GalahOnTheBay said...barn said...
Tolerance? Ba! Humbug!
Sigh...

I don't tolerate racism, fascism or homophobia either.. I don't need to tolerate people recommending my attendance to some self-righteous 12 step quasi-cult so I can hear Ghost Stories about some Higher Power..
SomeOtherGuy said...
I don't particularly like your definition but even if we both accept it, you'd still be wrong:
If you roll everything back and everything remains exactly the same and you run the tape forward, there's no guarantee of the same result. You can try to ignore the uncertainty principle but it'll still be there introducing randomness despite you. So by your own definition, the person does indeed have free will.
Feel free to redefine it!,
Even if I grant you the Uncertainty Principle, where random Quantum Sh!t ultimately decide our answers, is this real Free will?? We might as well set up a Double Slit Diffraction machine to make our decisions if that is Free Will?... I don't think relying on Quantum physics to give us an alternating response is Free Will, more like flipping a fancy coin?.. But anyway, the Uncertainty Principle has no affect on the Macro Chemistry in the brain.. We don't take the decision to rob a Bank so lightly that the final call is left to Quantum Uncertainty (although you could argue that in court)
I won't go further but there is some pretty interesting stuff out there..
whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/06/27/free-will-the-brain-and-the-law/This article talks about a
Charles Whitman's notorious murder of 13 people at the University of Texas in 1966. An autopsy revealed he had a brain tumor-a glioblastoma-that had affected the amygdala region of the brain, and might well have caused his unexpected rampage
Did he have a choice in his rampage? Or was he a victim of his genes/environment.. Same goes with a criminal who was abused as a child, fallen victim to the poverty cycle and has inherited a gene for
Badass, did the criminal have any choice in his criminal decisions?