russh said...pierrec45 said...russh said...
You sound like my dad 30 years ago
Huge country - transport everything - fuel
Small population - spread over that huge country
Import everything electrical - and have to have the latest
Some of the highest relative wages and workcover costs
Too many layers of government
Export and Make maximum profit for major corps and send profits overseas
Grin and bare it - it aint gonna get cheaper
Its probably worse for those in Sydney - one of the worlds most expensive places to live
If its too much buy a shack in the back of bourke hunt and grow your own food and sell some rabbits for some coopers brew kit
Huh, I can afford quite well, I bought my abodes when it was cheaper long time ago, but it still brings the question.
The points you make make no sense: Australia was just as big 30 years ago, look it up. And there were the same layers of gov't when Australia was comparatively cheaper - go ask your daddy.
Have to have the latest - this is common to all western countries. Import everything: always was the case. Australia was also an island then.
Anyone else ?
well stop being such an arrogant d!ck and please enlightenus all - its obvious you have all the answers
What makes you think I have answers? I was asking a dinkum question.
I was only pointing out to you that the size of Australia has not changed that dramatically in the last 30 years, that's all.
Anyhow, back to actual contributors on comparative CHANGES in the last 30 years, we're getting actual interesting clues, with a couple of posters (Formula above, Mark, couple others) relating negative gearing to housing to Hawke's changes, etc. Interesting stuff.
I'll bet you there's no real equivalent in the US, Canada, UK, Europe, therefore looks like good ideas...