yoyo said...
Buying a board is like buying a pig in a poke. You never know what's inside till they break. I also have seen a major brand's top slalom board which stated prominantly on the deck "carbon sandwichwich" broken clean in half and not a black fibre was visible in either the inner or outer skins. But the you have to ask. Did they know this? Maybe Cobra was charging them for carbon boards and giving them glass. Maybe Cobra specified carbon but the worker put in glass? The fact that it broke in half whilst sailing through chop, was only a few months old and never jumpered suggests something (a layer of carbon) was left out in manufacture and it was not the brand but Cobras fault.
I think a lot of it is about marketing, but you also need to consider that carbon is not necessarily better in all parts of a board. Off the top of my head (which is known to be unreliable), I think carbon has poor impact resistance compared to glass, but has better tensile strength. I think this suggests that you would really only want to use it where it stiffens the board, but maybe not where it is likely to suffer a lot of hits.
I know from limited experience that high carbon boards can be fragile.
I would guess that Cobra build boards exactly as they are intended as they must build them to a price. I wouldn't be surprised if the manufacturers would cut one up every now and then to see that the production standard was up to par.
On the board lady site she shows a board that was described as 'carbon', but has something like a single strand of carbon showing through

On a related note, I recently sailed a JP Xcite ride in carbon and it felt like my other high carbon boards. Are they noticably stiffer when riding them, or was I just imagining it?