Shark attack on wakeboarder

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
kyteryder
kyteryder
NSW
692 posts
NSW, 692 posts
16 Mar 2011 9:25pm
In the article it says she is also a Fan of kiteboarding, so hopefully she is alright, and makes a speedy recovery.

And yes I did cut and paste it from the inter web.






Lisa Mondy was waiting for a boat to pick her up after coming off her wakeboard in Port Stephens when the shark struck.

"(It) grabbed hold of her face," said Newcastle Rescue Service helicopter crewman Glen Ramplin.

"It's got her a second time on the left upper arm and it's pretty much taken her arm off.

"The bite on her arm is all the way to the bone."

The 24-year-old was wakeboarding with friends off Jimmys Beach, on the northern side of Port Stephens, when the attack happened.

She was conscious but in a serious condition when she arrived at John Hunter Hospital in Newcastle about 1.50pm (AEDT) today.

She has severe injuries to her head, shoulder, neck and left arm, but a hospital spokeswoman said she was stable by about 5.30pm

Ms Mondy works for Port Stephens Parasailing, a leisure company with offices in Nelson Bay.

Owner Ian Cutbush said his son had been wakeboarding with Ms Mondy using one of the company boats when the attack happened.

"I just had a heart attack myself when I learnt what happened," he said.

Witnesses told the ABC that Ms Mondy was dragged under the water twice, before being rescued by her boat crew and taken to the Nelson Bay public wharf.

Paramedics stabilised her at a nearby oval.

According to her Facebook page, Ms Monday is a fan of Sharkwater, a movie that "debunks historical stereotypes and media depictions of sharks as bloodthirsty, man-eating monsters".

Ms Mondy, originally from Wauchope, is also a fan of diving, kitesurfing, sandboarding and surfing.

One of her friends who was waiting outside the hospital told Network Ten she was a shark lover.

"She is aware of them, cares about them deeply," he told the broadcaster.

"They're an animal in the sea. We have to share their home."

Nelson Bay, a popular fishing area, is known for tiger and bull sharks, although there have been sightings of great whites.

Ben Morcom, 31, was attacked by a two-metre-long great white shark in December 2007 while surfing at Jimmys Beach.
 


 
Jedibrad
Jedibrad
NSW
527 posts
NSW, 527 posts
16 Mar 2011 9:55pm
0h man i was swimming there today off my boat and saw them skiing

last i heard on the news 'she is in a stable condition'
Nickoff
Nickoff
NSW
106 posts
NSW, 106 posts
16 Mar 2011 10:00pm
my profile pics taken right were it happened... ar sh1t!
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
16 Mar 2011 11:24pm

probably put a dint in the ps i love you, port stephens campaign
kitebored
kitebored
NSW
593 posts
NSW, 593 posts
17 Mar 2011 9:54am
That's two recent attacks there now, there was a guy bitten just up form there surfing Boulders. Great kiting spot though..
Mr float
Mr float
NSW
3452 posts
NSW, 3452 posts
17 Mar 2011 10:35am
theDoctor said...


probably put a dint in the ps i love you, port stephens campaign


New Port Stephens ad campaign " PS I love you ,you're delicious "
(Ps I don't mean to be disrespectful to the poor girl that got bitten by saying this )
kitelooper1
kitelooper1
112 posts
112 posts
17 Mar 2011 12:32pm
If there was less sharks there would be a lower probability of attack. The shark huggers are basically saying that if the cost of protecting and increasing shark numbers is that a few more humans are killed or mamed then so be it.
bigmark100
bigmark100
NSW
584 posts
NSW, 584 posts
17 Mar 2011 6:03pm
kitelooper1 said...

If there was less sharks there would be a lower probability of attack. The shark huggers are basically saying that if the cost of protecting and increasing shark numbers is that a few more humans are killed or mamed then so be it.


idiot. if you don't like the risk. don't go in the water.
Gwendy
Gwendy
SA
472 posts
SA, 472 posts
17 Mar 2011 8:22pm
bigmark100 said...

kitelooper1 said...

If there was less sharks there would be a lower probability of attack. The shark huggers are basically saying that if the cost of protecting and increasing shark numbers is that a few more humans are killed or mamed then so be it.


idiot. if you don't like the risk. don't go in the water.

Hey bigmark, wonder if you'd be so sympethetic if someone from your family got chewed. No need for insults like that when someones opinion differs to yours. really is quite pethetic
Charl dv
Charl dv
WA
2485 posts
WA, 2485 posts
17 Mar 2011 8:42pm
Gwendy said...

bigmark100 said...

kitelooper1 said...

If there was less sharks there would be a lower probability of attack. The shark huggers are basically saying that if the cost of protecting and increasing shark numbers is that a few more humans are killed or mamed then so be it.


idiot. if you don't like the risk. don't go in the water.

Hey bigmark, wonder if you'd be so sympethetic if someone from your family got chewed. No need for insults like that when someones opinion differs to yours. really is quite pethetic



its even more pathetic to take the view of just "remove them and there wont be a problem".

they are there to serve a purpose in the balance of the oceanic ecosystem. everyone that uses the ocean knows the risks involved. you step into THEIR home to use THEIR space and think you have the right to remove THEM from their OWN area is just ridiculous.
kitelooper1
kitelooper1
112 posts
112 posts
17 Mar 2011 11:00pm
Charl dv said...

Gwendy said...

bigmark100 said...

kitelooper1 said...

If there was less sharks there would be a lower probability of attack. The shark huggers are basically saying that if the cost of protecting and increasing shark numbers is that a few more humans are killed or mamed then so be it.


idiot. if you don't like the risk. don't go in the water.

Hey bigmark, wonder if you'd be so sympethetic if someone from your family got chewed. No need for insults like that when someones opinion differs to yours. really is quite pethetic



its even more pathetic to take the view of just "remove them and there wont be a problem".

they are there to serve a purpose in the balance of the oceanic ecosystem. everyone that uses the ocean knows the risks involved. you step into THEIR home to use THEIR space and think you have the right to remove THEM from their OWN area is just ridiculous.


Some of us in the human race are superior to other species. We remove them from their homes every day and use them as a resource to suit our needs and wants.

Dr Funk
Dr Funk
NSW
348 posts
NSW, 348 posts
18 Mar 2011 9:12am
kitelooper1 said...

Charl dv said...

Gwendy said...

bigmark100 said...

kitelooper1 said...

If there was less sharks there would be a lower probability of attack. The shark huggers are basically saying that if the cost of protecting and increasing shark numbers is that a few more humans are killed or mamed then so be it.


idiot. if you don't like the risk. don't go in the water.

Hey bigmark, wonder if you'd be so sympethetic if someone from your family got chewed. No need for insults like that when someones opinion differs to yours. really is quite pethetic



its even more pathetic to take the view of just "remove them and there wont be a problem".

they are there to serve a purpose in the balance of the oceanic ecosystem. everyone that uses the ocean knows the risks involved. you step into THEIR home to use THEIR space and think you have the right to remove THEM from their OWN area is just ridiculous.


Some of us in the human race are superior to other species. We remove them from their homes every day and use them as a resource to suit our needs and wants.




I can't tell if your trolling or if you are really that ignorant........if your not trolling then pull your head in because its stains like you that give the human race a bad name.
bigmark100
bigmark100
NSW
584 posts
NSW, 584 posts
18 Mar 2011 10:24am
I can honestly say that if me or a family member was hurt or worse by a shark , I would have no bitterness or hatred towards sharks or any other animal life.

I love kiting at Hawksnest, and the attack or media sensitization will not stop me from kiting there. And if a shark gets me.... so be it.

I stick by my original comment. You are an ignorant idiot if you suggest that removing sharks from the ocean is man's right.


Gwendy
Gwendy
SA
472 posts
SA, 472 posts
18 Mar 2011 11:33am
The real ignorance is the refusal to exept the facts of history for what they are. Comercial fishing has for generations manipulated the populations of marine life whether we like it or not. Great white populations were decimated in the 60's and 70's and changes in fishing practices and protection are now resulting in a huge comeback. Their numbers are increasing rapidly each year. We need to remember its not completely natural so some control may become necessary. Forget the natural balance of the sea, its been gone for decades. I think we could all agree that a steady return to natures status quo would be fantastic however it will take time and the envionmentalist movement is having an impact. Anyone who considers themselves part of this should feel pleased.
kitelooper1
kitelooper1
112 posts
112 posts
18 Mar 2011 9:15am
mmm feel like a nice peice of Flake for lunch.. Might exercise my rights and go and shoot me some Skippy for dinner after a hard days work on the D9 clearing some scrub some for some of me human brothers that just cant stop rooting and multiplying or turning up, invite or not. Right, wrong, rights - yeah right, the experts endorsed by the UN know it all started from nothin, a pure random event with a big bang. Look at us man, the dominant species that can change the world, with the help of Microsoft we even may one day be Masters of the Universe.

We got bigger fish to fry but those pesky Sharks that want to ruin our fun need to be kept under control and kept on our plate.
Sir V
Sir V
QLD
490 posts
QLD, 490 posts
18 Mar 2011 11:30am
What a load of Bull**** in this thread, with a capital B ->

We share this world, we don't own it. We are just one of the thousands of species that populate our planet therefore we are part of it's ecosytem and food chain.

If we are in the wrong place at the wrong time it is perhaps our doing, not the other species - we have a choice of what mediums we move in. We can be in land, water and air.. not all species are that fortunate.

It is ignorant to assume and behave that because of it we have the right to own or kill anything on this planet, or any other for that matter.

Don't get me wrong, I am not a bleeding heart. I've hunted for food, I fish all the time and I eat everything - almost literaly - but I do respect where I am threading and accept whatever happens as a consequence. I take care and defend myself when needed but I do not presume to be the dominant species and thus decide who or what lives or dies.

As mentioned here before our ecosystem depends on a fine balance. We are part of it so we must accept the consequences of what we do.

However, I feel deeply sadned by any loss of life or harm caused to anyone or anything, specially kite related. My respect and well wishes go to our fellow kitesurfer / wakeboarder.. may her recovery be fast and complete.

V
kitelooper1
kitelooper1
112 posts
112 posts
18 Mar 2011 11:49am
Gwendy said...

The real ignorance is the refusal to exept the facts of history for what they are. Comercial fishing has for generations manipulated the populations of marine life whether we like it or not. Great white populations were decimated in the 60's and 70's and changes in fishing practices and protection are now resulting in a huge comeback. Their numbers are increasing rapidly each year. We need to remember its not completely natural so some control may become necessary. Forget the natural balance of the sea, its been gone for decades. I think we could all agree that a steady return to natures status quo would be fantastic however it will take time and the envionmentalist movement is having an impact. Anyone who considers themselves part of this should feel pleased.


I think you mean status quo ante.

What previous point in natures time do you want to return to? Cant be too long ago, Cabrinhas have'nt been around for long.
hamburglar
hamburglar
ACT
2174 posts
ACT, 2174 posts
18 Mar 2011 2:54pm
hey leave the trees out of this champ.... and speedy recovery to Lisa
milko
milko
NSW
604 posts
NSW, 604 posts
18 Mar 2011 4:25pm
hamburglar said...

hey leave the trees out of this champ.... and speedy recovery to Lisa


That's ironic! I know Lisa and this is her kite. And it ain't a Cabrinha

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅