northy1 said..
Thanks for all the feedback! Unfortunately no demo available so will need to do more desktop research. My biggest concern when looking at a new circa 110/115 litre wave board is losing the ability to pick up smaller (waist to chest) waves as a result of reduced volume..but i assume bottom shape, tail width etc all play a key part here.
You're 100% correct that bottom shape and nose and tail widths / general amounts of rocker/ entry rockers, etc etc play a part in ease of getting into waves.
IN answer to your earlier question regarding the spitfire and hipster twin.
If you did go down to he 7'10 over the 8'0 in the hipster twin, it would be harder to paddle into the wave comparatively.
But then the wider nose tail of the 8'0 hipster would probably be easier than the 8'3 spitfire.
I would say the 7'10 hipster and 8'3 spitfire have a very close ease of entry into the wave.
And to reiterate what the differences between the two are, as I'm constantly switching between the Hipster and spitty depending on the wave conditions.
Noting that in Margaret river most of the waves are comparatively powerful to anywhere else. (plus a variation of deep water bombies where paddle power and length become increasingly important.
But basically. the hollower and more powerful wave I'll be reaching for the spitfire. Although a fast board in it's own right, it can contain higher speed/ vertical (Barreling) walls better. If you really want to push and feel resistance. Drive through your turns. Then this is the spitfire sensation.
The hipster twin will be from the chest to overhead range where acceleration / rail to rail transition / and tightness of arc -without slide) are the appeal when the waves are not as consequential . But tight turning whilst producing drive.
Two different sensations which are both very appealing.
Bother working in a wide range of conditions with the spitfire no slouch when it's small and the hipster still handling some solid juice.