Abel Tasman. Slowly the truth comes out.

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Gwendy
Gwendy
SA
472 posts
SA, 472 posts
17 Sep 2012 9:49pm
At last the media is investigating and beginning to present the true story to the public.

www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/rusty-boat-in-eye-of-a-storm-20120915-25yzw.html
www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/all-we-want-is-to-fish-within-the-rules-20120912-25s43.html
www.theaustralian.com.au/nocookies?a=A.flavipes

Perhaps a little late to prevent a government minister making a fool of himself to appease the ill-informed.

As I have said all along, this vessel is here to value add the product of a fishery that has existed for over 30 years.

It would introduce potentially 250 tons per day of food for human consumption.
Current practice is that it is dug into the ground as fertiliser.

It would do it with much less harm to other marine life than current practice.
It would do it with a much smaller carbon footprint that current practice.
It would do it much more efficiently than current practice.
There really is no downside to this.

To the detractors, I ask you this.

There are now over 7 billion humans on this plannet that need to eat. If this fish is not processed and added to the food supply, Where else will it come from?

Perhaps you are in favour of clearing more forest for cropping.
Maybe that same denuded land could be used for livestock.
Please don't start me up on aquaculture.

kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
17 Sep 2012 10:42pm
1st is an interview with the captain. Of course he's going to say it's a wonderful boat, great for the environment.

2nd is an interview with the head of the company who brought it over. Of course he's going to say it's a wonderful boat, great for the environment.

3rd is an opinion piece attacking Labor via minister Tony Burke, and behind a paywall. The guy Van Onselen has written 2 biographies of Little Johnny howard, and one on how great the Liberal party is, introduced by Alan Jones. you think he's a Lib by any chance, taking a potshot at Lab?

Despite it being behind a paywall, I'm gonna take a stab and guess he says it's a wonderful boat, great for the environment.

How about finding 3 less biased stories?
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
17 Sep 2012 10:44pm
PS what's wrong with aquaculture. Genuinely interested?
Agent000
Agent000
161 posts
161 posts
17 Sep 2012 9:54pm

Main problem with aquaculture is it is often used to grow high value fish ( eg tuna) and they are fed wild caught low value fish ( eg the stuff the mega trawler catches)

Conversion rate is often around 10 to 1 ie: 100 t of wild caught fish makes 10 tonne of tuna

Lot of work on using grains ect as feeds but if you want to feed the
Masses feed them the grain .

Not to say aquaculture will never help but it's not a front runner for
Saving the world/ marine environment.

worrier
worrier
WA
726 posts
WA, 726 posts
18 Sep 2012 6:52am
Great article in the weekend Australian on Aquaculture in Aussie.
We have a long way to go for it to be viable here. Some small succsess stories but a lot of empty pockets as well.
W
grumplestiltskin
grumplestiltskin
WA
2331 posts
WA, 2331 posts
18 Sep 2012 7:01am
I think the main cause of the problem is this

There are now over 7 billion humans on this plannet that need to eat.

Maybe if this was reduced or controlled we wouldnt have half the issues we have, including where is the food going to come from


Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
18 Sep 2012 9:16am
^^^ Agree that population is the issue - we shouldn't be raping the natural fish stocks (or any ecosystem for that matter) in order to provide more food for a parasitic species (humans) - sounds terrible, but it's sadly true.

As Gwendy mentioned, the trawler 'could' get more fish, cheaper & with less impact on the environment...which relates to more fish, & cheaper on the shelf...which in-turn means more sales. This equates to more fish needed, another few super-trawlers are made & sent out, and the cycle continues until the fish stocks are all but obliterated. From here - prices go up, ships get bigger & use better technology to find the schools & we're back to where we started.

Aquaculture is sadly like cattle/sheep farming in desolate areas - using good food & resources (ie; grain & water) to feed an animal for the required life-cycle. The amount of edible produce from the end-result is nowhere near the amount of edible produce used to grow the animal.
harry potter
harry potter
VIC
2777 posts
VIC, 2777 posts
18 Sep 2012 9:39am
^^^ global overpopulation will be the biggest issue the human race will face it will have a much greater effect than climate change and will be an issue long before climate change is.
But there really seems to be no discussions on this !!!
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
18 Sep 2012 9:43am
2km wide mouth to the HUGE FARK OFF net = HUGE FARK OFF BY-CATCH!
Lets run a 2km wide net across Sydney, Perth, Melbourne, Brisbane...

I say we sink it; I've been doing my own on the ground/water recon.

The "Tasman Destroyer" already obliterated South African waters, now it's over here to do the same.
westozwind
westozwind
WA
1418 posts
WA, 1418 posts
18 Sep 2012 8:52am
I don't like the fact the trawler is here but...
18 months of seeking state and federal govmint approval to bring the thing here, rubber stamp from the EPA (the ship did not decide to sail to Oz on a whim).
Greenies get a bit upset when it sails over the horizon and the Ranga pulls a fast one to get a boost in the ratings.
If you had spend much time and effort to meet all the regulatory requirements to bring the thing here, then get slapped at the last moment by to govmint that initally approved it, I'd be pissed off. No certainty now in any form of agriculture now.
Farmers beware, PETA is on you're case. You'll have to walk your cows and sheep to town for slaughter as mass transport by trucks will soon be outlawed.
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
18 Sep 2012 9:07am
Gwendy said...

At last the media is investigating and beginning to present the true story to the public.

www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/rusty-boat-in-eye-of-a-storm-20120915-25yzw.html
www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/all-we-want-is-to-fish-within-the-rules-20120912-25s43.html
www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/tony-burke-shows-himself-an-appalling-policymaker/story-fn53lw5p-1226473693621

Perhaps a little late to prevent a government minister making a fool of himself to appease the ill-informed.

As I have said all along, this vessel is here to value add the product of a fishery that has existed for over 30 years.

It would introduce potentially 250 tons per day of food for human consumption.
Current practice is that it is dug into the ground as fertiliser.

It would do it with much less harm to other marine life than current practice.
It would do it with a much smaller carbon footprint that current practice.
It would do it much more efficiently than current practice.
There really is no downside to this.

To the detractors, I ask you this.

There are now over 7 billion humans on this plannet that need to eat. If this fish is not processed and added to the food supply, Where else will it come from?

Perhaps you are in favour of clearing more forest for cropping.
Maybe that same denuded land could be used for livestock.
Please don't start me up on aquaculture.




There is a lot to be said for social licence to operate.

It doesn't matter what industry you are in; manufacturing, forestry, farming, fishing, construction, resources (like me)... If you don't have community and stakeholder engagement, then you can expect this kind of outrage!

This boat stinks of dead fish as do many of the incompetents involved in the approvals process! Massive fail!
tmurray
tmurray
WA
485 posts
WA, 485 posts
18 Sep 2012 2:04pm
Actually I think this is a good example of Democracy working!
Something happens, massive public outcry about it, government responds to their employer "the people".
Sometimes community feeling is more important than profit, or even science! (says me - a scientist). In this case the science may be valid in that it may not do any more damage than existing fishing quotas allow - but the public PERCEPTION is that by allocating such a large quota to 1 vessel significantly reduces the amount available to other commercial operators, including Australian small businesses.
Not too mention that the environmental impact is (as often) likely to be significantly downstated.
I think the really interesting point with these supertrawlers is that they do not operate consistently in any one year - if it's not economically viable to do so, it's extremely unlikely that it's environmentally sustainable. Whatever the paid for "science" says.

PS I agree with all those who said - lets focus on reducing world population growth rather than trying to figure out how to feed everyone.
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
18 Sep 2012 6:05pm
kiteboy dave said...

PS what's wrong with aquaculture. Genuinely interested?


Nearly all forms of marine aquaculture, fish not shell fish, require very high protein which is derived from netted fish.
Wollemi
Wollemi
NSW
350 posts
NSW, 350 posts
18 Sep 2012 6:18pm
laurie said...

Enjoy life folks. Seabreeze is for lighthearted fun.

doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
18 Sep 2012 4:29pm
Wollemi said...

laurie said...

Enjoy life folks. Seabreeze is for lighthearted fun.






kato
kato
VIC
3527 posts
VIC, 3527 posts
18 Sep 2012 6:36pm
Have a good look into the fishing industry and you will be shocked at what is really happening with the quota system and the value adding of the catch. At the moment for each ton of landed fish means that the "Dead" by product was about 3 ton. This is thrown over board.

The "Super trawler" didn,t value add, what went into the net was caught,kept and sold. No waste or rubbery figures. A 12 ton quota meant just that, not as most small trawlers do, 12 ton catch and 36ton of stuff that didn,t really count. Time to clean up the whole system i think and not just blame a big big boat
tmurray
tmurray
WA
485 posts
WA, 485 posts
18 Sep 2012 4:43pm
kato said...

Have a good look into the fishing industry and you will be shocked at what is really happening with the quota system and the value adding of the catch. At the moment for each ton of landed fish means that the "Dead" by product was about 3 ton. This is thrown over board.

The "Super trawler" didn,t value add, what went into the net was caught,kept and sold. No waste or rubbery figures. A 12 ton quota meant just that, not as most small trawlers do, 12 ton catch and 36ton of stuff that didn,t really count. Time to clean up the whole system i think and not just blame a big big boat


So are you saying there is NO bycatch. Zero. None.
No non-target species, no jellyfish, no marine mammals, or seabirds. Not even any garbage.
I'm not sure which concerns me more - the bits of seagull in the tinned herring or whatever they're catching, or your willing suspension of disbelief.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
18 Sep 2012 5:33pm
grumplestiltskin said...

I think the main cause of the problem is this

There are now over 7 billion humans on this plannet that need to eat.

Maybe if this was reduced or controlled we wouldnt have half the issues we have, including where is the food going to come from




And Australia is not going to save the world!

FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
18 Sep 2012 8:40pm
westozwind said...

I don't like the fact the trawler is here but...
18 months of seeking state and federal govmint approval to bring the thing here, rubber stamp from the EPA (the ship did not decide to sail to Oz on a whim).
Greenies get a bit upset when it sails over the horizon and the Ranga pulls a fast one to get a boost in the ratings.
If you had spend much time and effort to meet all the regulatory requirements to bring the thing here, then get slapped at the last moment by to govmint that initally approved it, I'd be pissed off. No certainty now in any form of agriculture now.
Farmers beware, PETA is on you're case. You'll have to walk your cows and sheep to town for slaughter as mass transport by trucks will soon be outlawed.



WTF... we've got a bunch of people who can hardly read... until they saw the monstrosity they had no idea what they were talking/writing about.
To the <tards who govern us, fish 78,000,000 kg of precious marine life in one go, is like writing BLAH BLAH 78 BLAH.
kato
kato
VIC
3527 posts
VIC, 3527 posts
18 Sep 2012 10:27pm
tmurray said...

So are you saying there is NO bycatch. Zero. None.
No non-target species, no jellyfish, no marine mammals, or seabirds. Not even any garbage.
I'm not sure which concerns me more - the bits of seagull in the tinned herring or whatever they're catching, or your willing suspension of disbelief.



No what i said is ,all by catch is counted as part of the quota and can be sold

No value adding of catches
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
18 Sep 2012 11:17pm




I've spoken to the locals and they're cool with us doing any damage we want to the Tasman Destroyer.

The farkers are up for $10k a day in the port, if we add repairs and extra crew the locals will be over joyed.

It's completely open and easy to get to, by boat or swimming... mind you the water's a little cold... I know I spent many hours in it.

An IED in the rear is more than enough.
tmurray
tmurray
WA
485 posts
WA, 485 posts
18 Sep 2012 9:20pm
kato said...

tmurray said...

So are you saying there is NO bycatch. Zero. None.
No non-target species, no jellyfish, no marine mammals, or seabirds. Not even any garbage.
I'm not sure which concerns me more - the bits of seagull in the tinned herring or whatever they're catching, or your willing suspension of disbelief.



No what i said is ,all by catch is counted as part of the quota and can be sold

No value adding of catches



So including non target species - ie everything is fair game?? And there is seagull in the tins??
Awesome. Plus 1 for factory fishing then.
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
19 Sep 2012 12:16am
grumplestiltskin said...

I think the main cause of the problem is this

There are now over 7 billion humans on this plannet that need to eat.

Maybe if this was reduced or controlled we wouldnt have half the issues we have, including where is the food going to come from





Maybe you should offer yourself and your family up for extermination for the betterment of the greed of the rest of us...
The only reason 7 billion is made out as being too much and unsustainable is because of fear and greed.
You're scared of those that don't have what you have coming and taking it off you, and the greed of those that control you, deny you freedom and feed you fear about this way being the only way
SailCoothara
SailCoothara
VIC
137 posts
VIC, 137 posts
19 Sep 2012 1:11am
But the greed is also what drives us to do better...
R0CKH0PPER
R0CKH0PPER
131 posts
131 posts
19 Sep 2012 12:04am
kato said...

tmurray said...

So are you saying there is NO bycatch. Zero. None.
No non-target species, no jellyfish, no marine mammals, or seabirds. Not even any garbage.
I'm not sure which concerns me more - the bits of seagull in the tinned herring or whatever they're catching, or your willing suspension of disbelief.



No what i said is ,all by catch is counted as part of the quota and can be sold

No value adding of catches




Cant say i've seen tinned dolphin in the markets lately, or seal and bird breakfast spread. If i wanted to eat animals that weren't really meant for food, I would head down my local chinese take-out.
R0CKH0PPER
R0CKH0PPER
131 posts
131 posts
19 Sep 2012 12:16am
I stand corrected.

Seems YOU CAN actually sell anything...






And my personal favourite....





....we wont even start on who seems to be eating the shredded dolphin

patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
19 Sep 2012 12:20am
It would make a great dive wreck and fish habitat.....
Gwendy
Gwendy
SA
472 posts
SA, 472 posts
19 Sep 2012 4:57pm
My intention in this thread was to offer access to articles that may aid the formation of a balanced opinion. The discerning among us will gather as much information as possible to avoid jumping to false conclusions.

At first the posts were reasonable. I don't expect everyone to agree with what I have learnt with 30 years experience in this field.

It then degenerated into a soapbox for the deranged to vent their contempt for society.

Talk of human culling would be offensive in most cultures I would suggest.

The third riech won few freinds with this particular policy.

One freak even thinks the marine habitat would benefit from the deliberate sabotage of a large vessel with hundreds of tons of fuel oil aboard.

This fool claims to have conducted research then overstates the net size 7 fold. He then calls other people retards.

I would wager said fool is a greenpeace member because this is exactly how these degenerates think. I have had contact with them several times.

Anyone wondering why the so called activists were so quiet when the Margiris arrived in Port Lincoln? Federal police working in conjunction with state law enforcement arrested them for conspiring to commit criminal activity.

Sabotage and piracy are criminal activities they are involved by their own admission

I'm over this. I have more constructive ways to invest my time.

You blokes can rave on with all the bush!t and crap you want.

I won't see it.

doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
19 Sep 2012 3:59pm
Gwendy said...

My intention in this thread was to offer access to articles that may aid the formation of a balanced opinion. The discerning among us will gather as much information as possible to avoid jumping to false conclusions.

At first the posts were reasonable. I don't expect everyone to agree with what I have learnt with 30 years experience in this field.

It then degenerated into a soapbox for the deranged to vent their contempt for society.

Talk of human culling would be offensive in most cultures I would suggest.

The third riech won few freinds with this particular policy.

One freak even thinks the marine habitat would benefit from the deliberate sabotage of a large vessel with hundreds of tons of fuel oil aboard.

This fool claims to have conducted research then overstates the net size 7 fold. He then calls other people retards.

I would wager said fool is a greenpeace member because this is exactly how these degenerates think. I have had contact with them several times.

Anyone wondering why the so called activists were so quiet when the Margiris arrived in Port Lincoln? Federal police working in conjunction with state law enforcement arrested them for conspiring to commit criminal activity.

Sabotage and piracy are criminal activities they are involved by their own admission

I'm over this. I have more constructive ways to invest my time.

You blokes can rave on with all the bush!t and crap you want.

I won't see it.






kato
kato
VIC
3527 posts
VIC, 3527 posts
19 Sep 2012 6:20pm
Gwendy said...

My intention in this thread was to offer access to articles that may aid the formation of a balanced opinion. The discerning among us will gather as much information as possible to avoid jumping to false conclusions.

At first the posts were reasonable. I don't expect everyone to agree with what I have learnt with 30 years experience in this field.

It then degenerated into a soapbox for the deranged to vent their contempt for society.

Talk of human culling would be offensive in most cultures I would suggest.

The third riech won few freinds with this particular policy.

One freak even thinks the marine habitat would benefit from the deliberate sabotage of a large vessel with hundreds of tons of fuel oil aboard.

This fool claims to have conducted research then overstates the net size 7 fold. He then calls other people retards.

I would wager said fool is a greenpeace member because this is exactly how these degenerates think. I have had contact with them several times.

Anyone wondering why the so called activists were so quiet when the Margiris arrived in Port Lincoln? Federal police working in conjunction with state law enforcement arrested them for conspiring to commit criminal activity.

Sabotage and piracy are criminal activities they are involved by their own admission

I'm over this. I have more constructive ways to invest my time.

You blokes can rave on with all the bush!t and crap you want.

I won't see it.



Thanks for trying,it was a good idea

kk
kk
WA
953 posts
kk kk
WA, 953 posts
19 Sep 2012 5:11pm
Wow. I think Gwen just threw his hat in the tree and took his bat and ball home with him!!

I guess his opinion is the only opinion that counts
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅