hoop said...
That was me. You seem to be making it up as you go.
At least point out WHY it seems I'm making it up, otherwise that's a bit hypocritical

. So here:
Why do speed boats give way to sailcraft? Why do fast cars give way to slow cars on highways (they move into the right lane and then back into the left, while slow cars dont have to change lanes at all). Why does a plane in the air give way to a plane taking off from the runway? Why do cars give way to trains at level crossings? Why do cars give way to pedestrians?
As you can see, what I was saying does hold true... it's based upon a principle being: the more manouvrable party gives way to the less manouvreable party. UNLESS:
Ofcourse as I did mention there are cases which are purely arbitrary such as starboard tack having right of way just because it sets up an order, which cannot otherwise be established (except as I've heard at one beach where it has been reversed for some other reason... someone will tell me) ... I can give you plenty of correlations for those too if you think I'm making it up.
Also the speedboat comment was said in jest... it also illustrated my point at the same time... sheesh tough crowd.
*added/edit* This principle would also apply to letting people outof the break when they are getting thrown around by the waves. That is why I'm saying it important not just to understand the rules themselves, but also cases in which they are ineffective and should be flexible as some are only arbitrary, others are based upon a reason relating to safety. User pointed out giving way to learners even if they technically don't have the right of way. That is what I'm trying to say is correct judgement, rather than adhering to a rulebook - which in reality does not work for ALL situations, just in most of them.