pwatts22 said..
I was asking the question regarding the mast as I have recently broken the bottom of a mast and I shortened it by 10cm to cut away the cracked area plus a little more, rigged it sailed it and it seems fine, can't tell any difference, I have noticed in this forum previously one of the highest ranked gps sailors frequently cutting bottoms of masts to have minimal extension and wanted to know where the line can be drawn regarding how much can reasonably be cut off without unduly effecting performance.
Cutting off 100 mm wont make any difference except for the need for 100mm extra extension. But if you do it to a mast that is longer than the recommended mast just to make it fit you end up with a mast that is too stiff. If a high ranking gps sailor is doing that it may be because he is unusually heavy and loads the mast more than normal so the bend he gets with a stiffer mast approximates the bend an 80kg sailor gets with the designated mast. Otherwise his sail performance is probably suffering. As I understand it the heavy weights of this world (like AA) use the recommended mast.
An ideally trimmed sail does much of the work for you. You sheet in and weight your harness and just go. The ideal sail just flexes away at the top in the gusts and you don't have to vary your sheeting or your weight distribution. You just hang on and go. If the mast is too stiff you can't do that. The gusts pull you up on your toes and you have to actively control the sheeting. You know that overpowered feeling? As a lightweight I'm familiar with it :)