's 'The happiest refugee' a while back.

Not all that well written but a great read all the same. Worth a gander no matter what your views on immigration and/or asylum issues.

Thank gawd we welcomed people like Anh Do into the country is all I can say.



Cassa, anyone who stands there, in this country, criticising another human being for investing their life savings in a desperate and dangerous escape from one of the most dangerous areas on earth, or for leaving their country of birth when that country's leaders persecute/rape/kill them.. well they are talking themselves up and peforming bum ventriliquism I reckon.

Get ya hand off it fellas. If your family was persecuted, your life and freedoms dominated in every respect, or your daughter in danger of being raped - you'd most likely be off like shot.
stamp
stamp
QLD
2797 posts
QLD, 2797 posts
9 Aug 2012 9:44am
Mark _australia said...

stamp said...

Cassa said...

Dunno , but if MY COUNTRY (thats just how I feel) was as f--ked up as what they are saying theirs is , I would fight like the last man alive to try to rectify the situation. If that meant getting into politics, standing up for my rights or going on a rampage to KILL people like the Taliban (if that sort of situation arose) to free MY family from the ****e that is happening I would , and know most around me would do the same!!!!![}:)]


NOT RUN LIKE A SCARED RABBIT , to find an EASY escape








i'm torn between pity, revulsion and scorn reading this.




Stamp, does that translate to "if we were invaded tomorrow I'd run away rather than fight" ???? Let me get this right - you are revulsed by one who would stand up and fight? Mandela must be right up on your sh!tlist huh? I guess all those who spoke out about black slavery in the USA some 50yrs ago are to be scorned?


IMHO, pity, scorn and revulsion are not the typical traits of anyone who made this country what you enjoy today.

Did you read my example about how the Viet men stayed to fight? Yet this current crop seem to do the opposite...... do a runner and leave the frail behind.

Just wondering....




don't put words in my mouth mark, of course it doesn't translate to that. but you know absolutely **** all about these people or their situation but are quite happy to brand them cowards.
what makes me sick is people like cassa who form opinions without thinking. you just imagine up a war zone and put yourself in it dressed up in fatigues and wielding an ak47. problem solved, time to crack a beer. how easy was that? why haven't they done it your way for the last thousand or so years? of course- they're cowards....
many of these asylum seeker are seeking asylum because they have stood up and fought for their rights and their families or got into the wrong side of politics.



Jradedmondo
Jradedmondo
NSW
637 posts
NSW, 637 posts
9 Aug 2012 9:47am
should set up a system like hunger games, winner can enter the country,the rest,well you get the idea

there might just be a few people down in canberra that could trial it

Jarryd
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
9 Aug 2012 10:58am
getfunky said...
Cassa, anyone who stands there, in this country, criticising another human being for investing their life savings in a desperate and dangerous escape from one of the most dangerous areas on earth, or for leaving their country of birth when that country's leaders persecute/rape/kill them.. well they are talking themselves up and peforming bum ventriliquism I reckon.

Get ya hand off it fellas. If your family was persecuted, your life and freedoms dominated in every respect, or your daughter in danger of being raped - you'd most likely be off like shot.


But, but... I just happened to fall out of a **** here a few decades back. I didn't want to be Australian, it just turned out that way. I didn't risk my families life so that they could be Australian, they just fell out of a **** and it was so. I didn't spend all my savings, I didn't leave my life behind, I didn't spend years in a detention centre.

So what right do they have to call themselves Australian? They didn't fall out of a **** like I did.

P.S. Yes, there are some 'economic refugees'. It is true. However let's not ignore how small a percentage that is, and that there are plenty of dole bludging Australians already here, true skippys, that are now 3rd or more generation bludgers. Call me crazy but the effort involved for a refugee just to get here seems an indication of a very brave, hard worker.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23652 posts
WA, 23652 posts
9 Aug 2012 11:17am
stamp said...

Mark _australia said...

stamp said...

Cassa said...

Dunno , but if MY COUNTRY (thats just how I feel) was as f--ked up as what they are saying theirs is , I would fight like the last man alive to try to rectify the situation. If that meant getting into politics, standing up for my rights or going on a rampage to KILL people like the Taliban (if that sort of situation arose) to free MY family from the ****e that is happening I would , and know most around me would do the same!!!!![}:)]


NOT RUN LIKE A SCARED RABBIT , to find an EASY escape








i'm torn between pity, revulsion and scorn reading this.




Stamp, does that translate to "if we were invaded tomorrow I'd run away rather than fight" ???? Let me get this right - you are revulsed by one who would stand up and fight? Mandela must be right up on your sh!tlist huh? I guess all those who spoke out about black slavery in the USA some 50yrs ago are to be scorned?


IMHO, pity, scorn and revulsion are not the typical traits of anyone who made this country what you enjoy today.

Did you read my example about how the Viet men stayed to fight? Yet this current crop seem to do the opposite...... do a runner and leave the frail behind.

Just wondering....




don't put words in my mouth mark, of course it doesn't translate to that. but you know absolutely **** all about these people or their situation but are quite happy to brand them cowards.
what makes me sick is people like cassa who form opinions without thinking. you just imagine up a war zone and put yourself in it dressed up in fatigues and wielding an ak47. problem solved, time to crack a beer. how easy was that? why haven't they done it your way for the last thousand or so years? of course- they're cowards....
many of these asylum seeker are seeking asylum because they have stood up and fought for their rights and their families or got into the wrong side of politics.






Yeah I know fk all about them cos I have never met one, I'll give you that.

What I do know though is that they chuck away ID and that alone means we should be a damn sight more cautious of them than any other refugees that have arrived here.

These threads make me smile - the pro side never answer the simple questions about them passing thru safe countries to get here (ie: Australia is the goal, not safety) or why they chuck away ID and the complain it takes too long to identify their antecedents.

leftfield
leftfield
WA
200 posts
WA, 200 posts
9 Aug 2012 11:29am
MarkAustralia said...



These threads make me smile - the pro side never answer the simple questions about them passing thru safe countries to get here



Just a quick look on google seems to suggest that Sri Lanka, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, thailand, Burma and Indonesia are not signatoires to UNHCR conventions/protocals on refugees. And therefore have no legal obligation to take them.
poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
9 Aug 2012 11:32am
Mark _australia said...


Yeah I know fk all about them


It shows.


Mark _australia said...


What I do know though is that they chuck away ID and that alone means we should be a damn sight more cautious of them than any other refugees that have arrived here.


Refugee Council of Australia said......
The majority of asylum seekers who have reached Australia by boat have been found to be genuine refugees. Between 70 and 90 per cent have typically been found to be refugees, compared to around 40 to 45 per cent of asylum seekers who arrive with some form of temporary visa (e.g. tourist, student or temporary work visa). In the 2009-10 financial year, the primary recognition rate for asylum seekers who arrived by boat was 73 per cent, compared to 44 per cent for asylum seekers who arrived on a temporary visa.

According to the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), of the 39,527 security assessments made in 2009-10 relating to visa applications (including Protection Visa applications), only 19 adverse findings were made across all visa categories. Understandably, every case is assessed on its individual merits; however, from these numbers it can be seen that the risks are very low.

The UN Refugee Convention excludes people who have committed war crimes, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity or other serious non-political crimes from obtaining refugee status. Any person who is guilty of these crimes will be denied refugee status. Additionally, all asylum seekers must undergo rigorous security and character checks before being granted protection in Australia. It is therefore highly unlikely that a war criminal, terrorist or any other person who posed a security threat would be able to enter Australia as a refugee.

It is also improbable that a criminal or terrorist would choose such a dangerous and difficult method to enter Australia, given that asylum seekers who arrive without authorisation or without valid travel documents undergo more rigorous security and identity checks than other entrants to Australia.






Mark _australia said...
These threads make me smile


How bizarre these threads make me cringe.


Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅