georgsurfer forum posts in last 60 days

Show Edits
georgsurfer
georgsurfer
36 posts
36 posts
14 May 2026 7:59pm
Holoholo said..

BWalnut said..


Holoholo said..
Any input from those who have been on S3 regarding the ease of collapse- meaning: line tension on the collapse at top half of its range, tendency to spin, ease to identify/grab the right lines as well as how it accordians? The 2 standout PWs Ive tried- Quest, Powerpack have had center 4 lines unite to a distinct single line. Seeing the spread on the A lines, wondering if any of the above is an issue?




It was annoying the day I tried it. But, the collapse is really clean and easy when you grab almost any combination of the A-Lines. I kept trying to grab all 4 and it was a struggle. When I just started randomly grabbing lines and stowing it fast I was happy.



Thanks for that- the exact technique can always be sorted with reps... good to know on day 1, it at the least likes to collapse easy enough which is a good sign.


I collapse it using the 2 center lines connected by the horizontal red line. Collapsed the 3.4 even with lines under high (not full) pressure and it was no problem. Tightly accordions with no opening, could ride in 25-35mph without any issue. 10 redeploys were smooth and without tangles.
georgsurfer
georgsurfer
36 posts
36 posts
13 May 2026 2:02pm
FranP said..

sunsetsailboards said..
interesting that the ARC is 0.3kg heavier than the Super K v2 in the 88/90 size despite not having a handle and being equivalent volume. Arc 88l is spec'd at 5.0kg, Super K2 90l in Pro Carbon at 4.7kg (although my personal board is 5.0kg).



A sharp bit of positioning from KT.
At a time when moving new boards is tougher than ever, they’re leaning into the parawing momentum and reframing the offer—arguably even nudging toward a new sub-category.
The ARC reads very close to a K2: roughly +1” in width, a touch more banana in the rocker, and about +300 g on the scale. Incremental, not radical. The real question is whether those tweaks translate into a meaningfully different on-water feel—or if this is primarily smart product segmentation (and, likely, healthier margins) dressed as innovation.👍👍👍👍

It’s not just the absolute width, they also removed the wide bevels of the SK2 and made the flat spot significantly wider on the ARC. More volume in nose and tail and you have a board that is significantly more stable. In smooth water this doesn’t matter. Out in open ocean swells without smooth surface the reason for the ARC becomes obvious. I have learned to pw on a sk2 and can’t wait to get the arc to make life easier. Also rocker is totally different, makes pumping w pw way easier

FranP said..

sunsetsailboards said..
interesting that the ARC is 0.3kg heavier than the Super K v2 in the 88/90 size despite not having a handle and being equivalent volume. Arc 88l is spec'd at 5.0kg, Super K2 90l in Pro Carbon at 4.7kg (although my personal board is 5.0kg).



A sharp bit of positioning from KT.
At a time when moving new boards is tougher than ever, they’re leaning into the parawing momentum and reframing the offer—arguably even nudging toward a new sub-category.
The ARC reads very close to a K2: roughly +1” in width, a touch more banana in the rocker, and about +300 g on the scale. Incremental, not radical. The real question is whether those tweaks translate into a meaningfully different on-water feel—or if this is primarily smart product segmentation (and, likely, healthier margins) dressed as innovation.👍👍👍👍





georgsurfer
georgsurfer
36 posts
36 posts
13 May 2026 1:45pm
Frankieboy said..
also curious about the low end of the S3 compared to what I know F-one Quest or Frigate



I’ve been riding the s3 5.3/4.2/3.4 for about week now, in all conditions from underpowered to overpowered. Re low end for me that’s right now 14-16mph. I’m 190lbs and ride a KT SK2 83L (custom) and Nomad 830 foil (midaspect wavefoil). What impressed me most for getting up with the s3 is that it sits very far forward in the window and pulls forward, allowing me to get up going across the wind and not pointing downwind like all other PWs. The difference this makes cannot be overstated. I am barely pumping my board (maybe 3-4 times), then pump the wing moderately 2-3 times and I’m flying. This is in underpowered conditions. I’m pretty sure that a skilled rider on a floaty board and a larger foil can shave at least 2mph from my numbers.
getting the wing off the water was no issue for me as long as it’s blowing at least 7-10mph. Below that the s3 just doesn’t want to fly properly (we are talking 5mph). Conversely when I am nicely powered (16-18mph on 5.3, 20-22 on 4.2) the s3 literally pulls me on foil without pumping. After the pumping orgies w other parawings this still amazes me every single time. I’ve ridden all new parawings (Vayu, Dflow, PRv2, PowerPack, Quest, Stash v2) and sold all my existing PWs and cancelled PRv2 orders. The BRM is plain amazing.
georgsurfer
georgsurfer
36 posts
36 posts
28 Apr 2026 10:59pm
Foilingaway said..
Can anyone compare to the Super K V1? Dims are not too far off


I used to Ride the v1 in 85L (custom). The ARC has a wider flat bottom throughout, making it significantly more stable when taxiing. The difference is really dramatic. W parawing it is very easy to pump and get on foil. V1 is probably not much worse if you have perfectly flat water. The moment where you add chop the ARC is much better for me because it is easier to maintain the pumping motion on a more stable board. Once in the air the ARC (and SK2) seem to be less impacted by wind and are flying more stable and seem to ride smaller than the v1
georgsurfer
georgsurfer
36 posts
36 posts
23 Apr 2026 11:40pm
samcclus said..
After riding the 6,2" super k2 all summer I can't wait for the 5'11 arc". I also rode a 70litre wing board often when the wind was 25knots and above. The smaller board felt better but only marginally. The negative was it took away any plan b if the wind dropped. The 78 litre as one board quiver and should be perfect. If the arc is an improvement on the super k it must be one hell of a board!


I learned to parawing on my SK2 83L (custom). Had a chance to ride the ARC here in Maui. The ARC in similar size is much more stable and easier to pump. Really impressive, allows me to ride smaller parawings which is very nice.
georgsurfer
georgsurfer
36 posts
36 posts
23 Apr 2026 11:31pm
I learned to parawing on a KT SuperK2 83L (custom). I just had a chance to try their new parawing board in a similar size. At my 86kg the pw board is much more stable and much easier to pump up, allowing me to ride w a smaller parawing. My every day foil is the Nomad 830.
georgsurfer
georgsurfer
36 posts
36 posts
21 Apr 2026 4:13pm
Been riding the KT SK2 as a custom in 83L for a year now and learned to parawing on it, using the Nomad 830 and in light wind the Atlas 960 foil. Just got a chance to ride the ARC 88L (I am 190lbs). The ARC is incredibly stable, it's literally difficult to fall off the board. It also has a pretty recessed deck and volume moved to nose and tail. Rockerline is very different, the board is super easy to pump, nearly intuitive. It allowed me to ride a smaller parawing than usually would. I am so impressed, I ordered one immediately.
Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅