Crazy wingsuit stunt

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
12 Jan 2014 2:25pm
This is the craziest thing I have seen in a long time. It makes going out at Jaws look like kiddy play.

Harrow
Harrow
NSW
4521 posts
NSW, 4521 posts
12 Jan 2014 6:07pm
CJW
CJW
NSW
1731 posts
CJW CJW
NSW, 1731 posts
12 Jan 2014 6:40pm
This seems to be a new trend flying between buildings, it's only a matter of time till someone hits one. Anyone ever seen that video of the wingsuit guy hit the cable stayed bridge? Yeah...bits....everywhere....
dan berry
dan berry
WA
2562 posts
WA, 2562 posts
12 Jan 2014 5:31pm
That really impresses you sludger?
Stuthepirate
Stuthepirate
SA
3591 posts
SA, 3591 posts
12 Jan 2014 8:12pm
CJW said..

This seems to be a new trend flying between buildings, it's only a matter of time till someone hits one.


The Arabs have been doing this for years.
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
13 Jan 2014 12:59am
dan berry said..

That really impresses you sludger?


Having done both sky diving and paragliding... yes, this impresses a lot. Although I admit I have no clue how easy or hard it is to "fly" using one of those wing suits.
Harrow
Harrow
NSW
4521 posts
NSW, 4521 posts
13 Jan 2014 9:20am
stehsegler said..
Having done both sky diving and paragliding... yes, this impresses a lot. Although I admit I have no clue how easy or hard it is to "fly" using one of those wing suits.

I've always wondered how much they are able to angle up and convert speed into altitude. Their glide slope seems terribly steep. In the case where the guy hits the bridge, he would have cleared it if he only had 1 meter more altitude, but instead he went through the railing like it was a cheese grater at some ridiculous speed. It appeared he wasn't able to 'pull up' the slightest bit, even though he was moving so fast.

The fact that they can't land using the suit alone, and still need a parachute, indicates to me they are falling, not flying.

mathew
mathew
QLD
2167 posts
QLD, 2167 posts
13 Jan 2014 9:06am
Harrow said..

The fact that they can't land using the suit alone, and still need a parachute, indicates to me they are falling, not flying.





Not sure it qualifies as "landing"... but is no worse than stunt-men stuff.
TheSailingMoose
TheSailingMoose
VIC
142 posts
VIC, 142 posts
13 Jan 2014 12:04pm
hahahaha, the random person walking along the street who gets the hell out of there at 4:01
dan berry
dan berry
WA
2562 posts
WA, 2562 posts
13 Jan 2014 9:11am
I think it's still a controlled fall as opposed to flying.
mathew
mathew
QLD
2167 posts
QLD, 2167 posts
13 Jan 2014 1:05pm
dan berry said..

I think it's still a controlled fall as opposed to flying.


Hard to say... how to you qualify "to fly"....?

Wing-suites have a glide-ratio better than 1... that probably qualifies as flight.
Given that it is possible to achieve 0 kph decent-rate (via a stall) - probably also indicates "flight".
dan berry
dan berry
WA
2562 posts
WA, 2562 posts
13 Jan 2014 1:09pm
Well they don't start on the ground and start flapping do they;)
PhilSWR
PhilSWR
NSW
1104 posts
NSW, 1104 posts
13 Jan 2014 4:15pm
dan berry said..

Well they don't start on the ground and start flapping do they;)


Lol, good call.

I say it's "gliding".
John340
John340
QLD
3410 posts
QLD, 3410 posts
13 Jan 2014 3:17pm
^^^ Dan, If your avatar can be decribed as floating, then it follows that these thrill seekers in wingsuits are flying
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
13 Jan 2014 2:46pm
John340 said..
^^^ Dan, If your avatar can be decribed as floating, then it follows that these thrill seekers in wingsuits are flying


Or if "surfing the internet" qualifies as surfing, then wingsuits must qualify as intergalactic space travel.
mathew
mathew
QLD
2167 posts
QLD, 2167 posts
13 Jan 2014 5:23pm
dan berry said..

Well they don't start on the ground and start flapping do they;)


So by that analogy, planes dont fly...
dan berry
dan berry
WA
2562 posts
WA, 2562 posts
13 Jan 2014 3:34pm
They start on the ground then get up to altitude by themself so IDE consider that to be flying.
CJW
CJW
NSW
1731 posts
CJW CJW
NSW, 1731 posts
13 Jan 2014 7:52pm
I would consider a glide ratio of ~1:1 a fall. I'm sure there's probably a definition somewhere but personally I reckon you've got to be capable of a sustained 10:1 glide to actually be considered flying. I'm with dangle :)
Harrow
Harrow
NSW
4521 posts
NSW, 4521 posts
13 Jan 2014 9:50pm
mathew said..
Not sure it qualifies as "landing"... but is no worse than stunt-men stuff.

Well, I sure wouldn't think anyone could argue that a stunt man jumping off a building onto a pile of foam, or cardboard boxes or whatever, was actually flying.

If they could flare, and land safely on their feet on solid ground, I might be persuaded.

Gonewindsurfing247
Gonewindsurfing247
WA
966 posts
WA, 966 posts
14 Jan 2014 11:00am
I can't believe there was no one out on those waves at the beginning.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅