eppo said..
Yeh I don't agree with a lot of his observations comparing negatives of the PR - except it's easier to pack. But even that can be sorted if you get good enough and practised enough, with enough water time under your belt. wave riding - yeh probs the PP
I will say for packing and redeploying constantly - he is correct on that. Then again i get near 100 percent redeployment on the PR and i'm quick to get it away.
PR def goes upwind at a far greater angle, has a much bigger wind range and has a lower accessible wind range usability to get up due to its aspect and the way it drives into the window without falling back.
It's the same as a mid aspect versus a high aspect kite. Same same. Physics is physics.
He now has a "fool" proof stow and redeploy parawing with significant compromises that he doesn't know he's making. The equipment expense is large and it always makes me wonder why the need to influence peoples expenditure if other than helping someone not waste money on the wrong product. I guess the review represents other parawingers who don't know any better and for them the PP is the right choice. I can't agree with anything he said when comparing the products.
