Razzonater said...
If I walk down the street and bounce a ball for 5 minutes and someone else walks on a moving train walking an identical speed as me bouncing the same ball the same amount of times the time and space the ball has covered is the same the only difference is the distance the ball has travelled.
The time and space and even distance the ball has covered is the same as you walking, relative to the train. It is different relative to you walking.
I don't really see what you are
trying to show us here.
When talking about mass or density if something remains the same size but becomes denser such as a black hole it in fact does increase its gravitational pull on space around it...
A star pumps out a lot of energy. When it runs out its own gravitational pull becomes greater than the energy it was pushing out. It now collapses upon itself. It becomes much, much smaller and as a result denser. Mass has a fixed amount of gravity. There is no new mass as it collapses, is there. There is no new gravity.
(note this happens for a particular size and type of star)
A black hole is simply a very, very ...very dense object. The mass of the sun that wasn't thrown out into space when it collapsed is now compressed into a seriously small piece of space. All that gravity that was once spread out across that much space is now in a very tiny space.
Imagine a sexy lady standing on a big plank of wood on your back. Now imagine them putting all their weight on your back in a pair of stilletos. Something like that.
Now imagine all the gravitational pull of a star thousands of times larger than our own, compressed into a pin head.
... I can guarantee that my theories may not be watertight however they are no less incorrect than anyone else's unless your theories are factual...
and in the words of Albert Einstein You cannot solve a problem you have created by using the same sort of thinking that got you there If anything if not entertaining I do believe this post has sparked an interesting debate between those who like being In the comfort zone of believing only what they have read and heard to those who are told believe half of what you see and none of what you hear ahhh nothing like irony oh and didn't we recently find out light is not the fastest thing anymore?
Light is still the fastest thing or are you in the comfort zone of only believing only what you read and hear? (yes I know about the neutrinos)
This is what always gets me about these type of know-it-alls. You contradict yourselves, sometimes twice in the same sentence, while saying we do.
Over and out.
