New Augusta Rivermouth

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
dylsa
dylsa
WA
22 posts
WA, 22 posts
18 Aug 2010 1:40pm
Heads up to anyone heading to Augusta this summer to Kite. The river mouth has been opened a km or so back up at the Colour Patch, where it was about 20 odd years ago.

Might not affect the nice long butter flat runs this year but I'm sure it'll silt up over the coming seasons. hopefully the change has the desired affect of flushing and cleansing the inlet.




andrewm
andrewm
WA
243 posts
WA, 243 posts
18 Aug 2010 1:54pm
Is this the 'new' rivermouth? did they actually close the natural one
dylsa
dylsa
WA
22 posts
WA, 22 posts
18 Aug 2010 2:06pm
In answer to your Qu I have no Idea where the original "natural mouth" was

I know it's been dug out in the same place before, possibly back mid 60's/70s by a bunch of farmers before there was and EPA DEP CALM etc etc. the idea being to get more of a tidal flushing to wash out a lot od the silt and algal buildup. I think there is a lot less water running down the river these days as well which isn't helping.
andrewm
andrewm
WA
243 posts
WA, 243 posts
18 Aug 2010 2:38pm
ok maybe not natural but the current river mouth. When I was there in February the river was open to the ocean about 2-3km up the beach (east?)
lostinlondon
lostinlondon
VIC
1159 posts
VIC, 1159 posts
18 Aug 2010 6:21pm
That's going to be hard work to tack upwind through...
snorton
snorton
WA
87 posts
WA, 87 posts
19 Aug 2010 8:27pm
I think what has happened is the natural river mouth has been slowly moving eastwards over the last few years. LGA was concerned that it wasn't flushing as well and causing stagnant water near colour patch ... so bingo lets cut ourselves a fresh one
Hunter S
Hunter S
WA
516 posts
WA, 516 posts
19 Aug 2010 10:16pm
andrewm said...

Is this the 'new' rivermouth? did they actually close the natural one


No. My understanding is that the plan they settled on was to open a new mouth so there now should be two.
Fabe
Fabe
WA
38 posts
WA, 38 posts
20 Aug 2010 4:44am
Hope it doesnt ruin it
hammo
hammo
WA
27 posts
WA, 27 posts
20 Aug 2010 9:42am
The original plan was to block up the current river mouth and re cut another one at the colourpatch. This option was going to be too expensive and put the town at risk of flooding. So they've now put the cut in at the colourpatch and kept the other opening.
The real problem lies upriver - the algae blooms are caused by phosphate run off from the farms. Based on previous experience, the cut will not improve water quality of the river.
What the cut has done is removed access to the 2 kms of sand spit and Jays beach, changed the wave at Jays beach and changed the conditions for kitesurfing. Its too early to say how the conditions will be affected. I think the river side of the cut will probably silt up over time.
Zeph
Zeph
WA
21 posts
WA, 21 posts
20 Aug 2010 12:21pm
Maybe the beach waves might get a bit better??
au_rick
au_rick
WA
752 posts
WA, 752 posts
20 Aug 2010 3:21pm
I think the longer term plan is to stabilise the "new" cut and put a marina in
Wogboy1
Wogboy1
24 posts
24 posts
20 Aug 2010 3:27pm
That looks like some good flat water, someone needs to tell them it would work better if they made it wider.
andrewm
andrewm
WA
243 posts
WA, 243 posts
20 Aug 2010 3:31pm
we had a similar issue back home where there were water quality issues. There was a mouth up the beach but some farmers dug another opening about 500m away. Few heavy rainfall periods, some big surf and 6 months later the sand spit that created the nice flat water was erroded away.
lancekenny
lancekenny
SA
402 posts
SA, 402 posts
31 Aug 2010 10:01pm
Just finished a great session at Augusta this arvo - fun long waves and plenty of wind!

No new river mouth any more either - going to take a lot of digging to move the sand thats in there at the moment!
IvorWindeas
IvorWindeas
WA
110 posts
WA, 110 posts
1 Sep 2010 5:18am

What numpties. Putting in the cut will have absolutely no impact on water quality or fish stocks which is the apparent reason they did it. Simple physics dictates that the river upstream will flow at exactly the same speed, its just that it now has a few hundred metres less distance to go.

Hopefully the cut fills up with sand quickly.
craggers
craggers
WA
475 posts
WA, 475 posts
1 Sep 2010 10:38am
IvorWindeas said...


What numpties. Putting in the cut will have absolutely no impact on water quality or fish stocks which is the apparent reason they did it. Simple physics dictates that the river upstream will flow at exactly the same speed, its just that it now has a few hundred metres less distance to go.

Hopefully the cut fills up with sand quickly.


Tide mate, tide. simple hydrophysics will tell you that they hope the ocean water can get in and out easier... hence 'flushing'.

Refer Mandurah (Dawesville), and the studies conducted there pre/post cut.
http://www.deh.gov.au/coasts/publications/somer/annex2/brodie.html

(bear in mind, i dont necessarily endorse bulldozers assisting nature, its just not as simple as 'simple' anything).

hmmmm thats the very spot i first stood up on a crusty old windsurfer, drifted 30 metres and then swam it back. 50 times. a day. for a week. 18 years ago.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅